CircleCI vs Code Climate

Overview

CircleCI

Stacks14.5K

Followers7.1K

Votes974

Code Climate

Stacks740

Followers497

Votes285

CircleCI vs Code Climate: What are the differences?

## Key Differences between CircleCI and Code Climate

CircleCI and Code Climate are two popular tools in the DevOps and software development landscape. Below are the key differences between the two platforms:

1. **Primary Functionality**: CircleCI is primarily a continuous integration and deployment platform that automates the build, test, and deployment processes. On the other hand, Code Climate focuses on providing automated code review and static analysis tools to help improve code quality and maintainability.

2. **Integration Capabilities**: CircleCI integrates seamlessly with various version control systems like GitHub and Bitbucket, as well as with multiple third-party tools for notifications and deployment. Code Climate, on the other hand, integrates with version control systems to analyze code quality and provide actionable insights to developers.

3. **Focus on Code Quality**: Code Climate emphasizes identifying issues such as duplication, complexity, and style violations in the codebase to maintain high code quality standards. CircleCI focuses more on automating the testing and deployment processes to ensure efficient software delivery.

4. **Pricing Model**: While both platforms offer free tiers for individual developers and small teams, CircleCI's pricing is based on the number of containers and parallelism required for builds. In contrast, Code Climate's pricing is based on the number of repositories and users, with additional features available as add-ons.

5. **Community Support**: CircleCI has a vibrant community of users and contributors who actively share tips, best practices, and solutions. Code Climate also has a community forum, but it is more focused on discussing code quality issues and tools rather than broader DevOps topics.

6. **Customization Options**: CircleCI allows users to customize their workflows, define specific build and deployment steps, and use Docker containers for build environments. Code Climate, while customizable to some extent, is more focused on providing predefined code quality checks and analysis tools out of the box.

In Summary, the key differences between CircleCI and Code Climate lie in their primary functionality, integration capabilities, focus on code quality, pricing models, community support, and customization options.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on CircleCI, Code Climate

Dustin

Senior Developer at Elegant Themes

Apr 18, 2019

Reviewon

CircleCI

We use CircleCI because of the better value it provides in its plans. I'm sure we could have used Travis just as easily but we found CircleCI's pricing to be more reasonable. In the two years since we signed up, the service has improved. CircleCI is always innovating and iterating on their platform. We have been very satisfied.

607k views607k

Comments

Somnath

Engineering Leader at Altimetrik Corp.

Jun 25, 2020

Needs adviceon

CircleCI

Drone.io

GitHub Actions

I am in the process of evaluating CircleCI, Drone.io, and GitHub Actions to cover my #CI/ #CD needs. I would appreciate your advice on comparative study w.r.t. attributes like language-Inclusive support, code-base integration, performance, cost, maintenance, support, ease of use, ability to deal with big projects, etc. based on actual industry experience.

Thanks in advance!

1.82M views1.82M

Comments

Felipe

May 24, 2020

Needs advice

My website is brand new and one of the few requirements of testings I had to implement was code coverage. Never though it was so hard to implement using a #docker container.
Given my lack of experience, every attempt I tried on making a simple code coverage test using the 4 combinations of #TravisCI, #CircleCi with #Coveralls, #Codecov I failed. The main problem was I was generating the .coverage file within the docker container and couldn't access it with #TravisCi or #CircleCi, every attempt to solve this problem seems to be very hacky and this was not the kind of complexity I want to introduce to my newborn website.
This problem was solved using a specific action for #GitHubActions, it was a 3 line solution I had to put in my github workflow file and I was able to access the .coverage file from my docker container and get the coverage report with #Codecov.

