StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Platform As A Service
  5. Cloud Foundry vs Stackato

Cloud Foundry vs Stackato

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Cloud Foundry
Cloud Foundry
Stacks188
Followers346
Votes5
Stackato
Stackato
Stacks11
Followers25
Votes2

Cloud Foundry vs Stackato: What are the differences?

Introduction

Cloud Foundry and Stackato are both Platform-as-a-Service (PaaS) solutions that allow for easy deployment and scaling of applications in the cloud. However, there are key differences between the two platforms that cater to different needs and preferences.

  1. Deployment Options: One major difference between Cloud Foundry and Stackato is the deployment options they offer. Cloud Foundry provides a public cloud offering through the Cloud Foundry Foundation, while Stackato is offered as a private cloud solution by ActiveState. This difference in deployment options may influence organizations' choices based on their needs for public or private cloud environments.

  2. Open Source vs. Commercial: Cloud Foundry is an open-source platform with a community-driven approach, while Stackato is a commercial product and comes with support from ActiveState. Organizations that prioritize open-source solutions and community support may prefer Cloud Foundry, whereas those looking for commercial support and services might opt for Stackato.

  3. Ease of Use: Stackato is known for its user-friendly interface and easy-to-use features, making it more accessible to developers and organizations with varying degrees of technical expertise. On the other hand, Cloud Foundry may have a steeper learning curve and require more technical knowledge to navigate and utilize effectively.

  4. Security Features: Stackato is often praised for its robust security features, including built-in access controls, auditing capabilities, and encryption mechanisms. Cloud Foundry also prioritizes security but may require additional configurations or integrations to achieve the same level of protection as Stackato out of the box.

  5. Scalability and Performance: Both Cloud Foundry and Stackato offer scalability and high-performance capabilities, but the specific configurations and optimizations may differ between the two platforms. Organizations with specific scalability and performance requirements should evaluate how each platform can meet their needs before making a decision.

  6. Customization and Extensibility: While both Cloud Foundry and Stackato offer a range of features and services, Stackato provides more flexibility for customization and extensibility through its modular architecture and support for various programming languages and frameworks. Organizations looking for a highly customizable platform may find Stackato more suitable for their needs.

In Summary, Cloud Foundry and Stackato differ in terms of deployment options, licensing models, ease of use, security features, scalability, and customization capabilities.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Cloud Foundry
Cloud Foundry
Stackato
Stackato

Cloud Foundry is an open platform as a service (PaaS) that provides a choice of clouds, developer frameworks, and application services. Cloud Foundry makes it faster and easier to build, test, deploy, and scale applications.

Stackato runs on top of your cloud infrastructure, and is the middleware from which your applications are launched. Developers simply upload their application source files to Stackato via IDE or command-line. Stackato automatically configures the required language runtimes, web frameworks, and data and messaging services.

Application and services centric lifecycle API;High performance dynamic routing;Buildpack support;Data and web services brokers;Linux Container management;Role Based Access and Teams;Active application health management;Standards based user authentication and authorization;Integrated real time logging API;Multi-provider ecosystem
Web console; Activity timeline; Multi-tenancy; App store; LDAP support; Oracle support; Amazon RDS integration; Self-service for developers; Uses buildpack; One-click SSO for deploys apps; Log streaming; Availability zones and placement zones support; Auto-scaling of app instances; Auto-scaling at infrastructure layer; Runs on vSphere, OpenStack, CloudStack, AWS, Rackspace, KVM, Virtualbox, VMware Fusion
Statistics
Stacks
188
Stacks
11
Followers
346
Followers
25
Votes
5
Votes
2
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 2
    Perfectly aligned with springboot
  • 1
    Application health management
  • 1
    Free service discovery (Eureka)
  • 1
    Free distributed tracing (zipkin)
Pros
  • 2
    Compliance - Owning the data helps with SOX, etc
Integrations
VMware vSphere
VMware vSphere
Logentries
Logentries
Amazon EC2
Amazon EC2
OpenStack
OpenStack
Papertrail
Papertrail
Amazon VPC
Amazon VPC
Splunk Cloud
Splunk Cloud
Sumo Logic
Sumo Logic
OpenStack
OpenStack
Apache CloudStack
Apache CloudStack
Amazon EC2
Amazon EC2
Rackspace Cloud Servers
Rackspace Cloud Servers
VirtualBox
VirtualBox
VMware vSphere
VMware vSphere
Docker
Docker

What are some alternatives to Cloud Foundry, Stackato?

Heroku

Heroku

Heroku is a cloud application platform – a new way of building and deploying web apps. Heroku lets app developers spend 100% of their time on their application code, not managing servers, deployment, ongoing operations, or scaling.

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud is a polyglot cloud application platform. The service helps developers to build applications with many languages and services, with auto-scaling features and a true pay-as-you-go pricing model.

Google App Engine

Google App Engine

Google has a reputation for highly reliable, high performance infrastructure. With App Engine you can take advantage of the 10 years of knowledge Google has in running massively scalable, performance driven systems. App Engine applications are easy to build, easy to maintain, and easy to scale as your traffic and data storage needs grow.

Red Hat OpenShift

Red Hat OpenShift

OpenShift is Red Hat's Cloud Computing Platform as a Service (PaaS) offering. OpenShift is an application platform in the cloud where application developers and teams can build, test, deploy, and run their applications.

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

Once you upload your application, Elastic Beanstalk automatically handles the deployment details of capacity provisioning, load balancing, auto-scaling, and application health monitoring.

Render

Render

Render is a unified platform to build and run all your apps and websites with free SSL, a global CDN, private networks and auto deploys from Git.

Hasura

Hasura

An open source GraphQL engine that deploys instant, realtime GraphQL APIs on any Postgres database.

Cloud 66

Cloud 66

Cloud 66 gives you everything you need to build, deploy and maintain your applications on any cloud, without the headache of dealing with "server stuff". Frameworks: Ruby on Rails, Node.js, Jamstack, Laravel, GoLang, and more.

Jelastic

Jelastic

Jelastic is a Multi-Cloud DevOps PaaS for ISVs, telcos, service providers and enterprises needing to speed up development, reduce cost of IT infrastructure, improve uptime and security.

Dokku

Dokku

It is an extensible, open source Platform as a Service that runs on a single server of your choice. It helps you build and manage the lifecycle of applications from building to scaling.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase