Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Azure DevOps vs Bamboo: What are the differences?
Introduction
Today, we will be discussing the key differences between Azure DevOps and Bamboo. Both Azure DevOps and Bamboo are popular continuous integration and continuous deployment (CI/CD) tools that assist in building, testing, and deploying software projects. While they serve similar purposes, there are several notable differences between the two.
Integration with different version control systems: Azure DevOps offers seamless integration with a wide range of version control systems, including Git, Team Foundation Version Control (TFVC), and Subversion (SVN). In contrast, Bamboo primarily focuses on Git and Mercurial, limiting its options for version control integration.
Ease of use and user interface: Azure DevOps provides a user-friendly interface and a simplified navigation experience, making it easier for users to navigate and perform tasks. On the other hand, Bamboo has a more complex user interface, which can be overwhelming for beginners and require a steeper learning curve.
Integration with other developer tools: Azure DevOps offers extensive integration capabilities with a variety of third-party developer tools, such as Jira, Slack, and Azure Services. This allows for a more seamless workflow and collaboration between different teams and tools. Bamboo, while providing some integration options, does not offer the same breadth and depth of integrations as Azure DevOps.
Pipeline configuration flexibility: Azure DevOps allows for highly customizable and flexible pipeline configurations, enabling users to define complex build and deployment workflows. With its YAML-based approach, it provides greater control and visibility into pipeline configurations. In comparison, Bamboo has a more limited configuration capability and relies on a graphical user interface, restricting the flexibility of pipeline setup.
Pricing and licensing: Azure DevOps offers a range of pricing options, including free tiers for small teams, as well as paid plans for larger organizations. It also provides a pay-per-minute pricing model for pipeline execution. Bamboo, on the other hand, is a part of Atlassian's suite of tools, which requires a separate license and subscription.
Ecosystem and community support: Azure DevOps benefits from a thriving ecosystem and a large community of developers, which translates into extensive documentation, resources, and community-driven extensions and integrations. Bamboo, while supported by Atlassian, may have a smaller community and a more limited range of community-driven resources.
In summary, Azure DevOps offers greater integration flexibility, a more user-friendly interface, and a customizable pipeline configuration approach, while Bamboo focuses more on simplicity and ease of getting started. Both tools have their strengths and weaknesses, and the choice between them depends on the specific needs and preferences of the development team.
Pros of Azure DevOps
- Complete and powerful56
- Huge extension ecosystem32
- Azure integration27
- Flexible and powerful26
- One Stop Shop For Build server, Project Mgt, CDCI26
- Everything I need. Simple and intuitive UI15
- Support Open Source13
- Integrations8
- GitHub Integration7
- Cost free for Stakeholders6
- One 4 all6
- Crap6
- Project Mgmt Features6
- Runs in the cloud5
- Agent On-Premise(Linux - Windows)3
- Aws integration2
- Link Test Cases to Stories2
- Jenkins Integration2
- GCP Integration1
Pros of Bamboo
- Integrates with other Atlassian tools10
- Great notification scheme4
- Great UI2
- Has Deployment Projects1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Azure DevOps
- Still dependant on C# for agents8
- Half Baked5
- Many in devops disregard MS altogether5
- Not a requirements management tool4
- Jack of all trades, master of none4
- Capacity across cross functional teams not visibile4
- Poor Jenkins integration3
- Tedious for test plan/case creation2
- Switching accounts is impossible1
Cons of Bamboo
- Expensive6
- Low community support1
- Bad UI1
- Bad integration with docker1