Catchpoint Synthetics vs SignalFx

Overview

SignalFx

Stacks53

Followers110

Votes22

Catchpoint Synthetics

Stacks5

Followers6

Votes0

Catchpoint Synthetics vs SignalFx: What are the differences?

Introduction: In the realm of website monitoring and performance analysis, Catchpoint Synthetics and SignalFx are two prominent tools that offer unique features. Understanding the key differences between these platforms can help businesses make informed decisions on which tool best suits their needs.

Monitoring Scope: Catchpoint Synthetics primarily focuses on monitoring the end-user experience by running synthetic transactions from multiple locations globally, providing insights into performance from various regions. In contrast, SignalFx specializes in real-time monitoring of infrastructure and applications, offering deep insights into system metrics and data.
Alerting Capabilities: Catchpoint Synthetics offers robust alerting capabilities that are tailored to specific performance thresholds and conditions, allowing users to receive instant notifications when issues arise. On the other hand, SignalFx provides flexible and customizable alerting options based on predefined conditions, enabling users to set up alerts for specific metrics and anomalies.
Data Visualization: Catchpoint Synthetics emphasizes visualizing data in a user-friendly dashboard format, enabling users to track performance trends and analyze data easily. In comparison, SignalFx excels in advanced data visualization techniques, such as heat maps and predictive analytics, providing users with deeper insights into complex performance patterns.
Integration Capabilities: Catchpoint Synthetics offers seamless integration with various third-party tools and platforms, allowing users to streamline their monitoring processes and data sharing. In contrast, SignalFx provides robust integration options with popular cloud services and container platforms, enabling users to monitor a wide range of environments effortlessly.
Customization Options: Catchpoint Synthetics provides extensive customization options for creating tailored monitoring scenarios and reports based on specific business requirements, offering a high degree of flexibility. Conversely, SignalFx offers customization features focused on configuring dashboards and visualizations to match users' preferences and monitoring needs.
Scalability and Performance: Catchpoint Synthetics is designed for high scalability and performance, allowing users to monitor a large number of endpoints and transactions efficiently. SignalFx, on the other hand, offers advanced scalability features that cater to the monitoring needs of complex and dynamic environments, ensuring consistent performance across diverse systems.

In Summary, understanding the key differences between Catchpoint Synthetics and SignalFx can help businesses choose the right monitoring tool based on their specific requirements and objectives.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

SignalFx	Catchpoint Synthetics
We provide operational intelligence for today’s elastic architectures through monitoring specifically designed for microservices and containers with: -powerful and proactive alerting -metrics aggregation -visualization into time series data	Monitor your websites, web applications, APIs, DNS and more, from over 800 locations relying on top-tier backbone carriers, consumer ISPs, over the air cellular carriers, and cloud providers.
Beautiful streaming visualizations; Meaningful, fast alerting using SignalFlow analytics; High resolution metrics up to 1 sec; Filter & aggregate by dimesions like source, geo, customer, etc; Build custom real-time analytics pipelines; Use dynamic alert thresholds like moving averages; Get alerts in PagerDuty, VictorOps, HipChat, Slack, & more; Overlay events like alerts, pushes, CI runs, etc; Integrations with AWS services, Docker, Mesos, Kubernetes, Kafka, Cassandra, Mongo, MySQL & much more; Use OSS agents and metrics libraries like collectd, StatsD, etc; Provides OSS libraries in Java, Python, Go, Node, Ruby, etc; Provides OSS proxy to consume existing metrics; REST API;	- Monitor Website, Transaction, Mobile, HTML Code, DNS, API, Ping, SMTP, Traceroute, Websocket, FTP, TCP, UDP, Streaming, SSH, NTP, IMAP - Monitor with real Chrome 66 and IE 11 Browsers - Receive alerts via email, sms, or through webhook integrations - Gain Comprehensive End-User Experience Visibility: Monitor everything from development to production that can affect your end-user experience. - Manage the performance of all external providers, from CDNs to tags, and understand their individual impact on your service delivery. - Detect network instability in real time to correlate the issue to specific events such as ISP health or DDoS attacks to optimize performance across the entire delivery chain. - Set advanced alerts with dynamic thresholds such as trend shifts and baseline deviations. - Capture detailed data, including server and system visibility, to immediately identify the failing component. - Get troubleshooting guidance from extended debugging information with every alert and issue. - Explore raw data and slice and dice on any dimension to uncover performance trends that are hidden in aggregated data. - Leverage robust, pre-built visualizations or bring your own to Catchpoint. - Create and view customizable dashboards and reports in real time and share them for seamless communication.
Statistics
Stacks 53	Stacks 5
Followers 110	Followers 6
Votes 22	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 5 High cardinality 5 Scalability 4 World class customer support 4 Easy to install 4 Fastest alerts	No community feedback yet
Integrations
Golang Redis VictorOps AWS OpsWorks Amazon Route 53 Kafka Python New Relic Chef PagerDuty	AppDynamics Grafana Elasticsearch PagerDuty Akamai Ansible Datadog Terraform Slack Sumo Logic

