CapRover vs cloudControl

Overview

cloudControl

Stacks2

Followers7

Votes0

CapRover

Stacks56

Followers94

Votes54

GitHub Stars14.6K

Forks941

CapRover vs cloudControl: What are the differences?

Introduction:

CapRover and cloudControl are two platforms that offer service deployment and management for cloud applications. However, they have several key differences that set them apart.

Open Source vs. Proprietary Technology: One major difference between CapRover and cloudControl is that CapRover is an open-source platform, allowing users to modify and customize the code according to their needs. On the other hand, cloudControl is a proprietary technology, meaning users have limited control over the underlying code.
Deployment Flexibility: CapRover provides users with the flexibility to deploy applications on any cloud infrastructure, allowing them to choose the provider that best suits their requirements. In contrast, cloudControl focuses on providing deployment services specifically on the Google Cloud Platform, limiting the options for users who prefer other cloud providers.
Pricing Structure: When it comes to pricing, CapRover offers a more cost-effective solution for smaller businesses or individual developers with its flexible pricing model based on resource usage. CloudControl, on the other hand, follows a more rigid pricing structure that may not be suitable for users with varying needs or limited budgets.
Community Support: CapRover benefits from a strong community of developers and users who actively contribute to its development and offer support through forums and documentation. In comparison, cloudControl lacks a vibrant community presence, which can make it challenging for users to find help or resources when encountering issues.
Scalability Options: CapRover is known for its scalability features, allowing users to easily scale their applications based on demand without experiencing downtime. In contrast, cloudControl may have limitations in terms of scalability, which could pose challenges for users looking to rapidly expand their services.
User Interface Design: Another notable difference between CapRover and cloudControl is the user interface design. CapRover features a more minimalist and user-friendly interface that simplifies the deployment process, making it accessible to users with varying levels of technical expertise. In contrast, cloudControl's interface may be more complex and less intuitive, requiring users to invest more time in learning how to navigate the platform effectively.

In Summary, CapRover and cloudControl differ in terms of their technology, deployment options, pricing structure, community support, scalability features, and user interface design.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

cloudControl	CapRover
The cloudControl PaaS supports multiple languages and their ecosystems natively and without vendor lock-in through open source buildpacks. Native support means you can continue to use the tools you know and love for development and simply push your code to the cloudControl platform. A buildpack is run on each push and prepares your app for deployment. E.g. compiling source code, minifying CSS and Javascript assets, pulling in dependencies with Maven, Composer, PIP, Bundler and more.	It is an extremely easy to use app/database deployment & web server manager for your NodeJS, Python, PHP, ASP.NET, Ruby, MySQL, MongoDB, Postgres, WordPress (and etc...) applications! It's blazingly fast and very robust as it uses Docker, nginx, LetsEncrypt and NetData under the hood behind its simple-to-use interface.
Develop and push code in any language- Native support for Java, PHP, Python, Ruby and more without vendor lock-in.;Deploy and scale your apps easily- Launch new versions without downtime and use horizontal or vertical scaling.;Use the flexible and secure runtime environment- Run your code in secure Linux containers and easily use Add-on services to add databases and more.	CLI for automation and scripting; Web GUI for ease of access and convenience; No lock-in! Remove CapRover and your apps keep working!; Docker Swarm under the hood for containerization and clustering; Nginx (fully customizable template) under the hood for load-balancing; Let's Encrypt under the hood for free SSL (HTTPS)
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 14.6K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 941
Stacks 2	Stacks 56
Followers 7	Followers 94
Votes 0	Votes 54
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet	Pros 12 Opensource 12 Mangage complex infrastructure easily 8 Auto SSL 6 Docker 6 Easy instalation
Integrations
Blitz Cloudant IronMQ Logentries Mailgun MongoLab New Relic Twilio SendGrid Treasure Data Loader.io	MongoDB Docker Node.js PostgreSQL MySQL NGINX Ruby PHP ASP.NET WordPress

What are some alternatives to cloudControl, CapRover?

Heroku

Heroku is a cloud application platform – a new way of building and deploying web apps. Heroku lets app developers spend 100% of their time on their application code, not managing servers, deployment, ongoing operations, or scaling.

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud is a polyglot cloud application platform. The service helps developers to build applications with many languages and services, with auto-scaling features and a true pay-as-you-go pricing model.

Google App Engine

Google has a reputation for highly reliable, high performance infrastructure. With App Engine you can take advantage of the 10 years of knowledge Google has in running massively scalable, performance driven systems. App Engine applications are easy to build, easy to maintain, and easy to scale as your traffic and data storage needs grow.

Red Hat OpenShift

OpenShift is Red Hat's Cloud Computing Platform as a Service (PaaS) offering. OpenShift is an application platform in the cloud where application developers and teams can build, test, deploy, and run their applications.

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

Once you upload your application, Elastic Beanstalk automatically handles the deployment details of capacity provisioning, load balancing, auto-scaling, and application health monitoring.

Render

Render is a unified platform to build and run all your apps and websites with free SSL, a global CDN, private networks and auto deploys from Git.

Hasura

An open source GraphQL engine that deploys instant, realtime GraphQL APIs on any Postgres database.

Cloud 66

Cloud 66 gives you everything you need to build, deploy and maintain your applications on any cloud, without the headache of dealing with "server stuff". Frameworks: Ruby on Rails, Node.js, Jamstack, Laravel, GoLang, and more.

Jelastic

Jelastic is a Multi-Cloud DevOps PaaS for ISVs, telcos, service providers and enterprises needing to speed up development, reduce cost of IT infrastructure, improve uptime and security.

Dokku

It is an extensible, open source Platform as a Service that runs on a single server of your choice. It helps you build and manage the lifecycle of applications from building to scaling.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Flyway vs Liquibase

CapRover vs cloudControl: What are the differences?

Introduction:

CapRover and cloudControl are two platforms that offer service deployment and management for cloud applications. However, they have several key differences that set them apart.

Open Source vs. Proprietary Technology: One major difference between CapRover and cloudControl is that CapRover is an open-source platform, allowing users to modify and customize the code according to their needs. On the other hand, cloudControl is a proprietary technology, meaning users have limited control over the underlying code.
Deployment Flexibility: CapRover provides users with the flexibility to deploy applications on any cloud infrastructure, allowing them to choose the provider that best suits their requirements. In contrast, cloudControl focuses on providing deployment services specifically on the Google Cloud Platform, limiting the options for users who prefer other cloud providers.
Pricing Structure: When it comes to pricing, CapRover offers a more cost-effective solution for smaller businesses or individual developers with its flexible pricing model based on resource usage. CloudControl, on the other hand, follows a more rigid pricing structure that may not be suitable for users with varying needs or limited budgets.
Community Support: CapRover benefits from a strong community of developers and users who actively contribute to its development and offer support through forums and documentation. In comparison, cloudControl lacks a vibrant community presence, which can make it challenging for users to find help or resources when encountering issues.
Scalability Options: CapRover is known for its scalability features, allowing users to easily scale their applications based on demand without experiencing downtime. In contrast, cloudControl may have limitations in terms of scalability, which could pose challenges for users looking to rapidly expand their services.
User Interface Design: Another notable difference between CapRover and cloudControl is the user interface design. CapRover features a more minimalist and user-friendly interface that simplifies the deployment process, making it accessible to users with varying levels of technical expertise. In contrast, cloudControl's interface may be more complex and less intuitive, requiring users to invest more time in learning how to navigate the platform effectively.

In Summary, CapRover and cloudControl differ in terms of their technology, deployment options, pricing structure, community support, scalability features, and user interface design.