Get Advice Icon

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Docker Swarm

799
988
+ 1
282
Terraform

18.6K
14.6K
+ 1
344
Add tool

Docker Swarm vs Terraform: What are the differences?

Introduction

Docker Swarm and Terraform are both widely used tools in the field of containerization and infrastructure management. However, there are key differences between these two platforms. In this markdown code, we will highlight and explain six major differences between Docker Swarm and Terraform.

  1. Scaling: Docker Swarm is primarily designed for container orchestration and deployment, allowing for the scaling of containers within a cluster. It focuses on optimizing the scheduling and management of containers across multiple nodes. On the other hand, Terraform is an infrastructure provisioning tool that enables the creation, modification, and removal of various resources like servers, networks, and storage. It is not inherently focused on container scaling like Docker Swarm.

  2. Multi-Cloud Support: Docker Swarm is tightly integrated with Docker Engine and is limited to managing the container environment. It does not provide native support for managing infrastructure resources across multiple cloud providers. In contrast, Terraform is cloud-agnostic and supports multiple cloud providers such as AWS, GCP, Azure, and more. It allows for the provisioning and management of infrastructure resources across different cloud platforms.

  3. Infrastructure as Code: Terraform follows an Infrastructure as Code (IaC) approach, where infrastructure can be defined and managed through code. It uses declarative configuration files to define the desired state of the infrastructure and creates or updates resources to match that state. Docker Swarm, on the other hand, relies on a command-line interface and configuration files specific to container orchestration. Although it can be automated using scripts, it does not follow the same Infrastructure as Code principles as Terraform.

  4. Resource Granularity: Docker Swarm operates at the container level, offering control and management of individual containers within a cluster. It focuses on managing the scheduling and scaling of containers. On the contrary, Terraform operates at a higher level of abstraction, allowing for the provisioning and management of entire infrastructure resources like servers, networks, and storage. It provides more granular control over infrastructure resources compared to Docker Swarm.

  5. Dependency Management: Docker Swarm manages dependencies between containers using the concept of services, where services are defined as a group of related containers. It allows for the execution of containers with inter-container communication and load balancing. Terraform, on the other hand, is not specifically designed for managing container dependencies. It focuses on managing infrastructure resources but does not offer built-in mechanisms for container coordination and communication.

  6. Ecosystem and Plugins: Docker Swarm has a growing ecosystem of Docker-related tools and plugins that integrate with its container orchestration capabilities. It benefits from the extensive Docker community and its rich set of tools. On the other hand, Terraform has its own extensive ecosystem of providers and plugins, enabling integration with various cloud providers, services, and resources. It offers a broader scope of infrastructure management beyond containerization.

In summary, Docker Swarm is primarily focused on container orchestration and scaling, while Terraform is an infrastructure provisioning tool that supports multi-cloud environments and follows an Infrastructure as Code approach. Docker Swarm operates at the container level, while Terraform operates at a higher level of infrastructure resources.

Decisions about Docker Swarm and Terraform

Because Pulumi uses real programming languages, you can actually write abstractions for your infrastructure code, which is incredibly empowering. You still 'describe' your desired state, but by having a programming language at your fingers, you can factor out patterns, and package it up for easier consumption.

See more
Simon Reymann
Senior Fullstack Developer at QUANTUSflow Software GmbH · | 30 upvotes · 12.2M views

Our whole DevOps stack consists of the following tools:

  • GitHub (incl. GitHub Pages/Markdown for Documentation, GettingStarted and HowTo's) for collaborative review and code management tool
  • Respectively Git as revision control system
  • SourceTree as Git GUI
  • Visual Studio Code as IDE
  • CircleCI for continuous integration (automatize development process)
  • Prettier / TSLint / ESLint as code linter
  • SonarQube as quality gate
  • Docker as container management (incl. Docker Compose for multi-container application management)
  • VirtualBox for operating system simulation tests
  • Kubernetes as cluster management for docker containers
  • Heroku for deploying in test environments
  • nginx as web server (preferably used as facade server in production environment)
  • SSLMate (using OpenSSL) for certificate management
  • Amazon EC2 (incl. Amazon S3) for deploying in stage (production-like) and production environments
  • PostgreSQL as preferred database system
  • Redis as preferred in-memory database/store (great for caching)

The main reason we have chosen Kubernetes over Docker Swarm is related to the following artifacts:

  • Key features: Easy and flexible installation, Clear dashboard, Great scaling operations, Monitoring is an integral part, Great load balancing concepts, Monitors the condition and ensures compensation in the event of failure.
  • Applications: An application can be deployed using a combination of pods, deployments, and services (or micro-services).
  • Functionality: Kubernetes as a complex installation and setup process, but it not as limited as Docker Swarm.
  • Monitoring: It supports multiple versions of logging and monitoring when the services are deployed within the cluster (Elasticsearch/Kibana (ELK), Heapster/Grafana, Sysdig cloud integration).
  • Scalability: All-in-one framework for distributed systems.
  • Other Benefits: Kubernetes is backed by the Cloud Native Computing Foundation (CNCF), huge community among container orchestration tools, it is an open source and modular tool that works with any OS.
See more
Sergey Ivanov
Overview

We use Terraform to manage AWS cloud environment for the project. It is pretty complex, largely static, security-focused, and constantly evolving.

