Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Grasshopper vs Twilio: What are the differences?
Key Differences between Grasshopper and Twilio
Grasshopper: 1. Pricing Model: Grasshopper offers a fixed pricing model based on the number of users, with different plans available depending on the number of minutes included. 2. Features: Grasshopper mainly focuses on providing virtual phone numbers and call forwarding services. It offers features like voicemail transcription, business texting, and inbound/outbound calling. 3. Phone System: Grasshopper acts as a complete phone system for small businesses, allowing them to manage incoming calls, set up greetings, and route calls to different extensions or employees. 4. Ease of Use: Grasshopper has a user-friendly interface and is designed to be easy to set up and use, making it a popular choice for entrepreneurs and small business owners who may not have technical expertise. 5. Integration Options: Grasshopper provides integrations with popular tools like Slack, HubSpot, and Google Workspace, allowing businesses to streamline their communications and workflow. 6. Customer Support: Grasshopper offers customer support available through phone, email, and live chat to assist users with any issues or questions they may have.
Twilio: 1. Pricing Model: Twilio offers a pay-as-you-go pricing model, where customers only pay for the services they use, without any fixed monthly plans. Pricing varies based on usage and specific features. 2. API-Centric Approach: Twilio is primarily an API platform that enables developers to build and integrate various communication channels, such as voice, SMS, and video, into their applications. 3. Customization and Flexibility: Twilio allows developers to have full control over the communication experiences they create, facilitating customization and flexibility in designing unique solutions. 4. Scalability: Twilio's platform is highly scalable, supporting businesses of all sizes, from small startups to large enterprises, and can handle high volumes of calls, messages, and other communication requests. 5. Global Reach: Twilio operates globally, providing phone numbers, services, and connectivity in numerous countries, enabling businesses to have a global presence and reach customers worldwide. 6. Extensive Developer Tools: Twilio offers a wide range of developer tools, libraries, and documentation, making it easier for developers to integrate and leverage communication features in their applications.
In Summary, Grasshopper focuses on providing a phone system for small businesses with fixed pricing and easy-to-use features, while Twilio offers an API-centric platform with customization, scalability, and extensive developer tools for building and integrating communication solutions.
Hey! We need an omnichannel inbox that's housed within Salesforce Sales Cloud that makes it super easy for our reps to respond to inbound communication (needs: clean inbox, provides historical context, etc.). We're a high-volume call center, and we get a ton of incoming SMS and email every day. We'd love a solution that lets us view all of that in one place — ideally Salesforce, as that's where our reps work, and we want to avoid needing them to switch between windows. Thanks!
if the inbound SMS are sales rep specific you could potentially have twilio fwd that msg to a google voice phone number which will in turn put an email in their inbox (so they're looking at 1 inbox instead of multiple places) Just an idea. Probably way off in left field compared to what you're thinking and I also invision. I'm not all familiar with MessageBird nor am I at all familiar w/ your data flow / business process. Would be happy to help brainstorm anytime! 10+ years experience on the sfdc platform
Check out Centro. We built this to solve this exact problem! We used tools like Twilio but wrapped it up in a application that runs on Slack.
Hello! We need to integrate an SMS gateway into our app for user phone verification. As we are just starting, we are searching for the most affordable/best price/performance option for SMS gateway to verify client phone numbers with the code, maybe you can suggest something between those two or maybe something else. We are planning to do business in Europe
Twilio is the leader. Strong API, excellent documentation and reliable service. I suggest Nexmo since their API has smaller learning curve, offering better prices and also reliable solution. Also Nexmo offers more call per sec. 3 vs 2 and 2, out of the box. Good luck
Twilio documentation is very good and as a platform it just works. It's robust and reliable. We road-tested plivo and it wasn't anywhere near in terms of docs or support. In fact their support was terrible at replying to us. 48 hours to answer basic questions.
That's said, were also using sendgrid by twilio and that's not been pleasant . Their email builder appears to be react based but written by a team who don't understand react very well. That's a nightmare as yet
Twilio might be not cheapest, but they have awesome documentation (a lot of examples), easy to use API and libraries. I think it's a very good product to start. If the bill will become too heavy, you can shop around for economical options.
stackshare doesn't seem to have this in the stack list yet, but in my experience Twillio is attractive. It's good for basics, their acquisition of SendGrid gives them a bit more market share.. They are stronger at marketing to those that benefit them. That said from my understanding SendGrid leases the networks, channels, and lines. While their interface is friendly, their pricing suited for lower volume, you want to look at what they are using via an API, a contract, etc. Is it a more friend UI to a combination of others. What redunancies do to they have, try their support. It's not that Twillio is bad, it's about the volume, the use case, the liabiitlies you might have to your end-users if Twillio isn't the right choice. Another option is Bandwidth. You ask for affordable, Twillio is an option, but front end costs v/s the costs of support you'll need to consider. Bandwidth has more reliability but requires more engineering and more skillset. Another option that is worth considering, not the most affordable, but https://www.zipwhip.com/ have perhaps options that might be higher and the cost is relative. Wight costs, of support costs of integration, cost of scale, costs of a volume..
Pros of Grasshopper
Pros of Twilio
- Powerful, simple, and well documented api148
- RESTful API88
- Clear pricing66
- Great sms services61
- Low cost of entry58
- Global SMS Gateway29
- Good value14
- Cloud IVR12
- Simple11
- Extremely simple to integrate with rails11
- Great for startups6
- SMS5
- Great developer program3
- Hassle free3
- Text me the app pages2
- New Features constantly rolling out1
- Many deployment options, from build from scratch to buy1
- Easy integration1
- Two factor authentication1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Grasshopper
Cons of Twilio
- Predictable pricing4
- Expensive2