Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Docker Swarm

780
979
+ 1
282
Salt

419
448
+ 1
164
Add tool

Docker Swarm vs Salt: What are the differences?

Docker Swarm vs. Salt

Docker Swarm is a container orchestration platform that allows users to manage a cluster of Docker engines, making it easier to schedule and scale containerized applications across multiple nodes. On the other hand, Salt is a configuration management and remote execution tool that is used for automating the deployment and management of infrastructure.

1. Scalability: Docker Swarm is designed for managing clusters of Docker hosts and scaling containerized applications across nodes, providing a platform for seamless scaling and deployment. In contrast, Salt is focused on configuration management and remote execution, allowing for efficient and centralized management of infrastructure components.

2. Use Case: Docker Swarm is specifically tailored for container orchestration and managing Docker containers, making it ideal for organizations seeking simplified deployment and scaling of applications. Salt, on the other hand, is more versatile and can be used for a broader range of automation tasks beyond container management, such as configuring servers and managing network devices.

3. Communication Model: Docker Swarm operates on a loosely-coupled communication model where nodes communicate with each other through the Swarm manager. In contrast, Salt follows a master-slave communication model, where the Salt master node sends commands to execute on Salt minion nodes, enabling centralized control over distributed infrastructure.

4. Resource Utilization: Docker Swarm optimizes resource utilization by distributing containers across nodes based on available resources and predefined constraints, ensuring efficient use of computing resources. Salt also focuses on resource optimization but does so by allowing administrators to define and enforce configurations on managed systems, reducing manual intervention and enhancing system consistency.

5. Integration: Docker Swarm seamlessly integrates with Docker Compose and Docker Engine, providing a comprehensive ecosystem for container management and deployment. Salt, on the other hand, integrates with various cloud providers, orchestration tools, and third-party modules, offering extensive customization and integration capabilities for diverse infrastructure environments.

6. Learning Curve: Docker Swarm offers a relatively straightforward learning curve for users familiar with Docker containers, as it builds on existing Docker concepts and tools. In contrast, Salt may have a steeper learning curve due to its extensive feature set and configuration management functionalities, requiring users to invest time in understanding Salt's architecture and capabilities.

In Summary, Docker Swarm focuses on container orchestration and scaling applications, while Salt prioritizes configuration management and automation of infrastructure, each catering to different aspects of the DevOps workflow.

Decisions about Docker Swarm and Salt
Simon Reymann
Senior Fullstack Developer at QUANTUSflow Software GmbH · | 30 upvotes · 8.9M views

Our whole DevOps stack consists of the following tools:

  • GitHub (incl. GitHub Pages/Markdown for Documentation, GettingStarted and HowTo's) for collaborative review and code management tool
  • Respectively Git as revision control system
  • SourceTree as Git GUI
  • Visual Studio Code as IDE
  • CircleCI for continuous integration (automatize development process)
  • Prettier / TSLint / ESLint as code linter
  • SonarQube as quality gate
  • Docker as container management (incl. Docker Compose for multi-container application management)
  • VirtualBox for operating system simulation tests
  • Kubernetes as cluster management for docker containers
  • Heroku for deploying in test environments
  • nginx as web server (preferably used as facade server in production environment)
  • SSLMate (using OpenSSL) for certificate management
  • Amazon EC2 (incl. Amazon S3) for deploying in stage (production-like) and production environments
  • PostgreSQL as preferred database system
  • Redis as preferred in-memory database/store (great for caching)

The main reason we have chosen Kubernetes over Docker Swarm is related to the following artifacts:

  • Key features: Easy and flexible installation, Clear dashboard, Great scaling operations, Monitoring is an integral part, Great load balancing concepts, Monitors the condition and ensures compensation in the event of failure.
  • Applications: An application can be deployed using a combination of pods, deployments, and services (or micro-services).
  • Functionality: Kubernetes as a complex installation and setup process, but it not as limited as Docker Swarm.
  • Monitoring: It supports multiple versions of logging and monitoring when the services are deployed within the cluster (Elasticsearch/Kibana (ELK), Heapster/Grafana, Sysdig cloud integration).
  • Scalability: All-in-one framework for distributed systems.
  • Other Benefits: Kubernetes is backed by the Cloud Native Computing Foundation (CNCF), huge community among container orchestration tools, it is an open source and modular tool that works with any OS.
See more
Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of Docker Swarm
Pros of Salt
  • 55
    Docker friendly
  • 46
    Easy to setup
  • 40
    Standard Docker API
  • 38
    Easy to use
  • 23
    Native
  • 22
    Free
  • 13
    Clustering made easy
  • 12
    Simple usage
  • 11
    Integral part of docker
  • 6
    Cross Platform
  • 5
    Labels and annotations
  • 5
    Performance
  • 3
    Easy Networking
  • 3
    Shallow learning curve
  • 46
    Flexible
  • 30
    Easy
  • 27
    Remote execution
  • 24
    Enormously flexible
  • 12
    Great plugin API
  • 10
    Python
  • 5
    Extensible
  • 3
    Scalable
  • 2
    nginx
  • 1
    Vagrant provisioner
  • 1
    HipChat
  • 1
    Best IaaC
  • 1
    Automatisation
  • 1
    Parallel Execution

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Docker Swarm
Cons of Salt
  • 9
    Low adoption
  • 1
    Bloated
  • 1
    Dangerous
  • 1
    No immutable infrastructure

Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

- No public GitHub repository available -

What is Docker Swarm?

Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.

What is Salt?

Salt is a new approach to infrastructure management. Easy enough to get running in minutes, scalable enough to manage tens of thousands of servers, and fast enough to communicate with them in seconds. Salt delivers a dynamic communication bus for infrastructures that can be used for orchestration, remote execution, configuration management and much more.

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

What companies use Docker Swarm?
What companies use Salt?
See which teams inside your own company are using Docker Swarm or Salt.
Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

What tools integrate with Docker Swarm?
What tools integrate with Salt?

Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

Blog Posts

What are some alternatives to Docker Swarm and Salt?
Docker Compose
With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.
Rancher
Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.
Ansible
Ansible is an IT automation tool. It can configure systems, deploy software, and orchestrate more advanced IT tasks such as continuous deployments or zero downtime rolling updates. Ansible’s goals are foremost those of simplicity and maximum ease of use.
Apache Mesos
Apache Mesos is a cluster manager that simplifies the complexity of running applications on a shared pool of servers.
CoreOS
It is designed for security, consistency, and reliability. Instead of installing packages via yum or apt, it uses Linux containers to manage your services at a higher level of abstraction. A single service's code and all dependencies are packaged within a container that can be run on one or many machines.
See all alternatives