Get Advice Icon

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

BrowserStack

2.7K
2K
+ 1
533
Docker

176.4K
141.7K
+ 1
3.9K
Add tool

BrowserStack vs Docker: What are the differences?

Differences between BrowserStack and Docker

BrowserStack and Docker are two popular tools used in web development and testing. Although they serve different purposes, there are key differences between the two. Below are the key differences between BrowserStack and Docker:

  1. Deployment Method: BrowserStack is a cloud-based testing platform that allows users to test their websites or web applications on various devices and browsers. It provides a scalable and on-demand infrastructure for testing. On the other hand, Docker is a tool that allows developers to package their applications and their dependencies into containers for easy deployment and scalability.

  2. Use Case: BrowserStack is primarily used for cross-browser testing, where developers can test their applications on different browsers and operating systems. It provides a wide range of browsers and devices for testing. Docker, on the other hand, is used for containerization of applications, which enables easy deployment and scalability.

  3. Dependency Management: BrowserStack does not involve managing dependencies as it is a cloud-based platform that provides the necessary browsers and devices for testing. Docker, on the other hand, allows developers to define and manage dependencies within the container, leading to consistent and reproducible application deployments.

  4. Isolation: BrowserStack provides isolation by allowing developers to test their applications individually on different browsers and devices. Each test run is conducted in a separate virtual machine or browser instance, ensuring the independence of the tests. Docker also provides isolation through containerization, where applications run in separate containers, ensuring that they do not interfere with each other.

  5. Scalability: BrowserStack offers scalability by providing a large number of devices and browsers for testing. Users can run tests parallelly on multiple devices and browsers, allowing them to quickly identify and fix cross-browser compatibility issues. Docker, on the other hand, offers scalability by allowing applications to be easily deployed and scaled across multiple containers, enabling efficient resource utilization.

  6. Development Environment: BrowserStack is primarily used for testing purposes and does not provide a development environment. It focuses on providing a platform for testers to validate their applications. Docker, on the other hand, provides a complete development environment where developers can package their applications with all the necessary dependencies and configurations, enabling consistent development and deployment.

In Summary, BrowserStack is a cloud-based testing platform primarily used for cross-browser testing, while Docker is a containerization tool for packaging and deploying applications.

Advice on BrowserStack and Docker

I am looking to purchase one of these tools for Mobile testing for my team. It should support Native, hybrid, and responsive app testing. It should also feature debugging, parallel execution, automation testing/easy integration with automation testing tools like Selenium, and the capability to provide availability of devices specifically for us to use at any time with good speed of performing all these activities.

I have already used Perfecto mobile, and Sauce Labs in my other projects before. I want to know how different or better is AWS Device farm in usage and how advantageous it would be for us to use it over other mentioned tools

See more
Replies (3)
Aaron Evans
Testing Strategist at One Shore · | 3 upvotes · 17.5K views

A SaaS offering like Sauce Labs (or BrowserStack or LambdaTest, etc) will provide a remote Selenium/Appium Grid including the ability to run test automation in parallel (up to the amount based your subscription level) an a wide array of browsers and mobile devices.

These tools can be expensive, but if you can afford them, the expertise and effort of maintaining the grid, browser updates, etc. is worth it.

AWS Device Farm can be significantly cheaper, but is much more work to setup and run. It will not give you as many devices, or the reporting and screen/video capture you get with the the services. And there is no support for AWS Device Farm, and very poor documentation. I have used it, but do not recommend it. Running your own grid and physical device lab is better, but I'd stick with a service like Sauce Labs or Perfecto which will save you time and give you better services despite the higher price tag.

See more
Recommends
on
BrowserStackBrowserStack

Stability - Just works. Availability - More than 15 datacenters. Enterprise features like SSO, local testing and SOC2/GDPR compliant.

See more
Jaymie Falconi
Recommends
on
BitBarBitBar

BitBar's Dedicated Devices would be a great option for you. It allows you to dedicate (reserve) devices for your use only which also having access to all of the devices in the shared cloud. BitBar has the features and integrations that you are looking for as well.

See more
Decisions about BrowserStack and Docker
Florian Sager
IT DevOp at Agitos GmbH · | 3 upvotes · 467.8K views
Chose
LXDLXD
over
DockerDocker

lxd/lxc and Docker aren't congruent so this comparison needs a more detailed look; but in short I can say: the lxd-integrated administration of storage including zfs with its snapshot capabilities as well as the system container (multi-process) approach of lxc vs. the limited single-process container approach of Docker is the main reason I chose lxd over Docker.

