StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Continuous Integration
  4. Continuous Integration
  5. Azure Pipelines vs Codeship

Azure Pipelines vs Codeship

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Codeship
Codeship
Stacks1.0K
Followers730
Votes1.5K
Azure Pipelines
Azure Pipelines
Stacks2.3K
Followers457
Votes14

Azure Pipelines vs Codeship: What are the differences?

Azure Pipelines and Codeship are popular continuous integration and continuous deployment tools used in DevOps practices. Below are the key differences between Azure Pipelines and Codeship:

  1. Integration with Azure Services: Azure Pipelines is tightly integrated with other Azure services, allowing seamless integration with Azure Repos, Azure Boards, and Azure Artifacts. On the other hand, Codeship may not have the same level of integration with Azure services, making it more suitable for non-Azure based projects.

  2. Scalability: Azure Pipelines offers more scalability options, allowing users to scale their pipelines based on the size and requirements of the project. Codeship may have limitations on scalability, especially for larger projects with complex deployment pipelines.

  3. Supported Languages and Frameworks: Azure Pipelines provides support for a wide range of languages and frameworks, including .NET, Java, Node.js, Python, and more. Codeship may have limited support for certain languages and frameworks, which could be a deciding factor based on the technology stack of the project.

  4. Customization and Extensibility: Azure Pipelines offers extensive customization and extensibility options through its YAML-based pipeline configurations, allowing users to tailor their pipelines to specific project requirements. Codeship also provides customization options, but it may not offer the same level of flexibility as Azure Pipelines.

  5. Cost: Azure Pipelines offers a generous free tier for open source projects and smaller teams, making it cost-effective for startups and small businesses. Codeship may have different pricing plans and cost structures, which could impact the choice of tool based on the project budget and requirements.

  6. Community and Support: Azure Pipelines benefits from being part of the larger Microsoft and Azure ecosystem, providing access to a wide community of users, documentation, and support resources. Codeship also has its community and support channels, but it may not have the same level of resources and community engagement as Azure Pipelines.

In Summary, Azure Pipelines and Codeship differ in terms of integration with Azure services, scalability, supported languages, customization, cost, and community support, which can influence the choice of tool for a DevOps team.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Codeship, Azure Pipelines

Balaramesh
Balaramesh

Apr 20, 2020

Needs adviceonAzure PipelinesAzure Pipelines.NET.NETJenkinsJenkins

We are currently using Azure Pipelines for continous integration. Our applications are developed witn .NET framework. But when we look at the online Jenkins is the most widely used tool for continous integration. Can you please give me the advice which one is best to use for my case Azure pipeline or jenkins.

663k views663k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Codeship
Codeship
Azure Pipelines
Azure Pipelines

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

Fast builds with parallel jobs and test execution. Use container jobs to create consistent and reliable builds with the exact tools you need. Create new containers with ease and push them to any registry.

Run you automated tests | Easily set up Codeship with Github or Bitbucket and trigger your automated tests with a simple push to your repository.; 100 builds & 5 private projects free per month.;Free for OSS.;Configure deployment pipelines | Set up powerful deployment pipelines that let you deploy with ease and confidence multiple times a day.;Notifications | Intelligent notifications and integrations keep your team up-to-date.;SSH debug access | Easily ssh into a debug build to get more insights.;Use your resources to build amazing products. Codeship takes care of managing and scaling your test and delivery infrastructure.
Any language, any platform; Containers and Kubernetes; Extensible; Deploy to any cloud; Open source; Advanced workflows and features
Statistics
Stacks
1.0K
Stacks
2.3K
Followers
730
Followers
457
Votes
1.5K
Votes
14
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 215
    Simple deployments
  • 179
    Easy setup
  • 159
    Github integration
  • 147
    Continuous deployment
  • 110
    Bitbucket integration
Cons
  • 3
    Ui could use some polishing
  • 0
    Antiquated ui
  • 0
    Difficult to answer build questions
Pros
  • 4
    Easy to get started
  • 3
    Built by Microsoft
  • 3
    Unlimited CI/CD minutes
  • 2
    Yaml support
  • 2
    Docker support
Integrations
Slack
Slack
GitLab CI
GitLab CI
GitHub
GitHub
HipChat
HipChat
Google Compute Engine
Google Compute Engine
Ninefold
Ninefold
Amazon EC2
Amazon EC2
Google App Engine
Google App Engine
AWS CodeDeploy
AWS CodeDeploy
Bitbucket
Bitbucket
.NET Core
.NET Core
Slack
Slack
Python
Python
Ruby
Ruby
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
.NET
.NET
Node.js
Node.js
Linux
Linux
Microsoft Azure
Microsoft Azure
RxJava
RxJava

What are some alternatives to Codeship, Azure Pipelines?

Jenkins

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Travis CI

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

CircleCI

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

TeamCity

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

GoCD

GoCD

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.

Shippable

Shippable

Shippable is a SaaS platform that lets you easily add Continuous Integration/Deployment to your Github and BitBucket repositories. It is lightweight, super simple to setup, and runs your builds and tests faster than any other service.

Buildkite

Buildkite

CI and build automation tool that combines the power of your own build infrastructure with the convenience of a managed, centralized web UI. Used by Shopify, Basecamp, Digital Ocean, Venmo, Cochlear, Bugsnag and more.

Snap CI

Snap CI

Snap CI is a cloud-based continuous integration & continuous deployment tool with powerful deployment pipelines. Integrates seamlessly with GitHub and provides fast feedback so you can deploy with ease.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana