StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Performance Monitoring
  4. Performance Monitoring
  5. Datadog vs packtracker

Datadog vs packtracker

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Datadog
Datadog
Stacks9.8K
Followers8.2K
Votes861
packtracker
packtracker
Stacks0
Followers3
Votes0

Datadog vs packtracker: What are the differences?

## Introduction
When comparing Datadog and Packtracker, there are several key differences to consider.

1. **Integration Capabilities**: Datadog offers a wide range of integrations with various platforms, tools, and services, making it flexible for different environments. In contrast, Packtracker is specifically focused on tracking and optimizing webpack bundle sizes, providing in-depth insights into bundle composition and dependencies.

2. **Monitoring Capabilities**: Datadog provides comprehensive monitoring solutions for IT infrastructure, application performance, and log management, allowing users to track various metrics and analyze system performance in real-time. On the other hand, Packtracker is more specialized in delivering detailed analytics and reports on webpack bundle sizes, helping developers optimize their frontend assets.

3. **Scope of Features**: Datadog is a comprehensive monitoring and analytics platform that covers a wide range of use cases, including infrastructure monitoring, application performance monitoring, security monitoring, and more. In comparison, Packtracker focuses specifically on webpack bundle tracking and optimization, offering detailed insights into bundle size changes over time and their impact on performance.

4. **Customization Options**: Datadog provides extensive customization options for creating dashboards, alerts, and reports tailored to specific use cases and requirements. In contrast, Packtracker offers predefined reports and insights aimed at optimizing webpack bundle sizes, with less room for customization beyond the provided features.

5. **Target Audience**: Datadog caters to a broad spectrum of users, including DevOps teams, IT administrators, and application developers, offering a versatile platform for monitoring and analytics. Packtracker, on the other hand, targets frontend developers and teams working with webpack to optimize the performance of their applications through bundle size analysis.

6. **Scalability**: Datadog is designed to scale effortlessly with growing infrastructure and application needs, providing robust monitoring capabilities for large and complex environments. Packtracker, while scalable for frontend projects of increasing size, may have limitations when it comes to handling monitoring and optimization tasks beyond webpack bundles.

In Summary, when comparing Datadog and Packtracker, the key differences lie in integration capabilities, monitoring focus, scope of features, customization options, target audience, and scalability. Each platform offers unique strengths tailored to different user needs and use cases.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Datadog, packtracker

Farzeem Diamond
Farzeem Diamond

Software Engineer at IVP

Jul 21, 2020

Needs adviceonDatadogDatadogDynatraceDynatraceAppDynamicsAppDynamics

Hey there! We are looking at Datadog, Dynatrace, AppDynamics, and New Relic as options for our web application monitoring.

Current Environment: .NET Core Web app hosted on Microsoft IIS

Future Environment: Web app will be hosted on Microsoft Azure

Tech Stacks: IIS, RabbitMQ, Redis, Microsoft SQL Server

Requirement: Infra Monitoring, APM, Real - User Monitoring (User activity monitoring i.e., time spent on a page, most active page, etc.), Service Tracing, Root Cause Analysis, and Centralized Log Management.

Please advise on the above. Thanks!

1.59M views1.59M
Comments
Medeti
Medeti

Jun 27, 2020

Needs adviceonAmazon EKSAmazon EKSKubernetesKubernetesAWS Elastic Load Balancing (ELB)AWS Elastic Load Balancing (ELB)

We are looking for a centralised monitoring solution for our application deployed on Amazon EKS. We would like to monitor using metrics from Kubernetes, AWS services (NeptuneDB, AWS Elastic Load Balancing (ELB), Amazon EBS, Amazon S3, etc) and application microservice's custom metrics.

We are expected to use around 80 microservices (not replicas). I think a total of 200-250 microservices will be there in the system with 10-12 slave nodes.

We tried Prometheus but it looks like maintenance is a big issue. We need to manage scaling, maintaining the storage, and dealing with multiple exporters and Grafana. I felt this itself needs few dedicated resources (at least 2-3 people) to manage. Not sure if I am thinking in the correct direction. Please confirm.

You mentioned Datadog and Sysdig charges per host. Does it charge per slave node?

