AWS Elastic Load Balancing (ELB) vs Google Cloud Load Balancing: What are the differences?

Key Differences between AWS Elastic Load Balancing (ELB) and Google Cloud Load Balancing

1. Integration with Cloud Infrastructure Providers:

AWS Elastic Load Balancing (ELB) is tightly integrated with other AWS services such as Amazon EC2, Auto Scaling, and Amazon Route 53. This allows for seamless scalability and high availability within the AWS ecosystem. On the other hand, Google Cloud Load Balancing is specifically designed for the Google Cloud Platform and provides seamless integration with other Google Cloud services like Google Compute Engine instances.

2. Load Balancer Types:

AWS Elastic Load Balancing offers three types of load balancers: Classic Load Balancer, Network Load Balancer, and Application Load Balancer. These load balancers cater to different types of traffic and offer various features. In comparison, Google Cloud Load Balancing offers two types of load balancers: Network Load Balancer and HTTP(S) Load Balancer. The load balancer types in both platforms are designed to handle specific use cases and traffic types.

3. Global Load Balancing:

Google Cloud Load Balancing provides global load balancing capabilities, allowing traffic to be distributed across multiple regions or across different cloud providers. This ensures high availability and fast response times for users located in different geographic locations. In contrast, AWS Elastic Load Balancing primarily operates within a single region and does not offer global load balancing out of the box.

4. Advanced Monitoring and Analytics:

AWS Elastic Load Balancing offers advanced monitoring and analytics through its integration with AWS CloudWatch. This allows users to gain insights into the performance and health of their load balancers and make data-driven decisions to optimize their application's performance. While Google Cloud Load Balancing also provides monitoring capabilities, AWS CloudWatch offers a more comprehensive set of features and integrations.

5. Autoscaling Integration:

AWS Elastic Load Balancing seamlessly integrates with AWS Auto Scaling, enabling automatic scaling of resources based on the incoming traffic and demand. This ensures that the load balancer can handle varying workloads and maintain optimal performance. Google Cloud Load Balancing also offers autoscaling capabilities but requires additional configuration and integration with Google Cloud's autoscaling features.

6. Pricing Structure:

The pricing structure for AWS Elastic Load Balancing and Google Cloud Load Balancing differs slightly. AWS Elastic Load Balancing charges based on the number of load balancer instances and the amount of data transferred through the load balancer. On the other hand, Google Cloud Load Balancing charges based on the number of forwarding rules and backend services used. The specific pricing details should be considered based on the specific requirements and usage patterns.

In Summary, AWS Elastic Load Balancing and Google Cloud Load Balancing have key differences in integration with cloud infrastructure providers, load balancer types offered, global load balancing capabilities, monitoring and analytics features, autoscaling integration, and pricing structure.