Bamboo vs Jest

Overview

Jest

Stacks15.2K

Followers4.1K

Votes175

Bamboo

Stacks504

Followers549

Votes17

Bamboo vs Jest: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will compare the key differences between Bamboo and Jest, two popular tools used in software development.

Integration with Continuous Integration/Continuous Deployment (CI/CD) Pipelines: Bamboo is a CI/CD tool that is commonly used for building, testing, and deploying software. It allows for seamless integration with other Atlassian tools, such as Jira and Bitbucket, making it a popular choice for teams working in the Atlassian ecosystem. On the other hand, Jest is a JavaScript testing framework primarily used for testing JavaScript code. While it can be used alongside CI/CD tools, it does not have the built-in CI/CD capabilities that Bamboo offers.
Testing Capabilities: Bamboo provides the capability to perform various types of tests, including unit testing, integration testing, and functional testing, by integrating with different testing frameworks. It supports a wide range of programming languages and frameworks, making it a versatile choice. Jest, on the other hand, is specifically designed for JavaScript and provides a rich set of features and utilities for testing JavaScript code, including support for snapshot testing, mocking, and code coverage analysis.
User Interface: Bamboo offers a user-friendly graphical interface that allows users to create, configure, and monitor their CI/CD pipelines. It provides visual feedback on the status of builds and deployments, making it easy to track progress and identify any issues. Jest, on the other hand, is primarily used through the command line interface (CLI). While it does offer some basic reporting features, it lacks the comprehensive user interface provided by Bamboo.
Community and Support: Bamboo is developed and maintained by Atlassian, a well-established software company with a large user base. This means that it benefits from regular updates, bug fixes, and community support. Jest, on the other hand, is an open-source project maintained by Facebook. It has a strong and active community behind it, which contributes to its development and provides support to users. However, it may not have the same level of resources and support as Bamboo.
Ease of Setup and Configuration: Bamboo provides a comprehensive set of documentation and tutorials to guide users through the setup and configuration process. It offers a step-by-step wizard for configuring CI/CD pipelines, making it relatively easy to set up. Jest, on the other hand, is easy to set up and configure for testing JavaScript code. It can be installed via npm and requires minimal configuration to get started. However, setting up more complex testing scenarios may require additional effort.
Cost: Bamboo is a commercial product that requires a license for full functionality. While it offers a free trial, a paid license is required for continued use. Jest, on the other hand, is an open-source tool and is available for free. It can be used without any licensing costs, making it an attractive choice for teams on a tight budget.

In summary, Bamboo is a versatile CI/CD tool with seamless integration with other Atlassian products, while Jest is a focused JavaScript testing framework. Bamboo offers a comprehensive user interface and supports a wide range of testing capabilities, but comes with a cost. On the other hand, Jest is free, easy to set up, and specifically designed for testing JavaScript code.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Jest, Bamboo

Dane

Feb 7, 2020

Needs adviceon

Cypress

Jest

As we all know testing is an important part of any application. To assist with our testing we are going to use both Cypress and Jest. We feel these tools complement each other and will help us get good coverage of our code. We will use Cypress for our end to end testing as we've found it quite user friendly. Jest will be used for our unit tests because we've seen how many larger companies use it with great success.

836k views836k

Comments

Anonymous

Feb 6, 2020

Needs advice

Postman will be used to do integration testing with the backend API we create. It offers a clean interface to create many requests, and you can even organize these requests into collections. It helps to test the backend API first to make sure it's working before using it in the front-end. Jest can also be used for testing and is already embedded into React. Not only does it offer unit testing support in javascript, it can also do snapshot testing for the front-end to make sure components are rendering correctly. Enzyme is complementary to Jest and offers more functions such as shallow rendering. UnitTest will be used for Python testing as it is simple, has a lot of functionality and already built in with python. Sentry will be used for keeping track of errors as it is also easily integratable with Heroku because they offer it as an add-on. LogDNA will be used for tracking logs which are not errors and is also a Heroku add-on. Its good to have a separate service to record logs, monitor, track and even fix errors in real-time so our application can run more smoothly.

290k views290k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Jest	Bamboo
Jest provides you with multiple layers on top of Jasmine.	Focus on coding and count on Bamboo as your CI and build server! Create multi-stage build plans, set up triggers to start builds upon commits, and assign agents to your critical builds and deployments.
Familiar Approach: Built on top of the Jasmine test framework, using familiar expect(value).toBe(other) assertions;Mock by Default: Automatically mocks CommonJS modules returned by require(), making most existing code testable;Short Feedback Loop: DOM APIs are mocked and tests run in parallel via a small node.js command line utility	-
Statistics
Stacks 15.2K	Stacks 504
Followers 4.1K	Followers 549
Votes 175	Votes 17
Pros & Cons
Pros 36 Open source 32 Mock by default makes testing much simpler 23 Testing React Native Apps 20 Parallel test running 16 Fast Cons 4 Ambiguous configuration 4 Documentation 3 Difficult 2 Many bugs still not fixed months/years after reporting 2 Difficult to run single test/describe/file	Pros 10 Integrates with other Atlassian tools 4 Great notification scheme 2 Great UI 1 Has Deployment Projects Cons 6 Expensive 1 Bad integration with docker 1 Bad UI 1 Low community support
Integrations
No integrations available	Confluence Jira Bitbucket HipChat

What are some alternatives to Jest, Bamboo?

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

Mocha

Mocha is a feature-rich JavaScript test framework running on node.js and the browser, making asynchronous testing simple and fun. Mocha tests run serially, allowing for flexible and accurate reporting, while mapping uncaught exceptions to the correct test cases.

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

GoCD

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.

Jasmine

Jasmine is a Behavior Driven Development testing framework for JavaScript. It does not rely on browsers, DOM, or any JavaScript framework. Thus it's suited for websites, Node.js projects, or anywhere that JavaScript can run.

Related Comparisons

Bamboo vs Jest: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will compare the key differences between Bamboo and Jest, two popular tools used in software development.

Integration with Continuous Integration/Continuous Deployment (CI/CD) Pipelines: Bamboo is a CI/CD tool that is commonly used for building, testing, and deploying software. It allows for seamless integration with other Atlassian tools, such as Jira and Bitbucket, making it a popular choice for teams working in the Atlassian ecosystem. On the other hand, Jest is a JavaScript testing framework primarily used for testing JavaScript code. While it can be used alongside CI/CD tools, it does not have the built-in CI/CD capabilities that Bamboo offers.
Testing Capabilities: Bamboo provides the capability to perform various types of tests, including unit testing, integration testing, and functional testing, by integrating with different testing frameworks. It supports a wide range of programming languages and frameworks, making it a versatile choice. Jest, on the other hand, is specifically designed for JavaScript and provides a rich set of features and utilities for testing JavaScript code, including support for snapshot testing, mocking, and code coverage analysis.
User Interface: Bamboo offers a user-friendly graphical interface that allows users to create, configure, and monitor their CI/CD pipelines. It provides visual feedback on the status of builds and deployments, making it easy to track progress and identify any issues. Jest, on the other hand, is primarily used through the command line interface (CLI). While it does offer some basic reporting features, it lacks the comprehensive user interface provided by Bamboo.
Community and Support: Bamboo is developed and maintained by Atlassian, a well-established software company with a large user base. This means that it benefits from regular updates, bug fixes, and community support. Jest, on the other hand, is an open-source project maintained by Facebook. It has a strong and active community behind it, which contributes to its development and provides support to users. However, it may not have the same level of resources and support as Bamboo.
Ease of Setup and Configuration: Bamboo provides a comprehensive set of documentation and tutorials to guide users through the setup and configuration process. It offers a step-by-step wizard for configuring CI/CD pipelines, making it relatively easy to set up. Jest, on the other hand, is easy to set up and configure for testing JavaScript code. It can be installed via npm and requires minimal configuration to get started. However, setting up more complex testing scenarios may require additional effort.
Cost: Bamboo is a commercial product that requires a license for full functionality. While it offers a free trial, a paid license is required for continued use. Jest, on the other hand, is an open-source tool and is available for free. It can be used without any licensing costs, making it an attractive choice for teams on a tight budget.

Bamboo vs Jest

Overview

Bamboo vs Jest: What are the differences?