Alternatives to Sapper logo

Alternatives to Sapper

Svelte, Nuxt.js, Next.js, React, and JavaScript are the most popular alternatives and competitors to Sapper.
41
56
+ 1
0

What is Sapper and what are its top alternatives?

Sapper is a framework for building web applications in Svelte. It provides server-side rendering, code splitting, and efficient client-side hydration. Sapper also offers features like routing, pre-fetching, and store management. However, it lacks extensive community support and documentation compared to other frameworks.

  1. Next.js: Next.js is a popular React framework that offers server-side rendering, routing, and dynamic data fetching. It has a large community and ecosystem, making it easier to find solutions and plugins. However, Next.js is more complex than Sapper and might have a steeper learning curve.
  2. Nuxt.js: Nuxt.js is a Vue framework that provides server-side rendering, static site generation, and code splitting. It offers a similar feature set to Sapper but with the Vue ecosystem. Nuxt.js has a strong community and extensive documentation.
  3. Gatsby: Gatsby is a static site generator that is highly performant and easy to use. It offers server-side rendering, code splitting, and data fetching from various sources. Gatsby is great for building static websites but might not be suitable for dynamic web applications.
  4. Angular Universal: Angular Universal is a server-side rendering solution for Angular applications. It allows developers to pre-render Angular applications on the server for better performance and SEO. However, Angular Universal can be more complex than Sapper to set up and manage.
  5. SvelteKit: SvelteKit is the official successor to Sapper, offering a streamlined framework for building Svelte applications. It focuses on simplicity, performance, and developer experience. SvelteKit improves upon Sapper's features and addresses some of its limitations.
  6. Razzle: Razzle is a universal JavaScript framework that offers server-side rendering, code splitting, and seamless client-side hydration. It supports React, Vue, and Angular, making it versatile for different projects. Razzle simplifies the setup of server-side rendering compared to Sapper.
  7. RedwoodJS: RedwoodJS is a full-stack framework for building web applications with React and GraphQL. It provides server-side rendering, API endpoints, and database integration out of the box. RedwoodJS is opinionated and aims to streamline the development process.
  8. Gridsome: Gridsome is a Vue framework for building static websites with GraphQL. It offers server-side rendering, data sourcing from various APIs, and a flexible plugin system. Gridsome is ideal for content-heavy websites but might not be as feature-rich as Sapper for dynamic applications.
  9. Blitz.js: Blitz.js is a full-stack JavaScript framework that is built on top of Next.js and Prisma. It provides server-side rendering, authentication, and database integration. Blitz.js aims to simplify full-stack development and reduce boilerplate code.
  10. Astro: Astro is a static site generator that blends the best of static and dynamic web development. It offers server-side rendering, code splitting, and data fetching while optimizing performance and developer experience. Astro is a modern alternative to Sapper for building static and dynamic websites.

Top Alternatives to Sapper

  • Svelte
    Svelte

    If you've ever built a JavaScript application, the chances are you've encountered – or at least heard of – frameworks like React, Angular, Vue and Ractive. Like Svelte, these tools all share a goal of making it easy to build slick interactive user interfaces. Rather than interpreting your application code at run time, your app is converted into ideal JavaScript at build time. That means you don't pay the performance cost of the framework's abstractions, or incur a penalty when your app first loads. ...

  • Nuxt.js
    Nuxt.js

    Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more. ...

  • Next.js
    Next.js

    Next.js is a minimalistic framework for server-rendered React applications.

  • React
    React

    Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project. ...

  • JavaScript
    JavaScript

    JavaScript is most known as the scripting language for Web pages, but used in many non-browser environments as well such as node.js or Apache CouchDB. It is a prototype-based, multi-paradigm scripting language that is dynamic,and supports object-oriented, imperative, and functional programming styles. ...

  • Python
    Python

    Python is a general purpose programming language created by Guido Van Rossum. Python is most praised for its elegant syntax and readable code, if you are just beginning your programming career python suits you best. ...

  • Node.js
    Node.js

    Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices. ...

  • HTML5
    HTML5

    HTML5 is a core technology markup language of the Internet used for structuring and presenting content for the World Wide Web. As of October 2014 this is the final and complete fifth revision of the HTML standard of the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). The previous version, HTML 4, was standardised in 1997. ...

Sapper alternatives & related posts

Svelte logo

Svelte

1.6K
499
A UI framework that compiles into tiny standalone JavaScript modules
1.6K
499
PROS OF SVELTE
  • 58
    Performance
  • 40
    Reactivity
  • 35
    Components
  • 35
    Simplicity
  • 34
    Javascript compiler (do that browsers don't have to)
  • 30
    Lightweight
  • 28
    Near to no learning curve
  • 26
    Real Reactivity
  • 26
    Fast as vanilajs
  • 22
    All in one
  • 18
    Compiler based
  • 18
    Use existing js libraries
  • 17
    SSR
  • 16
    Scalable
  • 16
    Very easy for beginners
  • 13
    Composable
  • 12
    No runtime overhead
  • 12
    Ease of use
  • 10
    Built in store
  • 9
    Typescript
  • 7
    Start with pure html + css
  • 7
    Best Developer Experience
  • 6
    Templates
  • 4
    Speed
CONS OF SVELTE
  • 3
    Event Listener Overload
  • 2
    Little to no libraries
  • 2
    Complex
  • 2
    Learning Curve
  • 2
    Hard to learn

related Svelte posts

Sarmad Chaudhary
Founder & CEO at Ebiz Ltd. · | 9 upvotes · 1.3M views

Hi there!

