GitHub Pages vs Postman

Overview

GitHub Pages

Stacks17.7K

Followers13.0K

Votes1.1K

Postman

Stacks96.1K

Followers82.5K

Votes1.8K

Forks0

GitHub Pages vs Postman: What are the differences?

GitHub Pages and Postman are both popular tools used in the software development process. While GitHub Pages is primarily used for hosting static websites and documentation, Postman is an API testing and development platform. There are several key differences between these two tools.

Deployment Platform: GitHub Pages is designed specifically for hosting static websites and documentation. It provides a simple and convenient way to publish HTML, CSS, and JavaScript files. On the other hand, Postman is not meant for hosting websites but is focused on API testing and development. It provides a platform for developers to design, test, and document APIs.
Functionality: GitHub Pages allows users to build and publish static websites directly from their GitHub repositories. It provides features like version control, collaborative editing, and continuous integration. Postman, on the other hand, is a comprehensive API development environment. It allows users to send requests, manage API endpoints, create automated tests, and generate documentation.
Collaboration: GitHub Pages has built-in collaboration features, allowing multiple contributors to work on the same project simultaneously. It also supports version control, allowing users to track changes and roll back if necessary. Postman, on the other hand, is more focused on individual development and testing. While it does have some collaboration features, they are not as extensive as GitHub Pages.
Integration: GitHub Pages seamlessly integrates with other GitHub services, such as GitHub Actions for continuous deployment. It also supports custom domain names and SSL encryption. Postman, on the other hand, integrates with various API-related services, such as API monitoring, documentation, and automated testing tools. It allows users to easily share their APIs with others.
User Interface: GitHub Pages has a simple and easy-to-use user interface, making it accessible even for non-technical users. It provides pre-built themes and templates, allowing users to quickly create visually appealing websites. Postman, on the other hand, has a more technical interface designed for developers. It provides a wide range of tools and features specifically tailored for API testing and development.
Cost: GitHub Pages is free to use for public repositories, with additional paid plans available for private repositories. Postman offers both free and paid plans, with the free plan providing limited features and the paid plans offering more advanced capabilities, such as team collaboration and enterprise-level support.

In summary, GitHub Pages is a platform for hosting static websites and documentation, providing collaboration features and seamless integration with GitHub services. Postman, on the other hand, is a comprehensive API testing and development platform, designed for individual developers and providing integration with various API-related services.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on GitHub Pages, Postman

Jagdeep

Tech Lead at Founder and Lightning

May 6, 2019

Reviewon

Postman

I use Postman because of the ease of team-management, using workspaces and teams, runner, collections, environment variables, test-scripts (post execution), variable management (pre and post execution), folders (inside collections, for better management of APIs), newman, easy-ci-integration (and probably a few more things that I am not able to recall right now).

411k views411k

Comments

Howie

Full Stack Engineer at Yintrust

Aug 13, 2020

Decidedon

Netlify

We use Netlify to host static websites.

The reasons for choosing Netlify over GitHub Pages are as follows:

Netfily can bind multiple domain names, while GitHub Pages can only bind one domain name
With Netfily, the original repository can be private, while GitHub Pages free tier requires the original repository to be public

In addition, in order to use CDN, we use Netlify DNS.

238k views238k

Comments

StackShare

May 1, 2019

Needs advice

From a StackShare Community member: "I just started working for a start-up and we are in desperate need of better documentation for our API. Currently our API docs is in a README.md file. We are evaluating Postman and Swagger UI. Since there are many options and I was wondering what other StackSharers would recommend?"

382k views382k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

GitHub Pages	Postman
Public webpages hosted directly from your GitHub repository. Just edit, push, and your changes are live.	It is the only complete API development environment, used by nearly five million developers and more than 100,000 companies worldwide.
Blogging with Jekyll; Custom URLs; Automatic Page Generator	Compact layout;HTTP requests with file upload support;Formatted API responses for JSON and XML;Image previews;Request history;Basic Auth, OAuth 1.0, OAuth 2.0, and other common auth helpers;Autocomplete for URL and header values;Key/value editors for adding parameters or header values. Works for URL parameters too.;Use environment variables to easily shift between settings. Great for testing production, staging or local setups.;Keyboard shortcuts to maximize your productivity;Automatically generated web documentation;Mock servers hosted on Postman’s cloud;API monitoring run from Postman cloud
Statistics
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 0
Stacks 17.7K	Stacks 96.1K
Followers 13.0K	Followers 82.5K
Votes 1.1K	Votes 1.8K
Pros & Cons
Pros 290 Free 217 Right out of github 185 Quick to set up 108 Instant 107 Easy to learn Cons 4 Not possible to perform HTTP redirects 3 Limited Jekyll plugins 3 Supports only Jekyll 1 Jekyll is bloated	Pros 490 Easy to use 369 Great tool 276 Makes developing rest api's easy peasy 156 Easy setup, looks good 144 The best api workflow out there Cons 10 Stores credentials in HTTP 9 Bloated features and UI 8 Cumbersome to switch authentication tokens 7 Poor GraphQL support 5 Expensive
Integrations
GitHub	HipChat Keen Slack Dropbox Datadog PagerDuty Bigpanda Microsoft Teams Newman VictorOps

What are some alternatives to GitHub Pages, Postman?

DomainRacer

It is a blazing fast hosting solution that provides Customer Satisfaction driven Web Hosting services since 2016.

Netlify

Netlify is smart enough to process your site and make sure all assets gets optimized and served with perfect caching-headers from a cookie-less domain. We make sure your HTML is served straight from our CDN edge nodes without any round-trip to our backend servers and are the only ones to give you instant cache invalidation when you push a new deploy. Netlify is also the only static hosting service with integrated continuous deployment.

Swagger UI

Swagger UI is a dependency-free collection of HTML, Javascript, and CSS assets that dynamically generate beautiful documentation and sandbox from a Swagger-compliant API

Paw

Paw is a full-featured and beautifully designed Mac app that makes interaction with REST services delightful. Either you are an API maker or consumer, Paw helps you build HTTP requests, inspect the server's response and even generate client code.

Apiary

It takes more than a simple HTML page to thrill your API users. The right tools take weeks of development. Weeks that apiary.io saves.

Vercel

A cloud platform for serverless deployment. It enables developers to host websites and web services that deploy instantly, scale automatically, and require no supervision, all with minimal configuration.

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

ReadMe.io

It is an easy-to-use tool to help you build out documentation! Each documentation site that you publish is a project where there is space for documentation, interactive API reference guides, a changelog, and much more.

Appwrite

Appwrite's open-source platform lets you add Auth, DBs, Functions and Storage to your product and build any application at any scale, own your data, and use your preferred coding languages and tools.

Runscope

Keep tabs on all aspects of your API's performance with uptime monitoring, integration testing, logging and real-time monitoring.

Related Comparisons

GitHub Pages vs Postman: What are the differences?

Deployment Platform: GitHub Pages is designed specifically for hosting static websites and documentation. It provides a simple and convenient way to publish HTML, CSS, and JavaScript files. On the other hand, Postman is not meant for hosting websites but is focused on API testing and development. It provides a platform for developers to design, test, and document APIs.
Functionality: GitHub Pages allows users to build and publish static websites directly from their GitHub repositories. It provides features like version control, collaborative editing, and continuous integration. Postman, on the other hand, is a comprehensive API development environment. It allows users to send requests, manage API endpoints, create automated tests, and generate documentation.
Collaboration: GitHub Pages has built-in collaboration features, allowing multiple contributors to work on the same project simultaneously. It also supports version control, allowing users to track changes and roll back if necessary. Postman, on the other hand, is more focused on individual development and testing. While it does have some collaboration features, they are not as extensive as GitHub Pages.
Integration: GitHub Pages seamlessly integrates with other GitHub services, such as GitHub Actions for continuous deployment. It also supports custom domain names and SSL encryption. Postman, on the other hand, integrates with various API-related services, such as API monitoring, documentation, and automated testing tools. It allows users to easily share their APIs with others.
User Interface: GitHub Pages has a simple and easy-to-use user interface, making it accessible even for non-technical users. It provides pre-built themes and templates, allowing users to quickly create visually appealing websites. Postman, on the other hand, has a more technical interface designed for developers. It provides a wide range of tools and features specifically tailored for API testing and development.
Cost: GitHub Pages is free to use for public repositories, with additional paid plans available for private repositories. Postman offers both free and paid plans, with the free plan providing limited features and the paid plans offering more advanced capabilities, such as team collaboration and enterprise-level support.

GitHub Pages vs Postman

Overview