198k views198k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

CircleCI	Code Climate
Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.	After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.
Language-Inclusive Support;Custom Environments;Flexible Resource Allocation;SSH Or Local Builds For Easy Debugging;Improved Caching;Unmatched Security;Parallelism;Insights	Automated Git Updates- Nothing to install. Code Climate runs everytime you push a new commit.;Activity Feeds- Up-to-the-minute information so you can see when and how code changes.;Instant Notifications- Major security and quality changes pushed to where you work: email, Campfire, HipChat, and RSS feeds.;Team Sharing- Instant access for your whole team to maximize code visibility across projects.;Hotspots- A hit list for refactoring. Target your messiest areas one-by-one.;Duplication Detection- Fuzzy matching algorithm finds DRY-violations that human reviewers might miss.;Email Notification- Instant email notifications to let you know when new security and code issues arise;Security Dashboard- Organized listing of your app's vulnerabilities, including when they were first introduced and how to address them.;Alerts for New Rails Disclosures- Going beyond Gemfile analysis to let you know whether you're at high risk based on how your specific code uses a vulnerable library.;Start Fixing with One Click- Full integration with Pivotal Tracker, GitHub Issues, and Lighthouse lets you open tickets instantly.;GitHub Integration- Post-receive hooks for instant updates and GitHub drilldown links throughout.;Test Coverage Integration- Surfacing coverage information at the repo, class, and source listing level.;Private, Safe, and Secure- All data is private by default. SSL encryption everywhere.
Statistics
Stacks 14.5K	Stacks 740
Followers 7.1K	Followers 497
Votes 974	Votes 285
Pros & Cons
Pros 226 Github integration 177 Easy setup 153 Fast builds 94 Competitively priced 74 Slack integration Cons 12 Unstable 6 Scammy pricing structure 0 Aggressive Github permissions	Pros 71 Auto sync with Github 49 Simple grade system that motivates to keep code clean 45 Better coding 30 Free for open source 21 Hotspots for quick refactoring candidates Cons 2 Learning curve, static analysis comparable to eslint 1 Complains about small stylistic decisions
Integrations
dotCloud GitHub Xcode Azure Container Service Slack Heroku JavaScript Node.js Python Amazon EC2	GitHub HipChat Campfire Semaphore

What are some alternatives to CircleCI, Code Climate?

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

GoCD

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

Shippable

Shippable is a SaaS platform that lets you easily add Continuous Integration/Deployment to your Github and BitBucket repositories. It is lightweight, super simple to setup, and runs your builds and tests faster than any other service.

Related Comparisons

CircleCI vs Code Climate: What are the differences?

## Key Differences between CircleCI and Code Climate

CircleCI and Code Climate are two popular tools in the DevOps and software development landscape. Below are the key differences between the two platforms:

1. **Primary Functionality**: CircleCI is primarily a continuous integration and deployment platform that automates the build, test, and deployment processes. On the other hand, Code Climate focuses on providing automated code review and static analysis tools to help improve code quality and maintainability.

2. **Integration Capabilities**: CircleCI integrates seamlessly with various version control systems like GitHub and Bitbucket, as well as with multiple third-party tools for notifications and deployment. Code Climate, on the other hand, integrates with version control systems to analyze code quality and provide actionable insights to developers.

3. **Focus on Code Quality**: Code Climate emphasizes identifying issues such as duplication, complexity, and style violations in the codebase to maintain high code quality standards. CircleCI focuses more on automating the testing and deployment processes to ensure efficient software delivery.

4. **Pricing Model**: While both platforms offer free tiers for individual developers and small teams, CircleCI's pricing is based on the number of containers and parallelism required for builds. In contrast, Code Climate's pricing is based on the number of repositories and users, with additional features available as add-ons.

5. **Community Support**: CircleCI has a vibrant community of users and contributors who actively share tips, best practices, and solutions. Code Climate also has a community forum, but it is more focused on discussing code quality issues and tools rather than broader DevOps topics.

6. **Customization Options**: CircleCI allows users to customize their workflows, define specific build and deployment steps, and use Docker containers for build environments. Code Climate, while customizable to some extent, is more focused on providing predefined code quality checks and analysis tools out of the box.

CircleCI vs Code Climate

Overview