StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Continuous Integration
  4. Continuous Integration
  5. CircleCI vs Codacy

CircleCI vs Codacy

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

CircleCI
CircleCI
Stacks14.5K
Followers7.1K
Votes974
Codacy
Codacy
Stacks313
Followers551
Votes248

CircleCI vs Codacy: What are the differences?

Introduction: In the world of software development, tools like CircleCI and Codacy play a vital role in ensuring the quality and efficiency of the codebase. Here, we will explore the key differences between CircleCI and Codacy.

  1. Purpose: CircleCI is primarily a continuous integration and delivery platform, focusing on automating the build, test, and deployment process of software projects. On the other hand, Codacy is a static code analysis tool that helps in detecting code quality issues, security vulnerabilities, and code style violations.

  2. Integration: CircleCI seamlessly integrates with version control systems like GitHub and Bitbucket, allowing developers to easily set up their CI/CD pipelines. Codacy also integrates with various version control platforms and supports multiple programming languages, providing in-depth code analysis and actionable insights.

  3. Workflow: In CircleCI, developers can define custom workflows, set up parallel jobs, and utilize caching mechanisms to speed up build processes. Codacy, on the other hand, focuses on analyzing code quality metrics, identifying issues, and enforcing coding standards, providing actionable feedback to developers.

  4. Scalability: CircleCI offers a scalable solution that can handle multiple projects and repositories with ease, making it suitable for teams of all sizes. Codacy, on the other hand, is more focused on code quality and security analysis at the code level, making it an ideal choice for teams looking to improve their codebase.

  5. Automation: CircleCI automates the entire CI/CD pipeline, from building and testing to deploying the application, ensuring fast feedback loops and efficient release cycles. Codacy automates code reviews, identifies patterns in the codebase, and enforces best practices, helping teams maintain a high level of code quality consistently.

  6. Community Support: CircleCI boasts a vibrant community of users, offering support, tutorials, and plugins to enhance the platform's functionality. Codacy also has an active user community, with regular updates, feature enhancements, and a knowledge base to help developers maximize the tool's capabilities.

In Summary, CircleCI and Codacy differ in their primary focus on continuous integration and delivery versus static code analysis, integration capabilities, workflow customization, scalability, automation features, and community support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on CircleCI, Codacy

Dustin
Dustin

Senior Developer at Elegant Themes

Apr 18, 2019

ReviewonCircleCICircleCI

We use CircleCI because of the better value it provides in its plans. I'm sure we could have used Travis just as easily but we found CircleCI's pricing to be more reasonable. In the two years since we signed up, the service has improved. CircleCI is always innovating and iterating on their platform. We have been very satisfied.

607k views607k
Comments
Somnath
Somnath

Engineering Leader at Altimetrik Corp.

Jun 25, 2020

Needs adviceonCircleCICircleCIDrone.ioDrone.ioGitHub ActionsGitHub Actions

I am in the process of evaluating CircleCI, Drone.io, and GitHub Actions to cover my #CI/ #CD needs. I would appreciate your advice on comparative study w.r.t. attributes like language-Inclusive support, code-base integration, performance, cost, maintenance, support, ease of use, ability to deal with big projects, etc. based on actual industry experience.

Thanks in advance!

1.82M views1.82M
Comments
Felipe
Felipe

May 24, 2020

Needs advice

My website is brand new and one of the few requirements of testings I had to implement was code coverage. Never though it was so hard to implement using a #docker container.
Given my lack of experience, every attempt I tried on making a simple code coverage test using the 4 combinations of #TravisCI, #CircleCi with #Coveralls, #Codecov I failed. The main problem was I was generating the .coverage file within the docker container and couldn't access it with #TravisCi or #CircleCi, every attempt to solve this problem seems to be very hacky and this was not the kind of complexity I want to introduce to my newborn website.
This problem was solved using a specific action for #GitHubActions, it was a 3 line solution I had to put in my github workflow file and I was able to access the .coverage file from my docker container and get the coverage report with #Codecov.

198k views198k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

CircleCI
CircleCI
Codacy
Codacy

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

Language-Inclusive Support;Custom Environments;Flexible Resource Allocation;SSH Or Local Builds For Easy Debugging;Improved Caching;Unmatched Security;Parallelism;Insights
Available for cloud and self-hosted repositories;Static code analysis for +40 languages;Analysis for cloud infrastructure-as-code frameworks;Automatic analysis integrated in your CI;Code coverage tracking;Support for linter configuration files;1-click autofixes for GitHub;Static IP addresses for allowlisting Codacy;
Statistics
Stacks
14.5K
Stacks
313
Followers
7.1K
Followers
551
Votes
974
Votes
248
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 226
    Github integration
  • 177
    Easy setup
  • 153
    Fast builds
  • 94
    Competitively priced
  • 74
    Slack integration
Cons
  • 12
    Unstable
  • 6
    Scammy pricing structure
  • 0
    Aggressive Github permissions
Pros
  • 45
    Automated code review
  • 35
    Easy setup
  • 29
    Free for open source
  • 20
    Customizable
  • 18
    Helps reduce technical debt
Cons
  • 6
    No support for private Git or Azure DevOps git
Integrations
dotCloud
dotCloud
GitHub
GitHub
Xcode
Xcode
Azure Container Service
Azure Container Service
Slack
Slack
Heroku
Heroku
JavaScript
JavaScript
Node.js
Node.js
Python
Python
Amazon EC2
Amazon EC2
GitHub
GitHub
GitLab
GitLab
Slack
Slack
Bitbucket
Bitbucket
Jira
Jira

What are some alternatives to CircleCI, Codacy?

Jenkins

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Travis CI

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

TeamCity

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Code Climate

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Drone.io

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

GoCD

GoCD

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.

Phabricator

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

Shippable

Shippable

Shippable is a SaaS platform that lets you easily add Continuous Integration/Deployment to your Github and BitBucket repositories. It is lightweight, super simple to setup, and runs your builds and tests faster than any other service.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana