Home
Application and Data
Application Hosting
Platform as a Service

Cloud Foundry vs Firebase

Get Advice Icon

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Cloud Foundry
189
345
+ 1
5
Firebase
41.5K
35.5K
+ 1
2K
Add tool

Cloud Foundry vs Firebase: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Cloud Foundry and Firebase are two popular platforms used for developing and deploying applications. While both offer benefits for developers, they have key differences that make each suitable for different use cases.

  1. Database Support: Cloud Foundry is platform agnostic and supports various databases, allowing developers to choose the database that best fits their needs. On the other hand, Firebase is tightly integrated with Google's Cloud Firestore, providing real-time syncing and offline support out of the box.

  2. Scalability: Cloud Foundry offers horizontal scalability, allowing applications to handle increased load by adding more resources. Firebase, on the other hand, scales automatically based on demand without the need for manual intervention.

  3. Pricing Model: Cloud Foundry typically charges based on resource consumption, such as memory and CPU usage. Firebase, however, offers a pay-as-you-go model where users only pay for what they use, making it more cost-effective for smaller projects.

  4. Authentication: Firebase provides built-in authentication services using email/password, social login, and anonymous authentication methods. In contrast, Cloud Foundry relies on external identity providers for authentication services.

  5. Vendor Lock-in: Cloud Foundry is an open-source platform that can be deployed on multiple cloud providers, reducing the risk of vendor lock-in. Firebase, on the other hand, is tightly integrated with Google Cloud Platform, which may limit flexibility in choosing a different cloud provider.

  6. Real-time Capabilities: Firebase provides real-time data synchronization through its Cloud Firestore database, making it ideal for applications that require live updates and instant messaging features. While Cloud Foundry can support real-time applications, developers may need to implement additional tools for real-time functionality.

In Summary, Cloud Foundry and Firebase differ in database support, scalability, pricing model, authentication methods, vendor lock-in, and real-time capabilities, making each platform suitable for different types of applications.

Advice on Cloud Foundry and Firebase
Noam Shemesh
| 9 upvotes · 1.1M views
Needs advice
on
ApolloApolloFirebaseFirebase
and
Socket.IOSocket.IO

We are starting to work on a web-based platform aiming to connect artists (clients) and professional freelancers (service providers). In-app, timeline-based, real-time communication between users (& storing it), file transfers, and push notifications are essential core features. We are considering using Node.js, ExpressJS, React, MongoDB stack with Socket.IO & Apollo, or maybe using Real-Time Database and functionalities of Firebase.

See more
Replies (3)
Timothy Malstead
Junior Full Stack Developer at Freelance · | 7 upvotes · 496.2K views
Recommends
on
FirebaseFirebase

I would recommend looking hard into Firebase for this project, especially if you do not have dedicated full-stack or backend members on your team.

The real time database, as you mentioned, is a great option, but I would also look into Firestore. Similar to RTDB, it adds more functions and some cool methods as well. Also, another great thing about Firebase is you have easy access to storage and dead simple auth as well.

Node.js Express MongoDB Socket.IO and Apollo are great technologies as well, and may be the better option if you do not wish to cede as much control to third parties in your application.

Overall, I say if you wish to focus more time developing your React application instead of other parts of your stack, Firebase is a great way to do that.

See more
Ramiro Nuñez Dosio
| 4 upvotes · 382.4K views
Recommends
on
AblyAbly

Hello Noam 👋,

I suggest taking a look at Ably, it has all the realtime features you need and the platform is designed to guarantee critical functionality at scale.

Here is an in depth comparison between Ably and Firebase

See more
Ilya Lazarev
PM · | 2 upvotes · 489K views
Recommends
on
8base8base

Hey Noam,

I would recommend you to take a look into 8base. It has features you've requested, also relation database and GraphQL API which will help you to develop rapidly.

Thanks, Ilya

See more
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More
Pros of Cloud Foundry
Pros of Firebase
  • 2
    Perfectly aligned with springboot
  • 1
    Free distributed tracing (zipkin)
  • 1
    Application health management
  • 1
    Free service discovery (Eureka)
  • 371
    Realtime backend made easy
  • 270
    Fast and responsive
  • 242
    Easy setup
  • 215
    Real-time
  • 191
    JSON
  • 134
    Free
  • 128
    Backed by google
  • 83
    Angular adaptor
  • 68
    Reliable
  • 36
    Great customer support
  • 32
    Great documentation
  • 25
    Real-time synchronization
  • 21
    Mobile friendly
  • 19
    Rapid prototyping
  • 14
    Great security
  • 12
    Automatic scaling
  • 11
    Freakingly awesome
  • 8
    Super fast development
  • 8
    Angularfire is an amazing addition!
  • 8
    Chat
  • 6
    Firebase hosting
  • 6
    Built in user auth/oauth
  • 6
    Awesome next-gen backend
  • 6
    Ios adaptor
  • 4
    Speed of light
  • 4
    Very easy to use
  • 3
    Great
  • 3
    It's made development super fast
  • 3
    Brilliant for startups
  • 2
    Free hosting
  • 2
    Cloud functions
  • 2
    JS Offline and Sync suport
  • 2
    Low battery consumption
  • 2
    .net
  • 2
    The concurrent updates create a great experience
  • 2
    Push notification
  • 2
    I can quickly create static web apps with no backend
  • 2
    Great all-round functionality
  • 2
    Free authentication solution
  • 1
    Easy Reactjs integration
  • 1
    Google's support
  • 1
    Free SSL
  • 1
    CDN & cache out of the box
  • 1
    Easy to use
  • 1
    Large
  • 1
    Faster workflow
  • 1
    Serverless
  • 1
    Good Free Limits
  • 1
    Simple and easy

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Cloud Foundry
Cons of Firebase
    Be the first to leave a con
    • 31
      Can become expensive
    • 16
      No open source, you depend on external company
    • 15
      Scalability is not infinite
    • 9
      Not Flexible Enough
    • 7
      Cant filter queries
    • 3
      Very unstable server
    • 3
      No Relational Data
    • 2
      Too many errors
    • 2
      No offline sync

    Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

    What is Cloud Foundry?

    Cloud Foundry is an open platform as a service (PaaS) that provides a choice of clouds, developer frameworks, and application services. Cloud Foundry makes it faster and easier to build, test, deploy, and scale applications.

    What is Firebase?

    Firebase is a cloud service designed to power real-time, collaborative applications. Simply add the Firebase library to your application to gain access to a shared data structure; any changes you make to that data are automatically synchronized with the Firebase cloud and with other clients within milliseconds.

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    What companies use Cloud Foundry?
    What companies use Firebase?
    Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
    Learn More

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with Cloud Foundry?
    What tools integrate with Firebase?

    Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

    What are some alternatives to Cloud Foundry and Firebase?
    Red Hat OpenShift
    OpenShift is Red Hat's Cloud Computing Platform as a Service (PaaS) offering. OpenShift is an application platform in the cloud where application developers and teams can build, test, deploy, and run their applications.
    Docker
    The Docker Platform is the industry-leading container platform for continuous, high-velocity innovation, enabling organizations to seamlessly build and share any application — from legacy to what comes next — and securely run them anywhere
    Kubernetes
    Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.
    OpenStack
    OpenStack is a cloud operating system that controls large pools of compute, storage, and networking resources throughout a datacenter, all managed through a dashboard that gives administrators control while empowering their users to provision resources through a web interface.
    Terraform
    With Terraform, you describe your complete infrastructure as code, even as it spans multiple service providers. Your servers may come from AWS, your DNS may come from CloudFlare, and your database may come from Heroku. Terraform will build all these resources across all these providers in parallel.
    See all alternatives

    Related Comparisons

    Cloud Foundry vs Heroku vs Red Hat OpenShiftFirebase vs SignalRAmazon EC2 vs Firebase vs HerokuFirebase vs Socket.IO vs deepstream.ioFirebase vs PubNub vs Socket.IO

    Trending Comparisons

    Django vs Laravel vs Node.jsBootstrap vs Foundation vs Material-UINode.js vs Spring BootFlyway vs LiquibaseAWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

    Top Comparisons

    HipChat vs Mattermost vs SlackBitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLabBootstrap vs MaterializePostman vs Swagger UI