Alternatives to FreeBSD logo

Alternatives to FreeBSD

Ubuntu, Linux, OpenBSD, Debian, and FreeNAS are the most popular alternatives and competitors to FreeBSD.
249
196
+ 1
28

What is FreeBSD and what are its top alternatives?

FreeBSD is a free and open-source Unix-like operating system known for its advanced networking, security features, and compatibility with a wide range of hardware platforms. It is based on the Berkeley Software Distribution (BSD) version of UNIX. Key features of FreeBSD include ZFS file system, Jails for virtualization, and Ports Collection for easy software installation. However, some limitations of FreeBSD include a steeper learning curve for beginners and a smaller user base compared to other operating systems.

  1. Ubuntu: Ubuntu is a popular Linux distribution known for its user-friendly interface and extensive software repository. Key features include long-term support releases, frequent security updates, and a large community for support. Pros of Ubuntu include ease of use and a vast software ecosystem, while cons include potential compatibility issues with certain hardware.
  2. CentOS: CentOS is a free, community-supported Linux distribution derived from the sources of Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL). Key features include stability, security updates, and compatibility with RHEL packages. Pros of CentOS include reliability and long-term support, while cons may include slower updates compared to other distributions.
  3. Debian: Debian is a versatile, stable, and secure Linux distribution known for its commitment to free software principles. Key features include a wide range of software packages, regular updates, and a strong focus on security. Pros of Debian include stability and security, while cons may include slower adoption of new technologies.
  4. OpenBSD: OpenBSD is a free and secure operating system known for its dedication to security and auditability. Key features include strong default security settings, regular security patches, and a focus on correctness in software development. Pros of OpenBSD include strong security practices and a tight-knit community, while cons may include slower performance due to security measures.
  5. Fedora: Fedora is a cutting-edge Linux distribution sponsored by Red Hat and known for its focus on the latest technologies. Key features include rapid development cycles, a wide range of software packages, and a commitment to open-source principles. Pros of Fedora include access to bleeding-edge software and active community participation, while cons may include potential instability due to frequent updates.
  6. Arch Linux: Arch Linux is a lightweight and flexible Linux distribution known for its simplicity and customizability. Key features include a rolling release model, a minimalist approach to software installation, and extensive documentation. Pros of Arch Linux include a high degree of control over the system and access to the latest software versions, while cons may include a steep learning curve and potential breakage during updates.
  7. Gentoo: Gentoo is a source-based Linux distribution known for its flexibility and optimization for specific hardware architectures. Key features include the Portage package manager, a rolling release model, and the ability to customize system components at a granular level. Pros of Gentoo include performance optimizations and user-controlled system configuration, while cons may include longer compilation times for software installations.
  8. Alpine Linux: Alpine Linux is a security-oriented, lightweight Linux distribution designed for containerized environments. Key features include a small footprint, musl libc, and OpenRC init system. Pros of Alpine Linux include fast boot times, strong security focus, and compatibility with Docker, while cons may include potential challenges with software compatibility due to its minimalistic approach.
  9. Void Linux: Void Linux is an independent Linux distribution known for its simplicity, speed, and cutting-edge software. Key features include the runit init system, XBPS package manager, and rolling release updates. Pros of Void Linux include a clean and minimalistic design, efficient system performance, and a dedicated community, while cons may include limited software availability compared to larger distributions.
  10. TrueOS: TrueOS is a user-friendly desktop operating system based on FreeBSD with an emphasis on ease of use and performance. Key features include the Lumina desktop environment, ZFS file system, and FreeBSD base. Pros of TrueOS include a familiar desktop experience for FreeBSD users and advanced filesystem capabilities, while cons may include a smaller software repository compared to mainstream Linux distributions.

Top Alternatives to FreeBSD

  • Ubuntu
    Ubuntu

    Ubuntu is an ancient African word meaning ‘humanity to others’. It also means ‘I am what I am because of who we all are’. The Ubuntu operating system brings the spirit of Ubuntu to the world of computers. ...

  • Linux
    Linux

    A clone of the operating system Unix, written from scratch by Linus Torvalds with assistance from a loosely-knit team of hackers across the Net. It aims towards POSIX and Single UNIX Specification compliance. ...

  • OpenBSD
    OpenBSD

    It is a free and secure UNIX-like operating system that emphasizes portability, standardization, correctness, proactive security & integrated cryptography. ...

  • Debian
    Debian

    Debian systems currently use the Linux kernel or the FreeBSD kernel. Linux is a piece of software started by Linus Torvalds and supported by thousands of programmers worldwide. FreeBSD is an operating system including a kernel and other software. ...

  • FreeNAS
    FreeNAS

    It is the simplest way to create a centralized and easily accessible place for your data. Use it with ZFS to protect, store, backup, all of your data. It is used everywhere, for the home, small business, and the enterprise. ...

  • CentOS
    CentOS

    The CentOS Project is a community-driven free software effort focused on delivering a robust open source ecosystem. For users, we offer a consistent manageable platform that suits a wide variety of deployments. For open source communities, we offer a solid, predictable base to build upon, along with extensive resources to build, test, release, and maintain their code. ...

  • JavaScript
    JavaScript

    JavaScript is most known as the scripting language for Web pages, but used in many non-browser environments as well such as node.js or Apache CouchDB. It is a prototype-based, multi-paradigm scripting language that is dynamic,and supports object-oriented, imperative, and functional programming styles. ...

  • Python
    Python

    Python is a general purpose programming language created by Guido Van Rossum. Python is most praised for its elegant syntax and readable code, if you are just beginning your programming career python suits you best. ...

FreeBSD alternatives & related posts

Ubuntu logo

Ubuntu

78.8K
468
The leading OS for PC, tablet, phone and cloud
78.8K
468
PROS OF UBUNTU
  • 230
    Free to use
  • 96
    Easy setup for testing discord bot
  • 57
    Gateway Linux Distro
  • 54
    Simple interface
  • 9
    Don't need driver installation in most cases
  • 6
    Open Source
  • 6
    Many active communities
  • 3
    Software Availability
  • 3
    Easy to custom
  • 2
    Many flavors/distros based on ubuntu
  • 1
    Lightweight container base OS
  • 1
    Great OotB Linux Shell Experience
CONS OF UBUNTU
  • 5
    Demanding system requirements
  • 4
    Adds overhead and unnecessary complexity over Debian
  • 2
    Snapd installed by default
  • 1
    Systemd

related Ubuntu posts

CDG

I use Laravel because it's the most advances PHP framework out there, easy to maintain, easy to upgrade and most of all : easy to get a handle on, and to follow every new technology ! PhpStorm is our main software to code, as of simplicity and full range of tools for a modern application.

Google Analytics Analytics of course for a tailored analytics, Bulma as an innovative CSS framework, coupled with our Sass (Scss) pre-processor.

As of more basic stuff, we use HTML5, JavaScript (but with Vue.js too) and Webpack to handle the generation of all this.

To deploy, we set up Buddy to easily send the updates on our nginx / Ubuntu server, where it will connect to our GitHub Git private repository, pull and do all the operations needed with Deployer .

CloudFlare ensure the rapidity of distribution of our content, and Let's Encrypt the https certificate that is more than necessary when we'll want to sell some products with our Stripe api calls.

Asana is here to let us list all the functionalities, possibilities and ideas we want to implement.

See more
Tassanai Singprom

This is my stack in Application & Data

JavaScript PHP HTML5 jQuery Redis Amazon EC2 Ubuntu Sass Vue.js Firebase Laravel Lumen Amazon RDS GraphQL MariaDB

My Utilities Tools

Google Analytics Postman Elasticsearch

My Devops Tools

Git GitHub GitLab npm Visual Studio Code Kibana Sentry BrowserStack

My Business Tools

Slack

See more
Linux logo

Linux

3K
41
A family of free and open source software operating systems based on the Linux kernel
3K
41
PROS OF LINUX
  • 17
    Open Source
  • 11
    Free
  • 8
    Reliability
  • 5
    Safe
CONS OF LINUX
    Be the first to leave a con

    related Linux posts

    I use Visual Studio Code because at this time is a mature software and I can do practically everything using it.

    • It's free and open source: The project is hosted on GitHub and it’s free to download, fork, modify and contribute to the project.

    • Multi-platform: You can download binaries for different platforms, included Windows (x64), MacOS and Linux (.rpm and .deb packages)

    • LightWeight: It runs smoothly in different devices. It has an average memory and CPU usage. Starts almost immediately and it’s very stable.

    • Extended language support: Supports by default the majority of the most used languages and syntax like JavaScript, HTML, C#, Swift, Java, PHP, Python and others. Also, VS Code supports different file types associated to projects like .ini, .properties, XML and JSON files.

    • Integrated tools: Includes an integrated terminal, debugger, problem list and console output inspector. The project navigator sidebar is simple and powerful: you can manage your files and folders with ease. The command palette helps you find commands by text. The search widget has a powerful auto-complete feature to search and find your files.

    • Extensible and configurable: There are many extensions available for every language supported, including syntax highlighters, IntelliSense and code completion, and debuggers. There are also extension to manage application configuration and architecture like Docker and Jenkins.

    • Integrated with Git: You can visually manage your project repositories, pull, commit and push your changes, and easy conflict resolution.( there is support for SVN (Subversion) users by plugin)

    See more
    Rogério R. Alcântara
    Shared insights
    on
    macOSmacOSLinuxLinuxGitGitDockerDocker

    Personal Dotfiles management

    Given that they are all “configuration management” tools - meaning they are designed to deploy, configure and manage servers - what would be the simplest - and yet robust - solution to manage personal dotfiles - for n00bs.

    Ideally, I reckon, it should:

    • be containerized (Docker?)
    • be versionable (Git)
    • ensure idempotency
    • allow full automation (tests, CI/CD, etc.)
    • be fully recoverable (Linux/ macOS)
    • be easier to setup/manage (as much as possible)

    Does it make sense?

    See more
    OpenBSD logo

    OpenBSD

    46
    0
    Free and open-source Unix-like operating system
    46
    0
    PROS OF OPENBSD
      Be the first to leave a pro
      CONS OF OPENBSD
        Be the first to leave a con

        related OpenBSD posts

        Debian logo

        Debian

        16K
        164
        The Universal Operating System
        16K
        164
        PROS OF DEBIAN
        • 54
          Massively supported
        • 50
          Stable
        • 21
          Reliable
        • 9
          Aptitude
        • 8
          Customizable
        • 8
          It is free
        • 8
          Turnkey linux use it
        • 6
          Works on all architectures
        CONS OF DEBIAN
        • 10
          Old versions of software
        • 2
          Can be difficult to set up on vanilla Debian

        related Debian posts

        Labinator Team

        At labinator.com, we use HTML5, CSS 3, Sass, Vanilla.JS and PHP when building our premium WordPress themes and plugins. When writing our codes, we use Sublime Text and Visual Studio Code depending on the project. We run Manjaro and Debian operating systems in our office. Manjaro is a great desktop operating system for all range of tasks while Debian is a solid choice for servers.

        WordPress became a very popular choice when it comes to content management systems and building websites. It is easy to learn and has a great community behind it. The high number of plugins as well that are available for WordPress allows any user to customize it depending on his/her needs.

        For development, HTML5 with Sass is our go-to choice when building our themes.

        Main Advantages Of Sass:

        • It's CSS syntax friendly
        • It offers variables
        • It uses a nested syntax
        • It includes mixins
        • Great community and online support.
        • Great documentation that is easy to read and follow.

        As for PHP, we always thrive to use PHP 7.3+. After the introduction of PHP 7, the WordPress development process became more stable and reliable than before. If you a developer considering PHP 7.3+ for your project, it would be good to note the following benefits.

        The Benefits Of Using PHP:

        • Open Source.
        • Highly Extendible.
        • Easy to learn and read.
        • Platform independent.
        • Compatible with APACHE.
        • Low development and maintenance cost.
        • Great community and support.
        • Detailed documentation that has everything you need!

        Why PHP 7.3+?

        • Flexible Heredoc & Nowdoc Syntaxes - Two key methods for defining strings within PHP. They also became easier to read and more reliable.
        • A good boost in performance speed which is extremely important when it comes to WordPress development.
        See more
        Jason Martin
        Senior PHP Developer at Orange · | 14 upvotes · 88.4K views
        Shared insights
        on
        LaravelLaravelMySQLMySQLDebianDebian

        For your purposes, I recommend @Laravel, or even @Symfony or @Yii, or whatever. In your use case, a framework is 100% indicated, because it will cut your boilerplate in half or more, and you'll have a pre-fab organization for files, classes and so on. Personally, I am not a fan of Frameworks, because they tend to take over your project like cancer and trap you. But for an internal app to manage stuff, it's probably the best idea to use one (preferably one you like).

        When doing internal apps, your best bet is to stick the essentials and basics, try Laravel with MySQL on a nice Debian virtual machine. Can't go wrong.

        See more
        FreeNAS logo

        FreeNAS

        36
        4
        An operating system that can be installed on virtually any hardware platform
        36
        4
        PROS OF FREENAS
        • 2
          Very Stable
        • 2
          Easy to install
        CONS OF FREENAS
          Be the first to leave a con

          related FreeNAS posts

          CentOS logo

          CentOS

          13.7K
          53
          The Community ENTerprise Operating System
          13.7K
          53
          PROS OF CENTOS
          • 16
            Stable
          • 9
            Free to use
          • 9
            Reliable
          • 6
            Has epel packages
          • 6
            Good support
          • 5
            Great Community
          • 2
            I've moved from gentoo to centos
          CONS OF CENTOS
          • 1
            Yum is a horrible package manager

          related CentOS posts

          Marcel Kornegoor

          Since #ATComputing is a vendor independent Linux and open source specialist, we do not have a favorite Linux distribution. We mainly use Ubuntu , Centos Debian , Red Hat Enterprise Linux and Fedora during our daily work. These are also the distributions we see most often used in our customers environments.

          For our #ci/cd training, we use an open source pipeline that is build around Visual Studio Code , Jenkins , VirtualBox , GitHub , Docker Kubernetes and Google Compute Engine.

          For #ServerConfigurationAndAutomation, we have embraced and contributed to Ansible mainly because it is not only flexible and powerful, but also straightforward and easier to learn than some other (open source) solutions. On the other hand: we are not affraid of Puppet Labs and Chef either.

          Currently, our most popular #programming #Language course is Python . The reason Python is so popular has to do with it's versatility, but also with its low complexity. This helps sysadmins to write scripts or simple programs to make their job less repetitive and automating things more fun. Python is also widely used to communicate with (REST) API's and for data analysis.

          See more
          Shared insights
          on
          UbuntuUbuntuOpenStackOpenStackCentOSCentOS
          at

          Hello guys

          I am confused between choosing CentOS7 or centos8 for OpenStack tripleo undercloud deployment. Which one should I use? There is another option to use OpenStack, Ubuntu, or MicroStack.

          We wanted to use this deployment to build our home cloud or private cloud infrastructure. I heard that centOS is always the best choice through a little research, but still not sure. As centos8 from Redhat is not supported for OpenStack tripleo deployments anymore, I had to upgrade to CentosStream.

          See more
          JavaScript logo

          JavaScript

          361.5K
          8.1K
          Lightweight, interpreted, object-oriented language with first-class functions
          361.5K
          8.1K
          PROS OF JAVASCRIPT
          • 1.7K
            Can be used on frontend/backend
          • 1.5K
            It's everywhere
          • 1.2K
            Lots of great frameworks
          • 898
            Fast
          • 746
            Light weight
          • 425
            Flexible
          • 392
            You can't get a device today that doesn't run js
          • 286
            Non-blocking i/o
          • 237
            Ubiquitousness
          • 191
            Expressive
          • 55
            Extended functionality to web pages
          • 49
            Relatively easy language
          • 46
            Executed on the client side
          • 30
            Relatively fast to the end user
          • 25
            Pure Javascript
          • 21
            Functional programming
          • 15
            Async
          • 13
            Full-stack
          • 12
            Future Language of The Web
          • 12
            Setup is easy
          • 12
            Its everywhere
          • 11
            Because I love functions
          • 11
            JavaScript is the New PHP
          • 10
            Like it or not, JS is part of the web standard
          • 9
            Easy
          • 9
            Can be used in backend, frontend and DB
          • 9
            Expansive community
          • 9
            Everyone use it
          • 8
            Easy to hire developers
          • 8
            Most Popular Language in the World
          • 8
            For the good parts
          • 8
            Can be used both as frontend and backend as well
          • 8
            No need to use PHP
          • 8
            Powerful
          • 7
            Evolution of C
          • 7
            Its fun and fast
          • 7
            It's fun
          • 7
            Nice
          • 7
            Versitile
          • 7
            Hard not to use
          • 7
            Popularized Class-Less Architecture & Lambdas
          • 7
            Agile, packages simple to use
          • 7
            Supports lambdas and closures
          • 7
            Love-hate relationship
          • 7
            Photoshop has 3 JS runtimes built in
          • 6
            1.6K Can be used on frontend/backend
          • 6
            Client side JS uses the visitors CPU to save Server Res
          • 6
            It let's me use Babel & Typescript
          • 6
            Easy to make something
          • 6
            Can be used on frontend/backend/Mobile/create PRO Ui
          • 5
            Client processing
          • 5
            What to add
          • 5
            Everywhere
          • 5
            Scope manipulation
          • 5
            Function expressions are useful for callbacks
          • 5
            Stockholm Syndrome
          • 5
            Promise relationship
          • 5
            Clojurescript
          • 4
            Only Programming language on browser
          • 4
            Because it is so simple and lightweight
          • 1
            Easy to learn and test
          • 1
            Easy to understand
          • 1
            Not the best
          • 1
            Subskill #4
          • 1
            Hard to learn
          • 1
            Test2
          • 1
            Test
          • 1
            Easy to learn
          • 0
            Hard 彤
          CONS OF JAVASCRIPT
          • 22
            A constant moving target, too much churn
          • 20
            Horribly inconsistent
          • 15
            Javascript is the New PHP
          • 9
            No ability to monitor memory utilitization
          • 8
            Shows Zero output in case of ANY error
          • 7
            Thinks strange results are better than errors
          • 6
            Can be ugly
          • 3
            No GitHub
          • 2
            Slow
          • 0
            HORRIBLE DOCUMENTS, faulty code, repo has bugs

          related JavaScript posts

          Zach Holman

          Oof. I have truly hated JavaScript for a long time. Like, for over twenty years now. Like, since the Clinton administration. It's always been a nightmare to deal with all of the aspects of that silly language.

          But wowza, things have changed. Tooling is just way, way better. I'm primarily web-oriented, and using React and Apollo together the past few years really opened my eyes to building rich apps. And I deeply apologize for using the phrase rich apps; I don't think I've ever said such Enterprisey words before.

          But yeah, things are different now. I still love Rails, and still use it for a lot of apps I build. But it's that silly rich apps phrase that's the problem. Users have way more comprehensive expectations than they did even five years ago, and the JS community does a good job at building tools and tech that tackle the problems of making heavy, complicated UI and frontend work.

          Obviously there's a lot of things happening here, so just saying "JavaScript isn't terrible" might encompass a huge amount of libraries and frameworks. But if you're like me, yeah, give things another shot- I'm somehow not hating on JavaScript anymore and... gulp... I kinda love it.

          See more
          Conor Myhrvold
          Tech Brand Mgr, Office of CTO at Uber · | 44 upvotes · 12.7M views

          How Uber developed the open source, end-to-end distributed tracing Jaeger , now a CNCF project:

          Distributed tracing is quickly becoming a must-have component in the tools that organizations use to monitor their complex, microservice-based architectures. At Uber, our open source distributed tracing system Jaeger saw large-scale internal adoption throughout 2016, integrated into hundreds of microservices and now recording thousands of traces every second.

          Here is the story of how we got here, from investigating off-the-shelf solutions like Zipkin, to why we switched from pull to push architecture, and how distributed tracing will continue to evolve:

          https://eng.uber.com/distributed-tracing/

          (GitHub Pages : https://www.jaegertracing.io/, GitHub: https://github.com/jaegertracing/jaeger)

          Bindings/Operator: Python Java Node.js Go C++ Kubernetes JavaScript OpenShift C# Apache Spark

          See more
          Python logo

          Python

          245.2K
          6.9K
          A clear and powerful object-oriented programming language, comparable to Perl, Ruby, Scheme, or Java.
          245.2K
          6.9K
          PROS OF PYTHON
          • 1.2K
            Great libraries
          • 963
            Readable code
          • 847
            Beautiful code
          • 788
            Rapid development
          • 691
            Large community
          • 438
            Open source
          • 393
            Elegant
          • 282
            Great community
          • 273
            Object oriented
          • 221
            Dynamic typing
          • 77
            Great standard library
          • 60
            Very fast
          • 55
            Functional programming
          • 50
            Easy to learn
          • 46
            Scientific computing
          • 35
            Great documentation
          • 29
            Productivity
          • 28
            Matlab alternative
          • 28
            Easy to read
          • 24
            Simple is better than complex
          • 20
            It's the way I think
          • 19
            Imperative
          • 18
            Very programmer and non-programmer friendly
          • 18
            Free
          • 17
            Machine learning support
          • 17
            Powerfull language
          • 16
            Fast and simple
          • 14
            Scripting
          • 12
            Explicit is better than implicit
          • 11
            Ease of development
          • 10
            Clear and easy and powerfull
          • 9
            Unlimited power
          • 8
            Import antigravity
          • 8
            It's lean and fun to code
          • 7
            Print "life is short, use python"
          • 7
            Python has great libraries for data processing
          • 6
            High Documented language
          • 6
            I love snakes
          • 6
            Readability counts
          • 6
            Rapid Prototyping
          • 6
            Now is better than never
          • 6
            Although practicality beats purity
          • 6
            Flat is better than nested
          • 6
            Great for tooling
          • 6
            There should be one-- and preferably only one --obvious
          • 6
            Fast coding and good for competitions
          • 5
            Web scraping
          • 5
            Lists, tuples, dictionaries
          • 5
            Great for analytics
          • 4
            Beautiful is better than ugly
          • 4
            Easy to learn and use
          • 4
            Easy to setup and run smooth
          • 4
            Multiple Inheritence
          • 4
            CG industry needs
          • 4
            Socially engaged community
          • 4
            Complex is better than complicated
          • 4
            Plotting
          • 4
            Simple and easy to learn
          • 3
            List comprehensions
          • 3
            Powerful language for AI
          • 3
            Flexible and easy
          • 3
            It is Very easy , simple and will you be love programmi
          • 3
            Many types of collections
          • 3
            If the implementation is easy to explain, it may be a g
          • 3
            If the implementation is hard to explain, it's a bad id
          • 3
            Special cases aren't special enough to break the rules
          • 3
            Pip install everything
          • 3
            No cruft
          • 3
            Generators
          • 3
            Import this
          • 2
            Batteries included
          • 2
            Securit
          • 2
            Can understand easily who are new to programming
          • 2
            Should START with this but not STICK with This
          • 2
            A-to-Z
          • 2
            Because of Netflix
          • 2
            Only one way to do it
          • 2
            Better outcome
          • 2
            Good for hacking
          • 1
            Best friend for NLP
          • 1
            Sexy af
          • 1
            Procedural programming
          • 1
            Automation friendly
          • 1
            Slow
          • 0
            Keep it simple
          • 0
            Powerful
          • 0
            Ni
          CONS OF PYTHON
          • 53
            Still divided between python 2 and python 3
          • 28
            Performance impact
          • 26
            Poor syntax for anonymous functions
          • 22
            GIL
          • 19
            Package management is a mess
          • 14
            Too imperative-oriented
          • 12
            Hard to understand
          • 12
            Dynamic typing
          • 12
            Very slow
          • 8
            Indentations matter a lot
          • 8
            Not everything is expression
          • 7
            Incredibly slow
          • 7
            Explicit self parameter in methods
          • 6
            Requires C functions for dynamic modules
          • 6
            Poor DSL capabilities
          • 6
            No anonymous functions
          • 5
            Fake object-oriented programming
          • 5
            Threading
          • 5
            The "lisp style" whitespaces
          • 5
            Official documentation is unclear.
          • 5
            Hard to obfuscate
          • 5
            Circular import
          • 4
            Lack of Syntax Sugar leads to "the pyramid of doom"
          • 4
            The benevolent-dictator-for-life quit
          • 4
            Not suitable for autocomplete
          • 2
            Meta classes
          • 1
            Training wheels (forced indentation)

          related Python posts

          Conor Myhrvold
          Tech Brand Mgr, Office of CTO at Uber · | 44 upvotes · 12.7M views

          How Uber developed the open source, end-to-end distributed tracing Jaeger , now a CNCF project:

          Distributed tracing is quickly becoming a must-have component in the tools that organizations use to monitor their complex, microservice-based architectures. At Uber, our open source distributed tracing system Jaeger saw large-scale internal adoption throughout 2016, integrated into hundreds of microservices and now recording thousands of traces every second.

          Here is the story of how we got here, from investigating off-the-shelf solutions like Zipkin, to why we switched from pull to push architecture, and how distributed tracing will continue to evolve:

          https://eng.uber.com/distributed-tracing/

          (GitHub Pages : https://www.jaegertracing.io/, GitHub: https://github.com/jaegertracing/jaeger)

          Bindings/Operator: Python Java Node.js Go C++ Kubernetes JavaScript OpenShift C# Apache Spark

          See more
          Nick Parsons
          Building cool things on the internet 🛠️ at Stream · | 35 upvotes · 4.3M views

          Winds 2.0 is an open source Podcast/RSS reader developed by Stream with a core goal to enable a wide range of developers to contribute.

          We chose JavaScript because nearly every developer knows or can, at the very least, read JavaScript. With ES6 and Node.js v10.x.x, it’s become a very capable language. Async/Await is powerful and easy to use (Async/Await vs Promises). Babel allows us to experiment with next-generation JavaScript (features that are not in the official JavaScript spec yet). Yarn allows us to consistently install packages quickly (and is filled with tons of new tricks)

          We’re using JavaScript for everything – both front and backend. Most of our team is experienced with Go and Python, so Node was not an obvious choice for this app.

          Sure... there will be haters who refuse to acknowledge that there is anything remotely positive about JavaScript (there are even rants on Hacker News about Node.js); however, without writing completely in JavaScript, we would not have seen the results we did.

          #FrameworksFullStack #Languages

          See more