StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Cloud Hosting
  4. Hybrid Cloud As A Service
  5. Google Anthos vs Rafay Systems

Google Anthos vs Rafay Systems

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Google Anthos
Google Anthos
Stacks54
Followers266
Votes8
Rafay Systems
Rafay Systems
Stacks9
Followers21
Votes0

Google Anthos vs Rafay Systems: What are the differences?

# Introduction

Key differences between Google Anthos and Rafay Systems:

1. **Deployment Options**: Google Anthos allows users to deploy applications on-premises, in the cloud, or in a hybrid environment, providing flexibility in deployment options. On the other hand, Rafay Systems primarily focuses on cloud-native infrastructure, offering a more streamlined approach for deploying applications exclusively in cloud environments.

2. **Ecosystem Integration**: Google Anthos is tightly integrated with Google Cloud Platform services, making it a seamless choice for organizations already using Google's cloud services. Rafay Systems, on the other hand, offers compatibility with a wide range of cloud providers and services, giving users more options for ecosystem integration.

3. **Management Capabilities**: Google Anthos provides advanced management capabilities such as multi-cluster management, centralized monitoring, and automated scaling, enabling efficient control over complex environments. In comparison, Rafay Systems offers a simpler management interface with a focus on ease of use and rapid deployment, making it suitable for smaller-scale deployments.

4. **Networking Features**: Google Anthos emphasizes networking features like service mesh integration, traffic management, and load balancing to enhance application performance and reliability. Rafay Systems, while also offering networking capabilities, may not provide the same level of advanced networking features as Google Anthos.

5. **Security Aspects**: Google Anthos includes robust security features like encryption, access control, and vulnerability scanning to ensure the protection of applications and data. Rafay Systems, although security-focused, may have a different set of security features or implementations compared to Google Anthos.

6. **Scalability and Performance**: When it comes to scalability and performance, Google Anthos is designed to handle large-scale deployments and high workloads efficiently, leveraging Google's infrastructure capabilities. Rafay Systems, while capable of scalability, may have limitations compared to the scalability capabilities of Google Anthos.

In Summary, Google Anthos and Rafay Systems differ in deployment options, ecosystem integration, management capabilities, networking features, security aspects, and scalability/performance capabilities, catering to different organizational needs within the cloud infrastructure space.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Google Anthos
Google Anthos
Rafay Systems
Rafay Systems

Formerly Cloud Services Platform, Anthos lets you build and manage modern hybrid applications across environments. Powered by Kubernetes and other industry-leading open-source technologies from Google.

Rafay's automation framework provides multi-cluster management and app operations at scale. Create, deploy, operate, monitor, upgrade and retire Kubernetes clusters & k8s-resident applications across multi-regions, clouds and environments.

Google Kubernetes Engine Support; GKE On-Prem Support; Istio on GKE Support; Anthos Config Management; Stackdriver Support; Kubernetes applications on GCP Marketplace; Serverless; API management; Continuous integration; Continuous delivery
CI/CD integration; Multi-Cloud abstractions; Customizable, In-cluster scaling; Cross-cluster deployment & scaling; Global traffic steering and API management; Dynamic workload placement; App log & metric aggregation; Operational debugging and diagnostics; Data & State synchronization; Config synchronization; Canary / Rolling upgrades; App health tracking
Statistics
Stacks
54
Stacks
9
Followers
266
Followers
21
Votes
8
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 3
    Operations support by Google SRE
  • 2
    Host Cloud Run (managed knative) anywhere
  • 1
    Access to Google Kubernetes Marketplace
  • 1
    Automatic k8s upgrades
  • 1
    Policy enforcement via ACM
Cons
  • 3
    Expensive
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Google Kubernetes Engine
Google Kubernetes Engine
Elasticsearch
Elasticsearch
MongoDB
MongoDB
GitLab
GitLab
Istio
Istio
Docker
Docker
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
Couchbase
Couchbase
Splunk
Splunk
Neo4j
Neo4j
Gmail
Gmail
Datadog
Datadog
Slack
Slack
Amazon EKS
Amazon EKS
PagerDuty
PagerDuty
Azure Cosmos DB
Azure Cosmos DB
OpenStack
OpenStack
Vault
Vault
Sumo Logic
Sumo Logic
Kubernetes
Kubernetes

What are some alternatives to Google Anthos, Rafay Systems?

Heroku

Heroku

Heroku is a cloud application platform – a new way of building and deploying web apps. Heroku lets app developers spend 100% of their time on their application code, not managing servers, deployment, ongoing operations, or scaling.

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud is a polyglot cloud application platform. The service helps developers to build applications with many languages and services, with auto-scaling features and a true pay-as-you-go pricing model.

Google App Engine

Google App Engine

Google has a reputation for highly reliable, high performance infrastructure. With App Engine you can take advantage of the 10 years of knowledge Google has in running massively scalable, performance driven systems. App Engine applications are easy to build, easy to maintain, and easy to scale as your traffic and data storage needs grow.

Red Hat OpenShift

Red Hat OpenShift

OpenShift is Red Hat's Cloud Computing Platform as a Service (PaaS) offering. OpenShift is an application platform in the cloud where application developers and teams can build, test, deploy, and run their applications.

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

Once you upload your application, Elastic Beanstalk automatically handles the deployment details of capacity provisioning, load balancing, auto-scaling, and application health monitoring.

Render

Render

Render is a unified platform to build and run all your apps and websites with free SSL, a global CDN, private networks and auto deploys from Git.

Hasura

Hasura

An open source GraphQL engine that deploys instant, realtime GraphQL APIs on any Postgres database.

Cloud 66

Cloud 66

Cloud 66 gives you everything you need to build, deploy and maintain your applications on any cloud, without the headache of dealing with "server stuff". Frameworks: Ruby on Rails, Node.js, Jamstack, Laravel, GoLang, and more.

Jelastic

Jelastic

Jelastic is a Multi-Cloud DevOps PaaS for ISVs, telcos, service providers and enterprises needing to speed up development, reduce cost of IT infrastructure, improve uptime and security.

Dokku

Dokku

It is an extensible, open source Platform as a Service that runs on a single server of your choice. It helps you build and manage the lifecycle of applications from building to scaling.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase