Ansible vs Bitbucket

Overview

Bitbucket

Stacks41.1K

Followers33.4K

Votes2.8K

Ansible

Stacks19.5K

Followers15.6K

Votes1.3K

GitHub Stars66.9K

Forks24.1K

Ansible vs Bitbucket: What are the differences?

Introduction:

In this article, we will discuss the key differences between Ansible and Bitbucket, two popular tools used in the field of software development and infrastructure management.

1. Ansible: Engine and Orchestration Tool
Ansible is an open-source automation engine that allows users to automate various IT tasks such as application deployment, configuration management, and cloud provisioning. It provides a simple and agentless architecture, making it easy to set up and manage. Ansible uses a declarative language, known as YAML, to define the desired state of the system.

2. Bitbucket: Version Control and Collaboration Platform
Bitbucket, on the other hand, is a web-based version control repository hosting service that enables teams to collaborate on software development projects. It provides features like Git and Mercurial repositories, pull requests, code reviews, and issue tracking. Bitbucket offers both cloud-based and self-hosted options, giving teams flexibility in their deployment choices.

3. Ansible: Infrastructure as Code
One key difference between Ansible and Bitbucket lies in their focus areas. Ansible is primarily used for infrastructure as code, where the complete set of instructions to provision and configure the infrastructure is stored in code. This approach helps in automating the provisioning and management of infrastructure, leading to faster and more reliable deployments.

4. Bitbucket: Version Control and Collaboration
Bitbucket, on the other hand, is designed specifically for version control and collaboration in development projects. It provides a platform for teams to track changes to their code, collaborate on its development, and manage the entire software development lifecycle. Bitbucket's features are focused on code versioning, team collaboration, and project management.

5. Ansible: Push-Based Configuration Management
Another key difference is in the way configuration management is handled. Ansible follows a push-based approach, where the control machine pushes the desired configuration to the target systems. This model allows for easier on-demand configuration changes and is well-suited for complex infrastructures with a large number of nodes.

6. Bitbucket: Pull Request-Based Development Process
Bitbucket, being a version control platform, focuses on a pull request-based development process. Developers create branches to work on specific features or bug fixes, make their changes, and then create a pull request to merge those changes into the main codebase. This process facilitates code reviews, collaboration, and ensures that changes are properly reviewed before being merged.

In summary, Ansible is an automation engine and orchestration tool that focuses on infrastructure as code and uses a push-based configuration management approach, while Bitbucket is a version control and collaboration platform that enables pull request-based development processes and provides features for team collaboration and project management.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Bitbucket, Ansible

Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Aug 3, 2020

Review

Do you review your Pull/Merge Request before assigning Reviewers?

If you work in a team opening a Pull Request (or Merge Request) looks appropriate. However, have you ever thought about opening a Pull/Merge Request when working by yourself? Here's a checklist of things you can review in your own:

Pick the correct target branch
Make Drafts explicit
Name things properly
Ask help for tools
Remove the noise
Fetch necessary data
Understand Mergeability
Pass the message
Add screenshots
Be found in the future
Comment inline in your changes

Read the blog post for more detailed explanation for each item :D

What else do you review before asking for code review?

1.19M views1.19M

Comments

Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Jul 22, 2020

Review

One of the magic tricks git performs is the ability to rewrite log history. You can do it in many ways, but git rebase -i is the one I most use. With this command, It’s possible to switch commits order, remove a commit, squash two or more commits, or edit, for instance.

It’s particularly useful to run it before opening a pull request. It allows developers to “clean up” the mess and organize commits before submitting to review. If you follow the practice 3 and 4, then the list of commits should look very similar to a task list. It should reveal the rationale you had, telling the story of how you end up with that final code.

1.1M views1.1M

Comments

Elmar

CEO, Managing Director at Wouters Media

Nov 9, 2020

Decided

I first used BitBucket because it had private repo's, and it didn't disappoint me. Also with the smooth integration of Jira, the decision to use BitBucket as a full application maintenance service was as easy as 1, 2, 3.

I honestly love BitBucket, by the looks, by the UI, and the smooth integration with Tower.

586k views586k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Bitbucket	Ansible
Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.	Ansible is an IT automation tool. It can configure systems, deploy software, and orchestrate more advanced IT tasks such as continuous deployments or zero downtime rolling updates. Ansible’s goals are foremost those of simplicity and maximum ease of use.
Unlimited private repositories, charged per user;Best-in-class Jira integration;Built-in CI/CD;Deployment visibility;Embedded Trello boards; Command Instructions;Source Browser;Git Powered Wikis;Integrated Issue Tracking;Code reviews with inline comments;Compare View;Newsfeed;Followers;Developer Profiles;Autocompletion for @username mentions;Support for Mercurial	Ansible's natural automation language allows sysadmins, developers, and IT managers to complete automation projects in hours, not weeks.;Ansible uses SSH by default instead of requiring agents everywhere. Avoid extra open ports, improve security, eliminate "managing the management", and reclaim CPU cycles.;Ansible automates app deployment, configuration management, workflow orchestration, and even cloud provisioning all from one system.
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 66.9K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 24.1K
Stacks 41.1K	Stacks 19.5K
Followers 33.4K	Followers 15.6K
Votes 2.8K	Votes 1.3K
Pros & Cons
Pros 905 Free private repos 397 Simple setup 349 Nice ui and tools 342 Unlimited private repositories 240 Affordable git hosting Cons 19 Not much community activity 17 Difficult to review prs because of confusing ui 15 Quite buggy 10 Managed by enterprise Java company 8 CI tool is not free of charge	Pros 284 Agentless 210 Great configuration 199 Simple 176 Powerful 155 Easy to learn Cons 8 Dangerous 5 Hard to install 3 Backward compatibility 3 Bloated 3 Doesn't Run on Windows
Integrations
Git AWS Cloud9 Sentry Microsoft Azure npm Trello Slack Confluence Docker Jira	Nexmo Stackdriver VMware vSphere Docker OpenStack Amazon EC2 Rackspace Cloud Servers Google Compute Engine New Relic PagerDuty

What are some alternatives to Bitbucket, Ansible?

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

GitLab

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

Chef

Chef enables you to manage and scale cloud infrastructure with no downtime or interruptions. Freely move applications and configurations from one cloud to another. Chef is integrated with all major cloud providers including Amazon EC2, VMWare, IBM Smartcloud, Rackspace, OpenStack, Windows Azure, HP Cloud, Google Compute Engine, Joyent Cloud and others.

Terraform

With Terraform, you describe your complete infrastructure as code, even as it spans multiple service providers. Your servers may come from AWS, your DNS may come from CloudFlare, and your database may come from Heroku. Terraform will build all these resources across all these providers in parallel.

Capistrano

Capistrano is a remote server automation tool. It supports the scripting and execution of arbitrary tasks, and includes a set of sane-default deployment workflows.

Puppet Labs

Puppet is an automated administrative engine for your Linux, Unix, and Windows systems and performs administrative tasks (such as adding users, installing packages, and updating server configurations) based on a centralized specification.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Salt

Salt is a new approach to infrastructure management. Easy enough to get running in minutes, scalable enough to manage tens of thousands of servers, and fast enough to communicate with them in seconds. Salt delivers a dynamic communication bus for infrastructures that can be used for orchestration, remote execution, configuration management and much more.

Related Comparisons

Ansible vs Bitbucket: What are the differences?

Introduction:

In this article, we will discuss the key differences between Ansible and Bitbucket, two popular tools used in the field of software development and infrastructure management.

Ansible vs Bitbucket

Overview