I just want to have a simple poll/vote...

If you guys need a UI/Component Library for React, Vue.js, or AngularJS, which type of library would you prefer between:

1 ) A single maintained cross-framework library that is 100% compatible and can be integrated with any popular framework like Vue, React, Angular 2, Svelte, etc.

2) A native framework-specific library developed to work only on target framework like ElementUI for Vue, Ant Design for React.

Your advice would help a lot! Thanks in advance :)

See more
Aleksander Jess
Marketer at ITMAGINATION · | 5 upvotes · 15.8K views

React is pretty much the standard nowadays. Companies of all sizes released integrations: the ecommerce ones too. I will bring up Shopify , that released their Hydrogen

There are (arguably) much better tools than React, you are right. There's Svelte (SvelteKit) , Solid.js, and more. They all suffer from morer or less the same issue, though (when it comes to SEO, at least).

The problem is not with React , it's with SPAs. It used to be (and still is sometimes) that search engines' bots wouldn't run JavaScript , meaning they wouldn't see anything on the page. Nowadays, it is said they do load it, but that takes longer than loading the HTML, which is what they are mostly interested in.

So what do you do? You use a static site generator, a prerenderer, a static site, or a server-side rendered site. Next.js does both SSG & SSR, which is why your Next.js sites should rank higher than the plain React sites (assuming the same content & structure).

I hope this answers your question.

See more
Nuxt.js logo

Nuxt.js

1.9K
367
The Vue.js Framework
1.9K
367
PROS OF NUXT.JS
  • 60
    SSR
  • 46
    Automatic routes
  • 32
    Middleware
  • 28
    Hot code reloading
  • 22
    Easy setup, easy to use, great community, FRENCH TOUCH
  • 22
    SPA
  • 21
    Static Websites
  • 20
    Code splitting for every page
  • 19
    Plugins
  • 18
    Custom layouts
  • 15
    Automatic transpilation and bundling (with webpack and
  • 13
    Modules ecosystem
  • 13
    Easy setup
  • 11
    Vibrant and helpful community
  • 11
    Amazing Developer Experience
  • 11
    Pages directory
  • 5
    Its Great for Team Development
CONS OF NUXT.JS
    Be the first to leave a con

    related Nuxt.js posts

    Simon Reymann
    Senior Fullstack Developer at QUANTUSflow Software GmbH · | 24 upvotes · 4.9M views

    Our whole Vue.js frontend stack (incl. SSR) consists of the following tools:

    • Nuxt.js consisting of Vue CLI, Vue Router, vuex, Webpack and Sass (Bundler for HTML5, CSS 3), Babel (Transpiler for JavaScript),
    • Vue Styleguidist as our style guide and pool of developed Vue.js components
    • Vuetify as Material Component Framework (for fast app development)
    • TypeScript as programming language
    • Apollo / GraphQL (incl. GraphiQL) for data access layer (https://apollo.vuejs.org/)
    • ESLint, TSLint and Prettier for coding style and code analyzes
    • Jest as testing framework
    • Google Fonts and Font Awesome for typography and icon toolkit
    • NativeScript-Vue for mobile development

    The main reason we have chosen Vue.js over React and AngularJS is related to the following artifacts:

    • Empowered HTML. Vue.js has many similar approaches with Angular. This helps to optimize HTML blocks handling with the use of different components.
    • Detailed documentation. Vue.js has very good documentation which can fasten learning curve for developers.
    • Adaptability. It provides a rapid switching period from other frameworks. It has similarities with Angular and React in terms of design and architecture.
    • Awesome integration. Vue.js can be used for both building single-page applications and more difficult web interfaces of apps. Smaller interactive parts can be easily integrated into the existing infrastructure with no negative effect on the entire system.
    • Large scaling. Vue.js can help to develop pretty large reusable templates.
    • Tiny size. Vue.js weights around 20KB keeping its speed and flexibility. It allows reaching much better performance in comparison to other frameworks.
    See more
    Nikolaj Ivancic

    I want to build a documentation tool - functionally equivalent to MkDocs. The initial choice ought to be VuePress - but I know of at least one respectable developer who started with VuePress and switched to Nuxt.js. A rich set of "themes" is a plus and all documents ought to be in Markdown.

    Any opinions?

    See more
    Next.js logo

    Next.js

    6.8K
    326
    A small framework for server-rendered universal JavaScript apps
    6.8K
    326
    PROS OF NEXT.JS
    • 51
      Automatic server rendering and code splitting
    • 44
      Built with React
    • 34
      Easy setup
    • 26
      TypeScript
    • 24
      Universal JavaScript
    • 22
      Zero setup
    • 21
      Static site generator
    • 12
      Just JavaScript
    • 12
      Simple deployment
    • 12
      Incremental static regeneration
    • 10
      Filesystem as an API
    • 10
      Frictionless development
    • 9
      Everything is a function
    • 9
      Well Documented
    • 8
      Has many examples and integrations
    • 8
      Testing
    • 7
      Isomorphic React applications
    • 4
      File based routing + hooks built in
    • 2
      Deployment
    • 1
      SEO
    CONS OF NEXT.JS
    • 9
      Structure is weak compared to Angular(2+)

    related Next.js posts

    Jan Vlnas
    Senior Software Engineer at Mews · | 26 upvotes · 404.6K views
    Shared insights
    on
    HTML5HTML5JavaScriptJavaScriptNext.jsNext.js

    Few years ago we were building a Next.js site with a few simple forms. This required handling forms validation and submission, but instead of picking some forms library, we went with plain JavaScript and constraint validation API in HTML5. This shaved off a few KBs of dependencies and gave us full control over the validation behavior and look. I describe this approach, with its pros and cons, in a blog post.

    See more

    I'm working as one of the engineering leads in RunaHR. As our platform is a Saas, we thought It'd be good to have an API (We chose Ruby and Rails for this) and a SPA (built with React and Redux ) connected. We started the SPA with Create React App since It's pretty easy to start.

    We use Jest as the testing framework and react-testing-library to test React components. In Rails we make tests using RSpec.

    Our main database is PostgreSQL, but we also use MongoDB to store some type of data. We started to use Redis  for cache and other time sensitive operations.

    We have a couple of extra projects: One is an Employee app built with React Native and the other is an internal back office dashboard built with Next.js for the client and Python in the backend side.

    Since we have different frontend apps we have found useful to have Bit to document visual components and utils in JavaScript.

    See more
    React logo

    React

    173.4K
    4.1K
    A JavaScript library for building user interfaces
    173.4K
    4.1K
    PROS OF REACT
    • 833
      Components
    • 673
      Virtual dom
    • 578
      Performance
    • 508
      Simplicity
    • 442
      Composable
    • 186
      Data flow
    • 166
      Declarative
    • 128
      Isn't an mvc framework
    • 120
      Reactive updates
    • 115
      Explicit app state
    • 50
      JSX
    • 29
      Learn once, write everywhere
    • 22
      Easy to Use
    • 21
      Uni-directional data flow
    • 17
      Works great with Flux Architecture
    • 11
      Great perfomance
    • 10
      Javascript
    • 9
      Built by Facebook
    • 8
      TypeScript support
    • 6
      Speed
    • 6
      Server Side Rendering
    • 6
      Scalable
    • 5
      Props
    • 5
      Excellent Documentation
    • 5
      Functional
    • 5
      Easy as Lego
    • 5
      Closer to standard JavaScript and HTML than others
    • 5
      Cross-platform
    • 5
      Feels like the 90s
    • 5
      Easy to start
    • 5
      Hooks
    • 5
      Awesome
    • 4
      Scales super well
    • 4
      Allows creating single page applications
    • 4
      Server side views
    • 4
      Sdfsdfsdf
    • 4
      Start simple
    • 4
      Strong Community
    • 4
      Fancy third party tools
    • 4
      Super easy
    • 3
      Has arrow functions
    • 3
      Very gentle learning curve
    • 3
      Beautiful and Neat Component Management
    • 3
      Just the View of MVC
    • 3
      Simple, easy to reason about and makes you productive
    • 3
      Fast evolving
    • 3
      SSR
    • 3
      Great migration pathway for older systems
    • 3
      Rich ecosystem
    • 3
      Simple
    • 3
      Has functional components
    • 3
      Every decision architecture wise makes sense
    • 2
      HTML-like
    • 2
      Image upload
    • 2
      Sharable
    • 2
      Recharts
    • 2
      Split your UI into components with one true state
    • 2
      Permissively-licensed
    • 2
      Fragments
    • 1
      Datatables
    • 1
      React hooks
    CONS OF REACT
    • 41
      Requires discipline to keep architecture organized
    • 30
      No predefined way to structure your app
    • 29
      Need to be familiar with lots of third party packages
    • 13
      JSX
    • 10
      Not enterprise friendly
    • 6
      One-way binding only
    • 3
      State consistency with backend neglected
    • 3
      Bad Documentation
    • 2
      Error boundary is needed
    • 2
      Paradigms change too fast

    related React posts

    Johnny Bell

    I was building a personal project that I needed to store items in a real time database. I am more comfortable with my Frontend skills than my backend so I didn't want to spend time building out anything in Ruby or Go.

    I stumbled on Firebase by #Google, and it was really all I needed. It had realtime data, an area for storing file uploads and best of all for the amount of data I needed it was free!

    I built out my application using tools I was familiar with, React for the framework, Redux.js to manage my state across components, and styled-components for the styling.

    Now as this was a project I was just working on in my free time for fun I didn't really want to pay for hosting. I did some research and I found Netlify. I had actually seen them at #ReactRally the year before and deployed a Gatsby site to Netlify already.

    Netlify was very easy to setup and link to my GitHub account you select a repo and pretty much with very little configuration you have a live site that will deploy every time you push to master.

    With the selection of these tools I was able to build out my application, connect it to a realtime database, and deploy to a live environment all with $0 spent.

    If you're looking to build out a small app I suggest giving these tools a go as you can get your idea out into the real world for absolutely no cost.

    See more
    Collins Ogbuzuru
    Front-end dev at Evolve credit · | 38 upvotes · 271.1K views

    Your tech stack is solid for building a real-time messaging project.

    React and React Native are excellent choices for the frontend, especially if you want to have both web and mobile versions of your application share code.

    ExpressJS is an unopinionated framework that affords you the flexibility to use it's features at your term, which is a good start. However, I would recommend you explore Sails.js as well. Sails.js is built on top of Express.js and it provides additional features out of the box, especially the Websocket integration that your project requires.

    Don't forget to set up Graphql codegen, this would improve your dev experience (Add Typescript, if you can too).

    I don't know much about databases but you might want to consider using NO-SQL. I used Firebase real-time db and aws dynamo db on a few of my personal projects and I love they're easy to work with and offer more flexibility for a chat application.

    See more
    JavaScript logo

    JavaScript

    361.5K
    8.1K
    Lightweight, interpreted, object-oriented language with first-class functions
    361.5K
    8.1K
    PROS OF JAVASCRIPT
    • 1.7K
      Can be used on frontend/backend
    • 1.5K
      It's everywhere
    • 1.2K
      Lots of great frameworks
    • 898
      Fast
    • 746
      Light weight
    • 425
      Flexible
    • 392
      You can't get a device today that doesn't run js
    • 286
      Non-blocking i/o
    • 237
      Ubiquitousness
    • 191
      Expressive
    • 55
      Extended functionality to web pages
    • 49
      Relatively easy language
    • 46
      Executed on the client side
    • 30
      Relatively fast to the end user
    • 25
      Pure Javascript
    • 21
      Functional programming
    • 15
      Async
    • 13
      Full-stack
    • 12
      Future Language of The Web
    • 12
      Setup is easy
    • 12
      Its everywhere
    • 11
      Because I love functions
    • 11
      JavaScript is the New PHP
    • 10
      Like it or not, JS is part of the web standard
    • 9
      Easy
    • 9
      Can be used in backend, frontend and DB
    • 9
      Expansive community
    • 9
      Everyone use it
    • 8
      Easy to hire developers
    • 8
      Most Popular Language in the World
    • 8
      For the good parts
    • 8
      Can be used both as frontend and backend as well
    • 8
      No need to use PHP
    • 8
      Powerful
    • 7
      Evolution of C
    • 7
      Its fun and fast
    • 7
      It's fun
    • 7
      Nice
    • 7
      Versitile
    • 7
      Hard not to use
    • 7
      Popularized Class-Less Architecture & Lambdas
    • 7
      Agile, packages simple to use
    • 7
      Supports lambdas and closures
    • 7
      Love-hate relationship
    • 7
      Photoshop has 3 JS runtimes built in
    • 6
      1.6K Can be used on frontend/backend
    • 6
      Client side JS uses the visitors CPU to save Server Res
    • 6
      It let's me use Babel & Typescript
    • 6
      Easy to make something
    • 6
      Can be used on frontend/backend/Mobile/create PRO Ui
    • 5
      Client processing
    • 5
      What to add
    • 5
      Everywhere
    • 5
      Scope manipulation
    • 5
      Function expressions are useful for callbacks
    • 5
      Stockholm Syndrome
    • 5
      Promise relationship
    • 5
      Clojurescript
    • 4
      Only Programming language on browser
    • 4
      Because it is so simple and lightweight
    • 1
      Easy to learn and test
    • 1
      Easy to understand
    • 1
      Not the best
    • 1
      Subskill #4
    • 1
      Hard to learn
    • 1
      Test2
    • 1
      Test
    • 1
      Easy to learn
    • 0
      Hard 彤
    CONS OF JAVASCRIPT
    • 22
      A constant moving target, too much churn
    • 20
      Horribly inconsistent
    • 15
      Javascript is the New PHP
    • 9
      No ability to monitor memory utilitization
    • 8
      Shows Zero output in case of ANY error
    • 7
      Thinks strange results are better than errors
    • 6
      Can be ugly
    • 3
      No GitHub
    • 2
      Slow
    • 0
      HORRIBLE DOCUMENTS, faulty code, repo has bugs

    related JavaScript posts

    Zach Holman

    Oof. I have truly hated JavaScript for a long time. Like, for over twenty years now. Like, since the Clinton administration. It's always been a nightmare to deal with all of the aspects of that silly language.

    But wowza, things have changed. Tooling is just way, way better. I'm primarily web-oriented, and using React and Apollo together the past few years really opened my eyes to building rich apps. And I deeply apologize for using the phrase rich apps; I don't think I've ever said such Enterprisey words before.

    But yeah, things are different now. I still love Rails, and still use it for a lot of apps I build. But it's that silly rich apps phrase that's the problem. Users have way more comprehensive expectations than they did even five years ago, and the JS community does a good job at building tools and tech that tackle the problems of making heavy, complicated UI and frontend work.

    Obviously there's a lot of things happening here, so just saying "JavaScript isn't terrible" might encompass a huge amount of libraries and frameworks. But if you're like me, yeah, give things another shot- I'm somehow not hating on JavaScript anymore and... gulp... I kinda love it.

    See more
    Conor Myhrvold
    Tech Brand Mgr, Office of CTO at Uber · | 44 upvotes · 12.7M views

    How Uber developed the open source, end-to-end distributed tracing Jaeger , now a CNCF project:

    Distributed tracing is quickly becoming a must-have component in the tools that organizations use to monitor their complex, microservice-based architectures. At Uber, our open source distributed tracing system Jaeger saw large-scale internal adoption throughout 2016, integrated into hundreds of microservices and now recording thousands of traces every second.

    Here is the story of how we got here, from investigating off-the-shelf solutions like Zipkin, to why we switched from pull to push architecture, and how distributed tracing will continue to evolve:

    https://eng.uber.com/distributed-tracing/

    (GitHub Pages : https://www.jaegertracing.io/, GitHub: https://github.com/jaegertracing/jaeger)

    Bindings/Operator: Python Java Node.js Go C++ Kubernetes JavaScript OpenShift C# Apache Spark

    See more
    Python logo

    Python

    245.2K
    6.9K
    A clear and powerful object-oriented programming language, comparable to Perl, Ruby, Scheme, or Java.
    245.2K
    6.9K
    PROS OF PYTHON
    • 1.2K
      Great libraries
    • 963
      Readable code
    • 847
      Beautiful code
    • 788
      Rapid development
    • 691
      Large community
    • 438
      Open source
    • 393
      Elegant
    • 282
      Great community
    • 273
      Object oriented
    • 221
      Dynamic typing
    • 77
      Great standard library
    • 60
      Very fast
    • 55
      Functional programming
    • 50
      Easy to learn
    • 46
      Scientific computing
    • 35
      Great documentation
    • 29
      Productivity
    • 28
      Matlab alternative
    • 28
      Easy to read
    • 24
      Simple is better than complex
    • 20
      It's the way I think
    • 19
      Imperative
    • 18
      Very programmer and non-programmer friendly
    • 18
      Free
    • 17
      Machine learning support
    • 17
      Powerfull language
    • 16
      Fast and simple
    • 14
      Scripting
    • 12
      Explicit is better than implicit
    • 11
      Ease of development
    • 10
      Clear and easy and powerfull
    • 9
      Unlimited power
    • 8
      Import antigravity
    • 8
      It's lean and fun to code
    • 7
      Print "life is short, use python"
    • 7
      Python has great libraries for data processing
    • 6
      High Documented language
    • 6
      I love snakes
    • 6
      Readability counts
    • 6
      Rapid Prototyping
    • 6
      Now is better than never
    • 6
      Although practicality beats purity
    • 6
      Flat is better than nested
    • 6
      Great for tooling
    • 6
      There should be one-- and preferably only one --obvious
    • 6
      Fast coding and good for competitions
    • 5
      Web scraping
    • 5
      Lists, tuples, dictionaries
    • 5
      Great for analytics
    • 4
      Beautiful is better than ugly
    • 4
      Easy to learn and use
    • 4
      Easy to setup and run smooth
    • 4
      Multiple Inheritence
    • 4
      CG industry needs
    • 4
      Socially engaged community
    • 4
      Complex is better than complicated
    • 4
      Plotting
    • 4
      Simple and easy to learn
    • 3
      List comprehensions
    • 3
      Powerful language for AI
    • 3
      Flexible and easy
    • 3
      It is Very easy , simple and will you be love programmi
    • 3
      Many types of collections
    • 3
      If the implementation is easy to explain, it may be a g
    • 3
      If the implementation is hard to explain, it's a bad id
    • 3
      Special cases aren't special enough to break the rules
    • 3
      Pip install everything
    • 3
      No cruft
    • 3
      Generators
    • 3
      Import this
    • 2
      Batteries included
    • 2
      Securit
    • 2
      Can understand easily who are new to programming
    • 2
      Should START with this but not STICK with This
    • 2
      A-to-Z
    • 2
      Because of Netflix
    • 2
      Only one way to do it
    • 2
      Better outcome
    • 2
      Good for hacking
    • 1
      Best friend for NLP
    • 1
      Sexy af
    • 1
      Procedural programming
    • 1
      Automation friendly
    • 1
      Slow
    • 0
      Keep it simple
    • 0
      Powerful
    • 0
      Ni
    CONS OF PYTHON
    • 53
      Still divided between python 2 and python 3
    • 28
      Performance impact
    • 26
      Poor syntax for anonymous functions
    • 22
      GIL
    • 19
      Package management is a mess
    • 14
      Too imperative-oriented
    • 12
      Hard to understand
    • 12
      Dynamic typing
    • 12
      Very slow
    • 8
      Indentations matter a lot
    • 8
      Not everything is expression
    • 7
      Incredibly slow
    • 7
      Explicit self parameter in methods
    • 6
      Requires C functions for dynamic modules
    • 6
      Poor DSL capabilities
    • 6
      No anonymous functions
    • 5
      Fake object-oriented programming
    • 5
      Threading
    • 5
      The "lisp style" whitespaces
    • 5
      Official documentation is unclear.
    • 5
      Hard to obfuscate
    • 5
      Circular import
    • 4
      Lack of Syntax Sugar leads to "the pyramid of doom"
    • 4
      The benevolent-dictator-for-life quit
    • 4
      Not suitable for autocomplete
    • 2
      Meta classes
    • 1
      Training wheels (forced indentation)

    related Python posts

    Conor Myhrvold
    Tech Brand Mgr, Office of CTO at Uber · | 44 upvotes · 12.7M views

    How Uber developed the open source, end-to-end distributed tracing Jaeger , now a CNCF project:

    Distributed tracing is quickly becoming a must-have component in the tools that organizations use to monitor their complex, microservice-based architectures. At Uber, our open source distributed tracing system Jaeger saw large-scale internal adoption throughout 2016, integrated into hundreds of microservices and now recording thousands of traces every second.

    Here is the story of how we got here, from investigating off-the-shelf solutions like Zipkin, to why we switched from pull to push architecture, and how distributed tracing will continue to evolve:

    https://eng.uber.com/distributed-tracing/

    (GitHub Pages : https://www.jaegertracing.io/, GitHub: https://github.com/jaegertracing/jaeger)

    Bindings/Operator: Python Java Node.js Go C++ Kubernetes JavaScript OpenShift C# Apache Spark

    See more
    Nick Parsons
    Building cool things on the internet 🛠️ at Stream · | 35 upvotes · 4.3M views

    Winds 2.0 is an open source Podcast/RSS reader developed by Stream with a core goal to enable a wide range of developers to contribute.

    We chose JavaScript because nearly every developer knows or can, at the very least, read JavaScript. With ES6 and Node.js v10.x.x, it’s become a very capable language. Async/Await is powerful and easy to use (Async/Await vs Promises). Babel allows us to experiment with next-generation JavaScript (features that are not in the official JavaScript spec yet). Yarn allows us to consistently install packages quickly (and is filled with tons of new tricks)

    We’re using JavaScript for everything – both front and backend. Most of our team is experienced with Go and Python, so Node was not an obvious choice for this app.

    Sure... there will be haters who refuse to acknowledge that there is anything remotely positive about JavaScript (there are even rants on Hacker News about Node.js); however, without writing completely in JavaScript, we would not have seen the results we did.

    #FrameworksFullStack #Languages

    See more
    Node.js logo

    Node.js

    188.9K
    8.5K
    A platform built on Chrome's JavaScript runtime for easily building fast, scalable network applications
    188.9K
    8.5K
    PROS OF NODE.JS
    • 1.4K
      Npm
    • 1.3K
      Javascript
    • 1.1K
      Great libraries
    • 1K
      High-performance
    • 805
      Open source
    • 486
      Great for apis
    • 477
      Asynchronous
    • 424
      Great community
    • 390
      Great for realtime apps
    • 296
      Great for command line utilities
    • 85
      Websockets
    • 83
      Node Modules
    • 69
      Uber Simple
    • 59
      Great modularity
    • 58
      Allows us to reuse code in the frontend
    • 42
      Easy to start
    • 35
      Great for Data Streaming
    • 32
      Realtime
    • 28
      Awesome
    • 25
      Non blocking IO
    • 18
      Can be used as a proxy
    • 17
      High performance, open source, scalable
    • 16
      Non-blocking and modular
    • 15
      Easy and Fun
    • 14
      Easy and powerful
    • 13
      Future of BackEnd
    • 13
      Same lang as AngularJS
    • 12
      Fullstack
    • 11
      Fast
    • 10
      Scalability
    • 10
      Cross platform
    • 9
      Simple
    • 8
      Mean Stack
    • 7
      Great for webapps
    • 7
      Easy concurrency
    • 6
      Typescript
    • 6
      Fast, simple code and async
    • 6
      React
    • 6
      Friendly
    • 5
      Control everything
    • 5
      Its amazingly fast and scalable
    • 5
      Easy to use and fast and goes well with JSONdb's
    • 5
      Scalable
    • 5
      Great speed
    • 5
      Fast development
    • 4
      It's fast
    • 4
      Easy to use
    • 4
      Isomorphic coolness
    • 3
      Great community
    • 3
      Not Python
    • 3
      Sooper easy for the Backend connectivity
    • 3
      TypeScript Support
    • 3
      Blazing fast
    • 3
      Performant and fast prototyping
    • 3
      Easy to learn
    • 3
      Easy
    • 3
      Scales, fast, simple, great community, npm, express
    • 3
      One language, end-to-end
    • 3
      Less boilerplate code
    • 2
      Npm i ape-updating
    • 2
      Event Driven
    • 2
      Lovely
    • 1
      Creat for apis
    • 0
      Node
    CONS OF NODE.JS
    • 46
      Bound to a single CPU
    • 45
      New framework every day
    • 40
      Lots of terrible examples on the internet
    • 33
      Asynchronous programming is the worst
    • 24
      Callback
    • 19
      Javascript
    • 11
      Dependency hell
    • 11
      Dependency based on GitHub
    • 10
      Low computational power
    • 7
      Very very Slow
    • 7
      Can block whole server easily
    • 7
      Callback functions may not fire on expected sequence
    • 4
      Breaking updates
    • 4
      Unstable
    • 3
      Unneeded over complication
    • 3
      No standard approach
    • 1
      Bad transitive dependency management
    • 1
      Can't read server session

    related Node.js posts

    Shared insights
    on
    Node.jsNode.jsGraphQLGraphQLMongoDBMongoDB

    I just finished the very first version of my new hobby project: #MovieGeeks. It is a minimalist online movie catalog for you to save the movies you want to see and for rating the movies you already saw. This is just the beginning as I am planning to add more features on the lines of sharing and discovery

    For the #BackEnd I decided to use Node.js , GraphQL and MongoDB:

    1. Node.js has a huge community so it will always be a safe choice in terms of libraries and finding solutions to problems you may have

    2. GraphQL because I needed to improve my skills with it and because I was never comfortable with the usual REST approach. I believe GraphQL is a better option as it feels more natural to write apis, it improves the development velocity, by definition it fixes the over-fetching and under-fetching problem that is so common on REST apis, and on top of that, the community is getting bigger and bigger.

    3. MongoDB was my choice for the database as I already have a lot of experience working on it and because, despite of some bad reputation it has acquired in the last months, I still believe it is a powerful database for at least a very long list of use cases such as the one I needed for my website

    See more
    Anurag Maurya

    Needs advice on code coverage tool in Node.js/ExpressJS with External API Testing Framework

    Hello community,

    I have a web application with the backend developed using Node.js and Express.js. The backend server is in one directory, and I have a separate API testing framework, made using SuperTest, Mocha, and Chai, in another directory. The testing framework pings the API, retrieves responses, and performs validations.

    I'm currently looking for a code coverage tool that can accurately measure the code coverage of my backend code when triggered by the API testing framework. I've tried using Istanbul and NYC with instrumented code, but the results are not as expected.

    Could you please recommend a reliable code coverage tool or suggest an approach to effectively measure the code coverage of my Node.js/Express.js backend code in this setup?

    See more
    HTML5 logo

    HTML5

    149K
    2.2K
    5th major revision of the core language of the World Wide Web
    149K
    2.2K
    PROS OF HTML5
    • 447
      New doctype
    • 389
      Local storage
    • 334
      Canvas
    • 285
      Semantic header and footer
    • 240
      Video element
    • 121
      Geolocation
    • 106
      Form autofocus
    • 100
      Email inputs
    • 85
      Editable content
    • 79
      Application caches
    • 10
      Easy to use
    • 9
      Cleaner Code
    • 5
      Easy
    • 4
      Websockets
    • 4
      Semantical
    • 3
      Better
    • 3
      Audio element
    • 3
      Modern
    • 2
      Portability
    • 2
      Semantic Header and Footer, Geolocation, New Doctype
    • 2
      Content focused
    • 2
      Compatible
    • 1
      Very easy to learning to HTML
    CONS OF HTML5
    • 1
      Easy to forget the tags when you're a begginner
    • 1
      Long and winding code

    related HTML5 posts

    Jan Vlnas
    Senior Software Engineer at Mews · | 26 upvotes · 404.6K views
    Shared insights
    on
    HTML5HTML5JavaScriptJavaScriptNext.jsNext.js

    Few years ago we were building a Next.js site with a few simple forms. This required handling forms validation and submission, but instead of picking some forms library, we went with plain JavaScript and constraint validation API in HTML5. This shaved off a few KBs of dependencies and gave us full control over the validation behavior and look. I describe this approach, with its pros and cons, in a blog post.

