StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Infrastructure as a Service
  4. Server Software
  5. Bitnami vs Docker

Bitnami vs Docker

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Bitnami
Bitnami
Stacks139
Followers221
Votes6
Docker
Docker
Stacks194.2K
Followers143.8K
Votes3.9K

Bitnami vs Docker: What are the differences?

  1. Bitnami: Bitnami is a tool that provides simplified and ready-to-use application stacks for various platforms like Windows, Linux, and macOS. It offers a wide range of applications, including content management systems, databases, development environments, and more. Bitnami packages these applications with all their dependencies and configurations, making it easy to deploy them on different environments without the need for manual installation and configuration.

  2. Docker: Docker is an open-source platform used for containerization. It allows developers to build, package, and distribute applications and their dependencies in lightweight and isolated containers. Docker containers are portable and can run on any system that has Docker installed, regardless of the underlying operating system or infrastructure.

  3. Integration with Infrastructure: Bitnami packages applications with all the required dependencies, including the operating system, web server, database, etc. This makes it easy to set up a complete application stack without worrying about compatibility issues. On the other hand, Docker containers encapsulate only the application and its dependencies, not the entire infrastructure. This allows for more flexibility in terms of infrastructure choices and enables easier integration with existing infrastructure components.

  4. Development Environment: Bitnami provides pre-configured development environments that can be easily set up on a local machine. These environments come with all the necessary tools and libraries required for development, making it convenient for developers to start coding immediately. Docker, on the other hand, focuses on the portability of applications across different environments, including development, staging, and production. Docker containers can be used to replicate the production environment locally, ensuring consistency throughout the development lifecycle.

  5. Scalability and Resource Efficiency: Docker containers are lightweight and have minimal overhead compared to full virtual machines. They share the host operating system's kernel, allowing for efficient resource utilization. Docker provides built-in scaling mechanisms, which enable horizontal scaling of applications by running multiple container instances. Bitnami, on the other hand, focuses more on ease of deployment and setup rather than scalability. It provides a complete stack, but scaling requires manual configuration.

  6. Community and Ecosystem: Docker has a large and active community, with a vast ecosystem of tools and libraries built around it. This vibrant ecosystem provides various solutions and integrations that extend the capabilities of Docker, making it a popular choice among developers and sysadmins. Bitnami also has a community, but it is comparatively smaller and more focused on its own curated stacks.

In Summary, Bitnami provides ready-to-use application stacks with integrated infrastructure, while Docker focuses on containerization and portability across different environments. Docker offers scalability, resource efficiency, and a vibrant ecosystem, while Bitnami emphasizes easy deployment and pre-configured development environments.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Bitnami, Docker

Florian
Florian

IT DevOp at Agitos GmbH

Oct 22, 2019

Decided

lxd/lxc and Docker aren't congruent so this comparison needs a more detailed look; but in short I can say: the lxd-integrated administration of storage including zfs with its snapshot capabilities as well as the system container (multi-process) approach of lxc vs. the limited single-process container approach of Docker is the main reason I chose lxd over Docker.

482k views482k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Bitnami
Bitnami
Docker
Docker

Our library provides trusted virtual machines for every major development stack and open source server application, ready to run in your infrastructure.

The Docker Platform is the industry-leading container platform for continuous, high-velocity innovation, enabling organizations to seamlessly build and share any application — from legacy to what comes next — and securely run them anywhere

BitNami Cloud Hosting lets you instantly run every BitNami package you already know and love and have it automatically configured, backed up and monitored.;Launch applications to the cloud with one click.;Choose from 50 popular open source applications, including SugarCRM, Alfresco, Drupal, WordPress, Redmine, JasperServer, Joomla! and many more.;By launching a server without adding any applications to it, you get a ready-to-run development environment that includes Apache, MySQL, Perl, PHP, Ruby, Python, Django, Memcached, Nginx, Subversion, Git, Sqlite, Tomcat and Java.;Run multiple applications on one server and save money by sharing the resources of a larger machine between applications.;Manage multiple Amazon Web Services accounts from one dashboard.;BitNami Cloud Hosting is powered by Amazon, the global leader in Cloud Computing.;Use BitNami Cloud Hosting to schedule weekly, daily or even hourly automatic backups. Backups are complete, incremental snapshots of your server.;Restore a complete, ready-to-run copy of your server, with all of your data and customizations, in one click.;Server scheduling enables you to specify times for your servers to automatically turn on and off.
Integrated developer tools; open, portable images; shareable, reusable apps; framework-aware builds; standardized templates; multi-environment support; remote registry management; simple setup for Docker and Kubernetes; certified Kubernetes; application templates; enterprise controls; secure software supply chain; industry-leading container runtime; image scanning; access controls; image signing; caching and mirroring; image lifecycle; policy-based image promotion
Statistics
Stacks
139
Stacks
194.2K
Followers
221
Followers
143.8K
Votes
6
Votes
3.9K
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 6
    Cloud Management
Pros
  • 823
    Rapid integration and build up
  • 692
    Isolation
  • 521
    Open source
  • 505
    Testa­bil­i­ty and re­pro­ducibil­i­ty
  • 460
    Lightweight
Cons
  • 8
    New versions == broken features
  • 6
    Unreliable networking
  • 6
    Documentation not always in sync
  • 4
    Moves quickly
  • 3
    Not Secure
Integrations
Amazon EC2
Amazon EC2
Google Compute Engine
Google Compute Engine
Google Kubernetes Engine
Google Kubernetes Engine
HP Cloud Compute
HP Cloud Compute
VMware vSphere
VMware vSphere
Microsoft Azure
Microsoft Azure
Java
Java
Docker Compose
Docker Compose
VirtualBox
VirtualBox
Linux
Linux
Amazon EC2 Container Service
Amazon EC2 Container Service
Docker Swarm
Docker Swarm
boot2docker
boot2docker
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
Docker Machine
Docker Machine
Vagrant
Vagrant

What are some alternatives to Bitnami, Docker?

LXD

LXD

LXD isn't a rewrite of LXC, in fact it's building on top of LXC to provide a new, better user experience. Under the hood, LXD uses LXC through liblxc and its Go binding to create and manage the containers. It's basically an alternative to LXC's tools and distribution template system with the added features that come from being controllable over the network.

LXC

LXC

LXC is a userspace interface for the Linux kernel containment features. Through a powerful API and simple tools, it lets Linux users easily create and manage system or application containers.

rkt

rkt

Rocket is a cli for running App Containers. The goal of rocket is to be composable, secure, and fast.

Vagrant Cloud

Vagrant Cloud

Vagrant Cloud pairs with Vagrant to enable access, insight and collaboration across teams, as well as to bring exposure to community contributions and development environments.

Studio 3T

Studio 3T

It's the only MongoDB tool that provides three ways to explore data alongside powerful features like query autocompletion, polyglot code generation, a stage-by-stage aggregation query builder, import and export, SQL query support and more.

OpenVZ

OpenVZ

Virtuozzo leverages OpenVZ as its core of a virtualization solution offered by Virtuozzo company. Virtuozzo is optimized for hosters and offers hypervisor (VMs in addition to containers), distributed cloud storage, dedicated support, management tools, and easy installation.

SmartOS

SmartOS

It combines the capabilities you get from a lightweight container OS, optimized to deliver containers, with the robust security, networking and storage capabilities you’ve come to expect and depend on from a hardware hypervisor.

Clear Containers

Clear Containers

We set out to build Clear Containers by leveraging the isolation of virtual-machine technology along with the deployment benefits of containers. As part of this, we let go of the "generic PC hardware" notion traditionally associated with virtual machines; we're not going to pretend to be a standard PC that is compatible with just about any OS on the planet.

Flatpak

Flatpak

It is a next-generation technology for building and distributing desktop applications on Linux

Lima

Lima

It launches Linux virtual machines with automatic file sharing, port forwarding, and containerd. It can be considered as some sort of unofficial "macOS subsystem for Linux", or "containerd for Mac". It is expected to be used on macOS hosts, but can be used on Linux hosts as well. It may work on NetBSD and Windows hosts as well.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana