Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Hexo vs Next.js: What are the differences?
Introduction
In this article, we will compare Hexo and Next.js, two popular frameworks for building websites. Hexo is a static site generator while Next.js is a React framework for building server-rendered applications.
Integration with React: Hexo is primarily built for static site generation and does not have native support for React. On the other hand, Next.js is specifically designed for building React applications. It provides server-side rendering and allows seamless integration with React components.
Routing: Hexo uses a file-based routing system where each page is a separate file. It follows a simple directory structure to generate the pages. In contrast, Next.js uses a dynamic routing approach where routes are defined programmatically. This allows for more flexibility in defining complex routing patterns.
Server Rendering vs. Static Generation: Next.js provides server-side rendering (SSR) out of the box, allowing pages to be rendered on the server before being sent to the client. This can improve the initial loading time and provide a better user experience. Hexo, on the other hand, generates static HTML files for each page, which can be served directly from a hosting provider's server.
Customization and Plugin Ecosystem: Hexo has a rich ecosystem of plugins that can extend its functionalities. These plugins allow users to customize various aspects of their site, such as adding support for different markup languages, SEO optimization, and improving the development workflow. Next.js also has a plugin system, but it is more focused on extending the build process rather than adding features to the website itself.
Community and Documentation: Both Hexo and Next.js have active communities and extensive documentation. However, Next.js, being built on top of React, has a larger community and more resources available. It also benefits from the vast React ecosystem, which provides additional libraries and tools for building complex web applications.
Learning Curve: Hexo is relatively easy to learn and use, especially for users familiar with Markdown and static site generators. On the other hand, Next.js has a steeper learning curve, especially for newcomers to React and server-side rendering. However, if you are already comfortable with React, Next.js can be an excellent choice for building scalable applications.
In summary, Hexo is a static site generator primarily focused on generating static HTML files, while Next.js is a React framework that provides server-side rendering and allows for more dynamic and interactive web applications. Both have their own strengths and are suitable for different use cases and skill levels.
Next.js is probably the most enjoyable React framework our team could have picked. The development is an extremely smooth process, the file structure is beautiful and organized, and the speed is no joke. Our work with Next.js comes out much faster than if it was built on pure React or frameworks alike. We were previously developing all of our projects in Meteor before making the switch. We left Meteor due to the slow compiler and website speed. We deploy all of our Next.js projects on Vercel.
Hey guys,
My backend set up is Prisma / GraphQL-Yoga at the moment, and I love it. It's so intuitive to learn and is really neat on the frontend too, however, there were a few gotchas when I was learning! Especially around understanding how it all pieces together (the stack). There isn't a great deal of information out there on exactly how to put into production my set up, which is a backend set up on a Digital Ocean droplet with Prisma/GraphQL Yoga in a Docker Container using Next & Apollo Client on the frontend somewhere else. It's such a niche subject, so I bet only a few hundred people have got a website with this stack in production. Anyway, I wrote a blog post to help those who might need help understanding it. Here it is, hope it helps!
Pros of Hexo
- Ease of deployment18
- Uses NodeJS and npm13
- Easy GitHub Pages publishing12
- Powerful templating10
- Useful tools and plugins7
- Easy intergrating with js4
- Open source3
- Blazing Fast3
Pros of Next.js
- Automatic server rendering and code splitting51
- Built with React44
- Easy setup34
- TypeScript26
- Universal JavaScript24
- Zero setup22
- Static site generator21
- Just JavaScript12
- Simple deployment12
- Incremental static regeneration12
- Filesystem as an API10
- Frictionless development10
- Everything is a function9
- Well Documented9
- Has many examples and integrations8
- Testing8
- Isomorphic React applications7
- File based routing + hooks built in4
- Deployment2
- SEO1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Hexo
Cons of Next.js
- Structure is weak compared to Angular(2+)9