Overview

GitHub

Stacks295.5K

Followers259.0K

Votes10.4K

Bitbucket

Stacks41.1K

Followers33.4K

Votes2.8K

Bitbucket vs GitHub: What are the differences?

GitHub and Bitbucket are both web-based platforms for hosting and managing version control repositories. While they serve the same purpose of enabling collaboration and code sharing among developers, there are key differences between these two platforms.

Pricing Model: GitHub offers free unlimited public repositories and charges for private repositories, while Bitbucket offers free private repositories for small teams (up to 5 users) and charges per user for larger teams. This difference in pricing models makes Bitbucket a more cost-effective choice for smaller teams or projects that require private repositories.
Integration with other tools: GitHub has a larger ecosystem of third-party integrations. It seamlessly integrates with popular developer tools like Slack, Trello, and Jira, enabling developers to streamline their workflow. Bitbucket, on the other hand, has fewer integrations available, but it offers seamless integration with other Atlassian tools like Jira and Confluence.
Issue Tracking: Both GitHub and Bitbucket provide issue tracking functionality, but there are some differences in their features. GitHub has a more robust issue tracking system with features like labels, milestones, and assignees, making it suitable for larger, complex projects. Bitbucket's issue tracking, on the other hand, is more lightweight and focuses on simplicity, making it a good choice for smaller projects or teams looking for a simpler workflow.
Branch Permissions: Bitbucket offers more granular control over branch permissions compared to GitHub. With Bitbucket, you can set specific access controls for each branch, allowing you to restrict or grant permissions at a more fine-grained level. This level of control is particularly useful for enforcing code review processes and ensuring code quality.
Mercurial Support: While both platforms support Git repositories, Bitbucket also supports Mercurial repositories. Mercurial is another version control system, and Bitbucket's support for it provides flexibility for teams who prefer to use this alternative system over Git.
Continuous Integration / Continuous Deployment (CI/CD): GitHub has built-in features for CI/CD through their Actions workflows. This allows developers to automate their build, test, and deployment processes directly within the platform. Bitbucket, on the other hand, requires the use of external services like Jenkins or Bamboo for CI/CD functionality.

In Summary, GitHub offers a wider range of integrations, strong issue tracking capabilities, and built-in CI/CD functionality with Actions workflows. Bitbucket, on the other hand, has a more flexible pricing model, better branch permission controls, and support for both Git and Mercurial repositories.

🔥 Trending in Code Collaboration on StackShare

Glide

Code Collaboration

AI-assisted technical design docs

Try it View Docs Alternatives

Try

0

8

Advice on GitHub, Bitbucket

Anonymous

May 25, 2020

Decided

Gitlab as A LOT of features that GitHub and Azure DevOps are missing. Even if both GH and Azure are backed by Microsoft, GitLab being open source has a faster upgrade rate and the hosted by gitlab.com solution seems more appealing than anything else! Quick win: the UI is way better and the Pipeline is way easier to setup on GitLab!

624k views624k

Comments

Phillip

Developer at Coach Align

Mar 18, 2021

Decided

Both of us are far more familiar with GitHub than Gitlab, and so for our first big project together decided to go with what we know here instead of figuring out something new (there are so many new things we need to figure out, might as well reduce the number of optionally new things, lol). We aren't currently taking advantage of GitHub Actions or very many other built-in features (besides Dependabot) but luckily it integrates very well with the other services we're using.

409k views409k

Comments

Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Jul 28, 2020

Review

Using an inclusive language is crucial for fostering a diverse culture. Git has changed the naming conventions to be more language-inclusive, and so you should change. Our development tools, like GitHub and GitLab, already supports the change.

SourceLevel deals very nicely with repositories that changed the master branch to a more appropriate word. Besides, you can use the grep linter the look for exclusive terms contained in the source code.

As the inclusive language gap may happen in other aspects of our lives, have you already thought about them?

944k views944k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

GitHub	Bitbucket
GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.	Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.
Command instructions; Source browser; Git powered wikis; Integrated issue tracking; Code reviews with inline comments; Compare view; Newsfeed; Followers; Developer profiles; Autocompletion for @username mentions	Unlimited private repositories, charged per user;Best-in-class Jira integration;Built-in CI/CD;Deployment visibility;Embedded Trello boards; Command Instructions;Source Browser;Git Powered Wikis;Integrated Issue Tracking;Code reviews with inline comments;Compare View;Newsfeed;Followers;Developer Profiles;Autocompletion for @username mentions;Support for Mercurial
Statistics
Stacks 295.5K	Stacks 41.1K
Followers 259.0K	Followers 33.4K
Votes 10.4K	Votes 2.8K
Pros & Cons
Pros 1773 Open source friendly 1463 Easy source control 1254 Nice UI 1137 Great for team collaboration 868 Easy setup Cons 56 Owned by micrcosoft 38 Expensive for lone developers that want private repos 15 Relatively slow product/feature release cadence 10 API scoping could be better 9 Only 3 collaborators for private repos	Pros 905 Free private repos 397 Simple setup 349 Nice ui and tools 342 Unlimited private repositories 240 Affordable git hosting Cons 19 Not much community activity 17 Difficult to review prs because of confusing ui 15 Quite buggy 10 Managed by enterprise Java company 8 CI tool is not free of charge
Integrations
Grove Lighthouse Airbrake Codeship Bugsnag BugHerd Visual Studio Code HipChat CopperEgg Nitrous.IO	Git AWS Cloud9 Sentry Microsoft Azure npm Trello Slack Confluence Docker Jira

What are some alternatives to GitHub, Bitbucket?

GitLab

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Gitea

Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

Upsource

Upsource summarizes recent changes in your repository, showing commit messages, authors, quick diffs, links to detailed diff views and associated code reviews. A commit graph helps visualize the history of commits, branches and merges in your repository.

Beanstalk

A single process to commit code, review with the team, and deploy the final result to your customers.

GitBucket

GitBucket provides a Github-like UI and features such as Git repository hosting via HTTP and SSH, repository viewer, issues, wiki and pull request.

BinTray

Bintray offers developers the fastest way to publish and consume OSS software releases. With Bintray's full self-service platform developers have full control over their published software and how it is distributed to the world.

Gitolite

Gitolite allows you to setup git hosting on a central server, with fine-grained access control and many more powerful features. Gitolite is an access control layer on top of git.