Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Code Climate vs Coveralls: What are the differences?
Key differences between Code Climate and Coveralls
Code Climate: Code Climate is a popular static analysis platform that focuses on helping developers improve the quality of their code. It provides a wide range of features, including code review, code coverage, and code duplication analysis. Code Climate offers extensive support for different programming languages and integrations with various source code repositories, making it a versatile tool for developers to identify and address code quality issues.
Coveralls: Coveralls, on the other hand, is a code coverage analysis tool that specifically focuses on tracking how much of a codebase is covered by tests. It offers integration with popular testing libraries and continuous integration tools, making it easy for developers to monitor code coverage during the development process. Coveralls provides detailed reports on which parts of the code are covered by tests, allowing developers to identify areas that require additional testing and improve overall test coverage.
Cost: While both Code Climate and Coveralls offer free plans with limited features, the pricing models for their premium plans differ. Code Climate offers a tiered pricing model based on the organization's size and the number of repositories being analyzed. Coveralls, on the other hand, offers a flat pricing structure based solely on the number of repositories being analyzed. Depending on the size and specific needs of the organization, this difference in pricing models may influence the choice between the two tools.
Additional features: Code Climate places a strong emphasis on providing a comprehensive code review experience, offering features such as automated code style enforcement and security vulnerability scanning. Coveralls, on the other hand, primarily focuses on code coverage analysis, providing features such as test suite integration and real-time coverage tracking. The choice between Code Climate and Coveralls may depend on the specific needs of the development team and the importance placed on code review versus code coverage analysis.
Integration and compatibility: Both Code Climate and Coveralls offer integrations with popular version control systems and continuous integration tools. However, the extent of the integrations and compatibility may vary. Code Climate provides a wide range of integrations and supports a variety of programming languages, making it suitable for diverse development environments. Coveralls, while also offering integrations, may have more limited language compatibility. It is important to consider the specific needs and technologies used in the development process when choosing between the two tools.
User interface and experience: Code Climate and Coveralls have different user interfaces and experiences. Code Climate offers a visually appealing, intuitive dashboard that provides comprehensive insights into the codebase's quality. It allows developers to easily navigate through the various analysis reports and track progress over time. Coveralls, on the other hand, offers a simpler interface focused on displaying code coverage metrics and test results. The choice between the two tools may depend on the desired level of visual presentation and ease of use for the development team.
In summary, Code Climate is a versatile code analysis platform with a strong focus on code review and quality improvement, while Coveralls is a dedicated code coverage analysis tool. The choice between the two tools depends on factors such as cost, specific needs in code review or coverage analysis, integrations, and user experience preferences.
My website is brand new and one of the few requirements of testings I had to implement was code coverage. Never though it was so hard to implement using a #docker container.
Given my lack of experience, every attempt I tried on making a simple code coverage test using the 4 combinations of #TravisCI, #CircleCi with #Coveralls, #Codecov I failed. The main problem was I was generating the .coverage file within the docker container and couldn't access it with #TravisCi or #CircleCi, every attempt to solve this problem seems to be very hacky and this was not the kind of complexity I want to introduce to my newborn website.
This problem was solved using a specific action for #GitHubActions, it was a 3 line solution I had to put in my github workflow file and I was able to access the .coverage file from my docker container and get the coverage report with #Codecov.
Pros of Code Climate
- Auto sync with Github71
- Simple grade system that motivates to keep code clean49
- Better coding45
- Free for open source30
- Hotspots for quick refactoring candidates21
- Continued encouragement to a have better / cleaner code15
- Great UI13
- Makes you a better coder11
- Duplication Detection10
- Safe and Secure5
- Private2
- Extremely accurate in telling you the errors2
- GitHub only2
- Python inspection2
- Great open community2
- GitHub integration, status inline in PRs2
- Uses rubocop2
- Locally Installable API1
Pros of Coveralls
- Free for public repositories45
- Code coverage13
- Ease of integration7
- More stable than Codecov2
- Combines coverage from multiple/parallel test runs1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Code Climate
- Learning curve, static analysis comparable to eslint2
- Complains about small stylistic decisions1
Cons of Coveralls
Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions
What is Code Climate?
What is Coveralls?
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
What companies use Coveralls?
Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions
Blog Posts
+26
+44