What are some alternatives to SignalFx, Catchpoint Synthetics?

New Relic

The world’s best software and DevOps teams rely on New Relic to move faster, make better decisions and create best-in-class digital experiences. If you run software, you need to run New Relic. More than 50% of the Fortune 100 do too.

Datadog

Datadog is the leading service for cloud-scale monitoring. It is used by IT, operations, and development teams who build and operate applications that run on dynamic or hybrid cloud infrastructure. Start monitoring in minutes with Datadog!

Raygun

Raygun gives you a window into how users are really experiencing your software applications. Detect, diagnose and resolve issues that are affecting end users with greater speed and accuracy.

AppSignal

AppSignal gives you and your team alerts and detailed metrics about your Ruby, Node.js or Elixir application. Sensible pricing, no aggressive sales & support by developers.

AppDynamics

AppDynamics develops application performance management (APM) solutions that deliver problem resolution for highly distributed applications through transaction flow monitoring and deep diagnostics.

Stackify

Stackify offers the only developers-friendly innovative cloud based solution that fully integrates application performance management (APM) with error and log. Allowing them to easily monitor, detect and resolve application issues faster

Skylight

Skylight is a smart profiler for your Rails apps that visualizes request performance across all of your servers.

Librato

Librato provides a complete solution for monitoring and understanding the metrics that impact your business at all levels of the stack. We provide everything you need to visualize, analyze, and actively alert on the metrics that matter to you.

Keymetrics

PM2 is a production process manager for Node.js applications with a built-in load balancer. It allows you to keep applications alive forever, to reload them without downtime and to facilitate common system admin tasks.

Dynatrace

It is an AI-powered, full stack, automated performance management solution. It provides user experience analysis that identifies and resolves application performance issues faster than ever before.

Related Comparisons

Catchpoint Synthetics vs SignalFx: What are the differences?

Monitoring Scope: Catchpoint Synthetics primarily focuses on monitoring the end-user experience by running synthetic transactions from multiple locations globally, providing insights into performance from various regions. In contrast, SignalFx specializes in real-time monitoring of infrastructure and applications, offering deep insights into system metrics and data.
Alerting Capabilities: Catchpoint Synthetics offers robust alerting capabilities that are tailored to specific performance thresholds and conditions, allowing users to receive instant notifications when issues arise. On the other hand, SignalFx provides flexible and customizable alerting options based on predefined conditions, enabling users to set up alerts for specific metrics and anomalies.
Data Visualization: Catchpoint Synthetics emphasizes visualizing data in a user-friendly dashboard format, enabling users to track performance trends and analyze data easily. In comparison, SignalFx excels in advanced data visualization techniques, such as heat maps and predictive analytics, providing users with deeper insights into complex performance patterns.
Integration Capabilities: Catchpoint Synthetics offers seamless integration with various third-party tools and platforms, allowing users to streamline their monitoring processes and data sharing. In contrast, SignalFx provides robust integration options with popular cloud services and container platforms, enabling users to monitor a wide range of environments effortlessly.
Customization Options: Catchpoint Synthetics provides extensive customization options for creating tailored monitoring scenarios and reports based on specific business requirements, offering a high degree of flexibility. Conversely, SignalFx offers customization features focused on configuring dashboards and visualizations to match users' preferences and monitoring needs.
Scalability and Performance: Catchpoint Synthetics is designed for high scalability and performance, allowing users to monitor a large number of endpoints and transactions efficiently. SignalFx, on the other hand, offers advanced scalability features that cater to the monitoring needs of complex and dynamic environments, ensuring consistent performance across diverse systems.

In Summary, understanding the key differences between Catchpoint Synthetics and SignalFx can help businesses choose the right monitoring tool based on their specific requirements and objectives.

Catchpoint Synthetics vs SignalFx

Overview