Bamboo vs Docker

Overview

Docker

Stacks194.2K

Followers143.8K

Votes3.9K

Bamboo

Stacks504

Followers549

Votes17

Bamboo vs Docker: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will compare Bamboo and Docker, two commonly used tools in the software development and deployment process. We will explore the key differences between these two tools and highlight their specific features and capabilities.

Deployment Process: Bamboo is a continuous integration and deployment tool that focuses on automating the entire software release process. It provides a centralized platform for building, testing, and deploying applications, allowing teams to streamline their development workflows. On the other hand, Docker is a containerization platform that enables developers to package their applications into portable containers. These containers encapsulate all the necessary dependencies, making the deployment process consistent across different environments.
Virtualization vs Containerization: Bamboo operates on virtual machines (VMs), which provide isolated environments for executing build and deployment tasks. Each build runs on a separate VM, ensuring a clean and isolated environment for testing and deployment. Docker, on the other hand, utilizes containerization technology. Containers are lightweight, isolated environments that share the host operating system's kernel. This approach offers faster startup times, better resource utilization, and easier scalability compared to traditional VM-based virtualization.
Build and Deployment Pipelines: Bamboo offers a comprehensive pipeline feature that allows users to define complex workflows for building, testing, and deploying their applications. It provides a graphical interface to create and visualize these pipelines, making it easier to manage dependencies and automate the entire release process. Docker focuses on containerization rather than specifying build and deployment pipelines explicitly. While Docker can be integrated into a CI/CD pipeline, it primarily focuses on container management and orchestration rather than defining the entire build and deployment process.
Application Portability: Bamboo is primarily used for building and deploying applications, but it does not provide native containerization capabilities. This means that the deployment process may vary across different environments, leading to potential compatibility issues and dependencies. Docker, on the other hand, focuses on containerization, providing a consistent deployment and runtime environment across different platforms. Docker containers are isolated and self-contained, making them highly portable and ensuring consistent application behavior across environments.
Scalability and Resource Management: Bamboo relies on traditional VM-based virtualization, which requires managing and provisioning virtual machines for each build and deployment task. This approach can be resource-intensive and may limit scalability, especially for large-scale projects. Docker, on the other hand, utilizes containerization technology, which offers better resource utilization and scalability. Docker containers share the host operating system's resources, allowing for efficient resource management and horizontal scaling of applications.
Integration with Contemporary Technologies: Bamboo provides seamless integration with other Atlassian tools like JIRA, Bitbucket, and Confluence, allowing for a cohesive development and deployment workflow. It also supports integration with various third-party tools and services through plugins. Docker, on the other hand, integrates with container orchestration platforms like Kubernetes, providing advanced features like load balancing, automatic scaling, and high availability. Docker also has a vast ecosystem of pre-built container images, making it easier to deploy and scale applications.

In summary, Bamboo is a CI/CD tool focusing on automating the software release process, while Docker is a containerization platform that provides a consistent deployment environment. Bamboo relies on virtual machines for deployment, while Docker utilizes lightweight containers. Bamboo offers a comprehensive pipeline feature, while Docker focuses on container management. Bamboo lacks native containerization capabilities, leading to potential compatibility issues, whereas Docker offers application portability. Docker provides better resource utilization and scalability compared to Bamboo. Lastly, Bamboo integrates well with other Atlassian tools, while Docker integrates with container orchestration platforms like Kubernetes.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Docker, Bamboo

Florian

IT DevOp at Agitos GmbH

Oct 22, 2019

Decided

lxd/lxc and Docker aren't congruent so this comparison needs a more detailed look; but in short I can say: the lxd-integrated administration of storage including zfs with its snapshot capabilities as well as the system container (multi-process) approach of lxc vs. the limited single-process container approach of Docker is the main reason I chose lxd over Docker.

482k views482k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Docker	Bamboo
The Docker Platform is the industry-leading container platform for continuous, high-velocity innovation, enabling organizations to seamlessly build and share any application — from legacy to what comes next — and securely run them anywhere	Focus on coding and count on Bamboo as your CI and build server! Create multi-stage build plans, set up triggers to start builds upon commits, and assign agents to your critical builds and deployments.
Integrated developer tools; open, portable images; shareable, reusable apps; framework-aware builds; standardized templates; multi-environment support; remote registry management; simple setup for Docker and Kubernetes; certified Kubernetes; application templates; enterprise controls; secure software supply chain; industry-leading container runtime; image scanning; access controls; image signing; caching and mirroring; image lifecycle; policy-based image promotion	-
Statistics
Stacks 194.2K	Stacks 504
Followers 143.8K	Followers 549
Votes 3.9K	Votes 17
Pros & Cons
Pros 823 Rapid integration and build up 692 Isolation 521 Open source 505 Testability and reproducibility 460 Lightweight Cons 8 New versions == broken features 6 Documentation not always in sync 6 Unreliable networking 4 Moves quickly 3 Not Secure	Pros 10 Integrates with other Atlassian tools 4 Great notification scheme 2 Great UI 1 Has Deployment Projects Cons 6 Expensive 1 Low community support 1 Bad integration with docker 1 Bad UI
Integrations
Java Docker Compose VirtualBox Linux Amazon EC2 Container Service Docker Swarm boot2docker Kubernetes Docker Machine Vagrant	Confluence Jira Bitbucket HipChat

What are some alternatives to Docker, Bamboo?

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

GoCD

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.

Shippable

Shippable is a SaaS platform that lets you easily add Continuous Integration/Deployment to your Github and BitBucket repositories. It is lightweight, super simple to setup, and runs your builds and tests faster than any other service.

Buildkite

CI and build automation tool that combines the power of your own build infrastructure with the convenience of a managed, centralized web UI. Used by Shopify, Basecamp, Digital Ocean, Venmo, Cochlear, Bugsnag and more.

Related Comparisons

Bamboo vs Docker: What are the differences?

Introduction

Deployment Process: Bamboo is a continuous integration and deployment tool that focuses on automating the entire software release process. It provides a centralized platform for building, testing, and deploying applications, allowing teams to streamline their development workflows. On the other hand, Docker is a containerization platform that enables developers to package their applications into portable containers. These containers encapsulate all the necessary dependencies, making the deployment process consistent across different environments.
Virtualization vs Containerization: Bamboo operates on virtual machines (VMs), which provide isolated environments for executing build and deployment tasks. Each build runs on a separate VM, ensuring a clean and isolated environment for testing and deployment. Docker, on the other hand, utilizes containerization technology. Containers are lightweight, isolated environments that share the host operating system's kernel. This approach offers faster startup times, better resource utilization, and easier scalability compared to traditional VM-based virtualization.
Build and Deployment Pipelines: Bamboo offers a comprehensive pipeline feature that allows users to define complex workflows for building, testing, and deploying their applications. It provides a graphical interface to create and visualize these pipelines, making it easier to manage dependencies and automate the entire release process. Docker focuses on containerization rather than specifying build and deployment pipelines explicitly. While Docker can be integrated into a CI/CD pipeline, it primarily focuses on container management and orchestration rather than defining the entire build and deployment process.
Application Portability: Bamboo is primarily used for building and deploying applications, but it does not provide native containerization capabilities. This means that the deployment process may vary across different environments, leading to potential compatibility issues and dependencies. Docker, on the other hand, focuses on containerization, providing a consistent deployment and runtime environment across different platforms. Docker containers are isolated and self-contained, making them highly portable and ensuring consistent application behavior across environments.
Scalability and Resource Management: Bamboo relies on traditional VM-based virtualization, which requires managing and provisioning virtual machines for each build and deployment task. This approach can be resource-intensive and may limit scalability, especially for large-scale projects. Docker, on the other hand, utilizes containerization technology, which offers better resource utilization and scalability. Docker containers share the host operating system's resources, allowing for efficient resource management and horizontal scaling of applications.
Integration with Contemporary Technologies: Bamboo provides seamless integration with other Atlassian tools like JIRA, Bitbucket, and Confluence, allowing for a cohesive development and deployment workflow. It also supports integration with various third-party tools and services through plugins. Docker, on the other hand, integrates with container orchestration platforms like Kubernetes, providing advanced features like load balancing, automatic scaling, and high availability. Docker also has a vast ecosystem of pre-built container images, making it easier to deploy and scale applications.

Bamboo vs Docker

Overview

Bamboo vs Docker: What are the differences?