See more
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More
Pros of BrowserStack
Pros of Docker
  • 135
    Multiple browsers
  • 76
    Ease of use
  • 65
    Real browsers
  • 44
    Ability to use it locally
  • 27
    Good price
  • 21
    Great web interface
  • 19
    IE support
  • 17
    Official mobile emulators
  • 15
    Cloud-based access
  • 15
    Instant access
  • 12
    Real mobile devices
  • 8
    Multiple Desktop OS
  • 8
    Selenium compatible
  • 8
    Screenshots
  • 7
    Can be used for Testing and E2E
  • 6
    Pre-installed developer tools
  • 5
    Video of test runs
  • 4
    Supports Manual, Functional and Visual Diff Testing
  • 4
    Favourites
  • 4
    Webdriver compatible
  • 4
    Many browsers
  • 3
    Test Management
  • 3
    Test automation dashboard
  • 3
    Cypress Compatible
  • 3
    Bi-directional Jira Sync
  • 3
    Free for Open Source
  • 3
    Unify and track test cases
  • 3
    Cross-browser testing
  • 2
    Speed is fast
  • 2
    Real devices
  • 1
    Private devices
  • 1
    Test WCAG Compliance
  • 1
    Web accessibility
  • 1
    Visual testing and review
  • 823
    Rapid integration and build up
  • 692
    Isolation
  • 521
    Open source
  • 505
    Testa­bil­i­ty and re­pro­ducibil­i­ty
  • 460
    Lightweight
  • 218
    Standardization
  • 185
    Scalable
  • 106
    Upgrading / down­grad­ing / ap­pli­ca­tion versions
  • 88
    Security
  • 85
    Private paas environments
  • 34
    Portability
  • 26
    Limit resource usage
  • 17
    Game changer
  • 16
    I love the way docker has changed virtualization
  • 14
    Fast
  • 12
    Concurrency
  • 8
    Docker's Compose tools
  • 6
    Easy setup
  • 6
    Fast and Portable
  • 5
    Because its fun
  • 4
    Makes shipping to production very simple
  • 3
    Highly useful
  • 3
    It's dope
  • 2
    Package the environment with the application
  • 2
    Super
  • 2
    Open source and highly configurable
  • 2
    Simplicity, isolation, resource effective
  • 2
    MacOS support FAKE
  • 2
    Its cool
  • 2
    Does a nice job hogging memory
  • 2
    Docker hub for the FTW
  • 2
    HIgh Throughput
  • 2
    Very easy to setup integrate and build
  • 0
    Asdfd

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of BrowserStack
Cons of Docker
  • 2
    Very limited choice of minor versions
  • 8
    New versions == broken features
  • 6
    Unreliable networking
  • 6
    Documentation not always in sync
  • 4
    Moves quickly
  • 3
    Not Secure

Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

523
747
712
11.1K
9.2K
137.5K

What is BrowserStack?

BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability.

What is Docker?

The Docker Platform is the industry-leading container platform for continuous, high-velocity innovation, enabling organizations to seamlessly build and share any application — from legacy to what comes next — and securely run them anywhere

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

What companies use BrowserStack?
What companies use Docker?
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More

Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

What tools integrate with BrowserStack?
What tools integrate with Docker?

Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

Blog Posts

PythonDockerKubernetes+7
3
1192
PythonDockerKubernetes+14
12
2688
Jul 9 2019 at 7:22PM

Blue Medora

DockerPostgreSQLNew Relic+8
11
2406
DockerAmazon EC2Scala+8
6
2798
GitHubDockerReact+17
42
37891
What are some alternatives to BrowserStack and Docker?
Browserling
We run the browsers on our servers. Fully interactive sessions, not static screenshots. No flash, no applets, nothing to install. Powered entirely by <canvas> and javascript.
LambdaTest
LambdaTest platform provides secure, scalable and insightful test orchestration for website, and mobile app testing. Customers at different points in their DevOps lifecycle can leverage Automation and/or Manual testing on LambdaTest.
Ghost Inspector
It lets you create and manage UI tests that check specific functionality in your website or application. We execute these automated browser tests continuously from the cloud and alert you if anything breaks.
AWS Device Farm
Run tests across a large selection of physical devices in parallel from various manufacturers with varying hardware, OS versions and form factors.
Appium
Appium is an open source test automation framework for use with native, hybrid, and mobile web apps. It drives iOS and Android apps using the WebDriver protocol. Appium is sponsored by Sauce Labs and a thriving community of open source developers.
See all alternatives