Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Buildkite vs Github Actions: What are the differences?
Key Differences between Buildkite and Github Actions
1. Scalability and Integration flexibility: Buildkite offers more scalability and flexibility in integrating with various tools and services. It allows users to build custom pipelines and easily integrate with third-party services, making it suitable for complex and diverse workflows. On the other hand, Github Actions provides a more streamlined integration within the Github ecosystem, making it simpler for developers already using Github for their projects.
2. Pricing Structures: Buildkite and Github Actions have different pricing structures. Buildkite offers a transparent pricing model based on the number of concurrent builds, allowing users to pay only for what they need. In contrast, Github Actions provides a generous usage quota for free, but charges based on usage for higher resource needs, making it more cost-effective for smaller projects.
3. Visualization and Monitoring: Buildkite provides a robust dashboard and advanced visualization capabilities to give users a comprehensive overview of their pipelines. It offers real-time insights, detailed build logs, and extensive monitoring and reporting features. Github Actions also provides basic visualization and monitoring tools, but with more limited capabilities compared to Buildkite.
4. Customizability and Extensibility: Buildkite offers more flexibility in customizing and extending its features. It allows users to write custom scripts and execute commands tailored to their specific needs. Github Actions, on the other hand, has a more standardized and restricted workflow syntax, limiting the level of customization and extensibility options available to users.
5. Community Support and Ecosystem: Github Actions benefits from its large user base and vibrant community, making it easier to find community-developed actions and resources. It has a rich ecosystem of pre-built actions and templates that can be readily used in workflows. While Buildkite also has community support, it is relatively smaller compared to Github Actions.
6. Availability and Deployment: Buildkite is a cloud-hosted CI/CD solution that provides a fully managed service, ensuring high availability and easy setup. Github Actions, on the other hand, is tightly integrated within the Github platform and is deployed directly from Github repositories. This makes it more easily accessible and deployable for projects already hosted on Github.
In Summary, Buildkite offers more scalability, customizable pipelines, and advanced monitoring capabilities, while Github Actions provides simpler integration with Github, cost-effective pricing for smaller projects, and a vibrant community ecosystem. Users can choose according to their specific needs and preferences in terms of scalability, flexibility, and community support.
Pros of Buildkite
- Great customer support18
- Github integration17
- Easy to use16
- Easy setup16
- Simplicity12
- Simple deployments10
- Simple and powerful configuration9
- Bitbucket integration4
- Github enterprise integration3
- Amazing swag3
- Integrates with everything2
- Sourcecode is hosted by source code owner.1
- Configuration in cloud1
- Run your own test containers with their AWS stack file1
- Superior user experience1
- Great ui1
Pros of GitHub Actions
- Integration with GitHub8
- Free5
- Easy to duplicate a workflow3
- Ready actions in Marketplace3
- Configs stored in .github2
- Docker Support2
- Read actions in Marketplace2
- Active Development Roadmap1
- Fast1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Buildkite
Cons of GitHub Actions
- Lacking [skip ci]5
- Lacking allow failure4
- Lacking job specific badges3
- No ssh login to servers2
- No Deployment Projects1
- No manual launch1