Overview

Jenkins

Stacks59.2K

Followers50.4K

Votes2.2K

GitHub Stars24.6K

Forks9.2K

Buddy

Stacks300

Followers348

Votes606

Buddy vs Jenkins: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Buddy and Jenkins

Buddy and Jenkins are both popular continuous integration/continuous deployment (CI/CD) tools commonly used in software development pipelines. While they serve similar purposes, there are several key differences that set them apart from each other.

User Interface: Buddy provides a modern and visually appealing user interface that is intuitive and user-friendly. It offers a more polished UI design with various customization options for ease of use. On the other hand, Jenkins has a more dated and less user-friendly interface that requires more technical expertise to navigate and configure.
Deployment Speed: Buddy is known for its fast and efficient deployment speed. It utilizes a highly optimized CI/CD process that allows for quick execution and deployment of software changes. In contrast, Jenkins can be slower in terms of deployment due to its more complex setup and configuration process.
Integration and Plugins: Buddy offers a wide range of integrations and plugins to enhance the development and deployment process. It seamlessly integrates with popular tools and platforms such as Slack, AWS, Azure, and Docker. While Jenkins also provides integration capabilities, it often requires additional plugins and configurations to achieve the same level of compatibility.
Ease of Setup: Buddy simplifies the setup process by providing a user-friendly interface for configuring pipelines and automating workflows. It offers predefined actions and templates, making it easier for developers to get started. Jenkins, on the other hand, requires more configuration and setup expertise, often involving scripting and complex configurations.
Scalability: Buddy is designed to handle scalability with ease. It can efficiently handle parallelism and multiple deployments simultaneously, enabling teams to scale their development processes as needed. Jenkins, although capable of scaling, may require additional infrastructure and configurations to achieve the same level of scalability.
Pricing Model: Buddy offers a straightforward and transparent pricing model based on the number of executions, which allows for more predictable costs. Jenkins, being an open-source tool, is free to use but may incur additional costs for infrastructure and maintenance depending on the setup.

In summary, Buddy provides a user-friendly interface, faster deployment speed, seamless integrations, simplified setup, scalability, and a transparent pricing model compared to Jenkins.

Advice on Jenkins, Buddy

Balaramesh

Apr 20, 2020

Needs adviceon

Azure Pipelines

.NET

Jenkins

We are currently using Azure Pipelines for continous integration. Our applications are developed witn .NET framework. But when we look at the online Jenkins is the most widely used tool for continous integration. Can you please give me the advice which one is best to use for my case Azure pipeline or jenkins.

663k views663k

Comments

StackShare

Apr 17, 2019

Needs advice

From a StackShare Community member: "Currently we use Travis CI and have optimized it as much as we can so our builds are fairly quick. Our boss is all about redundancy so we are looking for another solution to fall back on in case Travis goes down and/or jacks prices way up (they were recently acquired). Could someone recommend which CI we should go with and if they have time, an explanation of how they're different?"

529k views529k

Comments

Tatiana

Nov 16, 2019

Decided

Jenkins is a pretty flexible, complete tool. Especially I love the possibility to configure jobs as a code with Jenkins pipelines.

CircleCI is well suited for small projects where the main task is to run continuous integration as quickly as possible. Travis CI is recommended primarily for open-source projects that need to be tested in different environments.

And for something a bit larger I prefer to use Jenkins because it is possible to make serious system configuration thereby different plugins. In Jenkins, I can change almost anything. But if you want to start the CI chain as soon as possible, Jenkins may not be the right choice.

734k views734k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Jenkins	Buddy
In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.	Git platform for web and software developers with Docker-based tools for Continuous Integration and Deployment.
Easy installation;Easy configuration;Change set support;Permanent links;RSS/E-mail/IM Integration;After-the-fact tagging;JUnit/TestNG test reporting;Distributed builds;File fingerprinting;Plugin Support	Automatic deployments on push to branch;Docker-based builds and tests;10-minute setup of complete environment;Integrates with GitHub, Bitbucket & GitLab;DevOps and website monitoring actions;Clear and telling UI/UX;Supports all popular languages and frameworks, including PHP/Laravel, Node.js, Rails, Python, Java, .NET Core, Elixir and Go
Statistics
GitHub Stars 24.6K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 9.2K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 59.2K	Stacks 300
Followers 50.4K	Followers 348
Votes 2.2K	Votes 606
Pros & Cons
Pros 523 Hosted internally 469 Free open source 318 Great to build, deploy or launch anything async 243 Tons of integrations 211 Rich set of plugins with good documentation Cons 13 Workarounds needed for basic requirements 10 Groovy with cumbersome syntax 8 Plugins compatibility issues 7 Limited abilities with declarative pipelines 7 Lack of support	Pros 56 Easy setup 53 Docker 50 Continuous Integration 49 Integrations 46 Beautiful dashboard Cons 1 Deleted account after 1 month of not pushing code
Integrations
No integrations available	Jekyll Grunt Microsoft Azure Kubernetes Hexo Amazon EC2 Meteor Slack .NET Ruby

What are some alternatives to Jenkins, Buddy?

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

GoCD

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.

Shippable

Shippable is a SaaS platform that lets you easily add Continuous Integration/Deployment to your Github and BitBucket repositories. It is lightweight, super simple to setup, and runs your builds and tests faster than any other service.

Buildkite

CI and build automation tool that combines the power of your own build infrastructure with the convenience of a managed, centralized web UI. Used by Shopify, Basecamp, Digital Ocean, Venmo, Cochlear, Bugsnag and more.

Snap CI

Snap CI is a cloud-based continuous integration & continuous deployment tool with powerful deployment pipelines. Integrates seamlessly with GitHub and provides fast feedback so you can deploy with ease.