Code Climate vs Coveralls

Overview

Code Climate

Stacks740

Followers497

Votes285

Coveralls

Stacks1.7K

Followers278

Votes68

Code Climate vs Coveralls: What are the differences?

Key differences between Code Climate and Coveralls

Code Climate: Code Climate is a popular static analysis platform that focuses on helping developers improve the quality of their code. It provides a wide range of features, including code review, code coverage, and code duplication analysis. Code Climate offers extensive support for different programming languages and integrations with various source code repositories, making it a versatile tool for developers to identify and address code quality issues.
Coveralls: Coveralls, on the other hand, is a code coverage analysis tool that specifically focuses on tracking how much of a codebase is covered by tests. It offers integration with popular testing libraries and continuous integration tools, making it easy for developers to monitor code coverage during the development process. Coveralls provides detailed reports on which parts of the code are covered by tests, allowing developers to identify areas that require additional testing and improve overall test coverage.
Cost: While both Code Climate and Coveralls offer free plans with limited features, the pricing models for their premium plans differ. Code Climate offers a tiered pricing model based on the organization's size and the number of repositories being analyzed. Coveralls, on the other hand, offers a flat pricing structure based solely on the number of repositories being analyzed. Depending on the size and specific needs of the organization, this difference in pricing models may influence the choice between the two tools.
Additional features: Code Climate places a strong emphasis on providing a comprehensive code review experience, offering features such as automated code style enforcement and security vulnerability scanning. Coveralls, on the other hand, primarily focuses on code coverage analysis, providing features such as test suite integration and real-time coverage tracking. The choice between Code Climate and Coveralls may depend on the specific needs of the development team and the importance placed on code review versus code coverage analysis.
Integration and compatibility: Both Code Climate and Coveralls offer integrations with popular version control systems and continuous integration tools. However, the extent of the integrations and compatibility may vary. Code Climate provides a wide range of integrations and supports a variety of programming languages, making it suitable for diverse development environments. Coveralls, while also offering integrations, may have more limited language compatibility. It is important to consider the specific needs and technologies used in the development process when choosing between the two tools.
User interface and experience: Code Climate and Coveralls have different user interfaces and experiences. Code Climate offers a visually appealing, intuitive dashboard that provides comprehensive insights into the codebase's quality. It allows developers to easily navigate through the various analysis reports and track progress over time. Coveralls, on the other hand, offers a simpler interface focused on displaying code coverage metrics and test results. The choice between the two tools may depend on the desired level of visual presentation and ease of use for the development team.

In summary, Code Climate is a versatile code analysis platform with a strong focus on code review and quality improvement, while Coveralls is a dedicated code coverage analysis tool. The choice between the two tools depends on factors such as cost, specific needs in code review or coverage analysis, integrations, and user experience preferences.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Code Climate, Coveralls

Felipe

May 24, 2020

Needs advice

My website is brand new and one of the few requirements of testings I had to implement was code coverage. Never though it was so hard to implement using a #docker container.
Given my lack of experience, every attempt I tried on making a simple code coverage test using the 4 combinations of #TravisCI, #CircleCi with #Coveralls, #Codecov I failed. The main problem was I was generating the .coverage file within the docker container and couldn't access it with #TravisCi or #CircleCi, every attempt to solve this problem seems to be very hacky and this was not the kind of complexity I want to introduce to my newborn website.
This problem was solved using a specific action for #GitHubActions, it was a 3 line solution I had to put in my github workflow file and I was able to access the .coverage file from my docker container and get the coverage report with #Codecov.

198k views198k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Code Climate	Coveralls
After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.	Coveralls works with your CI server and sifts through your coverage data to find issues you didn't even know you had before they become a problem. Free for open source, pro accounts for private repos, instant sign up with GitHub OAuth.
Automated Git Updates- Nothing to install. Code Climate runs everytime you push a new commit.;Activity Feeds- Up-to-the-minute information so you can see when and how code changes.;Instant Notifications- Major security and quality changes pushed to where you work: email, Campfire, HipChat, and RSS feeds.;Team Sharing- Instant access for your whole team to maximize code visibility across projects.;Hotspots- A hit list for refactoring. Target your messiest areas one-by-one.;Duplication Detection- Fuzzy matching algorithm finds DRY-violations that human reviewers might miss.;Email Notification- Instant email notifications to let you know when new security and code issues arise;Security Dashboard- Organized listing of your app's vulnerabilities, including when they were first introduced and how to address them.;Alerts for New Rails Disclosures- Going beyond Gemfile analysis to let you know whether you're at high risk based on how your specific code uses a vulnerable library.;Start Fixing with One Click- Full integration with Pivotal Tracker, GitHub Issues, and Lighthouse lets you open tickets instantly.;GitHub Integration- Post-receive hooks for instant updates and GitHub drilldown links throughout.;Test Coverage Integration- Surfacing coverage information at the repo, class, and source listing level.;Private, Safe, and Secure- All data is private by default. SSL encryption everywhere.	Repository Coverage Statistics;Individual File Coverage Reports;Line By Line Coverage;Repository Overview
Statistics
Stacks 740	Stacks 1.7K
Followers 497	Followers 278
Votes 285	Votes 68
Pros & Cons
Pros 71 Auto sync with Github 49 Simple grade system that motivates to keep code clean 45 Better coding 30 Free for open source 21 Hotspots for quick refactoring candidates Cons 2 Learning curve, static analysis comparable to eslint 1 Complains about small stylistic decisions	Pros 45 Free for public repositories 13 Code coverage 7 Ease of integration 2 More stable than Codecov 1 Combines coverage from multiple/parallel test runs
Integrations
GitHub HipChat Campfire Semaphore	Travis CI CircleCI Semaphore Jenkins Codeship

What are some alternatives to Code Climate, Coveralls?

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

Codecov

Our patrons rave about our elegant coverage reports, integrated pull request comments, interactive commit graphs, our Chrome plugin and security.

PullReview

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.

SonarQube

SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.

RuboCop

RuboCop is a Ruby static code analyzer. Out of the box it will enforce many of the guidelines outlined in the community Ruby Style Guide.

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io automatically and continuously tracks code quality with every GitHub or BitBucket commit and pull request, helping software developers save time in code reviews and efficiently tackle technical debt.

ESLint

A pluggable and configurable linter tool for identifying and reporting on patterns in JavaScript. Maintain your code quality with ease.

Amazon CodeGuru

It is a machine learning service for automated code reviews and application performance recommendations. It helps you find the most expensive lines of code that hurt application performance and keep you up all night troubleshooting, then gives you specific recommendations to fix or improve your code.

Related Comparisons

Stacks740

Followers497

Votes285

Coveralls

Stacks1.7K

Followers278

Votes68

Code Climate vs Coveralls: What are the differences?

Key differences between Code Climate and Coveralls

Code Climate: Code Climate is a popular static analysis platform that focuses on helping developers improve the quality of their code. It provides a wide range of features, including code review, code coverage, and code duplication analysis. Code Climate offers extensive support for different programming languages and integrations with various source code repositories, making it a versatile tool for developers to identify and address code quality issues.
Coveralls: Coveralls, on the other hand, is a code coverage analysis tool that specifically focuses on tracking how much of a codebase is covered by tests. It offers integration with popular testing libraries and continuous integration tools, making it easy for developers to monitor code coverage during the development process. Coveralls provides detailed reports on which parts of the code are covered by tests, allowing developers to identify areas that require additional testing and improve overall test coverage.
Cost: While both Code Climate and Coveralls offer free plans with limited features, the pricing models for their premium plans differ. Code Climate offers a tiered pricing model based on the organization's size and the number of repositories being analyzed. Coveralls, on the other hand, offers a flat pricing structure based solely on the number of repositories being analyzed. Depending on the size and specific needs of the organization, this difference in pricing models may influence the choice between the two tools.
Additional features: Code Climate places a strong emphasis on providing a comprehensive code review experience, offering features such as automated code style enforcement and security vulnerability scanning. Coveralls, on the other hand, primarily focuses on code coverage analysis, providing features such as test suite integration and real-time coverage tracking. The choice between Code Climate and Coveralls may depend on the specific needs of the development team and the importance placed on code review versus code coverage analysis.
Integration and compatibility: Both Code Climate and Coveralls offer integrations with popular version control systems and continuous integration tools. However, the extent of the integrations and compatibility may vary. Code Climate provides a wide range of integrations and supports a variety of programming languages, making it suitable for diverse development environments. Coveralls, while also offering integrations, may have more limited language compatibility. It is important to consider the specific needs and technologies used in the development process when choosing between the two tools.
User interface and experience: Code Climate and Coveralls have different user interfaces and experiences. Code Climate offers a visually appealing, intuitive dashboard that provides comprehensive insights into the codebase's quality. It allows developers to easily navigate through the various analysis reports and track progress over time. Coveralls, on the other hand, offers a simpler interface focused on displaying code coverage metrics and test results. The choice between the two tools may depend on the desired level of visual presentation and ease of use for the development team.

Advice on Code Climate, Coveralls

Felipe

May 24, 2020

Needs advice

198k views198k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Code Climate	Coveralls
After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.	Coveralls works with your CI server and sifts through your coverage data to find issues you didn't even know you had before they become a problem. Free for open source, pro accounts for private repos, instant sign up with GitHub OAuth.
Automated Git Updates- Nothing to install. Code Climate runs everytime you push a new commit.;Activity Feeds- Up-to-the-minute information so you can see when and how code changes.;Instant Notifications- Major security and quality changes pushed to where you work: email, Campfire, HipChat, and RSS feeds.;Team Sharing- Instant access for your whole team to maximize code visibility across projects.;Hotspots- A hit list for refactoring. Target your messiest areas one-by-one.;Duplication Detection- Fuzzy matching algorithm finds DRY-violations that human reviewers might miss.;Email Notification- Instant email notifications to let you know when new security and code issues arise;Security Dashboard- Organized listing of your app's vulnerabilities, including when they were first introduced and how to address them.;Alerts for New Rails Disclosures- Going beyond Gemfile analysis to let you know whether you're at high risk based on how your specific code uses a vulnerable library.;Start Fixing with One Click- Full integration with Pivotal Tracker, GitHub Issues, and Lighthouse lets you open tickets instantly.;GitHub Integration- Post-receive hooks for instant updates and GitHub drilldown links throughout.;Test Coverage Integration- Surfacing coverage information at the repo, class, and source listing level.;Private, Safe, and Secure- All data is private by default. SSL encryption everywhere.	Repository Coverage Statistics;Individual File Coverage Reports;Line By Line Coverage;Repository Overview
Statistics
Stacks 740	Stacks 1.7K
Followers 497	Followers 278
Votes 285	Votes 68
Pros & Cons
Pros 71 Auto sync with Github 49 Simple grade system that motivates to keep code clean 45 Better coding 30 Free for open source 21 Hotspots for quick refactoring candidates Cons 2 Learning curve, static analysis comparable to eslint 1 Complains about small stylistic decisions	Pros 45 Free for public repositories 13 Code coverage 7 Ease of integration 2 More stable than Codecov 1 Combines coverage from multiple/parallel test runs
Integrations
GitHub HipChat Campfire Semaphore	Travis CI CircleCI Semaphore Jenkins Codeship

Code Climate vs Coveralls

Overview

Code Climate vs Coveralls: What are the differences?