Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Apache Flink vs Apache Spark vs Presto: What are the differences?
Introduction
Apache Flink, Apache Spark, and Presto are all popular distributed computing frameworks used for processing large-scale data. Each framework has its own unique features and characteristics that differentiate it from the others. In this article, we will explore the key differences between Apache Flink, Apache Spark, and Presto.
-
Data Processing Model:
- Apache Flink offers both batch and stream processing capabilities in a single unified model. It supports event time processing and provides support for event-driven applications.
- Apache Spark also supports both batch and stream processing, but it follows a micro-batch model for stream processing, which can introduce a small amount of latency. It focuses more on in-memory processing and provides libraries for machine learning and graph processing.
- Presto, on the other hand, is primarily designed for interactive query processing on large datasets. It doesn't have built-in support for stream processing or machine learning, but it excels at ad-hoc queries and fast data retrieval.
-
Fault Tolerance and Recovery:
- Apache Flink provides strong fault tolerance with exactly-once semantics. It uses a distributed snapshotting mechanism to ensure consistent state recovery in case of failures.
- Apache Spark offers fault tolerance as well but with at-least-once semantics. It uses RDD (Resilient Distributed Datasets) to recover lost data partitions in case of failures.
- Presto doesn't provide built-in fault tolerance. It assumes data source-level fault tolerance and relies on the underlying storage system for data recovery.
-
Execution Engine:
- Apache Flink has its own execution engine that works on data streams directly, providing low-latency processing and dynamic resource allocation.
- Apache Spark uses a general-purpose execution engine that works on RDDs, which introduces a slight overhead and latency compared to Flink's native stream processing engine.
- Presto also uses a general-purpose execution engine, but it focuses more on query optimization and parallel processing to achieve high query performance.
-
Connectivity and Integration:
- Apache Flink has built-in connectors to various data sources, including file systems, message queues, and databases. It also supports integration with Apache Kafka for event streaming.
- Apache Spark has a large ecosystem of connectors and libraries that enable seamless integration with various data sources, machine learning algorithms, and visualization tools.
- Presto provides connectors for querying data stored in various databases, data lakes, and file systems. It can integrate with external systems like Hive, Hadoop, and Kafka.
-
Real-time Processing:
- Apache Flink is designed for real-time stream processing and provides low-latency, event-driven processing capabilities. It supports event time processing, windowing, and stateful computations.
- Apache Spark's micro-batch model for stream processing introduces some latency, making it less suitable for low-latency, event-driven applications compared to Flink.
- Presto is not designed for real-time processing and is more suitable for interactive, ad-hoc queries on large datasets.
-
Ease of Use and Development:
- Apache Flink provides a rich and easy-to-use API for both batch and stream processing. It has good documentation and a supportive community. However, it may have a steeper learning curve compared to Spark or Presto.
- Apache Spark has a user-friendly API and provides high-level abstractions that simplify development. It has a large community and extensive documentation, making it easier for developers to get started.
- Presto also has a user-friendly SQL-like interface for querying data, which makes it accessible to users familiar with SQL. It has a smaller community compared to Flink or Spark but is gaining popularity.
In summary, Apache Flink excels in real-time stream processing, supports event-driven applications, and offers strong fault tolerance with exactly-once semantics. Apache Spark focuses on in-memory processing, provides libraries for machine learning and graph processing, and has a larger ecosystem. Presto specializes in interactive query processing, fast data retrieval, and supports ad-hoc queries on large datasets.
We have a Kafka topic having events of type A and type B. We need to perform an inner join on both type of events using some common field (primary-key). The joined events to be inserted in Elasticsearch.
In usual cases, type A and type B events (with same key) observed to be close upto 15 minutes. But in some cases they may be far from each other, lets say 6 hours. Sometimes event of either of the types never come.
In all cases, we should be able to find joined events instantly after they are joined and not-joined events within 15 minutes.
The first solution that came to me is to use upsert to update ElasticSearch:
- Use the primary-key as ES document id
- Upsert the records to ES as soon as you receive them. As you are using upsert, the 2nd record of the same primary-key will not overwrite the 1st one, but will be merged with it.
