StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Continuous Deployment
  4. Deployment As A Service
  5. Azure Pipelines vs Octopus Deploy

Azure Pipelines vs Octopus Deploy

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Octopus Deploy
Octopus Deploy
Stacks407
Followers493
Votes118
Azure Pipelines
Azure Pipelines
Stacks2.3K
Followers457
Votes14

Azure Pipelines vs Octopus Deploy: What are the differences?

<Azure Pipelines and Octopus Deploy are both popular DevOps tools used for continuous integration and deployment. However, they have distinct differences that cater to different needs and preferences.>

  1. Integration: Azure Pipelines is a part of the Azure DevOps service, providing a comprehensive DevOps solution that includes code repositories, build and release pipelines, and testing tools. On the other hand, Octopus Deploy focuses solely on deployment automation, offering advanced features for complex deployment scenarios.

  2. Environment Management: Azure Pipelines primarily focuses on managing the build and release processes, while Octopus Deploy specializes in managing and automating the deployment of applications to various environments. Octopus Deploy allows for more granular control over deployments in different environments.

  3. Deployment Targets: Azure Pipelines can deploy to a wide range of targets, including Azure services, Kubernetes clusters, virtual machines, and on-premises servers. Octopus Deploy, on the other hand, is designed to work with a variety of servers and cloud platforms, providing flexibility in deployment targets.

  4. Deployment Orchestration: Azure Pipelines offers sequential deployment processes, allowing users to define the order of deployment tasks. Octopus Deploy excels in deployment orchestration by providing features like deployment steps, run conditions, and built-in support for rolling deployments.

  5. Plugins and Extensions: Azure Pipelines supports a wide range of integrations and extensions, allowing users to customize their pipelines with third-party tools and services. Octopus Deploy also offers a library of community-contributed step templates and integrations, enhancing its extensibility and versatility.

  6. License and Cost: Azure Pipelines provides a certain number of free build minutes per month and offers paid plans for additional usage. Octopus Deploy follows a licensing model based on the number of deployment targets, making it a cost-effective option for organizations with a specific deployment infrastructure.

In Summary, Azure Pipelines and Octopus Deploy differ in their integration scope, environment management capabilities, deployment targets, orchestration features, plugin extensibility, and licensing model.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Octopus Deploy, Azure Pipelines

Balaramesh
Balaramesh

Apr 20, 2020

Needs adviceonAzure PipelinesAzure Pipelines.NET.NETJenkinsJenkins

We are currently using Azure Pipelines for continous integration. Our applications are developed witn .NET framework. But when we look at the online Jenkins is the most widely used tool for continous integration. Can you please give me the advice which one is best to use for my case Azure pipeline or jenkins.

663k views663k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Octopus Deploy
Octopus Deploy
Azure Pipelines
Azure Pipelines

Octopus Deploy helps teams to manage releases, automate deployments, and operate applications with automated runbooks. It's free for small teams.

Fast builds with parallel jobs and test execution. Use container jobs to create consistent and reliable builds with the exact tools you need. Create new containers with ease and push them to any registry.

Deploy on-premises or to the cloud, securely;.NET, Java, PHP, Node, Ruby;Full API support;Approvals and manual intervention;Enable self-service deployments;Installs in minutes;Integrates with your build server;Free for small teams
Any language, any platform; Containers and Kubernetes; Extensible; Deploy to any cloud; Open source; Advanced workflows and features
Statistics
Stacks
407
Stacks
2.3K
Followers
493
Followers
457
Votes
118
Votes
14
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 30
    Powerful
  • 25
    Simplicity
  • 20
    Easy to learn
  • 17
    .Net oriented
  • 14
    Easy to manage releases and rollback
Cons
  • 4
    Poor UI
  • 2
    Management of Config
  • 2
    Config & variables not versioned (e.g. in git)
Pros
  • 4
    Easy to get started
  • 3
    Unlimited CI/CD minutes
  • 3
    Built by Microsoft
  • 2
    Docker support
  • 2
    Yaml support
Integrations
Jenkins
Jenkins
Azure DevOps
Azure DevOps
TeamCity
TeamCity
Jira
Jira
Appveyor
Appveyor
Bamboo
Bamboo
.NET Core
.NET Core
Slack
Slack
Python
Python
Ruby
Ruby
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
.NET
.NET
Node.js
Node.js
Linux
Linux
Microsoft Azure
Microsoft Azure
RxJava
RxJava

What are some alternatives to Octopus Deploy, Azure Pipelines?

Jenkins

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Travis CI

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

TeamCity

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

GoCD

GoCD

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.

Shippable

Shippable

Shippable is a SaaS platform that lets you easily add Continuous Integration/Deployment to your Github and BitBucket repositories. It is lightweight, super simple to setup, and runs your builds and tests faster than any other service.

Buildkite

Buildkite

CI and build automation tool that combines the power of your own build infrastructure with the convenience of a managed, centralized web UI. Used by Shopify, Basecamp, Digital Ocean, Venmo, Cochlear, Bugsnag and more.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana