Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
CodeStream vs Terraform: What are the differences?
- Key difference 1: Integration with development tools: CodeStream is a code collaboration and knowledge-sharing platform that integrates with popular code editors like Visual Studio Code, Atom, and JetBrains IDEs. It provides seamless integrations and in-editor experiences for code reviews, comments, and discussions. On the other hand, Terraform is an open-source infrastructure as code software tool that allows users to define and provision infrastructure resources using declarative configuration files. It integrates with various cloud providers and deployment tools, enabling infrastructure orchestration and automation.
- Key difference 2: Scope of usage: CodeStream is primarily focused on enhancing the coding experience by providing tools for code review, knowledge sharing, and collaboration within an integrated development environment (IDE). It enables developers to discuss code in-line, capture feedback, and share code snippets more efficiently. In contrast, Terraform is specifically designed for managing infrastructure as code, allowing users to define, provision, and maintain cloud infrastructure resources such as virtual machines, networks, storage, and services.
- Key difference 3: Programming languages supported: CodeStream supports a wide range of programming languages since its main purpose is to facilitate code collaboration and discussion within an IDE. It provides language-specific features like code reviewing and commenting for various languages like JavaScript, Python, Java, C++, and more. On the contrary, Terraform is language-agnostic and can be used to provision infrastructure resources on any supported cloud provider, irrespective of the programming language used to develop the application.
- Key difference 4: Level of abstraction: CodeStream operates at a higher level of abstraction, focusing on the code review and collaboration aspects of software development. It provides real-time collaboration features, like code commenting and discussions, directly within the IDE. In contrast, Terraform operates at a lower level of abstraction, allowing users to define infrastructure resources and their configurations using declarative syntax, which is then translated into the specific cloud provider's API calls.
- Key difference 5: Complexity: CodeStream is designed to simplify the code review and collaboration process by providing a user-friendly interface and integrated functionalities within the IDE. It aims to reduce the complexity of coordinating and managing feedback and discussions related to code changes. Conversely, Terraform can involve more complexity due to the need to define and manage infrastructure resources, dependencies, and their configurations using Terraform-specific language constructs and modules.
- Key difference 6: Target audience: CodeStream is primarily targeted towards software development teams and organizations that prioritize collaboration, knowledge sharing, and code review processes as part of their development workflow. It is especially useful for teams working on complex projects or distributed teams that require effective code discussion and collaboration. In contrast, Terraform caters to infrastructure engineers, DevOps teams, and cloud architects who are responsible for managing and provisioning infrastructure resources, automating deployment processes, and maintaining infrastructure-as-code practices.
In summary, CodeStream focuses on enhancing code collaboration and knowledge sharing within an IDE, while Terraform is geared towards infrastructure management and provisioning using declarative configuration files, catering to different needs and target audiences in software development and infrastructure domains.
Because Pulumi uses real programming languages, you can actually write abstractions for your infrastructure code, which is incredibly empowering. You still 'describe' your desired state, but by having a programming language at your fingers, you can factor out patterns, and package it up for easier consumption.
We use Terraform to manage AWS cloud environment for the project. It is pretty complex, largely static, security-focused, and constantly evolving.
Terraform provides descriptive (declarative) way of defining the target configuration, where it can work out the dependencies between configuration elements and apply differences without re-provisioning the entire cloud stack.
AdvantagesTerraform is vendor-neutral in a way that it is using a common configuration language (HCL) with plugins (providers) for multiple cloud and service providers.
Terraform keeps track of the previous state of the deployment and applies incremental changes, resulting in faster deployment times.
Terraform allows us to share reusable modules between projects. We have built an impressive library of modules internally, which makes it very easy to assemble a new project from pre-fabricated building blocks.
DisadvantagesSoftware is imperfect, and Terraform is no exception. Occasionally we hit annoying bugs that we have to work around. The interaction with any underlying APIs is encapsulated inside 3rd party Terraform providers, and any bug fixes or new features require a provider release. Some providers have very poor coverage of the underlying APIs.
Terraform is not great for managing highly dynamic parts of cloud environments. That part is better delegated to other tools or scripts.
Terraform state may go out of sync with the target environment or with the source configuration, which often results in painful reconciliation.
I personally am not a huge fan of vendor lock in for multiple reasons:
- I've seen cost saving moves to the cloud end up costing a fortune and trapping companies due to over utilization of cloud specific features.
- I've seen S3 failures nearly take down half the internet.
- I've seen companies get stuck in the cloud because they aren't built cloud agnostic.
I choose to use terraform for my cloud provisioning for these reasons:
- It's cloud agnostic so I can use it no matter where I am.
- It isn't difficult to use and uses a relatively easy to read language.
- It tests infrastructure before running it, and enables me to see and keep changes up to date.
- It runs from the same CLI I do most of my CM work from.
Context: I wanted to create an end to end IoT data pipeline simulation in Google Cloud IoT Core and other GCP services. I never touched Terraform meaningfully until working on this project, and it's one of the best explorations in my development career. The documentation and syntax is incredibly human-readable and friendly. I'm used to building infrastructure through the google apis via Python , but I'm so glad past Sung did not make that decision. I was tempted to use Google Cloud Deployment Manager, but the templates were a bit convoluted by first impression. I'm glad past Sung did not make this decision either.
Solution: Leveraging Google Cloud Build Google Cloud Run Google Cloud Bigtable Google BigQuery Google Cloud Storage Google Compute Engine along with some other fun tools, I can deploy over 40 GCP resources using Terraform!
Check Out My Architecture: CLICK ME
Check out the GitHub repo attached
Pros of CodeStream
- Integrates with everything3
Pros of Terraform
- Infrastructure as code121
- Declarative syntax73
- Planning45
- Simple28
- Parallelism24
- Well-documented8
- Cloud agnostic8
- It's like coding your infrastructure in simple English6
- Immutable infrastructure6
- Platform agnostic5
- Extendable4
- Automation4
- Automates infrastructure deployments4
- Portability4
- Lightweight2
- Scales to hundreds of hosts2
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of CodeStream
Cons of Terraform
- Doesn't have full support to GKE1