Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

CapRover

55
93
+ 1
58
cloudControl

2
7
+ 1
0
Add tool

CapRover vs cloudControl: What are the differences?

Introduction:

CapRover and cloudControl are two platforms that offer service deployment and management for cloud applications. However, they have several key differences that set them apart.

  1. Open Source vs. Proprietary Technology: One major difference between CapRover and cloudControl is that CapRover is an open-source platform, allowing users to modify and customize the code according to their needs. On the other hand, cloudControl is a proprietary technology, meaning users have limited control over the underlying code.

  2. Deployment Flexibility: CapRover provides users with the flexibility to deploy applications on any cloud infrastructure, allowing them to choose the provider that best suits their requirements. In contrast, cloudControl focuses on providing deployment services specifically on the Google Cloud Platform, limiting the options for users who prefer other cloud providers.

  3. Pricing Structure: When it comes to pricing, CapRover offers a more cost-effective solution for smaller businesses or individual developers with its flexible pricing model based on resource usage. CloudControl, on the other hand, follows a more rigid pricing structure that may not be suitable for users with varying needs or limited budgets.

  4. Community Support: CapRover benefits from a strong community of developers and users who actively contribute to its development and offer support through forums and documentation. In comparison, cloudControl lacks a vibrant community presence, which can make it challenging for users to find help or resources when encountering issues.

  5. Scalability Options: CapRover is known for its scalability features, allowing users to easily scale their applications based on demand without experiencing downtime. In contrast, cloudControl may have limitations in terms of scalability, which could pose challenges for users looking to rapidly expand their services.

  6. User Interface Design: Another notable difference between CapRover and cloudControl is the user interface design. CapRover features a more minimalist and user-friendly interface that simplifies the deployment process, making it accessible to users with varying levels of technical expertise. In contrast, cloudControl's interface may be more complex and less intuitive, requiring users to invest more time in learning how to navigate the platform effectively.

In Summary, CapRover and cloudControl differ in terms of their technology, deployment options, pricing structure, community support, scalability features, and user interface design.

Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of CapRover
Pros of cloudControl
  • 13
    Opensource
  • 12
    Mangage complex infrastructure easily
  • 9
    Auto SSL
  • 7
    Docker
  • 7
    Easy instalation
  • 5
    Auto load balancing
  • 3
    Gitlab entegration
  • 2
    Easy to use PAAS
    Be the first to leave a pro

    Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

    - No public GitHub repository available -

    What is CapRover?

    It is an extremely easy to use app/database deployment & web server manager for your NodeJS, Python, PHP, ASP.NET, Ruby, MySQL, MongoDB, Postgres, WordPress (and etc...) applications! It's blazingly fast and very robust as it uses Docker, nginx, LetsEncrypt and NetData under the hood behind its simple-to-use interface.

    What is cloudControl?

    The cloudControl PaaS supports multiple languages and their ecosystems natively and without vendor lock-in through open source buildpacks. Native support means you can continue to use the tools you know and love for development and simply push your code to the cloudControl platform. A buildpack is run on each push and prepares your app for deployment. E.g. compiling source code, minifying CSS and Javascript assets, pulling in dependencies with Maven, Composer, PIP, Bundler and more.

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    What companies use CapRover?
    What companies use cloudControl?
    See which teams inside your own company are using CapRover or cloudControl.
    Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with CapRover?
    What tools integrate with cloudControl?

    Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

    What are some alternatives to CapRover and cloudControl?
    Heroku
    Heroku is a cloud application platform – a new way of building and deploying web apps. Heroku lets app developers spend 100% of their time on their application code, not managing servers, deployment, ongoing operations, or scaling.
    Kubernetes
    Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.
    Google App Engine
    Google has a reputation for highly reliable, high performance infrastructure. With App Engine you can take advantage of the 10 years of knowledge Google has in running massively scalable, performance driven systems. App Engine applications are easy to build, easy to maintain, and easy to scale as your traffic and data storage needs grow.
    Apollo
    Build a universal GraphQL API on top of your existing REST APIs, so you can ship new application features fast without waiting on backend changes.
    AWS Elastic Beanstalk
    Once you upload your application, Elastic Beanstalk automatically handles the deployment details of capacity provisioning, load balancing, auto-scaling, and application health monitoring.
    See all alternatives