Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Docker Swarm vs Salt: What are the differences?
Docker Swarm vs. Salt
Docker Swarm is a container orchestration platform that allows users to manage a cluster of Docker engines, making it easier to schedule and scale containerized applications across multiple nodes. On the other hand, Salt is a configuration management and remote execution tool that is used for automating the deployment and management of infrastructure.
1. Scalability: Docker Swarm is designed for managing clusters of Docker hosts and scaling containerized applications across nodes, providing a platform for seamless scaling and deployment. In contrast, Salt is focused on configuration management and remote execution, allowing for efficient and centralized management of infrastructure components.
2. Use Case: Docker Swarm is specifically tailored for container orchestration and managing Docker containers, making it ideal for organizations seeking simplified deployment and scaling of applications. Salt, on the other hand, is more versatile and can be used for a broader range of automation tasks beyond container management, such as configuring servers and managing network devices.
3. Communication Model: Docker Swarm operates on a loosely-coupled communication model where nodes communicate with each other through the Swarm manager. In contrast, Salt follows a master-slave communication model, where the Salt master node sends commands to execute on Salt minion nodes, enabling centralized control over distributed infrastructure.
4. Resource Utilization: Docker Swarm optimizes resource utilization by distributing containers across nodes based on available resources and predefined constraints, ensuring efficient use of computing resources. Salt also focuses on resource optimization but does so by allowing administrators to define and enforce configurations on managed systems, reducing manual intervention and enhancing system consistency.
5. Integration: Docker Swarm seamlessly integrates with Docker Compose and Docker Engine, providing a comprehensive ecosystem for container management and deployment. Salt, on the other hand, integrates with various cloud providers, orchestration tools, and third-party modules, offering extensive customization and integration capabilities for diverse infrastructure environments.
6. Learning Curve: Docker Swarm offers a relatively straightforward learning curve for users familiar with Docker containers, as it builds on existing Docker concepts and tools. In contrast, Salt may have a steeper learning curve due to its extensive feature set and configuration management functionalities, requiring users to invest time in understanding Salt's architecture and capabilities.
In Summary, Docker Swarm focuses on container orchestration and scaling applications, while Salt prioritizes configuration management and automation of infrastructure, each catering to different aspects of the DevOps workflow.
Our whole DevOps stack consists of the following tools:
- GitHub (incl. GitHub Pages/Markdown for Documentation, GettingStarted and HowTo's) for collaborative review and code management tool
- Respectively Git as revision control system
- SourceTree as Git GUI
- Visual Studio Code as IDE
- CircleCI for continuous integration (automatize development process)
- Prettier / TSLint / ESLint as code linter
- SonarQube as quality gate
- Docker as container management (incl. Docker Compose for multi-container application management)
- VirtualBox for operating system simulation tests
- Kubernetes as cluster management for docker containers
- Heroku for deploying in test environments
- nginx as web server (preferably used as facade server in production environment)
- SSLMate (using OpenSSL) for certificate management
- Amazon EC2 (incl. Amazon S3) for deploying in stage (production-like) and production environments
- PostgreSQL as preferred database system
- Redis as preferred in-memory database/store (great for caching)
The main reason we have chosen Kubernetes over Docker Swarm is related to the following artifacts:
- Key features: Easy and flexible installation, Clear dashboard, Great scaling operations, Monitoring is an integral part, Great load balancing concepts, Monitors the condition and ensures compensation in the event of failure.
- Applications: An application can be deployed using a combination of pods, deployments, and services (or micro-services).
- Functionality: Kubernetes as a complex installation and setup process, but it not as limited as Docker Swarm.
- Monitoring: It supports multiple versions of logging and monitoring when the services are deployed within the cluster (Elasticsearch/Kibana (ELK), Heapster/Grafana, Sysdig cloud integration).
- Scalability: All-in-one framework for distributed systems.
- Other Benefits: Kubernetes is backed by the Cloud Native Computing Foundation (CNCF), huge community among container orchestration tools, it is an open source and modular tool that works with any OS.
Pros of Docker Swarm
- Docker friendly55
- Easy to setup46
- Standard Docker API40
- Easy to use38
- Native23
- Free22
- Clustering made easy13
- Simple usage12
- Integral part of docker11
- Cross Platform6
- Labels and annotations5
- Performance5
- Easy Networking3
- Shallow learning curve3
Pros of Salt
- Flexible46
- Easy30
- Remote execution27
- Enormously flexible24
- Great plugin API12
- Python10
- Extensible5
- Scalable3
- nginx2
- Vagrant provisioner1
- HipChat1
- Best IaaC1
- Automatisation1
- Parallel Execution1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Docker Swarm
- Low adoption9
Cons of Salt
- Bloated1
- Dangerous1
- No immutable infrastructure1