Grasshopper vs Twilio

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Grasshopper

13
23
+ 1
0
Twilio

11.4K
8.7K
+ 1
521
Add tool

Grasshopper vs Twilio: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Grasshopper and Twilio

Grasshopper: 1. Pricing Model: Grasshopper offers a fixed pricing model based on the number of users, with different plans available depending on the number of minutes included. 2. Features: Grasshopper mainly focuses on providing virtual phone numbers and call forwarding services. It offers features like voicemail transcription, business texting, and inbound/outbound calling. 3. Phone System: Grasshopper acts as a complete phone system for small businesses, allowing them to manage incoming calls, set up greetings, and route calls to different extensions or employees. 4. Ease of Use: Grasshopper has a user-friendly interface and is designed to be easy to set up and use, making it a popular choice for entrepreneurs and small business owners who may not have technical expertise. 5. Integration Options: Grasshopper provides integrations with popular tools like Slack, HubSpot, and Google Workspace, allowing businesses to streamline their communications and workflow. 6. Customer Support: Grasshopper offers customer support available through phone, email, and live chat to assist users with any issues or questions they may have.

Twilio: 1. Pricing Model: Twilio offers a pay-as-you-go pricing model, where customers only pay for the services they use, without any fixed monthly plans. Pricing varies based on usage and specific features. 2. API-Centric Approach: Twilio is primarily an API platform that enables developers to build and integrate various communication channels, such as voice, SMS, and video, into their applications. 3. Customization and Flexibility: Twilio allows developers to have full control over the communication experiences they create, facilitating customization and flexibility in designing unique solutions. 4. Scalability: Twilio's platform is highly scalable, supporting businesses of all sizes, from small startups to large enterprises, and can handle high volumes of calls, messages, and other communication requests. 5. Global Reach: Twilio operates globally, providing phone numbers, services, and connectivity in numerous countries, enabling businesses to have a global presence and reach customers worldwide. 6. Extensive Developer Tools: Twilio offers a wide range of developer tools, libraries, and documentation, making it easier for developers to integrate and leverage communication features in their applications.

In Summary, Grasshopper focuses on providing a phone system for small businesses with fixed pricing and easy-to-use features, while Twilio offers an API-centric platform with customization, scalability, and extensive developer tools for building and integrating communication solutions.

Advice on Grasshopper and Twilio
Needs advice
on
MessageBirdMessageBird
and
TwilioTwilio

Hey! We need an omnichannel inbox that's housed within Salesforce Sales Cloud that makes it super easy for our reps to respond to inbound communication (needs: clean inbox, provides historical context, etc.). We're a high-volume call center, and we get a ton of incoming SMS and email every day. We'd love a solution that lets us view all of that in one place — ideally Salesforce, as that's where our reps work, and we want to avoid needing them to switch between windows. Thanks!

See more
Replies (2)
Recommends

if the inbound SMS are sales rep specific you could potentially have twilio fwd that msg to a google voice phone number which will in turn put an email in their inbox (so they're looking at 1 inbox instead of multiple places) Just an idea. Probably way off in left field compared to what you're thinking and I also invision. I'm not all familiar with MessageBird nor am I at all familiar w/ your data flow / business process. Would be happy to help brainstorm anytime! 10+ years experience on the sfdc platform

See more
Ryan Hitchler
CEO & Co-founder at Centro · | 1 upvotes · 116.5K views
Recommends
on
TwilioTwilio
at

Check out Centro. We built this to solve this exact problem! We used tools like Twilio but wrapped it up in a application that runs on Slack.

See more
Dainis Duļbinskis
Marketing project manager at Colortime · | 2 upvotes · 123K views
Needs advice
on
PlivoPlivo
and
TwilioTwilio

Hello! We need to integrate an SMS gateway into our app for user phone verification. As we are just starting, we are searching for the most affordable/best price/performance option for SMS gateway to verify client phone numbers with the code, maybe you can suggest something between those two or maybe something else. We are planning to do business in Europe

See more
Replies (4)
Recommends
on
NexmoNexmo

Twilio is the leader. Strong API, excellent documentation and reliable service. I suggest Nexmo since their API has smaller learning curve, offering better prices and also reliable solution. Also Nexmo offers more call per sec. 3 vs 2 and 2, out of the box. Good luck

See more
Recommends
on
TwilioTwilio
at

Twilio documentation is very good and as a platform it just works. It's robust and reliable. We road-tested plivo and it wasn't anywhere near in terms of docs or support. In fact their support was terrible at replying to us. 48 hours to answer basic questions.

