Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Amazon EC2

47.8K
35.1K
+ 1
2.5K
Google Compute Engine

12.1K
8.9K
+ 1
423
Add tool

Amazon EC2 vs Google Compute Engine: What are the differences?

Amazon EC2 and Google Compute Engine are two popular cloud computing platforms that allow users to create and manage virtual machines in the cloud. While both offer similar services, there are key differences between them that make each platform suitable for different use cases.

  1. Pricing Model: Amazon EC2 offers both on-demand and reserved instances, allowing users to pay for computing resources on an hourly basis or with a long-term commitment. On the other hand, Google Compute Engine offers sustained use discounts, where users get automatic discounts for long-running workloads, and committed use discounts for sustained usage with one or three-year commitments.

  2. Network Performance: Amazon EC2 provides Enhanced Networking, which uses custom networking interfaces to improve network throughput and reduce latency. It also offers features like Elastic Load Balancers and Virtual Private Clouds. Google Compute Engine uses the Google Cloud Load Balancer for distributing traffic and offers Virtual Private Clouds for secure networking. However, it does not have a specific enhanced networking feature like EC2.

  3. Machine Types: Amazon EC2 offers a wide range of instance types optimized for different workloads, such as compute-optimized, memory-optimized, and storage-optimized instances. Google Compute Engine also offers various machine types, including shared core instances, standard instances, high-memory instances, and high-CPU instances. However, Google does not have a specific storage-optimized instance type like EC2.

  4. Marketplace: Amazon EC2 has a vast marketplace where users can find pre-configured virtual machine images, software, and service offerings contributed by independent software vendors (ISVs), system integrators, and AWS partners. Google Compute Engine also has a marketplace, although it is not as extensive as EC2's marketplace.

  5. Load Balancing: Amazon EC2 offers three types of load balancers, namely the Classic Load Balancer, Application Load Balancer, and Network Load Balancer, which provide layer 4 and layer 7 load balancing capabilities. Google Compute Engine provides the Google Cloud Load Balancer, which offers both global and regional load balancing with SSL termination and content-based routing. However, it does not have the same range of load balancer options as EC2.

  6. Managed Services: Amazon EC2 provides a variety of managed services, including AWS Elastic Beanstalk for deploying web applications and AWS Elastic Kubernetes Service (EKS) for running Kubernetes clusters. Google Compute Engine has its own managed services, such as Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE) for managing Kubernetes clusters and App Engine for deploying web applications. However, it does not have an equivalent service to AWS Elastic Beanstalk.

In Summary, Amazon EC2 and Google Compute Engine differ in pricing models, network performance, available machine types, marketplace offerings, load balancing options, and managed services provided.

Amazon EC2 vs Google Compute Engine: What are the differences?

Introduction

Amazon EC2 and Google Compute Engine are two popular cloud computing platforms that allow users to create and manage virtual machines in the cloud. While both offer similar services, there are key differences between them that make each platform suitable for different use cases.

1. Pricing Model: Amazon EC2 offers both on-demand and reserved instances, allowing users to pay for computing resources on an hourly basis or with a long-term commitment. On the other hand, Google Compute Engine offers sustained use discounts, where users get automatic discounts for long-running workloads, and committed use discounts for sustained usage with one or three-year commitments.

2. Network Performance: Amazon EC2 provides Enhanced Networking, which uses custom networking interfaces to improve network throughput and reduce latency. It also offers features like Elastic Load Balancers and Virtual Private Clouds. Google Compute Engine uses the Google Cloud Load Balancer for distributing traffic and offers Virtual Private Clouds for secure networking. However, it does not have a specific enhanced networking feature like EC2.

3. Machine Types: Amazon EC2 offers a wide range of instance types optimized for different workloads, such as compute-optimized, memory-optimized, and storage-optimized instances. Google Compute Engine also offers various machine types, including shared core instances, standard instances, high-memory instances, and high-CPU instances. However, Google does not have a specific storage-optimized instance type like EC2.

4. Marketplace: Amazon EC2 has a vast marketplace where users can find pre-configured virtual machine images, software, and service offerings contributed by independent software vendors (ISVs), system integrators, and AWS partners. Google Compute Engine also has a marketplace, although it is not as extensive as EC2's marketplace.

5. Load Balancing: Amazon EC2 offers three types of load balancers, namely the Classic Load Balancer, Application Load Balancer, and Network Load Balancer, which provide layer 4 and layer 7 load balancing capabilities. Google Compute Engine provides the Google Cloud Load Balancer, which offers both global and regional load balancing with SSL termination and content-based routing. However, it does not have the same range of load balancer options as EC2.

6. Managed Services: Amazon EC2 provides a variety of managed services, including AWS Elastic Beanstalk for deploying web applications and AWS Elastic Kubernetes Service (EKS) for running Kubernetes clusters. Google Compute Engine has its own managed services, such as Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE) for managing Kubernetes clusters and App Engine for deploying web applications. However, it does not have an equivalent service to AWS Elastic Beanstalk.

In Summary, Amazon EC2 and Google Compute Engine are cloud computing services offering scalable and flexible virtual machine instances. While EC2 by Amazon Web Services (AWS) boasts a longer track record and a vast array of services, Google Compute Engine, part of Google Cloud Platform (GCP), is recognized for its performance efficiency and seamless integration with other Google Cloud services, allowing users to choose based on specific project requirements and preferences.

Decisions about Amazon EC2 and Google Compute Engine

Albeit restricted to only a few places worlwide compared to its peers in the cloud segment, I am yet to find another provider capable of delivering a score over 5000 (Geekbench) in a benchmark on a single CPU machine, and each machine costs $6 a month. For homelab and experienced users who don't need DBaaS or IaaC's, it's a pretty straightforward choice. A more comprehensive review of Vultr's HF machines can be found here.

See more
Tejas Sangoi
Founder, CEO at Thalia Technologies · | 4 upvotes · 39.9K views

Our company builds micro saas applications. Based on the application we decide whether to deploy it over one of our shared servers or on a dedicated server.

We decided to Lightsail over EC2.

  1. Lightsail is a lightweight, simplified product offering that has a dramatically simplified console. The instances run in a special VPC, but this aspect is also provisioned automatically, and invisible in the console.

  2. Lightsail supports optionally peering this hidden VPC with your default VPC in the same AWS region, allowing Lightsail instances to access services like EC2 and RDS in the default VPC within the same AWS account.

  3. Bandwidth is unlimited, but of course free bandwidth is not -- however, Lightsail instances do include a significant monthly bandwidth allowance before any bandwidth-related charges apply.

  4. It has predictable pricing with no surprises at the end.

  5. The flexibility of EC2 leads inevitably to complexity. Whereas for Lighsail there is virtually no learning curve, here. You don't even technically need to know how to use SSH with a private key -- the Lightsail console even has a built-in SSH client -- but there is no requirement that you use it. You can access these instances normally, with a standard SSH client.

See more
Jerome/Zen Quah
Shared insights
on
Amazon EC2Amazon EC2DigitalOceanDigitalOcean

DigitalOcean was where I began; its USD5/month is extremely competitive and the overall experience as highly user-friendly.

However, their offerings were lacking and integrating with other resources I had on AWS was getting more costly (due to transfer costs on AWS). Eventually I moved the entire project off DO's Droplets and onto AWS's EC2.

One may initially find the cost (w/o free tier) and interface of AWS daunting however with good planning you can achieve highly cost-efficient systems with savings plans, spot instances, etcetera.

Do not dive into AWS head-first! Seriously, don't. Stand back and read pricing documentation thoroughly. You can, not to the fault of AWS, easily go way overbudget. Your first action upon getting your AWS account should be to set up billing alarms for estimated and current bill totals.

See more
Craig Finch
Principal Consultant at Rootwork InfoTech · | 6 upvotes · 181.7K views

We first selected Google Cloud Platform about five years ago, because HIPAA compliance was significantly cheaper and easier on Google compared to AWS. We have stayed with Google Cloud because it provides an excellent command line tool for managing resources, and every resource has a well-designed, well-documented API. SDKs for most of these APIs are available for many popular languages. I have never worked with a cloud platform that's so amenable to automation. Google is also ahead of its competitors in Kubernetes support.

See more
Stephen Fox
Artificial Intelligence Fellow · | 2 upvotes · 184.7K views

GCE is much more user friendly than EC2, though Amazon has come a very long way since the early days (pre-2010's). This can be seen in how easy it is to edit the storage attached to an instance in GCE: it's under the instance details and is edited inline. In AWS you have to click the instance > click the storage block device (new screen) > click the edit option (new modal) > resize the volume > confirm (new model) then wait a very long time. Google's is nearly instant.

  • In both cases, the instance much be shut down.

There also the preference between "user burden-of-security" and automatic security: AWS goes for the former, GCE the latter.

See more

Most bioinformatics shops nowadays are hosting on AWS or Azure, since they have HIPAA tiers and offer enterprise SLA contracts. Meanwhile Heroku hasn't historically supported HIPAA. Rackspace and Google Cloud would be other hosting providers we would consider, but we just don't get requests for them. So, we mostly focus on AWS and Azure support.

See more
Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of Amazon EC2
Pros of Google Compute Engine
  • 647
    Quick and reliable cloud servers
  • 515
    Scalability
  • 393
    Easy management
  • 277
    Low cost
  • 271
    Auto-scaling
  • 89
    Market leader
  • 80
    Backed by amazon
  • 79
    Reliable
  • 67
    Free tier
  • 58
    Easy management, scalability
  • 13
    Flexible
  • 10
    Easy to Start
  • 9
    Elastic
  • 9
    Web-scale
  • 9
    Widely used
  • 7
    Node.js API
  • 5
    Industry Standard
  • 4
    Lots of configuration options
  • 2
    GPU instances
  • 1
    Simpler to understand and learn
  • 1
    Extremely simple to use
  • 1
    Amazing for individuals
  • 1
    All the Open Source CLI tools you could want.
  • 87
    Backed by google
  • 79
    Easy to scale
  • 75
    High-performance virtual machines
  • 58
    Performance
  • 52
    Fast and easy provisioning
  • 15
    Load balancing
  • 12
    Compliance and security
  • 9
    Kubernetes
  • 8
    GitHub Integration
  • 7
    Consistency
  • 3
    Good documentation
  • 3
    One Click Setup Options
  • 3
    Free $300 credit (12 months)
  • 2
    Ease of Use and GitHub support
  • 2
    Great integration and product support
  • 2
    Escort
  • 1
    Integration with mobile notification services
  • 1
    Easy Snapshot and Backup feature
  • 1
    Low cost
  • 1
    Support many OS
  • 1
    Very Reliable
  • 1
    Nice UI

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Amazon EC2
Cons of Google Compute Engine
  • 13
    Ui could use a lot of work
  • 6
    High learning curve when compared to PaaS
  • 3
    Extremely poor CPU performance
    Be the first to leave a con

    Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

    What is Amazon EC2?

    It is a web service that provides resizable compute capacity in the cloud. It is designed to make web-scale computing easier for developers.

    What is Google Compute Engine?

    Google Compute Engine is a service that provides virtual machines that run on Google infrastructure. Google Compute Engine offers scale, performance, and value that allows you to easily launch large compute clusters on Google's infrastructure. There are no upfront investments and you can run up to thousands of virtual CPUs on a system that has been designed from the ground up to be fast, and to offer strong consistency of performance.

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    What companies use Amazon EC2?
    What companies use Google Compute Engine?
    See which teams inside your own company are using Amazon EC2 or Google Compute Engine.
    Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with Amazon EC2?
    What tools integrate with Google Compute Engine?

    Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

    Blog Posts

    Jan 26 2022 at 4:34AM

    Pinterest

    Amazon EC2RocksDBOpenTSDB+3
    3
    710
    Dec 22 2020 at 9:26PM

    Pinterest

    Amazon EC2C langMemcached+4
    11
    2610
    May 21 2020 at 12:02AM

    Rancher Labs

    KubernetesAmazon EC2Grafana+12
    6
    1484
    What are some alternatives to Amazon EC2 and Google Compute Engine?
    Amazon LightSail
    Everything you need to jumpstart your project on AWS—compute, storage, and networking—for a low, predictable price. Launch a virtual private server with just a few clicks.
    Amazon S3
    Amazon Simple Storage Service provides a fully redundant data storage infrastructure for storing and retrieving any amount of data, at any time, from anywhere on the web
    Amazon EC2 Container Service
    Amazon EC2 Container Service lets you launch and stop container-enabled applications with simple API calls, allows you to query the state of your cluster from a centralized service, and gives you access to many familiar Amazon EC2 features like security groups, EBS volumes and IAM roles.
    Beanstalk
    A single process to commit code, review with the team, and deploy the final result to your customers.
    Amazon Web Services (AWS)
    It is a comprehensive and broadly adopted cloud platform, offering over 200 fully featured services from data centers globally.
    See all alternatives