StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Continuous Integration
  4. Mobile Continuous Integration
  5. Bitrise vs CodeMagic

Bitrise vs CodeMagic

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Bitrise
Bitrise
Stacks342
Followers373
Votes74
Codemagic
Codemagic
Stacks55
Followers56
Votes17

Bitrise vs CodeMagic: What are the differences?

Introduction

Bitrise and CodeMagic are two popular CI/CD platforms that offer automated build, test, and deployment solutions for mobile app development projects. While both platforms aim to streamline the development process, they have key differences that set them apart from each other.

  1. Platform Customizability: Bitrise offers extensive customization options, allowing developers to tailor their CI/CD workflows by choosing from a wide range of available steps and integrations. On the other hand, CodeMagic focuses on simplicity and ease of use, providing a more opinionated approach with pre-configured workflows that are optimized specifically for Flutter projects.

  2. Supported Platforms: Bitrise supports a wide range of platforms, including iOS, Android, web, macOS, and more. It offers flexibility for building and distributing applications across various platforms. CodeMagic, on the other hand, primarily focuses on Flutter app development and provides a specialized solution specifically for Flutter-based projects.

  3. Pricing Model: Bitrise follows a tiered pricing model based on usage and includes a free plan with limited features. It offers different pricing tiers with varying levels of features and capabilities. CodeMagic, on the other hand, offers a more straightforward pricing structure with a single paid plan that includes all features, without any free plan option.

  4. Integration Ecosystem: Bitrise provides a comprehensive integration ecosystem, allowing developers to easily connect their CI/CD workflows with various tools and services, such as GitHub, Slack, Jira, Firebase, and more. CodeMagic, while not as extensive as Bitrise, still offers integration options for popular services, including GitHub and Slack.

  5. Community and Support: Bitrise has a large and active community, providing a wealth of resources, tutorials, and support for developers. It also has an active forum for community discussions and problem-solving. CodeMagic, being a relatively newer platform, has a smaller community but still provides access to documentation, guides, and limited community support.

  6. Deployment Options: Bitrise offers a wide range of deployment options, including app store distribution for both iOS and Android, as well as various other distribution methods like email, Slack, and more. CodeMagic primarily focuses on app store deployment for iOS and Android applications.

In summary, Bitrise provides extensive customization options, supports a wide range of platforms, and has a diverse integration ecosystem, while CodeMagic focuses on simplicity for Flutter app development, offers a simplified pricing structure, and primarily focuses on app store deployment.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Bitrise
Bitrise
Codemagic
Codemagic

It is a Continous Integration and Delivery (CI/CD) Platform as a Service (PaaS) with a main focus on mobile app development (iOS, Android). You can automate the testing and deployment of your apps with just a few clicks. When you trigger a build a Virtual Machine is assigned to host your build and your defined Workflow (series of Steps scripts) will be executed, step by step.

Codemagic is the developer's favourite CI/CD tool for mobile app projects. Build your Android, iOS, React Native, Ionic, Unity and Flutter projects on Codemagic.

Continuous Delivery;Hosted Environment;Customizable Workflows;Code Security;Open Source;Support by Devs
Continuous integration; Continuous Delivery; Continuous Deployment; Debugging; Configuration Management ; Source Control; Access Controls/Permissions; Testing Management; Automatic Code signing; Automatic testing
Statistics
Stacks
342
Stacks
55
Followers
373
Followers
56
Votes
74
Votes
17
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 18
    Easy setup
  • 9
    Bitbucket Integration
  • 8
    Advanced Workflow configuration
  • 7
    Slack integration
  • 7
    Github Integration
Pros
  • 2
    Apple Developer Portal integration
  • 2
    Flutter support
  • 1
    Newest Xcode version
  • 1
    Great for teams
  • 1
    Always up to date with the latest developer tools
Integrations
Android SDK
Android SDK
Apache Cordova
Apache Cordova
TestFlight
TestFlight
TestFairy
TestFairy
Gradle
Gradle
Amazon S3
Amazon S3
Xamarin
Xamarin
Slack
Slack
Parse
Parse
Twilio
Twilio
Jira
Jira
GitLab
GitLab
Gradle
Gradle
Node.js
Node.js
Carthage
Carthage
Docker
Docker
React Native
React Native
GitHub
GitHub
Bitbucket
Bitbucket
Flutter
Flutter

What are some alternatives to Bitrise, Codemagic?

Jenkins

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Travis CI

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

TeamCity

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

GoCD

GoCD

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.

Shippable

Shippable

Shippable is a SaaS platform that lets you easily add Continuous Integration/Deployment to your Github and BitBucket repositories. It is lightweight, super simple to setup, and runs your builds and tests faster than any other service.

Buildkite

Buildkite

CI and build automation tool that combines the power of your own build infrastructure with the convenience of a managed, centralized web UI. Used by Shopify, Basecamp, Digital Ocean, Venmo, Cochlear, Bugsnag and more.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana