CircleCI vs GitHub

Overview

GitHub

Stacks295.6K

Followers259.0K

Votes10.4K

CircleCI

Stacks14.5K

Followers7.1K

Votes974

CircleCI vs GitHub: What are the differences?

Integration: One key difference between CircleCI and GitHub Actions is the level of integration with the respective platforms. CircleCI is a standalone continuous integration and deployment platform that can be used with GitHub or other version control systems, while GitHub Actions is tightly integrated with the GitHub platform, allowing for seamless automation of workflows directly in the repository.
Pricing: Another major difference is the pricing structure. CircleCI offers various pricing tiers based on usage, number of containers, and parallelism, while GitHub Actions provides a certain number of free minutes per month for public repositories and charges for additional minutes or for using Actions in private repositories.
Extensions: GitHub Actions offers a wide range of pre-built actions and workflows available in the GitHub Marketplace for easy integration into projects, while CircleCI has a smaller selection and may require more custom configuration.
Community Support: GitHub Actions benefits from GitHub's large user base and community support, making it easier to find resources, tutorials, and assistance, whereas CircleCI has a dedicated user base but may have fewer community-generated resources.
Workflow Configuration: CircleCI uses YAML configuration files for defining workflows, jobs, and steps, with a focus on simplicity and ease of use, while GitHub Actions also uses YAML but provides a visual editor within the GitHub interface for easier workflow creation.
Versatility: CircleCI has been around longer and supports a wide range of platforms and integrations, making it a more versatile option for complex CI/CD pipelines, whereas GitHub Actions is continuously evolving and improving, offering more features tailored to GitHub users and projects.

In Summary, CircleCI and GitHub Actions differ in integration, pricing, extensions, community support, workflow configuration, and versatility.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on GitHub, CircleCI

Anonymous

May 25, 2020

Decided

Gitlab as A LOT of features that GitHub and Azure DevOps are missing. Even if both GH and Azure are backed by Microsoft, GitLab being open source has a faster upgrade rate and the hosted by gitlab.com solution seems more appealing than anything else! Quick win: the UI is way better and the Pipeline is way easier to setup on GitLab!

624k views624k

Comments

Somnath

Engineering Leader at Altimetrik Corp.

Jun 25, 2020

Needs adviceon

CircleCI

Drone.io

GitHub Actions

I am in the process of evaluating CircleCI, Drone.io, and GitHub Actions to cover my #CI/ #CD needs. I would appreciate your advice on comparative study w.r.t. attributes like language-Inclusive support, code-base integration, performance, cost, maintenance, support, ease of use, ability to deal with big projects, etc. based on actual industry experience.

Thanks in advance!

1.82M views1.82M

Comments

tutulbuet

May 6, 2020

Needs adviceon

Java

GitHub

JFrog Artifactory

Whenever Qualys scan finds out software vulnerability, say for example Java SDK or any software version that has a potential vulnerability, we search the web to find out the solution and usually install a later version or patch downloading from the web. The problem is, as we are downloading it from web and there are a number of servers where we patch and as an ultimate outcome different people downloads different version and so forth. So I want to create a repository for such binaries so that we use the same patch for all servers.

When I was thinking about the repo, obviously first thought came as GitHub.. But then I realized, it is for code version control and collaboration, not for the packaged software. The other option I am thinking is JFrog Artifactory which stores the binaries and the package software.

What is your recommendation?

258k views258k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

GitHub	CircleCI
GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.	Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.
Command instructions; Source browser; Git powered wikis; Integrated issue tracking; Code reviews with inline comments; Compare view; Newsfeed; Followers; Developer profiles; Autocompletion for @username mentions	Language-Inclusive Support;Custom Environments;Flexible Resource Allocation;SSH Or Local Builds For Easy Debugging;Improved Caching;Unmatched Security;Parallelism;Insights
Statistics
Stacks 295.6K	Stacks 14.5K
Followers 259.0K	Followers 7.1K
Votes 10.4K	Votes 974
Pros & Cons
Pros 1773 Open source friendly 1463 Easy source control 1254 Nice UI 1137 Great for team collaboration 868 Easy setup Cons 56 Owned by micrcosoft 38 Expensive for lone developers that want private repos 15 Relatively slow product/feature release cadence 10 API scoping could be better 9 Only 3 collaborators for private repos	Pros 226 Github integration 177 Easy setup 153 Fast builds 94 Competitively priced 74 Slack integration Cons 12 Unstable 6 Scammy pricing structure 0 Aggressive Github permissions
Integrations
Grove Lighthouse Airbrake Codeship Bugsnag BugHerd Visual Studio Code HipChat CopperEgg Nitrous.IO	dotCloud Xcode Azure Container Service Slack Heroku JavaScript Node.js Python Amazon EC2 HipChat

What are some alternatives to GitHub, CircleCI?

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

GitLab

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

GoCD

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.

Related Comparisons

CircleCI vs GitHub: What are the differences?

Integration: One key difference between CircleCI and GitHub Actions is the level of integration with the respective platforms. CircleCI is a standalone continuous integration and deployment platform that can be used with GitHub or other version control systems, while GitHub Actions is tightly integrated with the GitHub platform, allowing for seamless automation of workflows directly in the repository.
Pricing: Another major difference is the pricing structure. CircleCI offers various pricing tiers based on usage, number of containers, and parallelism, while GitHub Actions provides a certain number of free minutes per month for public repositories and charges for additional minutes or for using Actions in private repositories.
Extensions: GitHub Actions offers a wide range of pre-built actions and workflows available in the GitHub Marketplace for easy integration into projects, while CircleCI has a smaller selection and may require more custom configuration.
Community Support: GitHub Actions benefits from GitHub's large user base and community support, making it easier to find resources, tutorials, and assistance, whereas CircleCI has a dedicated user base but may have fewer community-generated resources.
Workflow Configuration: CircleCI uses YAML configuration files for defining workflows, jobs, and steps, with a focus on simplicity and ease of use, while GitHub Actions also uses YAML but provides a visual editor within the GitHub interface for easier workflow creation.
Versatility: CircleCI has been around longer and supports a wide range of platforms and integrations, making it a more versatile option for complex CI/CD pipelines, whereas GitHub Actions is continuously evolving and improving, offering more features tailored to GitHub users and projects.

In Summary, CircleCI and GitHub Actions differ in integration, pricing, extensions, community support, workflow configuration, and versatility.

CircleCI vs GitHub

Overview