StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Testing Frameworks
  4. Beta Testing Mobile App Distribution
  5. TestFairy vs TestFlight

TestFairy vs TestFlight

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

TestFlight
TestFlight
Stacks1.1K
Followers705
Votes163
TestFairy
TestFairy
Stacks41
Followers76
Votes29

TestFairy vs TestFlight: What are the differences?

Differences Between TestFairy and TestFlight

TestFairy and TestFlight are both well-known mobile application testing platforms, but there are several key differences between them:

  1. Installation Process: The installation process differs significantly between TestFairy and TestFlight. TestFairy requires users to install a dedicated TestFairy app on their devices to access and test applications, while TestFlight allows testers to install and test apps directly from the App Store using redemption codes.

  2. Testing Capabilities: TestFairy offers more extensive testing capabilities compared to TestFlight. TestFairy provides features like video recording of user sessions, crash reporting, and advanced user feedback tools, which are not available in TestFlight.

  3. Platform Support: TestFairy supports a wide range of platforms, including iOS, Android, tvOS, and web applications, whereas TestFlight is limited to iOS and tvOS only. This makes TestFairy a more versatile solution for cross-platform app testing.

  4. Distribution Options: TestFairy provides multiple distribution options for APK and IPA files, allowing testers to download the app directly from the TestFairy website or using over-the-air (OTA) installation, whereas TestFlight relies solely on OTA installation.

  5. Integration and Customization: TestFairy offers comprehensive integration options, such as Jira, Trello, and Slack, making it easier for teams to incorporate it into their existing workflow. In contrast, TestFlight has limited integration options, primarily focusing on seamless integration with Apple's developer tools.

  6. User Experience: TestFairy is known for its user-friendly interface and provides a more intuitive and visually appealing experience for testers compared to TestFlight. TestFairy's interface makes it easier to navigate through app versions and access important testing features.

In summary, TestFairy offers a broader range of testing capabilities and platform support, along with more flexible distribution options and seamless integration with various tools. On the other hand, TestFlight provides a smoother installation process and is tightly integrated with Apple's developer ecosystem.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

TestFlight
TestFlight
TestFairy
TestFairy

With TestFlight, developers simply upload a build, and the testers can install it directly from their device, over the air.

When testing apps in the crowd, you never know what exactly was done, and what went wrong on the client side. TestFairy shows you a video of the exact test that was done, including CPU, memory, GPS, network and a lot more.

Sessions- Discover how testers are using your application. Watch as they progress and take unexpected turns.;Crash Reports- Reported in realtime, with environment snapshots and full session activity.;In-App Questions- The most effective way to get tester feedback. Get the answers you need by asking questions the moment a checkpoint is passed.;Checkpoints- Place checkpoints throughout your app to see how far testers are getting, confirm which areas are popular and reveal ones that need more testing.;Remote Logging- TFLogs are attached to your session and crash reports.;In-App Updates- Prompt testers to install the latest version of your app. This is the easiest way for your testers to take advantage of installing on the fly.
App distribution; Video recording; Crash handler; Community pages and landing pages; Remote logging; Performance monitoring; Customer feedback
Statistics
Stacks
1.1K
Stacks
41
Followers
705
Followers
76
Votes
163
Votes
29
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 62
    Must have for ios development
  • 49
    Beta testing
  • 20
    Easy setup
  • 10
    Easy way to push out updates for internal testers
  • 7
    In-App Updates
Pros
  • 8
    Get video rec of the user on your app
  • 4
    Landing Page
  • 4
    Better design
  • 3
    JIRA Integration
  • 2
    Supports Enterprise IPA's (TestFlight doesn't/didn't)
Integrations
Trigger.io
Trigger.io
Jira
Jira
Jenkins
Jenkins
Bugzilla
Bugzilla
Slack
Slack
Travis CI
Travis CI
GitHub
GitHub
Unity
Unity
PhoneGap
PhoneGap
Xamarin
Xamarin

What are some alternatives to TestFlight, TestFairy?

HockeyApp

HockeyApp

HockeyApp is the best way to collect live crash reports, get feedback from your users, distribute your betas, and analyze your test coverage.

Beta by Crashlytics

Beta by Crashlytics

A streamlined solution for distributing apps that gives you a single, cross-platform toolset for iOS and Android, and a delightful, effortless onboarding for your testers.

Fabric by Twitter

Fabric by Twitter

Installing and managing a wide range of SDKs can be cumbersome and complex. Fabric solves this problem by combining all seven of our SDKs under one roof and organizing them into three Kits: the Crashlytics Kit, the Twitter Kit, and the MoPub Kit.

BoardingBot

BoardingBot

BoardingBot will create a site for your app and allow users to opt-in to beta testing, and receive a TestFlight invitation automatically.

DryDock

DryDock

DryDock is an open source iOS application that we built at Venmo to manage and install all of our internal builds, allow employees to download new experimental apps at any time and to easily share builds designed for a broader audience with their friends.

Updraft

Updraft

It is a platform as a service for continuous mobile app delivery and beta testing. Easy distribute your iOS and Android beta apps to your product managers, testers or designers within your organization and get as early as possible feedback to your beta app. Remove bugs and improve your product to get the highest quality. Continuous enterprise mobile app delivery and bug reporting have never been easier!

Apperian

Apperian

It is the leading enterprise-class mobile application management (MAM®) and security platform for the delivery of critical apps to 100% of users across an organization.

Releasable

Releasable

It is a tool for companies to collect feedback from real customers prior to officially launching a product. The tool allows companies to manage all beta testing feedback from one central location, instead of using various disconnected tools for different purposes.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana