StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Continuous Integration
  4. Continuous Integration
  5. Azure Pipelines vs Bamboo

Azure Pipelines vs Bamboo

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Bamboo
Bamboo
Stacks504
Followers549
Votes17
Azure Pipelines
Azure Pipelines
Stacks2.3K
Followers457
Votes14

Azure Pipelines vs Bamboo: What are the differences?

Introduction

Azure Pipelines and Bamboo are both popular continuous integration and deployment tools used in software development. While they serve similar purposes, there are key differences between the two platforms that set them apart.

  1. Ease of Use: Azure Pipelines is known for its user-friendly interface and easy setup process. It offers a graphical user interface (GUI) that allows users to configure pipelines through a visual editor. On the other hand, Bamboo has a steeper learning curve and requires more technical expertise to configure and set up pipelines.

  2. Platform Compatibility: Azure Pipelines is a cloud-based solution offered by Microsoft that can be used with different operating systems, including Windows, MacOS, and Linux. It provides extensive support for integrations with various development tools and platforms. In contrast, Bamboo is primarily designed for users of the Atlassian ecosystem and is tailored to work seamlessly with Atlassian products such as Jira and Bitbucket. It may have limited support for third-party integrations and platforms.

  3. Scalability and Performance: Azure Pipelines has the advantage of easy scalability, as it is a cloud-based service that can effortlessly handle scaling requirements based on the workload. It offers parallel execution of jobs, allowing teams to run multiple build and deployment tasks simultaneously, improving overall performance. Bamboo, being an on-premises solution, may face limitations in scaling based on hardware resources and may require additional infrastructure setup for distributing the workload.

  4. Pricing Model: Azure Pipelines follows a flexible pricing model, offering a certain number of free build minutes and parallel jobs per month, with additional charges for higher usage. It also provides enterprise-level plans for larger organizations. In contrast, Bamboo follows a more straightforward pricing structure, as it is a one-time purchase with a perpetual license. This can be advantageous for organizations that prefer a fixed cost over a subscription-based model.

  5. Extensibility and Customization: Azure Pipelines offers extensive customization options through its supported programming languages, frameworks, and tools. It provides a wide range of built-in tasks and allows users to create custom tasks for unique requirements. Bamboo, being a part of the Atlassian ecosystem, offers integration with other Atlassian products and plug-ins for extending functionality. While it may not have the same level of customization options as Azure Pipelines, it can be a convenient choice for organizations already using Atlassian tools.

  6. Support and Documentation: Azure Pipelines benefits from Microsoft's extensive support resources and documentation. It has a vast community of users and developers contributing to knowledge-sharing platforms. Azure Pipelines also offers a robust support system with options for technical assistance. Bamboo, being an Atlassian product, has access to Atlassian's support and documentation resources. It has an active community of users and developers, but the support ecosystem may not be as extensive as that of Azure Pipelines.

In summary, Azure Pipelines and Bamboo differ in terms of ease of use, platform compatibility, scalability, pricing model, extensibility, and support. Organizations should consider these differences to choose the tool that best aligns with their development requirements and ecosystem.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Bamboo, Azure Pipelines

Balaramesh
Balaramesh

Apr 20, 2020

Needs adviceonAzure PipelinesAzure Pipelines.NET.NETJenkinsJenkins

We are currently using Azure Pipelines for continous integration. Our applications are developed witn .NET framework. But when we look at the online Jenkins is the most widely used tool for continous integration. Can you please give me the advice which one is best to use for my case Azure pipeline or jenkins.

663k views663k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Bamboo
Bamboo
Azure Pipelines
Azure Pipelines

Focus on coding and count on Bamboo as your CI and build server! Create multi-stage build plans, set up triggers to start builds upon commits, and assign agents to your critical builds and deployments.

Fast builds with parallel jobs and test execution. Use container jobs to create consistent and reliable builds with the exact tools you need. Create new containers with ease and push them to any registry.

-
Any language, any platform; Containers and Kubernetes; Extensible; Deploy to any cloud; Open source; Advanced workflows and features
Statistics
Stacks
504
Stacks
2.3K
Followers
549
Followers
457
Votes
17
Votes
14
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 10
    Integrates with other Atlassian tools
  • 4
    Great notification scheme
  • 2
    Great UI
  • 1
    Has Deployment Projects
Cons
  • 6
    Expensive
  • 1
    Low community support
  • 1
    Bad UI
  • 1
    Bad integration with docker
Pros
  • 4
    Easy to get started
  • 3
    Built by Microsoft
  • 3
    Unlimited CI/CD minutes
  • 2
    Docker support
  • 2
    Yaml support
Integrations
Confluence
Confluence
Jira
Jira
Bitbucket
Bitbucket
HipChat
HipChat
.NET Core
.NET Core
Slack
Slack
Python
Python
Ruby
Ruby
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
.NET
.NET
Node.js
Node.js
Linux
Linux
Microsoft Azure
Microsoft Azure
RxJava
RxJava

What are some alternatives to Bamboo, Azure Pipelines?

Jenkins

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Travis CI

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

TeamCity

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

GoCD

GoCD

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.

Shippable

Shippable

Shippable is a SaaS platform that lets you easily add Continuous Integration/Deployment to your Github and BitBucket repositories. It is lightweight, super simple to setup, and runs your builds and tests faster than any other service.

Buildkite

Buildkite

CI and build automation tool that combines the power of your own build infrastructure with the convenience of a managed, centralized web UI. Used by Shopify, Basecamp, Digital Ocean, Venmo, Cochlear, Bugsnag and more.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana