ruxit vs SignalFx: What are the differences?
Developers describe ruxit as "Full stack availability and performance monitoring powered by artificial intelligence". Ruxit is a all-in-one performance monitoring solution for cloud natives. In under five minutes customizable dashboard views show you your application's performance data. On the other hand, SignalFx is detailed as "Monitoring and Operational Intelligence for the Cloud". We provide operational intelligence for today’s elastic architectures through monitoring specifically designed for microservices and containers with: -powerful and proactive alerting -metrics aggregation -visualization into time series data.
ruxit and SignalFx can be categorized as "Performance Monitoring" tools.
Some of the features offered by ruxit are:
- AI-based analysis
- Full code-level visibility, including database calls & web service stacks
- Monitors server resources and availability
On the other hand, SignalFx provides the following key features:
- Beautiful streaming visualizations
- Meaningful, fast alerting using SignalFlow analytics
- High resolution metrics up to 1 sec
What is ruxit?
What is SignalFx?
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Sign up to add, upvote and see more prosMake informed product decisions
What are the cons of using ruxit?
What are the cons of using SignalFx?
Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions
We use SignalFx to monitor all of SignalFx.. that include the entire stack from core services like Cassandra and AWS EC2 up through custom application metrics from SignalFx itself.