StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Performance Monitoring
  4. Performance Monitoring
  5. AppDynamics vs ManageEngine Applications Manager

AppDynamics vs ManageEngine Applications Manager

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

AppDynamics
AppDynamics
Stacks305
Followers629
Votes68
ManageEngine Applications Manager
ManageEngine Applications Manager
Stacks6
Followers4
Votes0

AppDynamics vs ManageEngine Applications Manager: What are the differences?

  1. Deployment Model: AppDynamics offers both on-premise and SaaS-based deployment options, catering to different business needs and preferences. In contrast, ManageEngine Applications Manager is primarily offered as an on-premise solution, providing more control over data security and customization for enterprises that prefer to manage their applications in-house.

  2. Scalability: AppDynamics is known for its high scalability, capable of monitoring complex and large-scale distributed applications with ease. ManageEngine Applications Manager, while still capable of handling a significant number of applications, may exhibit limitations in scalability when compared to AppDynamics, especially in environments with a vast number of interconnected systems and applications.

  3. Real-time Monitoring: AppDynamics excels in real-time monitoring capabilities, providing instant insights into application performance and user experience. ManageEngine Applications Manager, while offering real-time monitoring features, may not offer the same level of detailed and actionable insights as AppDynamics, making it more suitable for basic monitoring needs.

  4. Integration Capabilities: AppDynamics has a strong ecosystem of integrations with various third-party tools and platforms, allowing seamless integration with other systems for enhanced functionality and automation. ManageEngine Applications Manager, while offering integration capabilities, may have a more limited range of integrations compared to AppDynamics, potentially requiring custom development for specific integrations.

  5. Cost Structure: AppDynamics is typically considered a higher-priced solution, targeted towards larger enterprises with complex application environments that require advanced monitoring capabilities. ManageEngine Applications Manager, on the other hand, offers a more cost-effective option for organizations with budget constraints or simpler monitoring requirements, providing a comprehensive monitoring solution at a lower price point.

  6. Customization and Extensibility: AppDynamics provides extensive customization options and a robust extensibility framework, allowing organizations to tailor the monitoring solution to their specific needs and integrate custom functionality seamlessly. In comparison, ManageEngine Applications Manager may have limitations in terms of customization and extensibility, potentially requiring more manual effort for implementing advanced monitoring features tailored to unique business requirements.

In Summary, the key differences between AppDynamics and ManageEngine Applications Manager lie in their deployment models, scalability, real-time monitoring capabilities, integration capabilities, cost structures, and customization and extensibility options.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

AppDynamics
AppDynamics
ManageEngine Applications Manager
ManageEngine Applications Manager

AppDynamics develops application performance management (APM) solutions that deliver problem resolution for highly distributed applications through transaction flow monitoring and deep diagnostics.

It is an application performance monitoring solution that proactively monitors business applications and help businesses ensure their revenue-critical applications meet end user expectations. It offers out-of-the-box monitoring support for 80+ applications and servers.

End User Monitoring;Real-Time Business Transaction Monitoring;Visualize & Manage your Entire Application;Detect Business Impact and Performance Spikes;Isolate Bottlenecks in your Application;Identify Root Cause with Complete Code diagnostics;Kickass for Business: Reports;Kickass for Ops: Dashboards;Kickass for Dev: Agile Comparison
Application Server Monitoring;Database Monitoring;Holistic View of IT Resources;Distributed Monitoring for High Scalability;Root Cause Analysis;Middleware/Portal Monitoring
Statistics
Stacks
305
Stacks
6
Followers
629
Followers
4
Votes
68
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 21
    Deep code visibility
  • 13
    Powerful
  • 8
    Real-Time Visibility
  • 7
    Great visualization
  • 6
    Easy Setup
Cons
  • 5
    Expensive
  • 2
    Poor to non-existent integration with aws services
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Rackspace Cloud Servers
Rackspace Cloud Servers
Microsoft Azure
Microsoft Azure
Amazon EC2
Amazon EC2
RightScale
RightScale
CloudBees
CloudBees
HP Cloud Compute
HP Cloud Compute
Boundary
Boundary
PagerDuty
PagerDuty
MongoDB
MongoDB
Oracle
Oracle
PostgreSQL
PostgreSQL
MySQL
MySQL
Hadoop
Hadoop
Redis
Redis
Memcached
Memcached
Cassandra
Cassandra
IBM DB2
IBM DB2
MSSQL
MSSQL

What are some alternatives to AppDynamics, ManageEngine Applications Manager?

New Relic

New Relic

The world’s best software and DevOps teams rely on New Relic to move faster, make better decisions and create best-in-class digital experiences. If you run software, you need to run New Relic. More than 50% of the Fortune 100 do too.

Datadog

Datadog

Datadog is the leading service for cloud-scale monitoring. It is used by IT, operations, and development teams who build and operate applications that run on dynamic or hybrid cloud infrastructure. Start monitoring in minutes with Datadog!

Raygun

Raygun

Raygun gives you a window into how users are really experiencing your software applications. Detect, diagnose and resolve issues that are affecting end users with greater speed and accuracy.

AppSignal

AppSignal

AppSignal gives you and your team alerts and detailed metrics about your Ruby, Node.js or Elixir application. Sensible pricing, no aggressive sales & support by developers.

Stackify

Stackify

Stackify offers the only developers-friendly innovative cloud based solution that fully integrates application performance management (APM) with error and log. Allowing them to easily monitor, detect and resolve application issues faster

Skylight

Skylight

Skylight is a smart profiler for your Rails apps that visualizes request performance across all of your servers.

Librato

Librato

Librato provides a complete solution for monitoring and understanding the metrics that impact your business at all levels of the stack. We provide everything you need to visualize, analyze, and actively alert on the metrics that matter to you.

Keymetrics

Keymetrics

PM2 is a production process manager for Node.js applications with a built-in load balancer. It allows you to keep applications alive forever, to reload them without downtime and to facilitate common system admin tasks.

Dynatrace

Dynatrace

It is an AI-powered, full stack, automated performance management solution. It provides user experience analysis that identifies and resolves application performance issues faster than ever before.

SignalFx

SignalFx

We provide operational intelligence for today’s elastic architectures through monitoring specifically designed for microservices and containers with: -powerful and proactive alerting -metrics aggregation -visualization into time series data

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana