Flowdock vs Riot.im

Overview

Flowdock

Stacks96

Followers81

Votes165

Riot.im

Stacks21

Followers36

Votes6

Flowdock vs Riot.im : What are the differences?

Introduction: Here is a comparison between Flowdock and Riot.im, highlighting their key differences.

Interface and Navigation: Flowdock offers a clean and user-friendly interface with easy navigation, making it simple for teams to communicate and collaborate effectively. On the other hand, Riot.im provides a more customizable interface but might have a steeper learning curve for new users due to its extensive features and options.
Integration Capabilities: Flowdock comes with a range of integrations including popular tools like Jira, GitHub, and Trello, enhancing productivity and workflow efficiency for teams. In comparison, Riot.im has a strong focus on open-source integrations and supports platforms like Matrix, IRC, and RSS feeds, catering to a more technical user base.
Privacy and Security Features: Flowdock ensures data privacy through encryption and secure data storage measures, making it a reliable choice for organizations handling sensitive information. Riot.im, being an open-source platform, offers transparency in its security protocols and allows users greater control over their data and communication channels.
Cost Structure: Flowdock operates on a subscription-based model, offering various pricing tiers for different user requirements, which can be beneficial for teams with specific budget constraints. On the other hand, Riot.im is open-source and free to use for all users, making it an attractive option for individuals and organizations seeking a cost-effective communication solution.
Collaboration Tools: Flowdock provides a range of collaboration tools such as shared to-do lists, file sharing, and video conferencing, enabling seamless teamwork within the platform. In contrast, Riot.im focuses on communication essentials like text messaging, voice calls, and video calls, emphasizing communication efficiency over additional collaboration features.
Community Support: Flowdock offers dedicated customer support channels for troubleshooting and assistance, ensuring users receive prompt solutions to any issues they encounter while using the platform. Riot.im, being open-source, relies on community forums and user contributions for support, which can lead to varied response times and solutions depending on community activity.

In Summary, Flowdock excels in user-friendly interface and integration capabilities, whereas Riot.im stands out for its privacy features, cost structure, and strong community support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Flowdock	Riot.im
Flowdock is a web-based team chat service that integrates with your tools to provide a window into your team's activities. With the team inbox, everyone on your team can stay up to date. Stay connected with Flowdock's iOS and Android apps.	It supports end to end encryption, groups, channels and sharing of files between users, also registration does not require a phone number.
Team Inbox;Group Chat;1-On-1 Private Chat;Chat & Threads;Search All History;Notify and be notified;Mention someone by their @name;iOS and Android apps;Tags;Custom emoji;Notifications;File sharing;Tool integrations;Persistent history	More than simple chat. Custom Communication; Choose who you trust with your data; Security; Voice & Video Conferencing; Share Files; Intelligent Notifications; Other Apps, Stickers, Widgets & Bots; Bridge other apps and networks.
Statistics
Stacks 96	Stacks 21
Followers 81	Followers 36
Votes 165	Votes 6
Pros & Cons
Pros 34 Threaded chat 30 Simpler integrations than others, team inbox = awesome 18 Great interface 17 Extremely easy to manage multiple conversations 15 Team Inbox	Pros 2 Behind firewall 2 Open source 1 Mobile app for andori 1 Mobile app for android and IOS, Also web-based app Cons 1 Deactivated users file remain on server 1 There is no admin UI. Very hard to moderate 1 You can not delete users
Integrations
GitHub Git Heroku Pivotal Tracker Trello Jira Semaphore Bitbucket Woopra New Relic	Pipedrive Slack Zapier Asana Weebly Basecamp Wix

What are some alternatives to Flowdock, Riot.im ?

Slack

Imagine all your team communication in one place, instantly searchable, available wherever you go. That’s Slack. All your messages. All your files. And everything from Twitter, Dropbox, Google Docs, Asana, Trello, GitHub and dozens of other services. All together.

HipChat

HipChat is a hosted private chat service for your company or team. Invite colleagues to share ideas and files in persistent group chat rooms. Get your team off AIM, Google Talk, and Skype — HipChat was built for business.

Zulip

Zulip is powerful, open source team chat that combines the immediacy of real-time chat with the productivity benefits of threaded conversations. Zulip allows busy managers and others in meetings all day to participate in their teams chats.

RocketChat

Rocket.Chat is a Web Chat Server, developed in JavaScript, using the Meteor fullstack framework. It is a great solution for communities and companies wanting to privately host their own chat service or for developers looking forward to build and evolve their own chat platforms.

Mattermost

Mattermost is modern communication from behind your firewall.

Gitter

Free chat rooms for your public repositories. A bit like IRC only smarter. Chats for private repositories as well as organisations.

Microsoft Teams

See content and chat history anytime, including team chats with Skype that are visible to the whole team. Private group chats are available for smaller group conversations.

Users can send messages and exchange photos, videos, stickers, audio and files of any type. It provides instant messaging, simple, fast, secure and synced across all your devices.

Keybase Teams

Keybase is for anyone. Imagine a Slack for the whole world, except end-to-end encrypted across all your devices. Or a Team Dropbox where the server can't leak your files or be hacked.

Fleep

Leave email behind and manage all conversations with your team, partners and clients in Fleep. If some of them are not Fleep users yet, they will receive all messages as normal emails.

Related Comparisons

HipChat vs Mattermost vs Slack

Email on Acid vs Litmus

InVision vs Marvel vs Proto.io

Microsoft Teams vs Webex

Mattermost vs RocketChat vs Slack

Flowdock vs Riot.im : What are the differences?

Introduction: Here is a comparison between Flowdock and Riot.im, highlighting their key differences.

Interface and Navigation: Flowdock offers a clean and user-friendly interface with easy navigation, making it simple for teams to communicate and collaborate effectively. On the other hand, Riot.im provides a more customizable interface but might have a steeper learning curve for new users due to its extensive features and options.
Integration Capabilities: Flowdock comes with a range of integrations including popular tools like Jira, GitHub, and Trello, enhancing productivity and workflow efficiency for teams. In comparison, Riot.im has a strong focus on open-source integrations and supports platforms like Matrix, IRC, and RSS feeds, catering to a more technical user base.
Privacy and Security Features: Flowdock ensures data privacy through encryption and secure data storage measures, making it a reliable choice for organizations handling sensitive information. Riot.im, being an open-source platform, offers transparency in its security protocols and allows users greater control over their data and communication channels.
Cost Structure: Flowdock operates on a subscription-based model, offering various pricing tiers for different user requirements, which can be beneficial for teams with specific budget constraints. On the other hand, Riot.im is open-source and free to use for all users, making it an attractive option for individuals and organizations seeking a cost-effective communication solution.
Collaboration Tools: Flowdock provides a range of collaboration tools such as shared to-do lists, file sharing, and video conferencing, enabling seamless teamwork within the platform. In contrast, Riot.im focuses on communication essentials like text messaging, voice calls, and video calls, emphasizing communication efficiency over additional collaboration features.
Community Support: Flowdock offers dedicated customer support channels for troubleshooting and assistance, ensuring users receive prompt solutions to any issues they encounter while using the platform. Riot.im, being open-source, relies on community forums and user contributions for support, which can lead to varied response times and solutions depending on community activity.

In Summary, Flowdock excels in user-friendly interface and integration capabilities, whereas Riot.im stands out for its privacy features, cost structure, and strong community support.

Flowdock vs Riot.im

Overview