New Relic vs Skylight

Get Advice Icon

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

New Relic
New Relic

14.8K
3.3K
+ 1
1.9K
Skylight
Skylight

84
44
+ 1
51
Add tool

New Relic vs Skylight: What are the differences?

New Relic: SaaS Application Performance Management for Ruby, PHP, .Net, Java, Python, and Node.js Apps. New Relic is the all-in-one web application performance tool that lets you see performance from the end user experience, through servers, and down to the line of application code; Skylight: The smart profiler for your Rails apps. Skylight is a smart profiler for your Rails apps that visualizes request performance across all of your servers.

New Relic and Skylight can be categorized as "Performance Monitoring" tools.

Some of the features offered by New Relic are:

  • Performance Data Retention
  • Real-User Response Time, Throughput, & Breakdown by Layer
  • App Response Time, Throughput, & Breakdown by Component

On the other hand, Skylight provides the following key features:

  • Skylight looks at how your code is behaving in production, alerting you to improvements you can make before they become showstoppers.
  • Skylight tells you exactly how your app is spending its time where it matters most—in your production environment
  • Pricing starts at $20 for the first million requests, with automatic discounts for high-volume customers

"Easy setup" is the top reason why over 411 developers like New Relic, while over 10 developers mention "Beautiful UI" as the leading cause for choosing Skylight.

According to the StackShare community, New Relic has a broader approval, being mentioned in 3142 company stacks & 575 developers stacks; compared to Skylight, which is listed in 39 company stacks and 5 developer stacks.

- No public GitHub repository available -
- No public GitHub repository available -

What is New Relic?

New Relic is the all-in-one web application performance tool that lets you see performance from the end user experience, through servers, and down to the line of application code.

What is Skylight?

Skylight is a smart profiler for your Rails apps that visualizes request performance across all of your servers.
Get Advice Icon

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Why do developers choose New Relic?
Why do developers choose Skylight?

Sign up to add, upvote and see more prosMake informed product decisions

Sign up to add, upvote and see more consMake informed product decisions

What companies use New Relic?
What companies use Skylight?

Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

What tools integrate with New Relic?
What tools integrate with Skylight?
    No integrations found

    Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

    What are some alternatives to New Relic and Skylight?
    AppDynamics
    AppDynamics develops application performance management (APM) solutions that deliver problem resolution for highly distributed applications through transaction flow monitoring and deep diagnostics.
    Datadog
    Datadog is the leading service for cloud-scale monitoring. It is used by IT, operations, and development teams who build and operate applications that run on dynamic or hybrid cloud infrastructure. Start monitoring in minutes with Datadog!
    Splunk
    Splunk Inc. provides the leading platform for Operational Intelligence. Customers use Splunk to search, monitor, analyze and visualize machine data.
    Airbrake
    Airbrake collects errors for your applications in all major languages and frameworks. We alert you to new errors and give you critical context, trends and details needed to find and fix errors fast.
    Prometheus
    Prometheus is a systems and service monitoring system. It collects metrics from configured targets at given intervals, evaluates rule expressions, displays the results, and can trigger alerts if some condition is observed to be true.
    See all alternatives
    Decisions about New Relic and Skylight
    Julien DeFrance
    Julien DeFrance
    Principal Software Engineer at Tophatter · | 3 upvotes · 101.3K views
    atStessaStessa
    New Relic
    New Relic
    Datadog
    Datadog
    #APM

    Which #APM / #Infrastructure #Monitoring solution to use?

    The 2 major players in that space are New Relic and Datadog Both are very comparable in terms of pricing, capabilities (Datadog recently introduced APM as well).

    In our use case, keeping the number of tools minimal was a major selection criteria.

    As we were already using #NewRelic, my recommendation was to move to the pro tier so we would benefit from advanced APM features, synthetics, mobile & infrastructure monitoring. And gain 360 degree view of our infrastructure.

    Few things I liked about New Relic: - Mobile App and push notificatin - Ease of setting up new alerts - Being notified via email and push notifications without requiring another alerting 3rd party solution

    I've certainly seen use cases where NewRelic can also be used as an input data source for Datadog. Therefore depending on your use case, it might also be worth evaluating a joint usage of both solutions.

    See more
    Jerome Dalbert
    Jerome Dalbert
    Senior Backend Engineer at StackShare · | 3 upvotes · 74.1K views
    atStackShareStackShare
    Heroku
    Heroku
    New Relic
    New Relic
    Skylight
    Skylight
    Rails
    Rails
    Pingdom
    Pingdom
    Slack
    Slack

    We currently monitor performance with the following tools:

    1. Heroku Metrics: our main app is Hosted on Heroku, so it is the best place to get quick server metrics like memory usage, load averages, or response times.
    2. Good old New Relic for detailed general metrics, including transaction times.
    3. Skylight for more specific Rails Controller#action transaction times. Navigating those timings is much better than with New Relic, as you get a clear full breakdown of everything that happens for a given request.

    Skylight offers better Rails performance insights, so why use New Relic? Because it does frontend monitoring, while Skylight doesn't. Now that we have a separate frontend app though, our frontend engineers are looking into more specialized frontend monitoring solutions.

    Finally, if one of our apps go down, Pingdom alerts us on Slack and texts some of us.

    See more
    Sebastian Gębski
    Sebastian Gębski
    CTO at Shedul/Fresha · | 4 upvotes · 299.3K views
    atFresha EngineeringFresha Engineering
    CircleCI
    CircleCI
    Jenkins
    Jenkins
    Git
    Git
    GitHub
    GitHub
    New Relic
    New Relic
    AppSignal
    AppSignal
    Sentry
    Sentry
    Logentries
    Logentries

    Regarding Continuous Integration - we've started with something very easy to set up - CircleCI , but with time we're adding more & more complex pipelines - we use Jenkins to configure & run those. It's much more effort, but at some point we had to pay for the flexibility we expected. Our source code version control is Git (which probably doesn't require a rationale these days) and we keep repos in GitHub - since the very beginning & we never considered moving out. Our primary monitoring these days is in New Relic (Ruby & SPA apps) and AppSignal (Elixir apps) - we're considering unifying it in New Relic , but this will require some improvements in Elixir app observability. For error reporting we use Sentry (a very popular choice in this class) & we collect our distributed logs using Logentries (to avoid semi-manual handling here).

    See more
    Interest over time
    Reviews of New Relic and Skylight
    Avatar of Zaijo
    ZLP Solutions s.r.o.
    Review ofSkylightSkylight

    If you follow the registration flow you end up with running analytics virtually in a minute. Awesome first experience.

    I don't have my application in production so I needed to enable skylight in development, but Skylight navigated me nicely to the exact paragraph of a documentation, which helped.

    How developers use New Relic and Skylight
    Avatar of StackShare
    StackShare uses SkylightSkylight

    When we were facing performance issues with the new StackShare app. We originally thought it was a server issue. So we did quite a bit of research to see how many dynos we should be using for the sort of application we have and traffic profile. We couldn’t find anything useful online so I ended up asking my buddy Alain over at BlockScore. After a quick convo with him, I knew we should be totally fine with just 2 dynos.

    We also tested the theory by increasing the number of dynos and running the load tests. They had little to no effect on error rate, so this also confirmed that it wasn’t a server issue.

    So that meant it was an application issue. New Relic wasn’t any help. I spoke with another friend who suggested we use a profiler. We totally should have been using one all along. We added mini-profiler, which was great for identifying slow queries and overall page load times. We also had the Rails Chrome extension so we could see how long view rendering was taking. So we cleaned up the slowest queries.

    We tried to use mini-profiler in production on the new StackShare app and for some reason, we couldn’t get it to work. We were in a time crunch so I asked Alain what they used and he said that they use Skylight in production. Funny enough, I remembered the name Skylight because we listed it on the site a while back. So we did that, and at first we couldn’t really see how it was useful. Then we realized what we were seeing were a ton of repeat queries on some of the pages we load tested.

    Skylight is cool because it sort of gives you the full MVC profile. We were able to pinpoint specific db queries that being repeated. So we cleaned those up pretty quickly. But then we noticed the views were taking up all the load time, so we start implementing caching more aggressively. After we cleaned up the db queries and added more caching, our pages went from this: skylight1 to this: skylight2

    Skylight ended up being super useful. We use it in production now.

    Avatar of StackShare
    StackShare uses New RelicNew Relic

    Free Heroku add-on. Not particularly useful for us. Rails profilers tend to do a better job at the app level. And I can never really figure out what’s going on with Heroku by looking at New Relic. I don’t know if we’re just not using New Relic correctly or if it really does just suck for our use case. But I guess some insight is better than none.

    Avatar of MaxCDN
    MaxCDN uses New RelicNew Relic

    How do you know what parts of the workflow need improvement? Measure it. With New Relic in place, we have graphs of our API performance and can directly see if a server or zone is causing trouble, and the impact of our changes. There’s no comparison between a real-time performance graph and “Strange, the site seems slow, I should tail the logs”.

    Avatar of Kalibrr
    Kalibrr uses New RelicNew Relic

    We monitor and troubleshoot our app's performance using New Relic, which gives us a great view into each type of request that hits our servers. It also gives us a nice weekly summary of error rates and response times so that we know how well we've done in the past week.

    Avatar of Steve Paulo
    Steve Paulo uses New RelicNew Relic

    I'm trying to wring more instrumentation out of New Relic as it pertains to Rack, but for the time being, New Relic is monitoring/alerting uptime and some basic performance metrics.

    Avatar of Jeff Flynn
    Jeff Flynn uses New RelicNew Relic

    Just like we care about errors, we care about metrics - especially around performance. You'd be crazy not to use it - and not surprisingly, it's a one-click add-on in Heroku.

    Avatar of Hund
    Hund uses SkylightSkylight

    An essential for determining production performance. It provides us with clear insights into what might be slowing down responses so we know exactly what to fix.

    How much does New Relic cost?
    How much does Skylight cost?
    News about Skylight
    More news