Bootstrap vs Quasar Framework

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Bootstrap

52.3K
11.4K
+ 1
7.6K
Quasar Framework

299
484
+ 1
315
Add tool

Bootstrap vs Quasar Framework: What are the differences?

Bootstrap: Simple and flexible HTML, CSS, and JS for popular UI components and interactions. Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web; Quasar Framework: Full front-end framework powered by Vue. Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

Bootstrap and Quasar Framework can be primarily classified as "Front-End Frameworks" tools.

Some of the features offered by Bootstrap are:

  • Preprocessors: Bootstrap ships with vanilla CSS, but its source code utilizes the two most popular CSS preprocessors, Less and Sass. Quickly get started with precompiled CSS or build on the source.
  • One framework, every device: Bootstrap easily and efficiently scales your websites and applications with a single code base, from phones to tablets to desktops with CSS media queries.
  • Full of features: With Bootstrap, you get extensive and beautiful documentation for common HTML elements, dozens of custom HTML and CSS components, and awesome jQuery plugins.

On the other hand, Quasar Framework provides the following key features:

  • SPAs (Single Page App)
  • SSR (Server-side Rendered App)
  • PWAs (Progressive Web App)

"Responsiveness" is the primary reason why developers consider Bootstrap over the competitors, whereas "Excellent documentation" was stated as the key factor in picking Quasar Framework.

Bootstrap and Quasar Framework are both open source tools. Bootstrap with 135K GitHub stars and 66.4K forks on GitHub appears to be more popular than Quasar Framework with 11.4K GitHub stars and 1.12K GitHub forks.

Spotify, Twitter, and Lyft are some of the popular companies that use Bootstrap, whereas Quasar Framework is used by Decision6, Learnlink AS, and Whiteboard-it. Bootstrap has a broader approval, being mentioned in 8441 company stacks & 6674 developers stacks; compared to Quasar Framework, which is listed in 11 company stacks and 47 developer stacks.

Advice on Bootstrap and Quasar Framework
Needs advice
on
Tailwind CSS
and
Bootstrap

I am planning to redesign my entire application, which is currently in Bootstrap. I heard about Tailwind CSS, and I think its really cool to work with. Is it okay if I use Bootstrap and Tailwind together? I can't remove Bootstrap altogether, as my application is using the js dependencies of Bootstrap, which I don't want to disturb.

See more
Replies (3)
Ivo Pereira

Factually talking about systems, we gotta make two bold headlines about each one: Bootstrap has been around for a while, has a vast community and much probably will not be gone in a while. Tailwind in the other hand, is the trendy framework starting from the past year. Referring to UI, I really prefer Tailwind, however I can't ignore the fact that a lot of libraries that emerged felt short in the end after a few years (a point where Bootstrap kept his status).

You are able to use both them together but I advise you ‚ÄĒ it will be a mess. And you gotta hope that you won't have any kind of conflicts between class naming and other general styling.

My recommendation would be to use one and only one. Perhaps rebuild the UI with a specific framework in mind, otherwise you will start to workaround things of both frameworks to contradict each other - and your team (if you work with one) will hate you.

See more
Arslan Ameer
at Synares Systems Pvt Ltd · | 5 upvotes · 227.1K views
Recommends
Bootstrap

You might have heard about bootstrap 5. Bootstrap is now totally jQuery free. i have tried foundation and bulma too. but eventually fall again for bootstrap, as it is most convenient and stable. i use bootstrap with less or sass.

See more
Barry Hylton
Recommends
Bootstrap

I use both of these regularly. If you're going to have to use Bootstrap due to your js dependencies, stick with Bootstrap. I actually prefer Tailwind, but trying to use both of them and make them "play nice" feels like making things more complex with no real benefit.

EDIT: Sorry for the late response, I just noticed how old this is. StackShare sent me this in an email for some reason so I assumed it was relatively fresh.

See more
Daniel Hern√°ndez Alcojor
Frontend Developer at atSistemas · | 8 upvotes · 338.8K views
Needs advice
on
UIkIt
Bulma
and
Bootstrap

I'm building, from scratch, a webapp. It's going to be a dashboard to check on our apps in New Relic and update the Apdex from the webapp. I have just chosen Next.js as our framework because we use React already, and after going through the tutorial, I just loved the latest changes they have implemented.

But we have to decide on a CSS framework for the UI. I'm partial to Bulma because I love that it's all about CSS (and you can use SCSS from the start), that it's rather lightweight and that it doesn't come with JavaScript clutter. One of the things I hate about Bootstrap is that you depend on jQuery to use the JavaScript part. My boss loves UIkIt, but when I've used it in the past, I didn't like it.

What do you think we should use? Maybe you have another suggestion?

See more
Replies (6)
Recommends
UIkIt

I have used bulma in several projects. We could not customize with the websites very well. Also when we need "quick solutions" Bulma is not suitable (I mean basic animations, to-top buttons, transparent navbar solutions etc. For these solutions, you need extra js codes).

Everybody knows about Bootstrap (heavy but popular).

Now we start a new project with UI kit, I like it. Pros: It is fast and lightweight and imho it has very good UI. Cons: Small community. Documentation.

Check this link for kick-off. https://github.com/zzseba78/Kick-Off

Maybe it is helpful.

See more
Damien Lucchese
Front End Web Developer · | 6 upvotes · 226.9K views
Recommends
Bulma

Been checking out Bulma, myself, and really dig it. I like that it's a great base level jumping off point. You can get a layout going with it, pretty quickly, and then customize as you want. It definitely sounds like it's the one you're leaning towards but a big factor would be who will be using it most? Your boss, yourself, others? Whichever you like best, you'll prob be most productive with but if in the end your boss says it has to be UIkit, then best to be open-minded and give it another shot. Sometimes you may not jive with new tools in your stack, at first, but then they can become tools you learn to love. Best to you in your decision! Take care & keep safe.

See more
Recommends
Diez

I've moved away from the concept of UI kits. Not that many support CSS grid. A lot of the icons are easier to use in SVG. I've had success in the concept of design framework and design tokens. I build my brand identity in Figma, and extract in Diez. Then Diez integrates into React and SASS. Much easier because design is decoupled from software in a central authority, and software updates automatically from design changes.

See more
Recommends
Bulma

Honestly - pick whatever you are the most comfortable with. You can achieve almost the same effects with different tools, so why not use something I like using?

See more
Tomer Fishaimer
Frontend Architect at Aqua Security · | 2 upvotes · 218.2K views
Recommends
Tailwind CSS

Actually it really depends on your needs, there are 3 types of UI frameworks you can use:

  1. A complete set of UI components like: https://react-bulma.dev/en/getting-started.

    Pros:

    Having a lot of pre-built UI components saves a lot of time

    Cons:

    need to learn the react framework and the bulma styles, and it's harder to customize to your needs

  2. A pure css framework, like Bulma, where you write all the components yourself.

    Pros:

    A lot of flexibility to build the components you need

    Cons:

    You are bound to Bulma classes and markup.

    Takes more time since you need to build the components

  3. A utility class framework like: https://tailwindcss.com/.

Pros:

Most flexible, mix and match classes as you like and build your own markup

Very easy to customize to your needs

Cons:

Might take time to get used to and takes more time since you need to build the components

If you choose options one, then it's just a matter of deciding what style you like (material,ant, bulma) and go with the library that implements it If you go with pure css and build your own components, I can't recommend tailwind enough, I've been finding myself building entire pages without writing a single line of css.

And if later on, the designer wants to make a change to some color, or size, I just need to change one value in the config file, and the entire app is updated.

See more
Needs advice
on
UIkIt
Tailwind CSS
and
Bootstrap

We are re-modifying the existing portal to the new one. Looking out for a CSS framework where over-rides are possible, the performance of page loading, extendable, etc Please suggest between tailwind, UIkit and bootstrap frameworks explaining in detail on different factors. I request your help on the same.

See more
Replies (2)
Brett Stevenson
Recommends
Bootstrap

I'm a big proponent of Tailwind and I personally use it whenever I get the chance, mostly because it's not really a UI-kit, but it sounds like in this case a UI-kit like Bootstrap with pre-defined components is more what you are looking for. Bootstrap is (relatively) extendable and overridable and makes it really simple to make a decent looking UI using a handful of pre-defined classes, whereas with Tailwind you configure the classes and create your own components. My main reason for replacing Bootstrap in my workflow is that it feels like the component creation has become so abstracted from the developer that any meaningful customization becomes a chore, resulting in many websites having the generic "Bootstrap-look". Nonetheless, it is effective for creating a pleasant and responsive UI. Though, I don't have any experience with UIkit.

See more
Collins Ogbuzuru
Front-end dev at Evolve credit · | 0 upvotes · 183.4K views
Recommends
Tailwind CSS

Hey Sai, My thoughts on UIkit - It's beautiful, it's fast and it has good animation too. Why would I choose it ? Nothing other than giving the internet a new look .

My thoughts on Bootstrap - it's beautiful, if used well. It's very fast and has clean class naming convention unlike Uikit.

Why I would choose it ? It's been tested and trusted, I can find a whole lot of resources and a community around it. Also with the type of project you working on I bet Bootstrap would do the job .

My thoughts on tailwind - classic, difficult to set up and clean utilities. I wouldn't think of tailwind the way I would to Bootstrap or UIkit. What do I mean ? Tailwind is more like a tool set to create your own design flow rather than giving you a pre-designed button it gives you the ability to design yours.

My final thoughts.

If you have the time , setup and use tailwind it will give you a great chance when it comes to extending and performance.

See more
Decisions about Bootstrap and Quasar Framework
Bridget Sarah
Full Stack Developer at Bridget Sarah · | 10 upvotes · 278.3K views

I do prefer to write things from scratch however when it came to wanting to jump-start the frontend, I found that it was taking me a lot longer hence why needing to use something very fast.

Bootstrap was the boom when it came out, I didn't like it, to be honest, set in its way and a pain to over-ride and in addition, you can tell from a distance if you're using boostrap and as everything looks the same.

I came across Tailwind CSS as I wanted more dynamic features, you could say, I've been now doing it for a few days and I love it a lot. I've been practising with the full stack part installed but I an't we wait until I do a new project, and I'll e able to select exactly what I want. Much faster.

See more
Andre Boyle

I find the Tailwind provides a lot for flexibility in how we approach design for Mojinxo, while still giving me the benefits of a defined framework and centralised configuration. With tailwind we can create something that is very much Mojinxo and not just a carbon copy of every other site using Tailwind, which is what I find tends to be the case with Bootstrap and Bulma.

There is a tradeoff in familairity for users, especially with Bootstrap where users just 'know' how a site will work based on the card display, the common navigation look and feel and the slide-out burger menus.

The icing on the cake is definitely size. Tailwind is just so small, effective and easy to pick up.

See more

Fonts and typography are fun. Material Design is a framework (developed by Google) that basically geeks out on how to assemble your typographical elements together into a design language. If you're into fonts and typography, it's fantastic. It provides a theming engine, reusable components, and can pull different user interfaces together under a common design paradigm. I'd highly recommend looking into Borries Schwesinger's book "The Form Book" if you're going to be working with Material UI or are otherwise new to component design.

https://www.amazon.com/Form-Book-Creating-Printed-Online/dp/0500515085

See more
Get Advice from developers at your company using Private StackShare. Sign up for Private StackShare.
Learn More
Pros of Bootstrap
Pros of Quasar Framework
  • 1.6K
    Responsiveness
  • 1.2K
    UI components
  • 943
    Consistent
  • 777
    Great docs
  • 677
    Flexible
  • 466
    HTML, CSS, and JS framework
  • 411
    Open source
  • 375
    Widely used
  • 368
    Customizable
  • 241
    HTML framework
  • 76
    Popular
  • 75
    Mobile first
  • 75
    Easy setup
  • 56
    Great grid system
  • 49
    Great community
  • 38
    Future compatibility
  • 34
    Integration
  • 27
    Very powerful foundational front-end framework
  • 24
    Standard
  • 23
    Javascript plugins
  • 19
    Build faster prototypes
  • 18
    Preprocessors
  • 13
    Grids
  • 8
    Clean
  • 7
    Good for a person who hates CSS
  • 4
    Rapid development
  • 4
    Love it
  • 4
    Easy to setup and learn
  • 2
    Clean and quick frontend development
  • 2
    Provide angular wrapper
  • 2
    Great and easy to use
  • 2
    Great and easy
  • 2
    Powerful grid system, Rapid development, Customization
  • 2
    Community
  • 2
    Great customer support
  • 2
    Popularity
  • 2
    Great and easy to make a responsive website
  • 2
    Sprzedam opla
  • 2
    Easy to use
  • 1
    Easy setup2
  • 1
    Reactjs
  • 1
    Responsive design
  • 1
    Geo
  • 1
    Not tied to jQuery
  • 1
    Design Agnostic
  • 1
    So clean and simple
  • 1
    Numerous components
  • 1
    Recognizable
  • 1
    Intuitive
  • 1
    Love the classes?
  • 1
    Material-ui
  • 1
    Pre-Defined components
  • 1
    Boostrap
  • 1
    Painless front end development
  • 1
    It's fast
  • 1
    Felxible, comfortable, user-friendly
  • 1
    The fame
  • 0
    Frefsd
  • 48
    Excellent documentation
  • 37
    Deploy one codebase to web, desktop, mobile, and more
  • 33
    Extensive collection of components
  • 33
    Lots of UI components
  • 31
    Being able to bundle for almost all platform is awesome
  • 23
    Excelent performance
  • 23
    Quasar App Extensions
  • 20
    Great community
  • 14
    Open Source
  • 13
    Attention to Security
  • 12
    Material Design
  • 8
    Cross Platform Andriod, IOS and Desktop
  • 7
    1 Cross Platform Android, IOS and Desktop
  • 6
    It is easy because of vue
  • 4
    Active and helpful community
  • 3
    SSR

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Bootstrap
Cons of Quasar Framework
  • 25
    Javascript is tied to jquery
  • 16
    Every site uses the defaults
  • 14
    Too much heavy decoration in default look
  • 14
    Grid system break points aren't ideal
  • 8
    Verbose styles
  • 1
    Super heavy
    Be the first to leave a con

    Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

    What is Bootstrap?

    Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

    What is Quasar Framework?

    Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    What companies use Bootstrap?
    What companies use Quasar Framework?
    See which teams inside your own company are using Bootstrap or Quasar Framework.
    Sign up for Private StackShareLearn More

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with Bootstrap?
    What tools integrate with Quasar Framework?

    Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

    Blog Posts

    What are some alternatives to Bootstrap and Quasar Framework?
    Semantic UI
    Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.
    jQuery
    jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.
    Material
    Express your creativity with Material, an animation and graphics framework for Google's Material Design and Apple's Flat UI in Swift.
    React
    Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.
    Foundation
    Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.
    See all alternatives