Terraform provides descriptive (declarative) way of defining the target configuration, where it can work out the dependencies between configuration elements and apply differences without re-provisioning the entire cloud stack.

Advantages

Terraform is vendor-neutral in a way that it is using a common configuration language (HCL) with plugins (providers) for multiple cloud and service providers.

Terraform keeps track of the previous state of the deployment and applies incremental changes, resulting in faster deployment times.

Terraform allows us to share reusable modules between projects. We have built an impressive library of modules internally, which makes it very easy to assemble a new project from pre-fabricated building blocks.

Disadvantages

Software is imperfect, and Terraform is no exception. Occasionally we hit annoying bugs that we have to work around. The interaction with any underlying APIs is encapsulated inside 3rd party Terraform providers, and any bug fixes or new features require a provider release. Some providers have very poor coverage of the underlying APIs.

Terraform is not great for managing highly dynamic parts of cloud environments. That part is better delegated to other tools or scripts.

Terraform state may go out of sync with the target environment or with the source configuration, which often results in painful reconciliation.

See more

I personally am not a huge fan of vendor lock in for multiple reasons:

  • I've seen cost saving moves to the cloud end up costing a fortune and trapping companies due to over utilization of cloud specific features.
  • I've seen S3 failures nearly take down half the internet.
  • I've seen companies get stuck in the cloud because they aren't built cloud agnostic.

I choose to use terraform for my cloud provisioning for these reasons:

  • It's cloud agnostic so I can use it no matter where I am.
  • It isn't difficult to use and uses a relatively easy to read language.
  • It tests infrastructure before running it, and enables me to see and keep changes up to date.
  • It runs from the same CLI I do most of my CM work from.
See more

Context: I wanted to create an end to end IoT data pipeline simulation in Google Cloud IoT Core and other GCP services. I never touched Terraform meaningfully until working on this project, and it's one of the best explorations in my development career. The documentation and syntax is incredibly human-readable and friendly. I'm used to building infrastructure through the google apis via Python , but I'm so glad past Sung did not make that decision. I was tempted to use Google Cloud Deployment Manager, but the templates were a bit convoluted by first impression. I'm glad past Sung did not make this decision either.

Solution: Leveraging Google Cloud Build Google Cloud Run Google Cloud Bigtable Google BigQuery Google Cloud Storage Google Compute Engine along with some other fun tools, I can deploy over 40 GCP resources using Terraform!

Check Out My Architecture: CLICK ME

Check out the GitHub repo attached

See more
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More
Pros of Docker Swarm
Pros of Terraform
  • 55
    Docker friendly
  • 46
    Easy to setup
  • 40
    Standard Docker API
  • 38
    Easy to use
  • 23
    Native
  • 22
    Free
  • 13
    Clustering made easy
  • 12
    Simple usage
  • 11
    Integral part of docker
  • 6
    Cross Platform
  • 5
    Labels and annotations
  • 5
    Performance
  • 3
    Easy Networking
  • 3
    Shallow learning curve
  • 121
    Infrastructure as code
  • 73
    Declarative syntax
  • 45
    Planning
  • 28
    Simple
  • 24
    Parallelism
  • 8
    Well-documented
  • 8
    Cloud agnostic
  • 6
    It's like coding your infrastructure in simple English
  • 6
    Immutable infrastructure
  • 5
    Platform agnostic
  • 4
    Extendable
  • 4
    Automation
  • 4
    Automates infrastructure deployments
  • 4
    Portability
  • 2
    Lightweight
  • 2
    Scales to hundreds of hosts

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Docker Swarm
Cons of Terraform
  • 9
    Low adoption
  • 1
    Doesn't have full support to GKE

Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

321
3.2K
153
305
19.3K
- No public GitHub repository available -

What is Docker Swarm?

Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.

What is Terraform?

With Terraform, you describe your complete infrastructure as code, even as it spans multiple service providers. Your servers may come from AWS, your DNS may come from CloudFlare, and your database may come from Heroku. Terraform will build all these resources across all these providers in parallel.

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

What companies use Docker Swarm?
What companies use Terraform?
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More

Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

What tools integrate with Docker Swarm?
What tools integrate with Terraform?

Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

Blog Posts

GitGitHubPython+22
17
14335
JavaScriptGitGitHub+33
20
2174
JavaScriptGitHubPython+42
53
22308
What are some alternatives to Docker Swarm and Terraform?
Docker Compose
With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.
Rancher
Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.
Ansible
Ansible is an IT automation tool. It can configure systems, deploy software, and orchestrate more advanced IT tasks such as continuous deployments or zero downtime rolling updates. Ansible’s goals are foremost those of simplicity and maximum ease of use.
Apache Mesos
Apache Mesos is a cluster manager that simplifies the complexity of running applications on a shared pool of servers.
CoreOS
It is designed for security, consistency, and reliability. Instead of installing packages via yum or apt, it uses Linux containers to manage your services at a higher level of abstraction. A single service's code and all dependencies are packaged within a container that can be run on one or many machines.
See all alternatives