CloudCheckr vs Datadog

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

CloudCheckr

14
33
+ 1
6
Datadog

5.8K
5K
+ 1
790
Add tool

CloudCheckr vs Datadog: What are the differences?

CloudCheckr: Analyze your AWS deployment to track resources, control costs, maintain security, and predict future needs. CloudCheckr provides otherwise unavailable visibility and analytics to remove the complexity from AWS usage. Our users quickly and efficiently gain control of their deployment, reduce costs, and optimize infrastructure performance; Datadog: Unify logs, metrics, and traces from across your distributed infrastructure. Datadog is the leading service for cloud-scale monitoring. It is used by IT, operations, and development teams who build and operate applications that run on dynamic or hybrid cloud infrastructure. Start monitoring in minutes with Datadog!.

CloudCheckr and Datadog are primarily classified as "Cloud Monitoring" and "Performance Monitoring" tools respectively.

Some of the features offered by CloudCheckr are:

  • Resource Control
  • Cost Optimization
  • Best Practices

On the other hand, Datadog provides the following key features:

  • 14-day Free Trial for an unlimited number of hosts
  • 200+ turn-key integrations for data aggregation
  • Clean graphs of StatsD and other integrations
Advice on CloudCheckr and Datadog
Farzeem Diamond Jiwani
Software Engineer at IVP · | 5 upvotes · 590.9K views
Needs advice
on
Dynatrace
Datadog
and
AppDynamics

Hey there! We are looking at Datadog, Dynatrace, AppDynamics, and New Relic as options for our web application monitoring.

Current Environment: .NET Core Web app hosted on Microsoft IIS

Future Environment: Web app will be hosted on Microsoft Azure

Tech Stacks: IIS, RabbitMQ, Redis, Microsoft SQL Server

Requirement: Infra Monitoring, APM, Real - User Monitoring (User activity monitoring i.e., time spent on a page, most active page, etc.), Service Tracing, Root Cause Analysis, and Centralized Log Management.

Please advise on the above. Thanks!

See more
Needs advice
on
Sysdig
New Relic
and
Datadog

We are looking for a centralised monitoring solution for our application deployed on Amazon EKS. We would like to monitor using metrics from Kubernetes, AWS services (NeptuneDB, AWS Elastic Load Balancing (ELB), Amazon EBS, Amazon S3, etc) and application microservice's custom metrics.

We are expected to use around 80 microservices (not replicas). I think a total of 200-250 microservices will be there in the system with 10-12 slave nodes.

We tried Prometheus but it looks like maintenance is a big issue. We need to manage scaling, maintaining the storage, and dealing with multiple exporters and Grafana. I felt this itself needs few dedicated resources (at least 2-3 people) to manage. Not sure if I am thinking in the correct direction. Please confirm.

You mentioned Datadog and Sysdig charges per host. Does it charge per slave node?

See more
Replies (3)
Recommends
Datadog

Can't say anything to Sysdig. I clearly prefer Datadog as

  • they provide plenty of easy to "switch-on" plugins for various technologies (incl. most of AWS)
  • easy to code (python) agent plugins / api for own metrics
  • brillant dashboarding / alarms with many customization options
  • pricing is OK, there are cheaper options for specific use cases but if you want superior dashboarding / alarms I haven't seen a good competitor (despite your own Prometheus / Grafana / Kibana dog food)

IMHO NewRelic is "promising since years" ;) good ideas but bad integration between their products. Their Dashboard query language is really nice but lacks critical functions like multiple data sets or advanced calculations. Needless to say you get all of that with Datadog.

Need help setting up a monitoring / logging / alarm infrastructure? Send me a message!

See more
Maik Schröder
Recommends
Instana

Hi Medeti,

you are right. Building based on your stack something with open source is heavy lifting. A lot of people I know start with such a set-up, but quickly run into frustration as they need to dedicated their best people to build a monitoring which is doing the job in a professional way.

As you are microservice focussed and are looking for 'low implementation and maintenance effort', you might want to have a look at INSTANA, which was built with modern tool stacks in mind. https://www.instana.com/apm-for-microservices/

We have a public sand-box available if you just want to have a look at the product once and of course also a free-trial: https://www.instana.com/getting-started-with-apm/

Let me know if you need anything on top.

See more

I have hands on production experience both with New Relic and Datadog. I personally prefer Datadog over NewRelic because of the UI, the Documentation and the overall user/developer experience.

NewRelic however, can do basically the same things as Datadog can, and some of the features like alerting have been present in NewRelic for longer than in Datadog. The cool thing about NewRelic is their last-summer-updated pricing: you no longer pay per host but after data you send towards New Relic. This can be a huge cost saver depending on your particular setup

https://docs.newrelic.com/docs/accounts/accounts-billing/new-relic-one-pricing-billing/new-relic-one-pricing-billing

I'd go for Datadog, but given you have lots of containers I would also make a cost calculation. If the price difference is significant and there's a budget constraint NewRelic might be the better choice.

See more
Decisions about CloudCheckr and Datadog
Kamil Kowalski
Lead Architect at Fresha · | 3 upvotes · 45.3K views

Coming from a Ruby background, we've been users of New Relic for quite some time. When we adopted Elixir, the New Relic integration was young and missing essential features, so we gave AppSignal a try. It worked for quite some time, we even implemented a :telemetry reporter for AppSignal . But it was difficult to correlate data in two monitoring solutions, New Relic was undergoing a UI overhaul which made it difficult to use, and AppSignal was missing the flexibility we needed. We had some fans of Datadog, so we gave it a try and it worked out perfectly. Datadog works great with Ruby , Elixir , JavaScript , and has powerful features our engineers love to use (notebooks, dashboards, very flexible alerting). Cherry on top - thanks to the Datadog Terraform provider everything is written as code, allowing us to collaborate on our Datadog setup.

See more
Attila Fulop
Team Leader at Artkonekt · | 3 upvotes · 175.1K views

I haven't heard much about Datadog until about a year ago. Ironically, the NewRelic sales person who I had a series of trainings with was trash talking about Datadog a lot. That drew my attention to Datadog and I gave it a try at another client project where we needed log handling, dashboards and alerting.

In 2019, Datadog was already offering log management and from that perspective, it was ahead of NewRelic. Other than that, from my perspective, the two tools are offering a very-very similar set of tools. Therefore I wouldn't say there's a significant difference between the two, the decision is likely a matter of taste. The pricing is also very similar.

The reasons why we chose Datadog over NewRelic were:

  • The presence of log handling feature (since then, logging is GA at NewRelic as well since falls 2019).
  • The setup was easier even though I already had experience with NewRelic, including participation in NewRelic trainings.
  • The UI of Datadog is more compact and my experience is smoother.
  • The NewRelic UI is very fragmented and New Relic One is just increasing this experience for me.
  • The log feature of Datadog is very well designed, I find very useful the tagging logs with services. The log filtering is also very awesome.

Bottom line is that both tools are great and it makes sense to discover both and making the decision based on your use case. In our case, Datadog was the clear winner due to its UI, ease of setup and the awesome logging and alerting features.

See more
Benoit Larroque
Principal Engineer at Sqreen · | 3 upvotes · 161.6K views

I chose Datadog APM because the much better APM insights it provides (flamegraph, percentiles by default).

The drawbacks of this decision are we had to move our production monitoring to TimescaleDB + Telegraf instead of NR Insight

NewRelic is definitely easier when starting out. Agent is only a lib and doesn't require a daemon

See more
Get Advice from developers at your company using Private StackShare. Sign up for Private StackShare.
Learn More
Pros of CloudCheckr
Pros of Datadog
  • 2
    Powerful S3 reports
  • 1
    Easy setup
  • 1
    CloudTrail integration
  • 1
    Powerful Reserved Instances reports
  • 1
    Cost Tracking
  • 133
    Monitoring for many apps (databases, web servers, etc)
  • 104
    Easy setup
  • 84
    Powerful ui
  • 81
    Powerful integrations
  • 67
    Great value
  • 52
    Great visualization
  • 43
    Events + metrics = clarity
  • 40
    Custom metrics
  • 39
    Notifications
  • 37
    Flexibility
  • 17
    Free & paid plans
  • 14
    Great customer support
  • 13
    Makes my life easier
  • 8
    Easy setup and plugins
  • 8
    Adapts automatically as i scale up
  • 6
    Super easy and powerful
  • 5
    In-context collaboration
  • 5
    AWS support
  • 4
    Rich in features
  • 3
    Docker support
  • 3
    Best than others
  • 3
    Cost
  • 2
    Cute logo
  • 2
    Good for Startups
  • 2
    Free setup
  • 2
    Monitor almost everything
  • 2
    Automation tools
  • 2
    Source control and bug tracking
  • 2
    Simple, powerful, great for infra
  • 2
    Full visibility of applications
  • 2
    Expensive
  • 2
    Easy to Analyze
  • 1
    Best in the field

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of CloudCheckr
Cons of Datadog
    Be the first to leave a con
    • 16
      Expensive
    • 3
      No errors exception tracking
    • 1
      External Network Goes Down You Wont Be Logging
    • 1
      Complicated

    Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

    What is CloudCheckr?

    CloudCheckr provides otherwise unavailable visibility and analytics to remove the complexity from AWS usage. Our users quickly and efficiently gain control of their deployment, reduce costs, and optimize infrastructure performance.

    What is Datadog?

    Datadog is the leading service for cloud-scale monitoring. It is used by IT, operations, and development teams who build and operate applications that run on dynamic or hybrid cloud infrastructure. Start monitoring in minutes with Datadog!

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    Jobs that mention CloudCheckr and Datadog as a desired skillset
    LaunchDarkly
    London, England, United Kingdom
    What companies use CloudCheckr?
    What companies use Datadog?
    See which teams inside your own company are using CloudCheckr or Datadog.
    Sign up for Private StackShareLearn More

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with CloudCheckr?
    What tools integrate with Datadog?

    Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

    Blog Posts

    +22
    17
    13377
    +34
    29
    40501
    +26
    28
    15197
    +44
    109
    49910
    What are some alternatives to CloudCheckr and Datadog?
    Cloudability
    Cloudability aggregates expenditures into accessible and comprehensive reports, helps identify new opportunities for reducing spend and increasing cloud efficiency, offers budget alerts and recommendations via SMS and email, provides APIs for connecting cloud billing and usage data to any business or financial system, and more.
    RightScale
    Automation is the core of RightScale, freeing you to run efficient, scalable, and highly-available applications. Our multi-cloud integration enables you to choose your own clouds, providing freedom to work with any vendor in a rapidly changing market. And rest assured knowing that you have visibility and control over all of your resources in one place. To take advantage of best practices, we encourage you to tap into cloud expertise provided by our service, support, and partner networks when building and managing your infrastructure.
    Amazon CloudWatch
    It helps you gain system-wide visibility into resource utilization, application performance, and operational health. It retrieve your monitoring data, view graphs to help take automated action based on the state of your cloud environment.
    Stackdriver
    Google Stackdriver provides powerful monitoring, logging, and diagnostics. It equips you with insight into the health, performance, and availability of cloud-powered applications, enabling you to find and fix issues faster.
    DigitalOcean Monitoring
    Collect metrics for visibility, monitor Droplet performance, and receive alerts when problems arise in your infrastructure – at no additional cost.
    See all alternatives