Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Bitbucket vs Octopus Deploy: What are the differences?
Key differences between Bitbucket and Octopus Deploy
Bitbucket and Octopus Deploy are two popular tools used in the software development and deployment process. While both offer features to support the development lifecycle, there are significant differences between the two. Here are the key differences:
Hosting and Version Control: Bitbucket is primarily a Git-based hosting platform that provides version control functionality. On the other hand, Octopus Deploy is a deployment automation tool that integrates with various version control systems like Git, Mercurial, and Subversion. Bitbucket offers a complete version control solution, while Octopus Deploy focuses on automating the application deployment process.
Code Review and Collaboration: Bitbucket puts a strong emphasis on code collaboration and offers features like pull requests, code reviews, and inline commenting. It provides a collaborative environment for developers to evaluate and improve code quality. Octopus Deploy, on the other hand, is not designed specifically for code review and collaboration. Its main focus is on automating the deployment process.
Continuous Integration and Build Pipelines: Bitbucket provides built-in integration with popular CI/CD tools like Jenkins, Bamboo, and Bitbucket Pipelines. It allows developers to define and manage build pipelines, automate tests, and deploy applications. Octopus Deploy, on the other hand, is a complete deployment automation solution that integrates with CI/CD tools like TeamCity, Jenkins, and Azure DevOps. It offers sophisticated release management capabilities to orchestrate deployments across multiple environments.
Deployment Targets and Environments: Octopus Deploy allows you to define and manage deployment targets, such as servers, cloud services, and containers. It provides fine-grained control over deploying applications to different environments, like development, staging, and production. Bitbucket, on the other hand, is not primarily designed for managing deployment targets and environments. Its focus is on version control and code collaboration.
Release Management and Versioning: Octopus Deploy has robust release management capabilities, allowing you to create, version, and deploy releases with ease. It supports versioning strategies, release notes, and rollbacks. Bitbucket, on the other hand, does not provide the same level of release management functionality. It focuses on managing code changes and collaboration.
Extensibility and Integrations: Octopus Deploy offers a variety of integrations with third-party tools and platforms, allowing you to extend its functionality as per your requirements. It integrates with various DevOps tools, cloud platforms, and infrastructure providers. Bitbucket also provides integrations with other tools, but its extensibility options are relatively limited compared to Octopus Deploy.
In summary, Bitbucket is a Git-based hosting platform with a strong focus on version control and code collaboration, while Octopus Deploy is a deployment automation tool specializing in orchestrating deployments across different environments.
I first used BitBucket because it had private repo's, and it didn't disappoint me. Also with the smooth integration of Jira, the decision to use BitBucket as a full application maintenance service was as easy as 1, 2, 3.
I honestly love BitBucket, by the looks, by the UI, and the smooth integration with Tower.
Do you review your Pull/Merge Request before assigning Reviewers?
If you work in a team opening a Pull Request (or Merge Request) looks appropriate. However, have you ever thought about opening a Pull/Merge Request when working by yourself? Here's a checklist of things you can review in your own:
- Pick the correct target branch
- Make Drafts explicit
- Name things properly
- Ask help for tools
- Remove the noise
- Fetch necessary data
- Understand Mergeability
- Pass the message
- Add screenshots
- Be found in the future
- Comment inline in your changes
Read the blog post for more detailed explanation for each item :D
What else do you review before asking for code review?
One of the magic tricks git performs is the ability to rewrite log history. You can do it in many ways, but git rebase -i
is the one I most use. With this command, It’s possible to switch commits order, remove a commit, squash two or more commits, or edit, for instance.
It’s particularly useful to run it before opening a pull request. It allows developers to “clean up” the mess and organize commits before submitting to review. If you follow the practice 3 and 4, then the list of commits should look very similar to a task list. It should reveal the rationale you had, telling the story of how you end up with that final code.
Pros of Bitbucket
- Free private repos904
- Simple setup397
- Nice ui and tools348
- Unlimited private repositories341
- Affordable git hosting240
- Integrates with many apis and services123
- Reliable uptime119
- Nice gui87
- Pull requests and code reviews85
- Very customisable58
- Mercurial repositories16
- SourceTree integration14
- JIRA integration12
- Track every commit to an issue in JIRA10
- Deployment hooks8
- Best free alternative to Github8
- Automatically share repositories with all your teammates7
- Compatible with Mac and Windows7
- Source Code Insight6
- Price6
- Login with Google5
- Create a wiki5
- Approve pull request button5
- Customizable pipelines4
- #2 Atlassian Product after JIRA4
- Also supports Mercurial3
- Unlimited Private Repos at no cost3
- Continuous Integration and Delivery3
- Academic license program2
- Multilingual interface2
- Teamcity2
- Open source friendly2
- Issues tracker2
- IAM2
- IAM integration2
- Mercurial Support2
Pros of Octopus Deploy
- Powerful30
- Simplicity25
- Easy to learn20
- .Net oriented17
- Easy to manage releases and rollback14
- Allows multitenancy8
- Nice interface4
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Bitbucket
- Not much community activity19
- Difficult to review prs because of confusing ui17
- Quite buggy15
- Managed by enterprise Java company10
- CI tool is not free of charge8
- Complexity with rights management7
- Only 5 collaborators for private repos6
- Slow performance4
- No AWS Codepipelines integration2
- No more Mercurial repositories1
- No server side git-hook support1
Cons of Octopus Deploy
- Poor UI4
- Config & variables not versioned (e.g. in git)2
- Management of Config2