Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Couchbase vs Redis: What are the differences?
Introduction
Couchbase and Redis are popular open-source NoSQL databases that are widely used for storing and retrieving data. While they share some similarities, there are key differences that set them apart.
Data Model: Couchbase is based on a document data model, where data is stored in flexible JSON-like documents, and relationships are managed through document hierarchy. On the other hand, Redis follows a key-value data model, where data is stored as key-value pairs without any inherent structure.
Data Persistence: Couchbase offers built-in support for data persistence, allowing data to be stored on disk and survive system restarts. Redis, on the other hand, primarily stores data in memory, with an optional but limited ability to persist data to disk.
Scalability: Couchbase provides scalable data distribution and replication capabilities, allowing it to handle larger datasets and high levels of traffic. Redis, on the other hand, can be scaled horizontally by adding more servers, but lacks the automatic data distribution and replication capabilities of Couchbase.
Data Access Patterns: Couchbase supports flexible querying through its N1QL (SQL-like) query language, enabling complex searches and filtering on document attributes. Redis, on the other hand, provides limited querying capabilities, primarily based on key lookup and simple data manipulation commands.
Data Types: Redis supports a wide range of data types, including lists, sets, sorted sets, and hashes, in addition to simple key-value pairs. This allows for more advanced data structures and operations. Couchbase, on the other hand, primarily focuses on the document data model and provides limited data types.
Cache vs. Database: While both Couchbase and Redis can be used as caching solutions, Redis is often used primarily as an in-memory cache due to its fast read and write capabilities. Couchbase, on the other hand, is designed as a distributed database with built-in caching capabilities, providing more persistent and durable storage for applications.
In summary, Couchbase and Redis differ in their data models, persistence options, scalability, querying capabilities, supported data types, and primary use cases.
We Have thousands of .pdf docs generated from the same form but with lots of variability. We need to extract data from open text and more important - from tables inside the docs. The output of Couchbase/Mongo will be one row per document for backend processing. ADOBE renders the tables in an unusable form.
I prefer MongoDB due to own experience with migration of old archive of pdf and meta-data to a new “archive”. The biggest advantage is speed of filters output - a new archive is way faster and reliable then the old one - but also the the easy programming of MongoDB with many code snippets and examples available. I have no personal experience so far with Couchbase. From the architecture point of view both options are OK - go for the one you like.
I would like to suggest MongoDB or ArangoDB (can't choose both, so ArangoDB). MongoDB is more mature, but ArangoDB is more interesting if you will need to bring graph database ideas to solution. For example if some data or some documents are interlinked, then probably ArangoDB is a best solution.
To process tables we used Abbyy software stack. It's great on table extraction.
If you can select text with mouse drag in PDF. Use pdftotext it is fast! You can install it on server with command "apt-get install poppler-utils". Use it like "pdftotext -layout /path-to-your-file". In same folder it will make text file with line by line content. There is few classes on git stacks that you can use, also.
After using couchbase for over 4 years, we migrated to MongoDB and that was the best decision ever! I'm very disappointed with Couchbase's technical performance. Even though we received enterprise support and were a listed Couchbase Partner, the experience was horrible. With every contact, the sales team was trying to get me on a $7k+ license for access to features all other open source NoSQL databases get for free.
Here's why you should not use Couchbase
Full-text search Queries The full-text search often returns a different number of results if you run the same query multiple types
N1QL queries Configuring the indexes correctly is next to impossible. It's poorly documented and nobody seems to know what to do, even the Couchbase support engineers have no clue what they are doing.
Community support I posted several problems on the forum and I never once received a useful answer
Enterprise support It's very expensive. $7k+. The team constantly tried to get me to buy even though the community edition wasn't working great
Autonomous Operator It's actually just a poorly configured Kubernetes role that no matter what I did, I couldn't get it to work. The support team was useless. Same lack of documentation. If you do get it to work, you need 6 servers at least to meet their minimum requirements.
Couchbase cloud Typical for Couchbase, the user experience is awful and I could never get it to work.
