Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Bamboo vs Jest: What are the differences?
Introduction
In this article, we will compare the key differences between Bamboo and Jest, two popular tools used in software development.
Integration with Continuous Integration/Continuous Deployment (CI/CD) Pipelines: Bamboo is a CI/CD tool that is commonly used for building, testing, and deploying software. It allows for seamless integration with other Atlassian tools, such as Jira and Bitbucket, making it a popular choice for teams working in the Atlassian ecosystem. On the other hand, Jest is a JavaScript testing framework primarily used for testing JavaScript code. While it can be used alongside CI/CD tools, it does not have the built-in CI/CD capabilities that Bamboo offers.
Testing Capabilities: Bamboo provides the capability to perform various types of tests, including unit testing, integration testing, and functional testing, by integrating with different testing frameworks. It supports a wide range of programming languages and frameworks, making it a versatile choice. Jest, on the other hand, is specifically designed for JavaScript and provides a rich set of features and utilities for testing JavaScript code, including support for snapshot testing, mocking, and code coverage analysis.
User Interface: Bamboo offers a user-friendly graphical interface that allows users to create, configure, and monitor their CI/CD pipelines. It provides visual feedback on the status of builds and deployments, making it easy to track progress and identify any issues. Jest, on the other hand, is primarily used through the command line interface (CLI). While it does offer some basic reporting features, it lacks the comprehensive user interface provided by Bamboo.
Community and Support: Bamboo is developed and maintained by Atlassian, a well-established software company with a large user base. This means that it benefits from regular updates, bug fixes, and community support. Jest, on the other hand, is an open-source project maintained by Facebook. It has a strong and active community behind it, which contributes to its development and provides support to users. However, it may not have the same level of resources and support as Bamboo.
Ease of Setup and Configuration: Bamboo provides a comprehensive set of documentation and tutorials to guide users through the setup and configuration process. It offers a step-by-step wizard for configuring CI/CD pipelines, making it relatively easy to set up. Jest, on the other hand, is easy to set up and configure for testing JavaScript code. It can be installed via npm and requires minimal configuration to get started. However, setting up more complex testing scenarios may require additional effort.
Cost: Bamboo is a commercial product that requires a license for full functionality. While it offers a free trial, a paid license is required for continued use. Jest, on the other hand, is an open-source tool and is available for free. It can be used without any licensing costs, making it an attractive choice for teams on a tight budget.
In summary, Bamboo is a versatile CI/CD tool with seamless integration with other Atlassian products, while Jest is a focused JavaScript testing framework. Bamboo offers a comprehensive user interface and supports a wide range of testing capabilities, but comes with a cost. On the other hand, Jest is free, easy to set up, and specifically designed for testing JavaScript code.
As we all know testing is an important part of any application. To assist with our testing we are going to use both Cypress and Jest. We feel these tools complement each other and will help us get good coverage of our code. We will use Cypress for our end to end testing as we've found it quite user friendly. Jest will be used for our unit tests because we've seen how many larger companies use it with great success.
Postman will be used to do integration testing with the backend API we create. It offers a clean interface to create many requests, and you can even organize these requests into collections. It helps to test the backend API first to make sure it's working before using it in the front-end. Jest can also be used for testing and is already embedded into React. Not only does it offer unit testing support in javascript, it can also do snapshot testing for the front-end to make sure components are rendering correctly. Enzyme is complementary to Jest and offers more functions such as shallow rendering. UnitTest will be used for Python testing as it is simple, has a lot of functionality and already built in with python. Sentry will be used for keeping track of errors as it is also easily integratable with Heroku because they offer it as an add-on. LogDNA will be used for tracking logs which are not errors and is also a Heroku add-on. Its good to have a separate service to record logs, monitor, track and even fix errors in real-time so our application can run more smoothly.
Pros of Bamboo
- Integrates with other Atlassian tools10
- Great notification scheme4
- Great UI2
- Has Deployment Projects1
Pros of Jest
- Open source36
- Mock by default makes testing much simpler32
- Testing React Native Apps23
- Parallel test running20
- Fast16
- Bundled with JSDOM to enable DOM testing13
- Mock by default screws up your classes, breaking tests8
- Out of the box code coverage7
- Promise support7
- One stop shop for unit testing6
- Great documentation3
- Assert Library Included2
- Built in watch option with interactive filtering menu1
- Preset support1
- Can be used for BDD0
- Karma0
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Bamboo
- Expensive6
- Low community support1
- Bad UI1
- Bad integration with docker1
Cons of Jest
- Documentation4
- Ambiguous configuration4
- Difficult3
- Many bugs still not fixed months/years after reporting2
- Multiple error messages for same error2
- Difficult to run single test/describe/file2
- Ambiguous2
- Bugged2
- BeforeAll timing out makes all passing tests fail1
- Slow1
- Reporter is too general1
- Unstable1
- Bad docs1
- Still does't support .mjs files natively1
- Can't fail beforeAll to abort tests1
- Interaction with watch mode on terminal0