Azure DevOps vs Chef

Overview

Chef

Stacks1.3K

Followers1.1K

Votes345

Azure DevOps

Stacks2.7K

Followers2.9K

Votes249

Azure DevOps vs Chef: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Azure DevOps and Chef

Azure DevOps and Chef are both widely used tools in the world of software development and operations. While they have some similarities, there are several key differences that set them apart. Here are the six main differences between Azure DevOps and Chef:

Purpose: Azure DevOps is a comprehensive set of development tools designed to help teams plan, develop, test, and deliver software efficiently. It provides a range of services such as version control, continuous integration, and project management. On the other hand, Chef is a configuration management tool that focuses on automating the process of deploying and managing infrastructure. It allows for the definition of infrastructure as code, making it easier to manage large-scale environments.
Scope: Azure DevOps covers the entire development lifecycle from planning to deployment, offering a wide range of services and integrations. It supports multiple programming languages and platforms, making it suitable for diverse development projects. In contrast, Chef is primarily focused on infrastructure automation and configuration management. It doesn't provide the same breadth of services as Azure DevOps, but it excels in managing and configuring infrastructure components.
Approach: Azure DevOps follows a more centralized approach, providing a single platform for all development and collaboration activities. It offers a unified user interface and integrates with popular development tools such as Visual Studio. Chef, on the other hand, takes a decentralized approach. It operates on the concept of "infrastructure as code" and allows for managing infrastructure through reusable code snippets called recipes.
Deployment: Azure DevOps provides built-in deployment capabilities, allowing teams to automate the process of deploying software to various environments. It supports a range of deployment options, including on-premises, cloud, and hybrid environments. In contrast, Chef is primarily focused on configuration management and does not provide dedicated deployment capabilities. However, it can be integrated with other tools and platforms to facilitate deployment workflows.
Flexibility: Azure DevOps is highly flexible and can be customized to fit the specific needs of a development team. It offers a marketplace with a wide range of extensions and integrations. This allows teams to add additional functionality and integrate with other tools and services. Chef also offers flexibility through its extensive list of cookbooks and plugins that can be used to extend its functionality. It supports integration with various platforms and can be adapted to different infrastructure setups.
Learning Curve: Azure DevOps has a relatively gentle learning curve, especially for teams already familiar with Microsoft technologies. It provides a user-friendly interface and integrates well with popular development tools. Chef, on the other hand, has a steeper learning curve due to its more technical nature. It requires proficiency in Ruby and understanding of infrastructure automation concepts. Mastering Chef's domain-specific language and best practices may take some time and effort.

In summary, Azure DevOps is a comprehensive development platform that covers the entire software development lifecycle, while Chef is a configuration management tool focused on automating infrastructure deployment and management. Azure DevOps offers a centralized approach with a wide range of services, flexibility, and a gentler learning curve. Chef, on the other hand, takes a decentralized approach, excels in managing infrastructure, and requires more technical expertise.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Chef, Azure DevOps

Anonymous

Sep 17, 2019

Needs advice

I'm just getting started using Vagrant to help automate setting up local VMs to set up a Kubernetes cluster (development and experimentation only). (Yes, I do know about minikube)

I'm looking for a tool to help install software packages, setup users, etc..., on these VMs. I'm also fairly new to Ansible, Chef, and Puppet. What's a good one to start with to learn? I might decide to try all 3 at some point for my own curiosity.

The most important factors for me are simplicity, ease of use, shortest learning curve.

329k views329k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Chef	Azure DevOps
Chef enables you to manage and scale cloud infrastructure with no downtime or interruptions. Freely move applications and configurations from one cloud to another. Chef is integrated with all major cloud providers including Amazon EC2, VMWare, IBM Smartcloud, Rackspace, OpenStack, Windows Azure, HP Cloud, Google Compute Engine, Joyent Cloud and others.	Azure DevOps provides unlimited private Git hosting, cloud build for continuous integration, agile planning, and release management for continuous delivery to the cloud and on-premises. Includes broad IDE support.
Access to 800+ Reusable Cookbooks;Integration with Leading Cloud Providers;Enterprise Platform Support including Windows and Solaris;Create, Bootstrap and Manage OpenStack Clouds;Easy Installation with 'one-click' Omnibus Installer;Automatic System Discovery with Ohai;Text-Based Search Capabilities;Multiple Environment Support;"Knife" Command Line Interface;"Dry Run" Mode for Testing Potential Changes;Manage 10,000+ Nodes on a Single Chef Server;Available as a Hosted Service;Centralized Activity and Resource Reporting;"Push" Command and Control Client Runs;Multi-Tenancy;Role-Based Access Control [RBAC];High Availability Installation Support and Verification;Centralized Authentication Using LDAP or Active Directory	Agile Tools: kanban boards, backlogs, scrum boards; Reporting: dashboards, widgets, Power BI; Git: free private repositories, pull requests; Continuous Integration: automated builds and diagnostics; Cloud build agents: cross-platform agents for Windows, Mac and Linux; Testing Tools: unit testing, load testing, manual, exploratory and user acceptance testing; Release Management: automate deployments, gated approval workflows, audit trails; Marketplace: extensions for the Visual Studio family of products; Package Management: host npm and NuGet packages; IDE Support: Eclipse, IntelliJ, Xcode and Visual Studio; Integration: link code and releases to work items, builds, and test results
Statistics
Stacks 1.3K	Stacks 2.7K
Followers 1.1K	Followers 2.9K
Votes 345	Votes 249
Pros & Cons
Pros 110 Dynamic and idempotent server configuration 76 Reusable components 47 Integration testing with Vagrant 43 Repeatable 30 Mock testing with Chefspec	Pros 56 Complete and powerful 32 Huge extension ecosystem 27 Azure integration 26 Flexible and powerful 26 One Stop Shop For Build server, Project Mgt, CDCI Cons 8 Still dependant on C# for agents 5 Half Baked 5 Many in devops disregard MS altogether 4 Capacity across cross functional teams not visibile 4 Jack of all trades, master of none
Integrations
Amazon EC2 Rackspace Cloud Servers Microsoft Azure HP Cloud Compute Joyent Cloud	GitHub Visual Studio Docker Slack Trello Git IntelliJ IDEA Jenkins Octopus Deploy Eclipse

What are some alternatives to Chef, Azure DevOps?

Trello

Trello is a collaboration tool that organizes your projects into boards. In one glance, Trello tells you what's being worked on, who's working on what, and where something is in a process.

Ansible

Ansible is an IT automation tool. It can configure systems, deploy software, and orchestrate more advanced IT tasks such as continuous deployments or zero downtime rolling updates. Ansible’s goals are foremost those of simplicity and maximum ease of use.

Asana

Asana is the easiest way for teams to track their work. From tasks and projects to conversations and dashboards, Asana enables teams to move work from start to finish--and get results. Available at asana.com and on iOS & Android.

Terraform

With Terraform, you describe your complete infrastructure as code, even as it spans multiple service providers. Your servers may come from AWS, your DNS may come from CloudFlare, and your database may come from Heroku. Terraform will build all these resources across all these providers in parallel.

Capistrano

Capistrano is a remote server automation tool. It supports the scripting and execution of arbitrary tasks, and includes a set of sane-default deployment workflows.

Puppet Labs

Puppet is an automated administrative engine for your Linux, Unix, and Windows systems and performs administrative tasks (such as adding users, installing packages, and updating server configurations) based on a centralized specification.

Basecamp

Basecamp is a project management and group collaboration tool. The tool includes features for schedules, tasks, files, and messages.

Confluence

Capture the knowledge that's too often lost in email inboxes and shared network drives in Confluence instead – where it's easy to find, use, and update.

Salt

Salt is a new approach to infrastructure management. Easy enough to get running in minutes, scalable enough to manage tens of thousands of servers, and fast enough to communicate with them in seconds. Salt delivers a dynamic communication bus for infrastructures that can be used for orchestration, remote execution, configuration management and much more.

Redmine

Redmine is a flexible project management web application. Written using the Ruby on Rails framework, it is cross-platform and cross-database.

Related Comparisons

Azure DevOps vs Chef: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Azure DevOps and Chef

Purpose: Azure DevOps is a comprehensive set of development tools designed to help teams plan, develop, test, and deliver software efficiently. It provides a range of services such as version control, continuous integration, and project management. On the other hand, Chef is a configuration management tool that focuses on automating the process of deploying and managing infrastructure. It allows for the definition of infrastructure as code, making it easier to manage large-scale environments.
Scope: Azure DevOps covers the entire development lifecycle from planning to deployment, offering a wide range of services and integrations. It supports multiple programming languages and platforms, making it suitable for diverse development projects. In contrast, Chef is primarily focused on infrastructure automation and configuration management. It doesn't provide the same breadth of services as Azure DevOps, but it excels in managing and configuring infrastructure components.
Approach: Azure DevOps follows a more centralized approach, providing a single platform for all development and collaboration activities. It offers a unified user interface and integrates with popular development tools such as Visual Studio. Chef, on the other hand, takes a decentralized approach. It operates on the concept of "infrastructure as code" and allows for managing infrastructure through reusable code snippets called recipes.
Deployment: Azure DevOps provides built-in deployment capabilities, allowing teams to automate the process of deploying software to various environments. It supports a range of deployment options, including on-premises, cloud, and hybrid environments. In contrast, Chef is primarily focused on configuration management and does not provide dedicated deployment capabilities. However, it can be integrated with other tools and platforms to facilitate deployment workflows.
Flexibility: Azure DevOps is highly flexible and can be customized to fit the specific needs of a development team. It offers a marketplace with a wide range of extensions and integrations. This allows teams to add additional functionality and integrate with other tools and services. Chef also offers flexibility through its extensive list of cookbooks and plugins that can be used to extend its functionality. It supports integration with various platforms and can be adapted to different infrastructure setups.
Learning Curve: Azure DevOps has a relatively gentle learning curve, especially for teams already familiar with Microsoft technologies. It provides a user-friendly interface and integrates well with popular development tools. Chef, on the other hand, has a steeper learning curve due to its more technical nature. It requires proficiency in Ruby and understanding of infrastructure automation concepts. Mastering Chef's domain-specific language and best practices may take some time and effort.

Azure DevOps vs Chef

Overview

Azure DevOps vs Chef: What are the differences?