Ambassador vs Runscope: What are the differences?

# Introduction
This Markdown code compares the key differences between Ambassador and Runscope.

1. **Integration Capabilities**: Ambassador primarily focuses on API gateway and Kubernetes integration, providing robust tools for managing API traffic and workload distribution. In contrast, Runscope specializes in API testing and monitoring, ensuring the reliability and performance of APIs by actively monitoring them for potential issues.
2. **Feature Set**: Ambassador offers features like rate limiting, authentication, and routing for API management, catering to the needs of developers and administrators. On the other hand, Runscope provides features such as automated API testing, detailed performance monitoring, and API analytics for comprehensive API quality assurance.
3. **Customization Options**: Ambassador allows users to customize and extend its functionality through plugins and custom configurations, enabling a high level of flexibility in managing API workflows. In contrast, Runscope offers customization options through test scripts and integrations with popular testing frameworks, facilitating in-depth API testing scenarios.
4. **Scalability**: Ambassador is designed to handle high volumes of API traffic and scale dynamically with Kubernetes clusters, ensuring consistent performance under heavy workloads. In comparison, Runscope focuses on providing scalable API testing solutions and monitoring tools to accommodate diverse testing needs across different environments.
5. **User Interface**: Ambassador offers a user-friendly interface with a dashboard for monitoring API traffic, configuring routing rules, and managing access control policies. In contrast, Runscope provides a comprehensive testing dashboard for creating tests, setting up monitors, and analyzing API performance metrics in real-time.
6. **Community Support**: Ambassador has a vibrant community of users and contributors who actively share resources, best practices, and extensions to enhance the platform's capabilities. On the other hand, Runscope offers dedicated customer support services and documentation to assist users in troubleshooting issues and optimizing API testing workflows.

In Summary, the key differences between Ambassador and Runscope lie in their focus on integration capabilities, feature sets, customization options, scalability, user interface design, and community support.