Alternatives to Apache Wicket logo

Alternatives to Apache Wicket

Spring MVC, Vaadin, AngularJS, Spring, and Django are the most popular alternatives and competitors to Apache Wicket.
61
2

What is Apache Wicket and what are its top alternatives?

It is a component-based web application framework for the Java programming language conceptually similar to JavaServer Faces and Tapestry.
Apache Wicket is a tool in the Frameworks (Full Stack) category of a tech stack.

Top Alternatives to Apache Wicket

  • Spring MVC
    Spring MVC

    A Java framework that follows the Model-View-Controller design pattern and provides an elegant solution to use MVC in spring framework by the help of DispatcherServlet. ...

  • Vaadin
    Vaadin

    It is the fastest way to build web applications in Java. It automates the communication between your server and the browser and gives you a high-level component API for all Vaadin components ...

  • AngularJS
    AngularJS

    AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding. ...

  • Spring
    Spring

    A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments. ...

  • Django
    Django

    Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design. ...

  • React
    React

    Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project. ...

  • JSF
    JSF

    It is used for building component-based user interfaces for web applications and was formalized as a standard through the Java Community ...

  • Spring Boot
    Spring Boot

    Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration. ...

Apache Wicket alternatives & related posts

Spring MVC logo

Spring MVC

482
517
0
A Java framework which is used to build web applications
482
517
+ 1
0
PROS OF SPRING MVC
    Be the first to leave a pro
    CONS OF SPRING MVC
      Be the first to leave a con

      related Spring MVC posts

      NIDHISH PUTHIYADATH
      Lead Software Engineer at EDIFECS · | 1 upvote · 310.8K views

      Material Design for Angular Angular 2 Node.js TypeScript Spring-Boot RxJS Microsoft SQL Server Hibernate Spring MVC

      We built our customer facing portal application using Angular frontend backed by Spring boot.

      See more
      Vaadin logo

      Vaadin

      197
      279
      36
      Components and tools for building web apps in Java
      197
      279
      + 1
      36
      PROS OF VAADIN
      • 9
        Java
      • 7
        Compatibility
      • 6
        Open Source
      • 6
        Components
      • 3
        Performance
      • 2
        Abstraction
      • 2
        Example packages
      • 1
        OSGI Support
      CONS OF VAADIN
      • 3
        Paid for more features

      related Vaadin posts

      AngularJS logo

      AngularJS

      61K
      44K
      5.3K
      Superheroic JavaScript MVW Framework
      61K
      44K
      + 1
      5.3K
      PROS OF ANGULARJS
      • 889
        Quick to develop
      • 589
        Great mvc
      • 573
        Powerful
      • 520
        Restful
      • 505
        Backed by google
      • 349
        Two-way data binding
      • 343
        Javascript
      • 329
        Open source
      • 307
        Dependency injection
      • 197
        Readable
      • 75
        Fast
      • 65
        Directives
      • 63
        Great community
      • 57
        Free
      • 38
        Extend html vocabulary
      • 29
        Components
      • 26
        Easy to test
      • 25
        Easy to learn
      • 24
        Easy to templates
      • 23
        Great documentation
      • 21
        Easy to start
      • 19
        Awesome
      • 18
        Light weight
      • 15
        Angular 2.0
      • 14
        Efficient
      • 14
        Javascript mvw framework
      • 14
        Great extensions
      • 11
        Easy to prototype with
      • 9
        High performance
      • 9
        Coffeescript
      • 8
        Two-way binding
      • 8
        Lots of community modules
      • 8
        Mvc
      • 7
        Easy to e2e
      • 7
        Clean and keeps code readable
      • 6
        One of the best frameworks
      • 6
        Easy for small applications
      • 5
        Works great with jquery
      • 5
        Fast development
      • 4
        I do not touch DOM
      • 4
        The two-way Data Binding is awesome
      • 3
        Hierarchical Data Structure
      • 3
        Be a developer, not a plumber.
      • 3
        Declarative programming
      • 3
        Typescript
      • 3
        Dart
      • 3
        Community
      • 2
        Fkin awesome
      • 2
        Opinionated in the right areas
      • 2
        Supports api , easy development
      • 2
        Common Place
      • 2
        Very very useful and fast framework for development
      • 2
        Linear learning curve
      • 2
        Great
      • 2
        Amazing community support
      • 2
        Readable code
      • 2
        Programming fun again
      • 2
        The powerful of binding, routing and controlling routes
      • 2
        Scopes
      • 2
        Consistency with backend architecture if using Nest
      • 1
        Fk react, all my homies hate react
      CONS OF ANGULARJS
      • 12
        Complex
      • 3
        Event Listener Overload
      • 3
        Dependency injection
      • 2
        Hard to learn
      • 2
        Learning Curve

      related AngularJS posts

      Simon Reymann
      Senior Fullstack Developer at QUANTUSflow Software GmbH · | 27 upvotes · 5.1M views

      Our whole Node.js backend stack consists of the following tools:

      • Lerna as a tool for multi package and multi repository management
      • npm as package manager
      • NestJS as Node.js framework
      • TypeScript as programming language
      • ExpressJS as web server
      • Swagger UI for visualizing and interacting with the API’s resources
      • Postman as a tool for API development
      • TypeORM as object relational mapping layer
      • JSON Web Token for access token management

      The main reason we have chosen Node.js over PHP is related to the following artifacts:

      • Made for the web and widely in use: Node.js is a software platform for developing server-side network services. Well-known projects that rely on Node.js include the blogging software Ghost, the project management tool Trello and the operating system WebOS. Node.js requires the JavaScript runtime environment V8, which was specially developed by Google for the popular Chrome browser. This guarantees a very resource-saving architecture, which qualifies Node.js especially for the operation of a web server. Ryan Dahl, the developer of Node.js, released the first stable version on May 27, 2009. He developed Node.js out of dissatisfaction with the possibilities that JavaScript offered at the time. The basic functionality of Node.js has been mapped with JavaScript since the first version, which can be expanded with a large number of different modules. The current package managers (npm or Yarn) for Node.js know more than 1,000,000 of these modules.
      • Fast server-side solutions: Node.js adopts the JavaScript "event-loop" to create non-blocking I/O applications that conveniently serve simultaneous events. With the standard available asynchronous processing within JavaScript/TypeScript, highly scalable, server-side solutions can be realized. The efficient use of the CPU and the RAM is maximized and more simultaneous requests can be processed than with conventional multi-thread servers.
      • A language along the entire stack: Widely used frameworks such as React or AngularJS or Vue.js, which we prefer, are written in JavaScript/TypeScript. If Node.js is now used on the server side, you can use all the advantages of a uniform script language throughout the entire application development. The same language in the back- and frontend simplifies the maintenance of the application and also the coordination within the development team.
      • Flexibility: Node.js sets very few strict dependencies, rules and guidelines and thus grants a high degree of flexibility in application development. There are no strict conventions so that the appropriate architecture, design structures, modules and features can be freely selected for the development.
      See more
      Simon Reymann
      Senior Fullstack Developer at QUANTUSflow Software GmbH · | 24 upvotes · 4.9M views

      Our whole Vue.js frontend stack (incl. SSR) consists of the following tools:

      • Nuxt.js consisting of Vue CLI, Vue Router, vuex, Webpack and Sass (Bundler for HTML5, CSS 3), Babel (Transpiler for JavaScript),
      • Vue Styleguidist as our style guide and pool of developed Vue.js components
      • Vuetify as Material Component Framework (for fast app development)
      • TypeScript as programming language
      • Apollo / GraphQL (incl. GraphiQL) for data access layer (https://apollo.vuejs.org/)
      • ESLint, TSLint and Prettier for coding style and code analyzes
      • Jest as testing framework
      • Google Fonts and Font Awesome for typography and icon toolkit
      • NativeScript-Vue for mobile development

      The main reason we have chosen Vue.js over React and AngularJS is related to the following artifacts:

      • Empowered HTML. Vue.js has many similar approaches with Angular. This helps to optimize HTML blocks handling with the use of different components.
      • Detailed documentation. Vue.js has very good documentation which can fasten learning curve for developers.
      • Adaptability. It provides a rapid switching period from other frameworks. It has similarities with Angular and React in terms of design and architecture.
      • Awesome integration. Vue.js can be used for both building single-page applications and more difficult web interfaces of apps. Smaller interactive parts can be easily integrated into the existing infrastructure with no negative effect on the entire system.
      • Large scaling. Vue.js can help to develop pretty large reusable templates.
      • Tiny size. Vue.js weights around 20KB keeping its speed and flexibility. It allows reaching much better performance in comparison to other frameworks.
      See more
      Spring logo