    See more
    Jonathan Pugh
    Software Engineer / Project Manager / Technical Architect · | 25 upvotes · 3M views

    I needed to choose a full stack of tools for cross platform mobile application design & development. After much research and trying different tools, these are what I came up with that work for me today:

    For the client coding I chose Framework7 because of its performance, easy learning curve, and very well designed, beautiful UI widgets. I think it's perfect for solo development or small teams. I didn't like React Native. It felt heavy to me and rigid. Framework7 allows the use of #CSS3, which I think is the best technology to come out of the #WWW movement. No other tech has been able to allow designers and developers to develop such flexible, high performance, customisable user interface elements that are highly responsive and hardware accelerated before. Now #CSS3 includes variables and flexboxes it is truly a powerful language and there is no longer a need for preprocessors such as #SCSS / #Sass / #less. React Native contains a very limited interpretation of #CSS3 which I found very frustrating after using #CSS3 for some years already and knowing its powerful features. The other very nice feature of Framework7 is that you can even build for the browser if you want your app to be available for desktop web browsers. The latest release also includes the ability to build for #Electron so you can have MacOS, Windows and Linux desktop apps. This is not possible with React Native yet.

    Framework7 runs on top of Apache Cordova. Cordova and webviews have been slated as being slow in the past. Having a game developer background I found the tweeks to make it run as smooth as silk. One of those tweeks is to use WKWebView. Another important one was using srcset on images.

    I use #Template7 for the for the templating system which is a no-nonsense mobile-centric #HandleBars style extensible templating system. It's easy to write custom helpers for, is fast and has a small footprint. I'm not forced into a new paradigm or learning some new syntax. It operates with standard JavaScript, HTML5 and CSS 3. It's written by the developer of Framework7 and so dovetails with it as expected.

    I configured TypeScript to work with the latest version of Framework7. I consider TypeScript to be one of the best creations to come out of Microsoft in some time. They must have an amazing team working on it. It's very powerful and flexible. It helps you catch a lot of bugs and also provides code completion in supporting IDEs. So for my IDE I use Visual Studio Code which is a blazingly fast and silky smooth editor that integrates seamlessly with TypeScript for the ultimate type checking setup (both products are produced by Microsoft).

    I use Webpack and Babel to compile the JavaScript. TypeScript can compile to JavaScript directly but Babel offers a few more options and polyfills so you can use the latest (and even prerelease) JavaScript features today and compile to be backwards compatible with virtually any browser. My favorite recent addition is "optional chaining" which greatly simplifies and increases readability of a number of sections of my code dealing with getting and setting data in nested objects.

    I use some Ruby scripts to process images with ImageMagick and pngquant to optimise for size and even auto insert responsive image code into the HTML5. Ruby is the ultimate cross platform scripting language. Even as your scripts become large, Ruby allows you to refactor your code easily and make it Object Oriented if necessary. I find it the quickest and easiest way to maintain certain aspects of my build process.

    For the user interface design and prototyping I use Figma. Figma has an almost identical user interface to #Sketch but has the added advantage of being cross platform (MacOS and Windows). Its real-time collaboration features are outstanding and I use them a often as I work mostly on remote projects. Clients can collaborate in real-time and see changes I make as I make them. The clickable prototyping features in Figma are also very well designed and mean I can send clickable prototypes to clients to try user interface updates as they are made and get immediate feedback. I'm currently also evaluating the latest version of #AdobeXD as an alternative to Figma as it has the very cool auto-animate feature. It doesn't have real-time collaboration yet, but I heard it is proposed for 2019.

    For the UI icons I use Font Awesome Pro. They have the largest selection and best looking icons you can find on the internet with several variations in styles so you can find most of the icons you want for standard projects.

    For the backend I was using the #GraphCool Framework. As I later found out, #GraphQL still has some way to go in order to provide the full power of a mature graph query language so later in my project I ripped out #GraphCool and replaced it with CouchDB and Pouchdb. Primarily so I could provide good offline app support. CouchDB with Pouchdb is very flexible and efficient combination and overcomes some of the restrictions I found in #GraphQL and hence #GraphCool also. The most impressive and important feature of CouchDB is its replication. You can configure it in various ways for backups, fault tolerance, caching or conditional merging of databases. CouchDB and Pouchdb even supports storing, retrieving and serving binary or image data or other mime types. This removes a level of complexity usually present in database implementations where binary or image data is usually referenced through an #HTML5 link. With CouchDB and Pouchdb apps can operate offline and sync later, very efficiently, when the network connection is good.

    I use PhoneGap when testing the app. It auto-reloads your app when its code is changed and you can also install it on Android phones to preview your app instantly. iOS is a bit more tricky cause of Apple's policies so it's not available on the App Store, but you can build it and install it yourself to your device.

    So that's my latest mobile stack. What tools do you use? Have you tried these ones?

    See more