Bitbucket vs Puppet Labs: What are the differences?

# Introduction
Here are the key differences between Bitbucket and Puppet Labs.

1. **Version Control vs Configuration Management**:
   Bitbucket is primarily a version control system used for storing and managing code, while Puppet Labs is a configuration management tool used for automating the provisioning, configuration, and management of IT infrastructure.

2. **Collaboration vs Infrastructure Management**:
   Bitbucket focuses on facilitating collaboration among developers by providing features like code review, pull requests, and branching, while Puppet Labs is geared towards managing and automating the configuration of servers and other IT infrastructure components.

3. **Language Support**:
   Bitbucket supports a variety of programming languages and can be used for any type of code, whereas Puppet Labs uses its own domain-specific language called Puppet DSL for defining configuration policies and managing infrastructure.

4. **Hosting**:
   Bitbucket is a cloud-based service provided by Atlassian, offering both free and paid plans, while Puppet Labs is an on-premise solution that needs to be installed on servers within the organization's infrastructure.

5. **Focus**:
   Bitbucket is more developer-centric, focusing on code collaboration and version control, while Puppet Labs is more operations-centric, focusing on automating the management and configuration of IT infrastructure.

6. **Use Cases**:
   Bitbucket is commonly used by software development teams to store, review, and collaborate on code, whereas Puppet Labs is used by IT operations teams to automate the deployment and management of servers and other infrastructure components.

In Summary, Bitbucket is a version control system for code collaboration, while Puppet Labs is a configuration management tool for automating IT infrastructure management.