Minimum requirements
The minimum requirements in production are 6 servers. On AWS the calculated monthly cost would be ~$600. We achieved better performance using a $16 MongoDB instance on the Mongo Atlas Cloud
writing queries is a nightmare While N1QL is similar to SQL and it's easier to write because of the familiarity, that isn't entirely true. The "smart index" that Couchbase advertises is not smart at all. Creating an index with 5 fields, and only using 4 of them won't result in Couchbase using the same index, so you have to create a new one.
Couchbase UI
The UI that comes with every database deployment is full of bugs, barely functional and the developer experience is poor. When I asked Couchbase about it, they basically said they don't care because real developers use SQL directly from code
Consumes too much RAM
Couchbase is shipped with a smaller Memcached instance to handle the in-memory cache. Memcached ends up using 8 GB of RAM for 5000 documents! I'm not kidding! We had less than 5000 docs on a Couchbase instance and less than 20 indexes and RAM consumption was always over 8 GB
Memory allocations are useless I asked the Couchbase team a question: If a bucket has 1 GB allocated, what happens when I have more than 1GB stored? Does it overflow? Does it cache somewhere? Do I get an error? I always received the same answer: If you buy the Couchbase enterprise then we can guide you.
We implemented our first large scale EPR application from naologic.com using CouchDB .
Very fast, replication works great, doesn't consume much RAM, queries are blazing fast but we found a problem: the queries were very hard to write, it took a long time to figure out the API, we had to go and write our own @nodejs library to make it work properly.
It lost most of its support. Since then, we migrated to Couchbase and the learning curve was steep but all worth it. Memcached indexing out of the box, full text search works great.
Pros of Couchbase
- High performance18
- Flexible data model, easy scalability, extremely fast18
- Mobile app support9
- You can query it with Ansi-92 SQL7
- All nodes can be read/write6
- Equal nodes in cluster, allowing fast, flexible changes5
- Both a key-value store and document (JSON) db5
- Open source, community and enterprise editions5
- Automatic configuration of sharding4
- Local cache capability4
- Easy setup3
- Linearly scalable, useful to large number of tps3
- Easy cluster administration3
- Cross data center replication3
- SDKs in popular programming languages3
- Elasticsearch connector3
- Web based management, query and monitoring panel3
- Map reduce views2
- DBaaS available2
- NoSQL2
- Buckets, Scopes, Collections & Documents1
- FTS + SQL together1
Pros of Redis
- Performance887
- Super fast542
- Ease of use514
- In-memory cache444
- Advanced key-value cache324
- Open source194
- Easy to deploy182
- Stable165
- Free156
- Fast121
- High-Performance42
- High Availability40
- Data Structures35
- Very Scalable32
- Replication24
- Pub/Sub23
- Great community22
- "NoSQL" key-value data store19
- Hashes16
- Sets13
- Sorted Sets11
- Lists10
- NoSQL10
- Async replication9
- BSD licensed9
- Integrates super easy with Sidekiq for Rails background8
- Bitmaps8
- Open Source7
- Keys with a limited time-to-live7
- Lua scripting6
- Strings6
- Awesomeness for Free5
- Hyperloglogs5
- Runs server side LUA4
- Transactions4
- Networked4
- Outstanding performance4
- Feature Rich4
- Written in ANSI C4
- LRU eviction of keys4
- Data structure server3
- Performance & ease of use3
- Temporarily kept on disk2
- Dont save data if no subscribers are found2
- Automatic failover2
- Easy to use2
- Scalable2
- Channels concept2
- Object [key/value] size each 500 MB2
- Existing Laravel Integration2
- Simple2
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Couchbase
- Terrible query language3
Cons of Redis
- Cannot query objects directly15
- No secondary indexes for non-numeric data types3
- No WAL1
Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions
What is Couchbase?
What is Redis?
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
What companies use Couchbase?
Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
What tools integrate with Couchbase?
What tools integrate with Redis?
Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions
Blog Posts
+17
+9
+8
+17
+9
+12+23+17