That's said, were also using sendgrid by twilio and that's not been pleasant . Their email builder appears to be react based but written by a team who don't understand react very well. That's a nightmare as yet

See more
Recommends
on
TwilioTwilio

Twilio might be not cheapest, but they have awesome documentation (a lot of examples), easy to use API and libraries. I think it's a very good product to start. If the bill will become too heavy, you can shop around for economical options.

See more
Andrew Voirol
Founder at The Social Diner · | 1 upvotes · 122.6K views
Recommends
on
PlivoPlivo

stackshare doesn't seem to have this in the stack list yet, but in my experience Twillio is attractive. It's good for basics, their acquisition of SendGrid gives them a bit more market share.. They are stronger at marketing to those that benefit them. That said from my understanding SendGrid leases the networks, channels, and lines. While their interface is friendly, their pricing suited for lower volume, you want to look at what they are using via an API, a contract, etc. Is it a more friend UI to a combination of others. What redunancies do to they have, try their support. It's not that Twillio is bad, it's about the volume, the use case, the liabiitlies you might have to your end-users if Twillio isn't the right choice. Another option is Bandwidth. You ask for affordable, Twillio is an option, but front end costs v/s the costs of support you'll need to consider. Bandwidth has more reliability but requires more engineering and more skillset. Another option that is worth considering, not the most affordable, but https://www.zipwhip.com/ have perhaps options that might be higher and the cost is relative. Wight costs, of support costs of integration, cost of scale, costs of a volume..

See more
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More
Pros of Grasshopper
Pros of Twilio
    Be the first to leave a pro
    • 148
      Powerful, simple, and well documented api
    • 88
      RESTful API
    • 66
      Clear pricing
    • 61
      Great sms services
    • 58
      Low cost of entry
    • 29
      Global SMS Gateway
    • 14
      Good value
    • 12
      Cloud IVR
    • 11
      Simple
    • 11
      Extremely simple to integrate with rails
    • 6
      Great for startups
    • 5
      SMS
    • 3
      Great developer program
    • 3
      Hassle free
    • 2
      Text me the app pages
    • 1
      New Features constantly rolling out
    • 1
      Many deployment options, from build from scratch to buy
    • 1
      Easy integration
    • 1
      Two factor authentication

    Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

    Cons of Grasshopper
    Cons of Twilio
      Be the first to leave a con
      • 4
        Predictable pricing
      • 2
        Expensive

      Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

      What is Grasshopper?

      Sound more professional and stay connected with Grasshopper, the Virtual Phone System designed for entrepreneurs. Grasshopper works just like a traditional phone system, but requires no hardware to purchase or software to install.

      What is Twilio?

      Twilio offers developers a powerful API for phone services to make and receive phone calls, and send and receive text messages. Their product allows programmers to more easily integrate various communication methods into their software and programs.

      Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

      What companies use Grasshopper?
      What companies use Twilio?
      Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
      Learn More

      Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

      What tools integrate with Grasshopper?
      What tools integrate with Twilio?
        No integrations found

        Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

        Blog Posts

        Jul 2 2019 at 9:34PM

        Segment

        Google AnalyticsAmazon S3New Relic+25
        10
        6911
        GitHubPythonReact+42
        49
        40987
        What are some alternatives to Grasshopper and Twilio?
        RingCentral
        Since RingCentral is cloud based, you enjoy the freedom to connect and manage multiple locations, devices and workers within your cloud phone system. You can easily customize users, departments, and call handling rules. No matter where you, or the users, are. You only need a high-speed Internet connection and your phone system is ready to work lightning fast, anytime and anyplace. There’s no PBX hardware.
        Locust
        Locust is an easy-to-use, distributed, user load testing tool. Intended for load testing web sites (or other systems) and figuring out how many concurrent users a system can handle.
        Apache Ant
        Ant is a Java-based build tool. In theory, it is kind of like Make, without Make's wrinkles and with the full portability of pure Java code.
        Cicada Shell
        It is a simple bash-like Unix shell written in Rust.
        Mantis
        It is a free web-based bug tracking system. It provides a delicate balance between simplicity and power. Users are able to get started in minutes and start managing their projects while collaborating with their teammates and clients effectively.
        See all alternatives