      Spring

      4K
      4.8K
      1.1K
      Provides a comprehensive programming and configuration model for modern Java-based enterprise applications
      4K
      4.8K
      + 1
      1.1K
      PROS OF SPRING
      • 230
        Java
      • 157
        Open source
      • 136
        Great community
      • 123
        Very powerful
      • 114
        Enterprise
      • 64
        Lot of great subprojects
      • 60
        Easy setup
      • 44
        Convention , configuration, done
      • 40
        Standard
      • 31
        Love the logic
      • 13
        Good documentation
      • 11
        Dependency injection
      • 11
        Stability
      • 9
        MVC
      • 6
        Easy
      • 3
        Makes the hard stuff fun & the easy stuff automatic
      • 3
        Strong typing
      • 2
        Code maintenance
      • 2
        Best practices
      • 2
        Maven
      • 2
        Great Desgin
      • 2
        Easy Integration with Spring Security
      • 2
        Integrations with most other Java frameworks
      • 1
        Java has more support and more libraries
      • 1
        Supports vast databases
      • 1
        Large ecosystem with seamless integration
      • 1
        OracleDb integration
      • 1
        Live project
      CONS OF SPRING
      • 15
        Draws you into its own ecosystem and bloat
      • 3
        Verbose configuration
      • 3
        Poor documentation
      • 3
        Java
      • 2
        Java is more verbose language in compare to python

      related Spring posts

      Is learning Spring and Spring Boot for web apps back-end development is still relevant in 2021? Feel free to share your views with comparison to Django/Node.js/ ExpressJS or other frameworks.

      Please share some good beginner resources to start learning about spring/spring boot framework to build the web apps.

      See more

      I am consulting for a company that wants to move its current CubeCart e-commerce site to another PHP based platform like PrestaShop or Magento. I was interested in alternatives that utilize Node.js as the primary platform. I currently don't know PHP, but I have done full stack dev with Java, Spring, Thymeleaf, etc.. I am just unsure that learning a set of technologies not commonly used makes sense. For example, in PrestaShop, I would need to work with JavaScript better and learn PHP, Twig, and Bootstrap. It seems more cumbersome than a Node JS system, where the language syntax stays the same for the full stack. I am looking for thoughts and advice on the relevance of PHP skillset into the future AND whether the Node based e-commerce open source options can compete with Magento or Prestashop.

      See more
      Django logo

      Django

      37.6K
      34K
      4.2K
      The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines
      37.6K
      34K
      + 1
      4.2K
      PROS OF DJANGO
      • 673
        Rapid development
      • 487
        Open source
      • 425
        Great community
      • 379
        Easy to learn
      • 277
        Mvc
      • 232
        Beautiful code
      • 223
        Elegant
      • 207
        Free
      • 203
        Great packages
      • 194
        Great libraries
      • 80
        Comes with auth and crud admin panel
      • 79
        Restful
      • 78
        Powerful
      • 76
        Great documentation
      • 72
        Great for web
      • 57
        Python
      • 43
        Great orm
      • 41
        Great for api
      • 32
        All included
      • 29
        Fast
      • 25
        Web Apps
      • 23
        Clean
      • 23
        Easy setup
      • 21
        Used by top startups
      • 19
        Sexy
      • 19
        ORM
      • 15
        The Django community
      • 14
        Allows for very rapid development with great libraries
      • 14
        Convention over configuration
      • 11
        King of backend world
      • 10
        Full stack
      • 10
        Great MVC and templating engine
      • 8
        Mvt
      • 8
        Fast prototyping
      • 7
        Its elegant and practical
      • 7
        Easy to develop end to end AI Models
      • 7
        Batteries included
      • 6
        Have not found anything that it can't do
      • 6
        Very quick to get something up and running
      • 6
        Cross-Platform
      • 5
        Zero code burden to change databases
      • 5
        Great peformance
      • 5
        Python community
      • 5
        Easy Structure , useful inbuilt library
      • 4
        Easy to use
      • 4
        Map
      • 4
        Easy to change database manager
      • 4
        Full-Text Search
      • 4
        Just the right level of abstraction
      • 4
        Many libraries
      • 4
        Modular
      • 4
        Easy
      • 3
        Scaffold
      • 1
        Node js
      • 1
        Built in common security
      • 1
        Great default admin panel
      • 1
        Scalable
      • 1
        Cons
      • 1
        Gigante ta
      • 1
        Fastapi
      • 0
        Rails
      CONS OF DJANGO
      • 26
        Underpowered templating
      • 22
        Autoreload restarts whole server
      • 22
        Underpowered ORM
      • 15
        URL dispatcher ignores HTTP method
      • 10
        Internal subcomponents coupling
      • 8
        Not nodejs
      • 8
        Configuration hell
      • 7
        Admin
      • 5
        Not as clean and nice documentation like Laravel
      • 4
        Python
      • 3
        Not typed
      • 3
        Bloated admin panel included
      • 2
        Overwhelming folder structure
      • 2
        InEffective Multithreading
      • 1
        Not type safe

      related Django posts

      Dmitry Mukhin
      Engineer at Uploadcare · | 25 upvotes · 2.6M views

      Simple controls over complex technologies, as we put it, wouldn't be possible without neat UIs for our user areas including start page, dashboard, settings, and docs.

      Initially, there was Django. Back in 2011, considering our Python-centric approach, that was the best choice. Later, we realized we needed to iterate on our website more quickly. And this led us to detaching Django from our front end. That was when we decided to build an SPA.

      For building user interfaces, we're currently using React as it provided the fastest rendering back when we were building our toolkit. It’s worth mentioning Uploadcare is not a front-end-focused SPA: we aren’t running at high levels of complexity. If it were, we’d go with Ember.js.

      However, there's a chance we will shift to the faster Preact, with its motto of using as little code as possible, and because it makes more use of browser APIs. One of our future tasks for our front end is to configure our Webpack bundler to split up the code for different site sections. For styles, we use PostCSS along with its plugins such as cssnano which minifies all the code.

      All that allows us to provide a great user experience and quickly implement changes where they are needed with as little code as possible.

      See more

      Hey, so I developed a basic application with Python. But to use it, you need a python interpreter. I want to add a GUI to make it more appealing. What should I choose to develop a GUI? I have very basic skills in front end development (CSS, JavaScript). I am fluent in python. I'm looking for a tool that is easy to use and doesn't require too much code knowledge. I have recently tried out Flask, but it is kinda complicated. Should I stick with it, move to Django, or is there another nice framework to use?

      See more
      React logo

      React

      172.9K
      142.8K
      4.1K
      A JavaScript library for building user interfaces
      172.9K
      142.8K
      + 1
      4.1K
      PROS OF REACT
      • 832
        Components
      • 673
        Virtual dom
      • 578
        Performance
      • 508
        Simplicity
      • 442
        Composable
      • 186
        Data flow
      • 166
        Declarative
      • 128
        Isn't an mvc framework
      • 120
        Reactive updates
      • 115
        Explicit app state
      • 50
        JSX
      • 29
        Learn once, write everywhere
      • 22
        Easy to Use
      • 21
        Uni-directional data flow
      • 17
        Works great with Flux Architecture
      • 11
        Great perfomance
      • 10
        Javascript
      • 9
        Built by Facebook
      • 8
        TypeScript support
      • 6
        Server Side Rendering
      • 6
        Speed
      • 5
        Feels like the 90s
      • 5
        Excellent Documentation
      • 5
        Props
      • 5
        Functional
      • 5
        Easy as Lego
      • 5
        Closer to standard JavaScript and HTML than others
      • 5
        Cross-platform
      • 5
        Easy to start
      • 5
        Hooks
      • 5
        Awesome
      • 5
        Scalable
      • 4
        Super easy
      • 4
        Allows creating single page applications
      • 4
        Server side views
      • 4
        Sdfsdfsdf
      • 4
        Start simple
      • 4
        Strong Community
      • 4
        Fancy third party tools
      • 4
        Scales super well
      • 3
        Has arrow functions
      • 3
        Beautiful and Neat Component Management
      • 3
        Just the View of MVC
      • 3
        Simple, easy to reason about and makes you productive
      • 3
        Fast evolving
      • 3
        SSR
      • 3
        Great migration pathway for older systems
      • 3
        Rich ecosystem
      • 3
        Simple
      • 3
        Has functional components
      • 3
        Every decision architecture wise makes sense
      • 3
        Very gentle learning curve
      • 2
        Split your UI into components with one true state
      • 2
        Image upload
      • 2
        Permissively-licensed
      • 2
        Fragments
      • 2
        Sharable
      • 2
        Recharts
      • 2
        HTML-like
      • 1
        React hooks
      • 1
        Datatables
      CONS OF REACT
      • 41
        Requires discipline to keep architecture organized
      • 30
        No predefined way to structure your app
      • 29
        Need to be familiar with lots of third party packages
      • 13
        JSX
      • 10
        Not enterprise friendly
      • 6
        One-way binding only
      • 3
        State consistency with backend neglected
      • 3
        Bad Documentation
      • 2
        Error boundary is needed
      • 2
        Paradigms change too fast

      related React posts

      Johnny Bell

      I was building a personal project that I needed to store items in a real time database. I am more comfortable with my Frontend skills than my backend so I didn't want to spend time building out anything in Ruby or Go.

      I stumbled on Firebase by #Google, and it was really all I needed. It had realtime data, an area for storing file uploads and best of all for the amount of data I needed it was free!

      I built out my application using tools I was familiar with, React for the framework, Redux.js to manage my state across components, and styled-components for the styling.

      Now as this was a project I was just working on in my free time for fun I didn't really want to pay for hosting. I did some research and I found Netlify. I had actually seen them at #ReactRally the year before and deployed a Gatsby site to Netlify already.

      Netlify was very easy to setup and link to my GitHub account you select a repo and pretty much with very little configuration you have a live site that will deploy every time you push to master.

      With the selection of these tools I was able to build out my application, connect it to a realtime database, and deploy to a live environment all with $0 spent.

      If you're looking to build out a small app I suggest giving these tools a go as you can get your idea out into the real world for absolutely no cost.

      See more
      Collins Ogbuzuru
      Front-end dev at Evolve credit · | 38 upvotes · 257.6K views

      Your tech stack is solid for building a real-time messaging project.

      React and React Native are excellent choices for the frontend, especially if you want to have both web and mobile versions of your application share code.

      ExpressJS is an unopinionated framework that affords you the flexibility to use it's features at your term, which is a good start. However, I would recommend you explore Sails.js as well. Sails.js is built on top of Express.js and it provides additional features out of the box, especially the Websocket integration that your project requires.

      Don't forget to set up Graphql codegen, this would improve your dev experience (Add Typescript, if you can too).

      I don't know much about databases but you might want to consider using NO-SQL. I used Firebase real-time db and aws dynamo db on a few of my personal projects and I love they're easy to work with and offer more flexibility for a chat application.

      See more
      JSF logo

      JSF

      140
      222
      4
      It is used for building component-based web interfaces
      140
      222
      + 1
      4
      PROS OF JSF
      • 2
        Rich and comprehensive Request Life-cycle
      • 1
        Very Mature UI framework
      • 1
        Server Side component
      CONS OF JSF
        Be the first to leave a con

        related JSF posts

        Hello guys, my first time here, and for requesting advice.

        I am a JavaScript Developer MERN Stack with a focus on Frontend Development. I wanna go more to Backend Development.

        Which Language has a Solid Ecosystem and not so many changes like JavaScript Frontend, quite Frankly that's freaking me out nowadays!

        In my Location Germany Industries, Finance, Utilities, Insurances, Retails, and Healthcare dominate Java in the Backend. In my case Java is the logical choice BUT, XML, old codebase, JSP/JSF , boring and verbose syntax without Syntactic Sugar, test Battle, and so on make me crazy.

        I have Java, Python, Golang, and Node.js/TypeScript as a choice, but because of a lack of Backend knowledge, I can't make a decision. Which Language and Ecosystem should I learn and master for a long time, my Goal is to work with a selected stack for 10+ years and I don't do Data Science only Software Engineering.

        Thanks for reading and Advice! Important! !!! I see via Email somebody send me an Advice, but unfortunately i can't see/read your Advice here :( Users like: Jose Manuel Ortega or nullStack65....

        See more

        Hello guys! I would ask for your advice. Our situation is like that there will be a project to revamp workflows and introduce new services like mobile apps, machine learning, and some online services that would use cloud storage. We use JSF, JavaScript, Ajax, Spring, Oracle 12c running on Linux (VM) and providing online services to internal users and the public. But, we are not technically savvy enough to evaluate what tools should be introduced. Personally, I am evaluating whether to take this opportunity to change our practice/PM approach from Prince to Scrum/Agile (It seemed that DevOps is popular) ... Since we adopt ISO 27001 and ISO 20000, security is a crucial factor that we consider. Would you please help to recommend a list of tools and explain the reasons why you recommend them? Thanks in advance~!

        See more
        Spring Boot logo

        Spring Boot

        26K
        23.6K
        1K
        Create Spring-powered, production-grade applications and services with absolute minimum fuss
        26K
        23.6K
        + 1
        1K
        PROS OF SPRING BOOT
        • 149
          Powerful and handy
        • 134
          Easy setup
        • 128
          Java
        • 90
          Spring
        • 85
          Fast
        • 46
          Extensible
        • 37
          Lots of "off the shelf" functionalities
        • 32
          Cloud Solid
        • 26
          Caches well
        • 24
          Productive
        • 24
          Many receipes around for obscure features
        • 23
          Modular
        • 23
          Integrations with most other Java frameworks
        • 22
          Spring ecosystem is great
        • 21
          Auto-configuration
        • 21
          Fast Performance With Microservices
        • 18
          Community
        • 17
          Easy setup, Community Support, Solid for ERP apps
        • 15
          One-stop shop
        • 14
          Easy to parallelize
        • 14
          Cross-platform
        • 13
          Easy setup, good for build erp systems, well documented
        • 13
          Powerful 3rd party libraries and frameworks
        • 12
          Easy setup, Git Integration
        • 5
          It's so easier to start a project on spring
        • 4
          Kotlin
        • 1
          Microservice and Reactive Programming
        • 1
          The ability to integrate with the open source ecosystem
        CONS OF SPRING BOOT
        • 23
          Heavy weight
        • 18
          Annotation ceremony
        • 13
          Java
        • 11
          Many config files needed
        • 5
          Reactive
        • 4
          Excellent tools for cloud hosting, since 5.x
        • 1
          Java 😒😒

        related Spring Boot posts

        Praveen Mooli
        Engineering Manager at Taylor and Francis · | 19 upvotes · 4M views

        We are in the process of building a modern content platform to deliver our content through various channels. We decided to go with Microservices architecture as we wanted scale. Microservice architecture style is an approach to developing an application as a suite of small independently deployable services built around specific business capabilities. You can gain modularity, extensive parallelism and cost-effective scaling by deploying services across many distributed servers. Microservices modularity facilitates independent updates/deployments, and helps to avoid single point of failure, which can help prevent large-scale outages. We also decided to use Event Driven Architecture pattern which is a popular distributed asynchronous architecture pattern used to produce highly scalable applications. The event-driven architecture is made up of highly decoupled, single-purpose event processing components that asynchronously receive and process events.

        To build our #Backend capabilities we decided to use the following: 1. #Microservices - Java with Spring Boot , Node.js with ExpressJS and Python with Flask 2. #Eventsourcingframework - Amazon Kinesis , Amazon Kinesis Firehose , Amazon SNS , Amazon SQS, AWS Lambda 3. #Data - Amazon RDS , Amazon DynamoDB , Amazon S3 , MongoDB Atlas

        To build #Webapps we decided to use Angular 2 with RxJS

        #Devops - GitHub , Travis CI , Terraform , Docker , Serverless

        See more

        Is learning Spring and Spring Boot for web apps back-end development is still relevant in 2021? Feel free to share your views with comparison to Django/Node.js/ ExpressJS or other frameworks.

        Please share some good beginner resources to start learning about spring/spring boot framework to build the web apps.

        See more