StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Continuous Integration
  4. Continuous Integration
  5. Jenkins vs fastlane

Jenkins vs fastlane

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Jenkins
Jenkins
Stacks59.2K
Followers50.4K
Votes2.2K
GitHub Stars24.6K
Forks9.2K
fastlane
fastlane
Stacks716
Followers437
Votes74
GitHub Stars40.6K
Forks6.0K

Jenkins vs fastlane: What are the differences?

Differences between Jenkins and fastlane

Jenkins and fastlane are two popular tools used in software development for automating various processes. Here are the key differences between Jenkins and fastlane:

  1. Installation and setup: Jenkins is a Java-based tool, requiring a Java Runtime Environment (JRE) to be installed before it can be used. It can be installed on different operating systems such as Windows, Linux, and macOS. On the other hand, fastlane is a Ruby gem that requires Ruby to be installed, which can make the setup process slightly more complex for developers who are not familiar with Ruby.

  2. Supported platforms: Jenkins is a cross-platform tool, meaning it can be used on various operating systems like Windows, Linux, and macOS. It is highly flexible and can be integrated with different tools and services. Fastlane, on the other hand, is primarily focused on mobile app development and is specifically designed for iOS and Android platforms. It offers a wide range of features and tools specifically tailored for these platforms.

  3. Functionality: Jenkins is a powerful CI/CD (Continuous Integration/Continuous Deployment) tool that provides a wide range of features to automate build, test, and deployment processes. It can handle complex workflows and supports integration with various plugins to enhance its functionalities. Fastlane, on the other hand, is primarily focused on mobile app deployment processes. It provides a streamlined approach for automating common tasks like building, testing, and distributing mobile apps.

  4. Ease of use and learning curve: Jenkins has a steep learning curve, especially for developers who are new to the tool. It requires knowledge of scripting and configuration to set up and manage jobs or pipelines. Fastlane, on the other hand, has a more straightforward and intuitive approach, with a simplified configuration setup using a "Fastfile" that defines the automation tasks. It is relatively easier to learn and use, especially for developers working on mobile app development.

  5. Community support and plugins: Jenkins has a large and active community, with a wide range of plugins available for extending its functionalities. It has been around for many years and has a mature ecosystem supporting it. Fastlane also has a growing community, but it might not have the same level of extensive plugin support as Jenkins. However, fastlane provides a rich set of built-in tools and integrations specifically tailored for mobile app development.

  6. Integration with other tools: Jenkins is known for its flexibility in integrating with other tools and services, allowing developers to create customizable workflows and pipelines. It supports various version control systems, build tools, and issue tracking systems. Fastlane, on the other hand, offers native integrations with popular development tools like Xcode and Android Studio. It focuses on providing a streamlined experience for mobile app developers by integrating with the existing ecosystem of mobile app development tools.

In summary, Jenkins is a flexible CI/CD tool that can be used on multiple platforms and is highly customizable through plugins. On the other hand, fastlane is a specialized tool for mobile app development, providing a streamlined approach for automating common tasks in the iOS and Android app deployment process.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Jenkins, fastlane

Balaramesh
Balaramesh

Apr 20, 2020

Needs adviceonAzure PipelinesAzure Pipelines.NET.NETJenkinsJenkins

We are currently using Azure Pipelines for continous integration. Our applications are developed witn .NET framework. But when we look at the online Jenkins is the most widely used tool for continous integration. Can you please give me the advice which one is best to use for my case Azure pipeline or jenkins.

663k views663k
Comments
StackShare
StackShare

Apr 17, 2019

Needs advice

From a StackShare Community member: "Currently we use Travis CI and have optimized it as much as we can so our builds are fairly quick. Our boss is all about redundancy so we are looking for another solution to fall back on in case Travis goes down and/or jacks prices way up (they were recently acquired). Could someone recommend which CI we should go with and if they have time, an explanation of how they're different?"

529k views529k
Comments
Tatiana
Tatiana

Nov 16, 2019

Decided

Jenkins is a pretty flexible, complete tool. Especially I love the possibility to configure jobs as a code with Jenkins pipelines.

CircleCI is well suited for small projects where the main task is to run continuous integration as quickly as possible. Travis CI is recommended primarily for open-source projects that need to be tested in different environments.

And for something a bit larger I prefer to use Jenkins because it is possible to make serious system configuration thereby different plugins. In Jenkins, I can change almost anything. But if you want to start the CI chain as soon as possible, Jenkins may not be the right choice.

734k views734k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Jenkins
Jenkins
fastlane
fastlane

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

fastlane lets you define and run your deployment pipelines for different environments. It helps you unify your app’s release process and automate the whole process. fastlane connects all fastlane tools and third party tools, like CocoaPods.

Easy installation;Easy configuration;Change set support;Permanent links;RSS/E-mail/IM Integration;After-the-fact tagging;JUnit/TestNG test reporting;Distributed builds;File fingerprinting;Plugin Support
Connect all build tools together;Define multiple lanes for different needs;Jenkins Integration;Extend by adding your own build steps;Deploy from any computer;Release new app updates with the push of a button
Statistics
GitHub Stars
24.6K
GitHub Stars
40.6K
GitHub Forks
9.2K
GitHub Forks
6.0K
Stacks
59.2K
Stacks
716
Followers
50.4K
Followers
437
Votes
2.2K
Votes
74
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 523
    Hosted internally
  • 469
    Free open source
  • 318
    Great to build, deploy or launch anything async
  • 243
    Tons of integrations
  • 211
    Rich set of plugins with good documentation
Cons
  • 13
    Workarounds needed for basic requirements
  • 10
    Groovy with cumbersome syntax
  • 8
    Plugins compatibility issues
  • 7
    Limited abilities with declarative pipelines
  • 7
    Lack of support
Pros
  • 20
    Easy to use
  • 13
    Itunes connect deployment
  • 13
    Open Source
  • 11
    Incredible flexability
  • 9
    Third party integrations
Integrations
No integrations available
Testmunk
Testmunk
GitHub
GitHub
Bitbucket
Bitbucket
TestFlight
TestFlight
HockeyApp
HockeyApp
HipChat
HipChat
Crashlytics
Crashlytics
Travis CI
Travis CI
Slack
Slack
Hall
Hall

What are some alternatives to Jenkins, fastlane?

Travis CI

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

TeamCity

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

GoCD

GoCD

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.

Shippable

Shippable

Shippable is a SaaS platform that lets you easily add Continuous Integration/Deployment to your Github and BitBucket repositories. It is lightweight, super simple to setup, and runs your builds and tests faster than any other service.

Buildkite

Buildkite

CI and build automation tool that combines the power of your own build infrastructure with the convenience of a managed, centralized web UI. Used by Shopify, Basecamp, Digital Ocean, Venmo, Cochlear, Bugsnag and more.

Snap CI

Snap CI

Snap CI is a cloud-based continuous integration & continuous deployment tool with powerful deployment pipelines. Integrates seamlessly with GitHub and provides fast feedback so you can deploy with ease.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana