Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Ansible vs Visual Studio Team Services: What are the differences?
Ansible automates configuration and deployment, prioritizing simplicity, while Visual Studio Team Services (now Azure DevOps) is a comprehensive Microsoft platform for end-to-end DevOps activities. Here are the key differences between them.
Scalability: Ansible is highly scalable, allowing it to handle large-scale infrastructure and manage thousands of nodes. On the other hand, Visual Studio Team Services is more suitable for smaller teams and projects, with a limited scalability compared to Ansible.
Infrastructure Management: Ansible focuses on infrastructure-as-code, enabling users to automate the management of their infrastructure. It provides a declarative approach where users define the desired state of their infrastructure. In contrast, Visual Studio Team Services primarily focuses on software development and collaboration, with less emphasis on infrastructure management.
Integration with CI/CD: Visual Studio Team Services offers seamless integration with continuous integration and continuous deployment (CI/CD) pipelines. It provides comprehensive functionalities for building, testing, and deploying applications. In comparison, while Ansible can be integrated into CI/CD pipelines, it primarily focuses on orchestration and automation rather than providing dedicated CI/CD capabilities.
Agent-based vs Agentless: Ansible follows an agentless architecture, whereby it utilizes SSH or WinRM connections to manage remote systems. This reduces the overhead of installing and maintaining agents on each target system. Conversely, Visual Studio Team Services relies on agents for executing tasks on remote machines, which requires the installation and configuration of these agents.
Platform Support: Ansible has broader platform support, enabling it to manage a wide range of operating systems, cloud platforms, and networking devices. It offers native support for various platforms, including Linux, Windows, VMware, AWS, Azure, and more. In contrast, Visual Studio Team Services primarily focuses on Windows-based platforms and provides limited support for other operating systems and cloud providers.
Open-source vs Proprietary: Ansible is an open-source tool, which means it is freely available, transparent, and benefits from a vibrant community of contributors. Users can modify and customize Ansible to fit their specific needs. In contrast, Visual Studio Team Services is a proprietary tool offered by Microsoft, which comes with licensing costs and may have limitations on customization.
In summary, Ansible is focused on automation and configuration management, providing flexibility across various environments, while Visual Studio Team Services (Azure DevOps) is a broader DevOps platform, offering a suite of integrated tools for end-to-end application lifecycle management.
I'm just getting started using Vagrant to help automate setting up local VMs to set up a Kubernetes cluster (development and experimentation only). (Yes, I do know about minikube)
I'm looking for a tool to help install software packages, setup users, etc..., on these VMs. I'm also fairly new to Ansible, Chef, and Puppet. What's a good one to start with to learn? I might decide to try all 3 at some point for my own curiosity.
The most important factors for me are simplicity, ease of use, shortest learning curve.
I have been working with Puppet and Ansible. The reason why I prefer ansible is the distribution of it. Ansible is more lightweight and therefore more popular. This leads to situations, where you can get fully packaged applications for ansible (e.g. confluent) supported by the vendor, but only incomplete packages for Puppet.
The only advantage I would see with Puppet if someone wants to use Foreman. This is still better supported with Puppet.
If you are just starting out, might as well learn Kubernetes There's a lot of tools that come with Kube that make it easier to use and most importantly: you become cloud-agnostic. We use Ansible because it's a lot simpler than Chef or Puppet and if you use Docker Compose for your deployments you can re-use them with Kubernetes later when you migrate
Pros of Ansible
- Agentless284
- Great configuration210
- Simple199
- Powerful176
- Easy to learn155
- Flexible69
- Doesn't get in the way of getting s--- done55
- Makes sense35
- Super efficient and flexible30
- Powerful27
- Dynamic Inventory11
- Backed by Red Hat9
- Works with AWS7
- Cloud Oriented6
- Easy to maintain6
- Vagrant provisioner4
- Simple and powerful4
- Multi language4
- Simple4
- Because SSH4
- Procedural or declarative, or both4
- Easy4
- Consistency3
- Well-documented2
- Masterless2
- Debugging is simple2
- Merge hash to get final configuration similar to hiera2
- Fast as hell2
- Manage any OS1
- Work on windows, but difficult to manage1
- Certified Content1
Pros of Azure DevOps
- Complete and powerful56
- Huge extension ecosystem32
- Azure integration27
- Flexible and powerful26
- One Stop Shop For Build server, Project Mgt, CDCI26
- Everything I need. Simple and intuitive UI15
- Support Open Source13
- Integrations8
- GitHub Integration7
- Cost free for Stakeholders6
- One 4 all6
- Crap6
- Project Mgmt Features6
- Runs in the cloud5
- Agent On-Premise(Linux - Windows)3
- Aws integration2
- Link Test Cases to Stories2
- Jenkins Integration2
- GCP Integration1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Ansible
- Dangerous8
- Hard to install5
- Doesn't Run on Windows3
- Bloated3
- Backward compatibility3
- No immutable infrastructure2
Cons of Azure DevOps
- Still dependant on C# for agents8
- Half Baked5
- Many in devops disregard MS altogether5
- Not a requirements management tool4
- Jack of all trades, master of none4
- Capacity across cross functional teams not visibile4
- Poor Jenkins integration3
- Tedious for test plan/case creation2
- Switching accounts is impossible1