StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Continuous Integration
  4. Continuous Integration
  5. Jenkins vs ngrok

Jenkins vs ngrok

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Jenkins
Jenkins
Stacks59.2K
Followers50.4K
Votes2.2K
GitHub Stars24.6K
Forks9.2K
ngrok
ngrok
Stacks420
Followers457
Votes57
GitHub Stars24.4K
Forks4.3K

Jenkins vs ngrok: What are the differences?

Key Differences Between Jenkins and ngrok

Introduction

Jenkins and ngrok are both popular tools used in software development and deployment. However, they serve different purposes and have distinct features. In this article, we will explore the key differences between Jenkins and ngrok.

  1. Deployment Platform: Jenkins is a continuous integration and continuous delivery (CI/CD) tool used for building, testing, and deploying software applications. It provides a framework for automating the integration and delivery process. On the other hand, ngrok is a secure tunneling tool that allows developers to expose their local development server over the internet, enabling external access to their applications during development and testing.

  2. Functionality: Jenkins offers a wide range of features to support the development and deployment process. It integrates with version control systems, like Git, and allows the automation of build, test, and deployment tasks. Jenkins also provides extensive plugin support, allowing users to extend its functionality and integrate with various tools and platforms. In contrast, ngrok's primary functionality is to create secure tunnels and expose local servers. It simplifies the process of sharing applications in development or testing environments without the need for configuring network settings.

  3. Ease of Use: Jenkins provides a highly flexible and configurable environment, but it requires initial setup and configuration. Users need to define pipelines, configure jobs, and install plugins to customize its behavior. In contrast, ngrok is relatively easy to use. It requires downloading and running a single executable file, which handles all the secure tunneling automatically. Users can simply run ngrok, specify the local port and get a URL that exposes their local server.

  4. Community Support: Jenkins has a large and active community of users, with a vast collection of plugins, documentation, and resources available. Users can find solutions to common problems, share knowledge, and contribute to the project. Ngrok also has a supportive community, but due to its specific use case, the community might be relatively smaller compared to Jenkins.

  5. Cost: Jenkins is an open-source tool that is free to use. Users can install and configure Jenkins on their own servers or use cloud-based solutions. Ngrok offers both a free and paid version. The free version provides basic features and limitations, while the paid version offers additional functionality and advanced features such as custom domains, reserved tunnels, and team collaboration.

  6. Use Case: Jenkins is primarily used for automating software build, test, and deployment processes in a CI/CD pipeline. It is often employed in larger development teams and complex software projects. On the other hand, ngrok is useful during development and testing stages, allowing developers to share their locally hosted applications securely with external stakeholders, such as clients or team members.

In summary, Jenkins is a CI/CD tool used for automating software development processes, while ngrok is a secure tunneling tool used for sharing locally hosted applications. Jenkins provides a comprehensive solution for the entire software development lifecycle, while ngrok simplifies the process of exposing local servers during development and testing.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Jenkins, ngrok

Balaramesh
Balaramesh

Apr 20, 2020

Needs adviceonAzure PipelinesAzure Pipelines.NET.NETJenkinsJenkins

We are currently using Azure Pipelines for continous integration. Our applications are developed witn .NET framework. But when we look at the online Jenkins is the most widely used tool for continous integration. Can you please give me the advice which one is best to use for my case Azure pipeline or jenkins.

663k views663k
Comments
StackShare
StackShare

Apr 17, 2019

Needs advice

From a StackShare Community member: "Currently we use Travis CI and have optimized it as much as we can so our builds are fairly quick. Our boss is all about redundancy so we are looking for another solution to fall back on in case Travis goes down and/or jacks prices way up (they were recently acquired). Could someone recommend which CI we should go with and if they have time, an explanation of how they're different?"

530k views530k
Comments
Tatiana
Tatiana

Nov 16, 2019

Decided

Jenkins is a pretty flexible, complete tool. Especially I love the possibility to configure jobs as a code with Jenkins pipelines.

CircleCI is well suited for small projects where the main task is to run continuous integration as quickly as possible. Travis CI is recommended primarily for open-source projects that need to be tested in different environments.

And for something a bit larger I prefer to use Jenkins because it is possible to make serious system configuration thereby different plugins. In Jenkins, I can change almost anything. But if you want to start the CI chain as soon as possible, Jenkins may not be the right choice.

734k views734k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Jenkins
Jenkins
ngrok
ngrok

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

ngrok is a reverse proxy that creates a secure tunnel between from a public endpoint to a locally running web service. ngrok captures and analyzes all traffic over the tunnel for later inspection and replay.

Easy installation;Easy configuration;Change set support;Permanent links;RSS/E-mail/IM Integration;After-the-fact tagging;JUnit/TestNG test reporting;Distributed builds;File fingerprinting;Plugin Support
Expose any http service behind a NAT or firewall to the internet on a subdomain of ngrok.com;Expose any tcp service behind a NAT or firewall to the internet on a random port of ngrok.com;Inspect all http requests/responses that are transmitted over the tunnel;Replay any request that was transmitted over the tunnel
Statistics
GitHub Stars
24.6K
GitHub Stars
24.4K
GitHub Forks
9.2K
GitHub Forks
4.3K
Stacks
59.2K
Stacks
420
Followers
50.4K
Followers
457
Votes
2.2K
Votes
57
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 523
    Hosted internally
  • 469
    Free open source
  • 318
    Great to build, deploy or launch anything async
  • 243
    Tons of integrations
  • 211
    Rich set of plugins with good documentation
Cons
  • 13
    Workarounds needed for basic requirements
  • 10
    Groovy with cumbersome syntax
  • 8
    Plugins compatibility issues
  • 7
    Limited abilities with declarative pipelines
  • 7
    Lack of support
Pros
  • 26
    Easy to use
  • 11
    Super-fast
  • 7
    Free
  • 6
    Awesome traffic analysis page
  • 5
    Reliable custom domains
Cons
  • 5
    Doesn't Support UDP
  • 1
    El tunel SSH cambia de dominio constantemente
Integrations
No integrations available
Twilio SendGrid
Twilio SendGrid
GitHub
GitHub
Slack
Slack

What are some alternatives to Jenkins, ngrok?

Travis CI

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

TeamCity

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

GoCD

GoCD

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.

Shippable

Shippable

Shippable is a SaaS platform that lets you easily add Continuous Integration/Deployment to your Github and BitBucket repositories. It is lightweight, super simple to setup, and runs your builds and tests faster than any other service.

Buildkite

Buildkite

CI and build automation tool that combines the power of your own build infrastructure with the convenience of a managed, centralized web UI. Used by Shopify, Basecamp, Digital Ocean, Venmo, Cochlear, Bugsnag and more.

Snap CI

Snap CI

Snap CI is a cloud-based continuous integration & continuous deployment tool with powerful deployment pipelines. Integrates seamlessly with GitHub and provides fast feedback so you can deploy with ease.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana