Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
BrowserStack vs Docker: What are the differences?
Differences between BrowserStack and Docker
BrowserStack and Docker are two popular tools used in web development and testing. Although they serve different purposes, there are key differences between the two. Below are the key differences between BrowserStack and Docker:
Deployment Method: BrowserStack is a cloud-based testing platform that allows users to test their websites or web applications on various devices and browsers. It provides a scalable and on-demand infrastructure for testing. On the other hand, Docker is a tool that allows developers to package their applications and their dependencies into containers for easy deployment and scalability.
Use Case: BrowserStack is primarily used for cross-browser testing, where developers can test their applications on different browsers and operating systems. It provides a wide range of browsers and devices for testing. Docker, on the other hand, is used for containerization of applications, which enables easy deployment and scalability.
Dependency Management: BrowserStack does not involve managing dependencies as it is a cloud-based platform that provides the necessary browsers and devices for testing. Docker, on the other hand, allows developers to define and manage dependencies within the container, leading to consistent and reproducible application deployments.
Isolation: BrowserStack provides isolation by allowing developers to test their applications individually on different browsers and devices. Each test run is conducted in a separate virtual machine or browser instance, ensuring the independence of the tests. Docker also provides isolation through containerization, where applications run in separate containers, ensuring that they do not interfere with each other.
Scalability: BrowserStack offers scalability by providing a large number of devices and browsers for testing. Users can run tests parallelly on multiple devices and browsers, allowing them to quickly identify and fix cross-browser compatibility issues. Docker, on the other hand, offers scalability by allowing applications to be easily deployed and scaled across multiple containers, enabling efficient resource utilization.
Development Environment: BrowserStack is primarily used for testing purposes and does not provide a development environment. It focuses on providing a platform for testers to validate their applications. Docker, on the other hand, provides a complete development environment where developers can package their applications with all the necessary dependencies and configurations, enabling consistent development and deployment.
In Summary, BrowserStack is a cloud-based testing platform primarily used for cross-browser testing, while Docker is a containerization tool for packaging and deploying applications.
I am looking to purchase one of these tools for Mobile testing for my team. It should support Native, hybrid, and responsive app testing. It should also feature debugging, parallel execution, automation testing/easy integration with automation testing tools like Selenium, and the capability to provide availability of devices specifically for us to use at any time with good speed of performing all these activities.
I have already used Perfecto mobile, and Sauce Labs in my other projects before. I want to know how different or better is AWS Device farm in usage and how advantageous it would be for us to use it over other mentioned tools
A SaaS offering like Sauce Labs (or BrowserStack or LambdaTest, etc) will provide a remote Selenium/Appium Grid including the ability to run test automation in parallel (up to the amount based your subscription level) an a wide array of browsers and mobile devices.
These tools can be expensive, but if you can afford them, the expertise and effort of maintaining the grid, browser updates, etc. is worth it.
AWS Device Farm can be significantly cheaper, but is much more work to setup and run. It will not give you as many devices, or the reporting and screen/video capture you get with the the services. And there is no support for AWS Device Farm, and very poor documentation. I have used it, but do not recommend it. Running your own grid and physical device lab is better, but I'd stick with a service like Sauce Labs or Perfecto which will save you time and give you better services despite the higher price tag.
Stability - Just works. Availability - More than 15 datacenters. Enterprise features like SSO, local testing and SOC2/GDPR compliant.
BitBar's Dedicated Devices would be a great option for you. It allows you to dedicate (reserve) devices for your use only which also having access to all of the devices in the shared cloud. BitBar has the features and integrations that you are looking for as well.
lxd/lxc and Docker aren't congruent so this comparison needs a more detailed look; but in short I can say: the lxd-integrated administration of storage including zfs with its snapshot capabilities as well as the system container (multi-process) approach of lxc vs. the limited single-process container approach of Docker is the main reason I chose lxd over Docker.
Pros of BrowserStack
- Multiple browsers135
- Ease of use76
- Real browsers65
- Ability to use it locally44
- Good price27
- Great web interface21
- IE support19
- Official mobile emulators17
- Cloud-based access15
- Instant access15
- Real mobile devices12
- Multiple Desktop OS8
- Selenium compatible8
- Screenshots8
- Can be used for Testing and E2E7
- Pre-installed developer tools6
- Video of test runs5
- Supports Manual, Functional and Visual Diff Testing4
- Favourites4
- Webdriver compatible4
- Many browsers4
- Test Management3
- Test automation dashboard3
- Cypress Compatible3
- Bi-directional Jira Sync3
- Free for Open Source3
- Unify and track test cases3
- Cross-browser testing3
- Speed is fast2
- Real devices2
- Private devices1
- Test WCAG Compliance1
- Web accessibility1
- Visual testing and review1
Pros of Docker
- Rapid integration and build up823
- Isolation692
- Open source521
- Testability and reproducibility505
- Lightweight460
- Standardization218
- Scalable185
- Upgrading / downgrading / application versions106
- Security88
- Private paas environments85
- Portability34
- Limit resource usage26
- Game changer17
- I love the way docker has changed virtualization16
- Fast14
- Concurrency12
- Docker's Compose tools8
- Easy setup6
- Fast and Portable6
- Because its fun5
- Makes shipping to production very simple4
- Highly useful3
- It's dope3
- Package the environment with the application2
- Super2
- Open source and highly configurable2
- Simplicity, isolation, resource effective2
- MacOS support FAKE2
- Its cool2
- Does a nice job hogging memory2
- Docker hub for the FTW2
- HIgh Throughput2
- Very easy to setup integrate and build2
- Asdfd0
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of BrowserStack
- Very limited choice of minor versions2
Cons of Docker
- New versions == broken features8
- Unreliable networking6
- Documentation not always in sync6
- Moves quickly4
- Not Secure3