Cons: The load on ES will be higher, due to upsert.
To use Flink:
- Create a KeyedDataStream by the primary-key
- In the ProcessFunction, save the first record in a State. At the same time, create a Timer for 15 minutes in the future
- When the 2nd record comes, read the 1st record from the State, merge those two, and send out the result, and clear the State and the Timer if it has not fired
- When the Timer fires, read the 1st record from the State and send out as the output record.
- Have a 2nd Timer of 6 hours (or more) if you are not using Windowing to clean up the State
Pro: if you have already having Flink ingesting this stream. Otherwise, I would just go with the 1st solution.
Please refer "Structured Streaming" feature of Spark. Refer "Stream - Stream Join" at https://spark.apache.org/docs/latest/structured-streaming-programming-guide.html#stream-stream-joins . In short you need to specify "Define watermark delays on both inputs" and "Define a constraint on time across the two inputs"
To provide employees with the critical need of interactive querying, we’ve worked with Presto, an open-source distributed SQL query engine, over the years. Operating Presto at Pinterest’s scale has involved resolving quite a few challenges like, supporting deeply nested and huge thrift schemas, slow/ bad worker detection and remediation, auto-scaling cluster, graceful cluster shutdown and impersonation support for ldap authenticator.
Our infrastructure is built on top of Amazon EC2 and we leverage Amazon S3 for storing our data. This separates compute and storage layers, and allows multiple compute clusters to share the S3 data.
We have hundreds of petabytes of data and tens of thousands of Apache Hive tables. Our Presto clusters are comprised of a fleet of 450 r4.8xl EC2 instances. Presto clusters together have over 100 TBs of memory and 14K vcpu cores. Within Pinterest, we have close to more than 1,000 monthly active users (out of total 1,600+ Pinterest employees) using Presto, who run about 400K queries on these clusters per month.
Each query submitted to Presto cluster is logged to a Kafka topic via Singer. Singer is a logging agent built at Pinterest and we talked about it in a previous post. Each query is logged when it is submitted and when it finishes. When a Presto cluster crashes, we will have query submitted events without corresponding query finished events. These events enable us to capture the effect of cluster crashes over time.
Each Presto cluster at Pinterest has workers on a mix of dedicated AWS EC2 instances and Kubernetes pods. Kubernetes platform provides us with the capability to add and remove workers from a Presto cluster very quickly. The best-case latency on bringing up a new worker on Kubernetes is less than a minute. However, when the Kubernetes cluster itself is out of resources and needs to scale up, it can take up to ten minutes. Some other advantages of deploying on Kubernetes platform is that our Presto deployment becomes agnostic of cloud vendor, instance types, OS, etc.
#BigData #AWS #DataScience #DataEngineering
The platform deals with time series data from sensors aggregated against things( event data that originates at periodic intervals). We use Cassandra as our distributed database to store time series data. Aggregated data insights from Cassandra is delivered as web API for consumption from other applications. Presto as a distributed sql querying engine, can provide a faster execution time provided the queries are tuned for proper distribution across the cluster. Another objective that we had was to combine Cassandra table data with other business data from RDBMS or other big data systems where presto through its connector architecture would have opened up a whole lot of options for us.
Pros of Apache Flink
- Unified batch and stream processing16
- Easy to use streaming apis8
- Out-of-the box connector to kinesis,s3,hdfs8
- Open Source4
- Low latency2
Pros of Presto
- Works directly on files in s3 (no ETL)18
- Open-source13
- Join multiple databases12
- Scalable10
- Gets ready in minutes7
- MPP6
Pros of Apache Spark
- Open-source61
- Fast and Flexible48
- One platform for every big data problem8
- Great for distributed SQL like applications8
- Easy to install and to use6
- Works well for most Datascience usecases3
- Interactive Query2
- Machine learning libratimery, Streaming in real2
- In memory Computation2
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Apache Flink
Cons of Presto
Cons of Apache Spark
- Speed4