1.51M views1.51M
Comments
Benoit
Benoit

Principal Engineer at Sqreen

Sep 17, 2019

Decided

I chose Datadog APM because the much better APM insights it provides (flamegraph, percentiles by default).

The drawbacks of this decision are we had to move our production monitoring to TimescaleDB + Telegraf instead of NR Insight

NewRelic is definitely easier when starting out. Agent is only a lib and doesn't require a daemon

457k views457k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Datadog
Datadog
packtracker
packtracker

Datadog is the leading service for cloud-scale monitoring. It is used by IT, operations, and development teams who build and operate applications that run on dynamic or hybrid cloud infrastructure. Start monitoring in minutes with Datadog!

Check your webpack bundle size on every pull request. Track your webpack bundle size and composition over time and use that data to optimize your individual assets. Catch webpack bundle bloat before your users do.

14-day Free Trial for an unlimited number of hosts;200+ turn-key integrations for data aggregation;Clean graphs of StatsD and other integrations;Slice and dice graphs and alerts by tags, roles, and more;Easy-to-use search for hosts, metrics, and tags;Alert notifications via e-mail and PagerDuty;Receive alerts on any metric, for a single host or an entire cluster;Full API access in more than 15 languages;Overlay metrics and events across disparate sources;Out-of-the-box and customizable monitoring dashboards;Easy way to compute rates, ratios, averages, or integrals;Sampling intervals of 10 seconds;Mute all alerts with 1 click during upgrades and maintenance;Tools for team collaboration
Webpack bundle analysis; Pull request reporting; Bundle explorer; Size tracking
Statistics
Stacks
9.8K
Stacks
0
Followers
8.2K
Followers
3
Votes
861
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 140
    Monitoring for many apps (databases, web servers, etc)
  • 107
    Easy setup
  • 87
    Powerful ui
  • 84
    Powerful integrations
  • 70
    Great value
Cons
  • 20
    Expensive
  • 4
    No errors exception tracking
  • 2
    External Network Goes Down You Wont Be Logging
  • 1
    Complicated
No community feedback yet
Integrations
NGINX
NGINX
Google App Engine
Google App Engine
Apache HTTP Server
Apache HTTP Server
Java
Java
Docker
Docker
Pingdom
Pingdom
MySQL
MySQL
Ruby
Ruby
Python
Python
Memcached
Memcached
GitHub
GitHub
CircleCI
CircleCI
Rails
Rails

What are some alternatives to Datadog, packtracker?

New Relic

New Relic

The world’s best software and DevOps teams rely on New Relic to move faster, make better decisions and create best-in-class digital experiences. If you run software, you need to run New Relic. More than 50% of the Fortune 100 do too.

Raygun

Raygun

Raygun gives you a window into how users are really experiencing your software applications. Detect, diagnose and resolve issues that are affecting end users with greater speed and accuracy.

AppSignal

AppSignal

AppSignal gives you and your team alerts and detailed metrics about your Ruby, Node.js or Elixir application. Sensible pricing, no aggressive sales & support by developers.

AppDynamics

AppDynamics

AppDynamics develops application performance management (APM) solutions that deliver problem resolution for highly distributed applications through transaction flow monitoring and deep diagnostics.

Stackify

Stackify

Stackify offers the only developers-friendly innovative cloud based solution that fully integrates application performance management (APM) with error and log. Allowing them to easily monitor, detect and resolve application issues faster

Skylight

Skylight

Skylight is a smart profiler for your Rails apps that visualizes request performance across all of your servers.

Librato

Librato

Librato provides a complete solution for monitoring and understanding the metrics that impact your business at all levels of the stack. We provide everything you need to visualize, analyze, and actively alert on the metrics that matter to you.

Keymetrics

Keymetrics

PM2 is a production process manager for Node.js applications with a built-in load balancer. It allows you to keep applications alive forever, to reload them without downtime and to facilitate common system admin tasks.

Dynatrace

Dynatrace

It is an AI-powered, full stack, automated performance management solution. It provides user experience analysis that identifies and resolves application performance issues faster than ever before.

SignalFx

SignalFx

We provide operational intelligence for today’s elastic architectures through monitoring specifically designed for microservices and containers with: -powerful and proactive alerting -metrics aggregation -visualization into time series data

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana